Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “remediation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 937 records · Page 52

Impacts of the Addition of Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40 on Acid Stoichiometry and Hydrogen Production

H-Canyon plans to discard Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material that is currently stored in Tanks 16.3 and 16.4. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) determined that a portion of the SRE material can be added to Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) in Tank 40 and the remainder will be added to Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) that is currently being prepared in Tank 51. A processing flowsheet for both the nitric-formic acid flowsheet and the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet were previously developed for SB9 sludge-only and coupled operation with the Actinide Removal Process – Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (ARP-MCU) and the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Due to the compositional change in Tank 40 after the addition of SRE material, it is necessary to determine the influence on the acid stoichiometry operating window and hydrogen production for SB9 processing. An assessment was completed to address the influence of an addition of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon on the chemistry of Tank 40, the defined acid stoichiometry window (with and without SWPF streams) for the nitric-formic and nitric-glycolic acid flowsheets, and the resulting influence of the hydrogen production. Hydrogen production during the SRAT/SME cycles consists of thermolytic, radiolytic, and catalytic hydrogen. For the nitric-formic acid flowsheet, catalytic hydrogen dominates the hydrogen production during DWPF operation mode for the SRAT and SME vessels. This report was written to summarize that assessment. No SRNL testing is needed prior to adding up to 7,100 additional gallons of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40. Also, the addition of SRE will not exceed the Shielded Cells reported values for catalytic hydrogen for either the nitric-formic acid flowsheet (Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) limit of 0.15 lb/h) or the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet (TSR limit 0.024 lb/h). The addition of the ARP stream from SWPF and the use of the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet are both expected to decrease hydrogen generation, leading to a larger safety margin in the CPC.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Antifoam Development for Eliminating Flammability Hazards and Decreasing Cycle Time in the Defense Waste Processing Facility

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to develop a new antifoam control method for the Defense Waste Processing Facility’s (DWPF) Chemical Process Cell (CPC). SRNL completed testing of both chemical and nonchemical foam controls. The nonchemical foam controls were either ineffective (or worse, created more foam) or impractical (a water spray can control foam, but excessive water is needed). As a result, the focus of this study was on finding a superwetter or commercial antifoam for controlling foam. Thirty potential antifoams were tested as part of this study. A series of tests were developed to help screen out ineffective alternatives including: 1. Spreading testing of superspreaders, 2. Foam column testing with physical simulants, 3. Boiling testing with physical and chemical simulants, 4. Days-only Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) process simulations with sludge (containing noble metals and mercury), Precipitate Reactor Feed Tank (PRFT), and Slurry Mix Evaporator Feed Tank (SEFT) simulants in the RC1 Reaction Calorimeter (purchased for antifoam testing), and 5. Around-the-clock SRAT and Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME) process simulations with sludge(containing noble metals and mercury), PRFT, and SEFT simulants in the RC1 Reaction Calorimeter. Evonik Surfynol® MD20, a commercially available defoamer, was relatively effective in controlling foam, while remaining chemically stable in SRAT and SME processing across the pH range of 4 to 13. No degradation products were detected in the offgas, in the condensate or in the SRAT and SME products. In nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet testing, 250 mg/kg Evonik Surfynol® MD20 was needed for foam control compared to 1,625 mg/kg for Antifoam 747, DWPF’s current antifoam. In nitric-formic acid flowsheet testing, 1,125 mg/kg of Evonik Surfynol® MD20 was needed to control foam throughout the SRAT and SME cycles. The commercially available superspreader Momentive™ Y-17112 was even more effective than Evonik Surfynol® MD20 as both a defoamer and an antifoam. Not only was the foam destroyed upon addition but also was less persistent between additions. It was the most effective antifoam in testing using both the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet and the nitric-formic acid flowsheet. In nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet testing, only 100 mg/kg Momentive™ Y-17112 was needed to control foam throughout the SRAT and SME cycles. In nitric-formic acid flowsheet testing, 300 mg/kg Momentive™ Y-17112 was needed to control foam throughout the SRAT and SME cycles. Momentive™ Y-17112 is also resistant to hydrolysis as demonstrated by its chemical stability in SRAT and SME processing across the pH range of 4 to 13 and lack of degradation products in offgas or condensate. Both candidates were effective as potential replacements for Antifoam 747, with Y-17112 demonstrating superior foam control. During nitric-glycolic flowsheet testing 50% less antifoam was needed when using Momentive™ Y-17112 compared to MD20. During nitric-formic flowsheet testing 75% less antifoam was needed when using Momentive™ Y-17112 compared to MD20. Foam remediated with Momentive™ Y-17112 was less persistent throughout testing. In addition, no degradation products were detected in the offgas, in the condensate or in the SRAT and SME products. Based on this testing, Momentive™ Y-17112 is clearly superior to Evonik Surfynol® MD20 and Antifoam 747, especially for the nitric-formic acid flowsheet processing; it is recommended that Momentive™ Y-17112 replace Antifoam 747 in DWPF. An antifoam addition strategy is recommended for both the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet and the nitric-formic acid flowsheet. Implementation of Momentive™ Y-17112 is expected to decrease SRAT and SME boiling times by up to 50%, eliminate the issues resulting from Antifoam 747 degradation products, and minimize foamovers. To validate the effectiveness of these defoaming agents, SRNL recommends irradiation of a SRAT or SME product simulant containing fresh antifoam. The goal of this testing is to determine whether the irradiation causes decomposition of the antifoam that would make it less effective or produce new species in the offgas or slurry. This testing began in April 2020. An evaluation should be completed to determine the thermolytic hydrogen and methane generation rate in downstream equipment, including the High-Level Waste evaporators.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of Ionic Mercury Species in SRR Samples Measured by SRNL and Eurofins FGS

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) requested the development of mercury speciation capabilities at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to support the Liquid Waste Operations at SRS. As part of that method development, SRR requested that SRNL Analytical Development (AD) compare their results with those obtained from their outside contract laboratory, Eurofins Frontier Global Sciences (FGS). This document reports on this method development work performed at SRNL as well as the comparative analyses conducted between the two laboratories. Development, optimization, and validation were undertaken at SRNL to produce a method for the species-specific analysis of ionic mercury. This method was developed as a secondary step to an existing method, L16.1-ADS-1579 Purgeable Mercury Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrophotometry. As such, much of the development and validation were performed in service of development of L16.1-ADS-1579. Six samples, representing two consecutive quarterly Tank 50 batches, were tested for ionic mercury by SRNL-AD and Eurofins FGS. The mean values reported by each lab for ionic mercury differed by less than one standard deviation, therefore the values reported by both labs were considered to be in agreement. SRNL-AD reported values for the six samples that differed by -5.56 mean percent, relative to Eurofins FGS. Together with comparable quality control data reported by each laboratory, these data represent a high level of agreement among both laboratories. With a viable method for ionic mercury that matches the data quality provided by outside commercial laboratories, SRNL-AD has demonstrated competency in measuring methylmercury, ethylmercury, total mercury, soluble & particulate mercury, purgeable mercury, and ionic mercury species in a variety of radioactive tank samples.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

BioGeoChemistry of Actinides (LLNL SFA OBER - SBR FY20 Program Management and Performance Report)

The focus of the BioGeoChemistry of Actinides SFA is to identify and quantify the biogeochemical processes and the underlying mechanisms that control actinide mobility in an effort to reliably predict and control the cycling and migration of actinides in the environment. The research approach includes: (1) Field Studies (Research Thrust 1) that capture actinide behavior on the timescale of decades and (2) Fundamental Laboratory Studies (Research Thrust 2) that isolate specific biogeochemical processes observed in the field. These research thrusts are underpinned by the unique capabilities and staff expertise at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), allowing the BioGeoChemistry of Actinides SFA to advance our understanding of actinide migration behavior in the environment, and serve as an international resource for environmental radiochemistry research (Figure 1). Research Thrusts 1 and 2 are guided by broad central hypotheses: Thrust 1 Hypothesis: Biogeochemical processes occurring on the timescale of years to decades lead to greater actinide recalcitrance in sediments and limit their migration in surface and groundwater. Thrust 2 Hypothesis: Long-term biogeochemical processes include mineral and surface alteration, which leads to stabilization of actinide surface associations or incorporation into mineral precipitates. Our strategic goal is to use the knowledge gained from our Science Plan to advance our understanding of the behavior of actinides, providing DOE with the scientific basis for remediation and long-term stewardship of DOE’s legacy sites and, more broadly, increasing our understanding of transport phenomena in environmental systems sciences with a particular emphasis on environmentally relevant (long-term) timescales. Although our focus is on actinide biogeochemistry, the increased focus on biogeochemistry at unique Test Bed locations associated with this SFA is providing fundamental information on redox processes and associated microbiological processes that control the cycling of redox sensitive metals under dynamic and transient biogeochemical conditions.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Summary of Expedited Results from Samples Supporting Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 3 for processing through the TCCR unit. SRNL received and characterized a set of dip samples collected from Tank 10H (one surface and one variable depth sample). No solids were observed in either sample and therefore the samples were combined, and a suite of analyses were performed on the composite sample. The density of the combined sample was 1.174 g/mL (0.18 %RSD), which was consistent with the measured sodium concentration of 3.54 M (0.08 %RSD). The 137Cs activity in the sample was 4.75E+07 dpm/mL (4.28 %RSD) and the total Cs concentration was calculated to be 1.54 mg/L (1.16E-05 M). The in-tank batch contact samples consist of 0.1 g of crystalline silicotitanate (CST) contained within a teabag device. Duplicate samples were submerged in Tank 10H supernate for a period of about 13 days, after which time they were retrieved and transferred to SRNL for analysis. At SRNL the CST was rinsed to remove excess salt solution and the CST was then air dried before being digested for analysis. Results of the analysis indicated a 137 Cs loading of 3.66E+10 ± 1.40E+09 dpm/g or 16.5 ± 0.63 Ci/kg CST . This value represents a bounding upper limit as it includes the addition of two sigma uncertainty from replicate analysis of the individual teabag samples as well as the addition of the small amount of 137 Cs activity measured in the rinse solutions. The above values are based on the air-dried mass of CST. Correcting to the true dry mass using a F-factor of 0.8191 results in a maximum loading of 20.2 ± 0.77 Ci/kg CST .

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Sensor Recommendations for Long Term Monitoring of the F-Area Seepage Basins

In mid-2018, a new paradigm for long-term monitoring was developed after of decade of applied research projects funded by the Department of Energy’s office of Environmental Management Technology Development program. The program at SRNL was focused on transitioning complex environmental waste sites from active to passive remediations strategies. A key result of these studies was that the use of enhanced attenuation approaches at radiologically contaminated sites will result in the creation of secondary source areas in the subsurface that will require monitoring for decades. Alternative monitoring approaches are being developed and tested at the Savannah River Site’s F-Area Hazardous Waste Management Facility, the new paradigm provides innovative solutions that will significantly lower costs of monitoring through the coupling of data collection, machine learning and deterministic groundwater modeling. The foundation of this approach is a well-optimized network of sensors for measuring hydrogeochemical master variables that control, and therefore act as indicators of groundwater contaminant transport. By monitoring changes in the controlling master variables over time arising from geological and environmental shifts, predictive modelling can assist with identifying new strategies for ensuring regulatory requirements are met if trends toward conditions for potential remobilization of attenuated contaminants are detected. In this report, we evaluated commercially available single parameter sensor platforms (e.g., temperature/depth) and configurable multi-parameter sensor platforms (e.g., pH, oxidation-reduction potential, temperature, depth, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity). Each was scored using an optimization function based on how well the system supports the proposed long-term monitoring paradigm, in general, and the site-specific conditions at F-Area, in particular. Several viable sensor systems were identified. Of these, a combined platform including the In-Situ Aqua TROLL 500 multi-parameter sensor platform and the In-Situ temperature/depth sensor had the highest rating and was identified as the most suitable candidate for installation and monitoring of the master variables and potentiometric surface that control groundwater contaminant plumes emanating from the F-Area Seepage Basins. The discussion of recommended potential deployment locations builds upon recommendations made by Denham et al (2019).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Non-Destructive Imaging of a Liquid Moving Through Porous Media Using a Computer Tomography Scanner

The most common approach used by modelers to describe movement of liquids through a porous solid, such as cement, sediment, or glass, is to assume a uniform flow rate, such as a Darcy Flux or a diffusion constant. However, this convenient simplification is problematic because in many cases it ignors the presence of fractures and macropores, which commonly dominate water flow and contaminant transport. For this reason, it is common that such modeling results do not reflect the multi-modal flow detected in laboratory and field studies. The objective of this seedling study was to develop a new capability for SRNL to track liquid moving through micro- (matrix-) and macro-flow using an X-ray Computed Topography (CT) Scanner. 4-dimensional anamated renditions were created that permited quantifying traditional matrix flow and macropore flow. These animations were modelled using a public domain software, HYDRUS 1-D, describing one dimension, dual-porosity and dual-permeability processes. This new capability provides a proof of concept for reducing model uncertainty applicable to waste disposal risk calculations, environmental remediation, and waste form development when describing the movement of liquids as they pass through glass, cement, fractured rock, or soil.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Summary of Analytical Results from Samples Supporting Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 and Modeling Results for Cs Loading on CST

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. As part of that process, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) receives and analyzes samples in support of the qualification of each batch to be processed. SRNL recently received supernate samples retrieved from Tank 10H as well as in-tank batch contact samples for characterization in support of qualifying Batch 3 for processing through the TCCR unit. Some results from analysis of those samples have been previously reported. This report documents the remaining analyses of the in-tank batch contact samples as well as the results of ZAM (Zheng, Anthony, Miller) isotherm modeling performed for comparison to the measured results. Results of the additional analyses include analysis of the loading of other radionuclides besides 137 Cs on the crystalline silicotitanate (CST) contained within the in-tank batch contact test samples. Results from those analyses revealed the next highest contributor to the activity on the CST was 90 Sr with an average loading of 2.76E+08 dpm/g CST compared to 3.56E+10 dpm/g CST for the 137Cs. Isotopes of plutonium were also detected on the samples. ZAM modeling was performed using the measured composition of the Tank 10H Batch 3 qualification samples. The modeling predicted a maximum Cs loading approximately 2.2x higher than the measured result. This is a slightly lower ratio (expected/measured) compared to what was observed for the prior TCCR in-tank batch contact testing performed for Batches 1A and 2 where the ZAM results were 2.7-2.8x higher than the measured values.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Actinide N-Donor Thermodynamics: Expanding the f-element Covalency Dialogue. Final report

Resolving the chemistry and physics of f-electrons is one of the grand challenges of science for energy technology. A central component of this challenge is describing covalency in actinide-ligand interactions. Crystallography, x-ray spectroscopy and computational techniques have provided reasonable, and in some cases remarkable, support for covalency in actinide-ligand interactions. Courtesy the quality of the results obtained, a significant portion of the covalency dialogue has been forwarded through solid-state and computational studies of the more stable actinides (Th, U, Pu, Np). However; recent reports have questioned whether covalency in actinide interactions increases or decreases across the series. Examination of less-stable trans-actinides (Am, Cm, Bk, Cf and Es) by the aforementioned approaches can be rapidly limited due to material availability, radiological hazards and experimental data to validate computational models. Furthermore, limited thermodynamic data exists to confirm covalency in actinide solution phase interactions that are highly relevant to the remediation and reprocessing of used nuclear fuel. The best-defined interactions of actinides with soft donors in aqueous solutions involve (poly)aminopolycarboxylate (APC) ligands. The chelate effect and binding affinity with the acetic acid APCs subgroups encourages amine interactions with the actinide metal center. In the absence of these factors, amine interactions with actinides are too weak to overcome the protective hydration shell of the dissolved ion. The ability for APCs to force actinide interactions with soft nitrogen donors (as defined by Pearson’s Hard Soft Acid Base theory) encourages the application of these ligands in a variety of processes for actinide recovery from nearly chemically identical lanthanides. The ability to functionalize the amine center of the ligand in a variety of capacities (adding additional amine groups, exchanging the conventional acetate group for an acetate group, etcetera), allows for the APC ligand to serve as a thermodynamic probe for actinide-nitrogen interactions. Perhaps the single most significant breakthrough during the previous funding cycle was the observation that covalency for the transplutonium part of the actinide series can be increasingly influenced with energy degeneracy driven covalency as the actinides become heavier. This was observed most predominantly with dipicolinic acid, but extensions of f-orbital degeneracy were found to affect aliphatic aminopolycarboxylate-actinide complexes through einsteinium.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Metal-Organic Framework Glasses as Rad Contaminant Sequesters and Nuclear Waste Forms

Remediation of Tc remains an unresolved problem at SRS and other DOE sites. The objective of this project was to develop novel metal organic framework (MOF) glasses for radioactive contaminant sequestration and stabilization from aqueous media. During FY20, we synthesized, characterized and evaluated additional cetyltrimethylcimmonium bromide (CTAB)-functionalized and F - , Cl - , I - , CF 3 SO 3 - exchanged MIL-101-Cr samples. MIL-10l-Cr-NO 3 -CTAB was demonstrated to have high ReO 4 - removed capacity (139 mg/g sorbent) from artificial groundwater (AGW). Re chemical specicition and binding mechanism on MIL-101-CTAB were also studied by synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy. ReO 4 - was demonstrated as being in the pore structure with slightly larger Re-O bond distances than those in NciReO 4 and binding with the positively charged sites of CTAB. In addition, a new Ni-TIPA MOF was demonstrated to be very stable, selective and effective for TcO 4 - removed from the SRS tank waste stream (~90% removed). The Ni-TIPA MOF sample containing ReO 4 - was prepared and shipped/planned for vitrification studies by a high-pressure technique. This research may provide a highly applicable platform for solving critical DOE and industrial problems related to nuclear environmental stewardship and nuclear power production.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Biotic degradation of acetonitrile. Limitations, controls and conversion rates

This document has been prepared to support Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) in their evaluation of technologies to remediate organic compounds in the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF)/Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) during direct feed low activity waste (DFLAW) operations at Hanford. This report summarizes the results of a review of the available literature describing aerobic and anaerobic biological treatment of acetonitrile and proposes a test matrix to evaluate microbial degradation rates of acetonitrile. Numerous studies describe acetonitrile degradation by pure culture strains of bacteria, fungi, and yeast; however, the purpose of this review was to provide estimations of degradation under conditions that more closely approximate the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) basins at the Hanford Site. To this end, documented limitations, controls, and conversion rates are summarized for mixed and natural microbial communities being maintained or operated as a biological treatment for wastewater processing. Based on the literature evaluation, the inherent capacity and rates of microbial degradation of acetonitrile are sufficiently high that if applied in the LERF basins, acetonitrile removal would be achieved. To be clear, though, published studies have not been conducted under conditions that approximate or that could be directly related to the LERF basins. Thus, a focused test matrix the encompasses LERF relevant conditions to specifically measure microbial degradation of acetonitrile is proposed and the results would provide the strong technical justification for use of this low-cost efficient biological process at LERF during DFLAW operations and beyond.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Investigation of Automated Corrective Actions for Special Protection Schemes

The constantly evolving nature of the grid is compelling the design process of Remedial Action Schemes (RAS) to keep up with the changes. This document proposes a flexible and computationally efficient approach to automatically determine RAS corrective actions that alleviate line overloading violations. Statistical and functional characteristics summarized from RAS implemented in real power systems are used to guide the design parameters. This report also leverages sensitivity-based techniques to determine corrective actions for specific contingencies quickly without repeated numerical simulations. Finally, future directions for implementing this approach for a fully automated, online RAS are discussed.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

Porous Membranes for Moisture Probe Protection (SR18024)

In the presence of contaminants, moisture probes can give false moisture readings and have shorter lifetimes. Absolute humidity probes are composed of porous, hygroscopic metallic oxide thin films (Al 2 O 3 ) coupled to electrodes (e.g. Au and Al). While these materials provide absolute humidity readings at low water levels at a relatively low cost, they are sensitive to the presence of contaminants, especially ammonia, due to its high hygroscopicity and ability to bind to the probe. Without frequent recalibration, especially in the presence of contaminants, the humidity levels are inaccurately reported due to measurement drift that occurs when the pores close, changing the impedance of the probe. The goal of this project was to improve the stability and reliability of these moisture probes by incorporating a molecular sieve into the probe to allow only the water to reach the sensor. Molecular sieves contain pores that allow molecule specific permeation. Two dimensional inorganic nanosheets (e.g. BN, MoO 2 , MoS 2 ) have recently been shown to behave as molecular sieves for water. Compared to zeolites, nanoporous materials have higher flux rates through the pores, leading to faster water permeation. Graphene oxide sheets have also been successfully employed for unimpeded water permeation; however, at lower humidity levels, the structure is unstable and the pores shrink, preventing the sieving of molecules. Compared to graphene oxide, sheets based off of inorganic materials, such as molybdenum, have been found to be more stable at lower humidity levels and have faster permeation rates. By creating a barrier in before the Al 2 O 3 sensor chip to prevent the permeation of contaminants into the probe, the lifetime of the probe will be extended. While the molybdenum sheets are a promising material for this application, their performance against ammonia and tritiated compounds have not yet been evaluated. This technology can be applied to other applications, including gas and liquid purification for environmental remediation, single molecule sensors, field effect transistors, and catalysts.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Additional Analysis of the 2H-Evaporator Wall Scale Sample HTF-17-57

Savannah River National Laboratory previously analyzed scale samples from both the wall and cone sections of the 242-16H Evaporator prior to chemical cleaning. The samples were analyzed for uranium and plutonium isotopes required for a Nuclear Criticality Safety Assessment of the scale removal process. The analysis of the scale samples found the material to contain crystalline nitrated cancrinite and clarkeite and significant amounts of mercury. Savannah River Remediation subsequently requested additional analyses on the samples. Inspection of the sample bottles revealed that no sample remained of the cone scale (HTF-17-56) while approximately 4 g of the wall scale sample (HTF-17-57) remained. The wall sample was subsequently ground with a mortar and pestle, at which time it was discovered that the sample contained a significant amount of liquid, metallic mercury. The portion of the sample that was not mercury was approximately 3 g. This portion of the sample was analyzed to determine the concentrations of selected radionuclides. The following radionuclide concentrations were measured: <9.6E+02 dpm/g H-3, 2.9E+02 dpm/g C-14, 5.6E+03 dpm/g Tc-99, and 1.6E+02 dpm/g I-129. Blank samples were also analyzed to evaluate sample contamination from the Shielded Cells environment. All blank sample results were below detectable limits. Due to the limited sample size and the anticipated low levels of the target radionuclides, no replicate sample analysis was conducted.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Scale-Up of Electrode Coating and Flow-Field for Commercial Hydrogen Peroxide Electrolyzer: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number CRD-17-00687

Hydrogen peroxide is currently produced at central chemical plants via the anthraquinone oxidation process. This process produces environmental pollutants that are costly to remediate, requires hazardous long distance shipping of highly concentrated peroxide (50% or 70%), and necessitates extra handling costs related to storage and dilution. Peroxygen Systems, Inc. (PSi) is developing breakthrough technology for on-site hydrogen peroxide production. PSi’s on-site on-demand electrolyzer can reduce the cost of producing hydrogen peroxide by 50%, while also completely eliminating the cost and safety issues associated with shipping and handling of high concentration hydrogen peroxide. The challenge for PSi is scaling. To support the next step toward commercialization (customer pilot tests), scaling the prototype into larger single cells and 20-40 cell stacks is required. In addition to internal hardware and flow-field design efforts at PSi, NREL will address three critical problems for this scale-up effort: (1) demonstrating a large scale roll-to-roll (R2R) process to coat uniform electrode materials for 100 cm2 and 500 cm2 stack testing, (2) demonstrating an in-line diagnostic to achieve better electrode quality control, and (3) performing in situ cell/stack testing to better understand and optimize the performance of the flow field design.

28 EE - Advanced Manufacturing Office (EE-5A)↗

Characterization of Tank 11H Samples from Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - Intermediate and Final Samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Additional analyses of the 4 th interim sample are pending and will be documented in a revision to this report.

11H↗

Model Package Report: Central Plateau Vadose Zone Models

This model package report describes concisely the modeling objectives, conceptualization, implementation, uncertainty and sensitivity, configuration control, limitations, data needs, and recommendations for improvement of the Central Plateau Vadose Zone Models. This collection of models is developed to meet the vadose zone simulation needs of the Hanford Site Composite Analysis (CA), the Hanford Site Cumulative Impact Evaluation (CIE), and are expected to find other applications in Hanford Site remedial cleanup decision-making processes. This model package report describes and documents the development of the models themselves to fulfill technical approaches defined for the CA and the CIE. This report does not document any specific calculation using these models: instead, applications of individual vadose models to perform specific calculations will be documented in environmental calculation files, including inputs and results, as appropriate. Configuration management for the Central Plateau Vadose Zone Models is managed through assignment of unique sequential numerical version numbers and archival of the models in the Environmental Modeling Management Archive.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Characterization of Tank 11H samples from tank closure cesium removal (TCCR) Batch 3 - intermediate and final samples

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently operating the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) process to remove 137 Cs from tank waste supernate using an ion exchange process. The TCCR unit processes dissolved salt from Tank 10H through a series of ion exchange columns containing crystalline silicotitanate (CST) and the effluent is then discharged to Tank 11H. Four interim samples pulled from Tank 11H during and just after the completion of processing of Batch 3 through the TCCR process have been analyzed for 137 Cs activity and density. The 137 Cs activity was found to decrease with each subsequent sample, which is consistent with the addition of decontaminated solution to Tank 11H. When compared to the expected composition from mixing the Tank 10H Batch 3 feed with the material already present in Tank 11H, the bulk chemical composition was as expected. A corrosion control sample collected from Tank 11H in June 2020 showed changes in the chemical composition and 137 Cs activity when compared to the composition measured at the end of Batch 2 processing. As there were no additions made to the tank during this period, these changes were attributed to leaching of the solids present in Tank 11H. Revision 1 of this report contains additional analyses of the fourth interim sample including inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) results and activities of other radionuclides. These results are consistent with the previously reported results, showing leaching from the Tank 11H heel. Notably, the 90 Sr activity was about 2.7x higher than calculated from a mixture of the original Tank 11H supernate and the Tank 10H supernate as treated by TCCR, suggesting additional leaching of Sr from the Tank 11H heel solids. In addition, Revision 1 includes analysis results for the Batch 3 Post-Production surface and variable depth samples collected in October of 2020. The Post-Production surface sample was similar in composition to the fourth interim surface sample, except for the increased Cs-137 and oxalate concentrations that were presumably associated with leaching of the Tank 11H heel solids.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗