Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “lithium anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 937 records · Page 52

A Progress Report on Metal–Sulfur Batteries

Nonaqueous conversion-reaction sulfur chemistry has been attracting increasing attention over the past decade for the development of next-generation lithium-based batteries. Li–S batteries are currently approaching a nexus stage from lab-scale experiments to possible pragmatic applications. Inspired by the success of Li–S chemistry, other metal–sulfur batteries with a variety of metallic anodes, such as sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and aluminum, have also started to attract attention. In comparison to lithium, Na, Mg, Al, K, and Ca are naturally more abundant and affordable. The Na-S, Mg-S, Al-S, K-S, and Ca-S battery systems provide a great potential for improving the volumetric energy density of sulfur-based batteries. The multivalent metal-sulfur systems, Mg-S, Al-S, and Ca-S, offer better safety features as well. However, the research and development on Na-S, Mg-S, Al-S, K-S, and Ca-S batteries is far behind the Li–S system due to many critical challenges. In this progress report, the fundamental principles of various metal–sulfur chemistries are first presented and compared. Then, the historical progress, recent advances, and key challenges of the Li–S, Na-S, Mg-S, Al-S, K-S, and Ca-S systems are summarized and discussed. Finally, future efforts and directions for both the fundamental and practical research are prospected.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Robust Solid/Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) formation on Si Anodes Using Glyme-based Electrolytes

Silicon (Si) is the most naturally abundant element possessing 10-fold theoretical capacity than graphitebased anodes. The practicality of implementing Si anodes is, however limited by the unstable solidelectrolyte interphase (SEI) and anode fracturing during continuous lithiation/delithiation. We demonstrate that glyme-based electrolytes (GlyEls) assure a conformal SEI on Si and keep the Si ‘fracture-free’. Benchmarking against the optimal, commonly-used carbonate electrolyte with the fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additive, Si anode cycled in a GlyEl exhibits reduced early parasitic current (by 62.5%) and interfacial resistance (by 72.8%), while the cell capacity retention is promoted by >7% over a course of 110 cycles. The mechanistic investigation by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) indicates GlyEl enriches Si SEI with elastic polyether but diminishes its carbonate species. Glyme-based electrolytes prove viable in stabilizing the SEI on silicon for future high energy density lithium-ion batteries.

Yang, Guang↗

Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with a Block Copolymer Electrolyte Analyzed by X-ray Microtomography

Most of the work on Lithium-sulfur (LiS) batteries use liquid electrolytes that have limited stability when coupled with Li metal anodes. We have studied LiS batteries with a solid block copolymer electrolyte which exhibits improved stability against Li anodes. Additionally, the electrolyte comprises a polystyrene-b-poly(ethylene oxide) (SEO) copolymer doped with a Li salt. Hollow carbon nanospheres impregnated with sulfur were used to build a composite cathode. Two types of sulfur-impregnated functionalized carbon nanospheres were used: One with carboxylic acid groups and the other with short lithium poly(4-styrenesulfonyl(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) (PSTFSI-Li) chains. Cells with Li S dissolved in the SEO based electrolyte served as the baseline. After cycling, the reason for capacity fade was determined by imaging the batteries using synchrotron hard X-ray microtomography. It is generally assumed that LiS cells fail due to dissolution of polysulfide into the liquid electrolyte, i.e., the main problems related to the cathode. In our all-solid cells, failure was primarily due to delamination of the Li foil from the polymer electrolyte layer. Delamination is also observed at the sulfur cathode. It is likely that the large changes in volume of the active materials during cycling induce delamination in all-solid LiS cells. 2 8

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Networks of electrochemical oxidation of common lithium-ion Battery solvents revealed by NMR spectroscopy

Raising the upper cutoff voltage of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) to increase energy density often exceeds the electrolyte’s anodic stability limit, accelerating degradation and creating a major durability tradeoff. Designing electrolytes that can sustain long-term high-voltage cycling requires a clearer understanding of the fundamental mechanisms occurring when commercial carbonate solvents oxidize. Here, to this end, simplified single-salt, single-solvent formulations of LiClO 4 and LiPF 6 in dimethyl carbonate (DMC), ethylene carbonate (EC), or ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) were anodically electrolyzed on inert electrodes and monitored for extended periods of time using 1 H, 13 C, 19 F, and 35 Cl nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The controlled environment of the experiments, coupled to the unique sensitivity of NMR, unveiled novel metastable intermediates and the formation of branching networks of products with temporal evolution. Oxidation of the pristine solvent primarily proceeds through a radical pathway that also produces highly reactive protons but faces competition from a second pathway involving a radical carbocation intermediate. In all cases, the intermediates follow a variety of downstream pathways that can intersect with each other. The concomitant network of reactions represents a significant increase in complexity compared to common descriptions in the literature, yet, critically, it helps explain the wide range of products typically identified in electrolyte oxidation in complete cells. The results highlight the need for refocusing fundamental research on anodic stability to analysis of the hierarchy of reaction networks to better inform efforts to mitigate the detrimental effects on battery performance, including prevention and harvesting of proton and radical products.

Electrolytes↗

On the Efficacy of Repeat Voltage Holds for Conditioning and Calendar Life Testing of Graphite and Silicon Cells

Voltage-hold (V-hold) protocols have shown promise toward calendar lifetime analysis of cells with graphite (Gr) and silicon (Si) anodes. In this work, repeat V-holds are performed on Gr and Si cells paired with lithium iron phosphate cathodes to delineate their beneficial role in formation and conditioning. We find that V-hold at the top of charge supplements constant current cycling in conditioning the cell to higher capacities for both Gr and Si cells after the first V-hold. A reduced order model provides the irreversible capacity proportions of each V-hold. With each repeat V-hold, parasitic loss of lithium to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) decreases on both Gr and Si cells. Gr cells show the square-root-of-time capacity loss behavior within 200 h of V-hold, indicative of its fast relaxation and low impact of reference performance test cycles on the SEI growth. Lifetime estimates from repeat V-holds on Gr can reach years. Si exhibits longer transition times from kinetic to diffusion-limited SEI growth, evidenced by the 400 h and 200 h holds showing square-root-of-time and linear behavior, respectively. Lifetime predictions from repeat V-holds on Si only reach 1–2 months, highlighting its limitations. Recommended duration of V-holds for Si cells should be ≥400 h.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Al 2 O 3 Thin Films on Magnesium: Assessing the Impact of an Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase

Among the many emerging technologies under investigation as alternatives to the successful Lithium-ion battery, the magnesium battery is promising due to the wide availability of magnesium, its high volumetric capacity, and the possibility for safety improvements. One of the largest challenges facing rechargeable magnesium batteries is the formation of a passivation layer at the Mg metal anode interface when reactive species in the electrolyte are reduced at the electrode-electrolyte interface. To control the solid electrolyte interphase in Lithium batteries, protective layers called artificial solid electrolyte interphase (ASEI) layers have been successful in improving Li metal anode performance. The approach of protecting Mg metal anodes from electrolyte degradation has been demonstrated by fewer studies in the literature than Li systems. In this work, we discuss the properties of Al 2 O 3 thin films deposited using atomic layer deposition as an artificial solid electrolyte interphase at the Mg anode. Our results demonstrate that Al 2 O 3 does prevent electrolyte degradation due to the reductive nature of Mg. However, undesirable properties such as defects and layer breakdown lead to Mg growth that causes soft-shorting. The soft-shorting occurs with and without the protection layer, indicating the ALD layer does not prevent it and hinders Al 2 O 3 from being an ideal candidate for a protection layer. Crucial effects of this layer on Mg electrochemistry at the interface were observed, including growth of Mg deposits leading to soft-shorting of the cell whose morphology showed a dependence on the Al 2 O 3 layer. These results may provide guidelines for the future design and development of protective ASEI layers for Mg anodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Solution-Processable High-Modulus Crystalline Artificial Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Practical Lithium Metal Batteries

The solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) has been identified as a key challenge for Li metal anodes. The brittle and inhomogeneous native SEI generated by parasitic reactions between Li and liquid electrolytes can devastate battery performance; therefore, artificial SEIs (ASEIs) have been proposed as an effective strategy to replace native SEIs. Herein, as a collaboration between academia and industrial R&D teams, a multifunctional (crystalline, high modulus, and robust, Li + ion conductive, electrolyte-blocking, and solution processable) ASEI material, LiAl-FBD (where “FBD” refers to 2,2,3,3-tetra-fluoro-1,4-butanediol), for improving Li metal battery performance is designed and synthesized. The LiAl-FBD crystal structure consists of Al 3+ ions bridged by FBD 2– ligands to form anion clusters while Li + ions are loosely bound at the periphery, enabling an Li + ion conductivity of 9.4 × 10 –6 S cm –1 . Further, the fluorinated, short ligands endow LiAl-FBD with electrolyte phobicity and high modulus. The ASEI is found to prevent side reactions and extend the cycle life of Li metal electrodes. Specifically, pairing LiAl-FBD coated 50 μm thick Li with industrial 3.5 mAh cm –2 NMC811 cathode and 2.8 μL mAh –1 lean elec-trolyte, the Li metal full cells show superior cycle life compared to bare ones, achieving 250 cycles at 1 mA cm –2 .

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Li-Metal Anode in Dilute Electrolyte LiFSI/TMP: Electrochemical Stability Using Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics

Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations were performed for Li + conducting electrolytes based on trimethyl phosphates (TMP) and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (Li + FSI – ) salt in contact with a Li-metal electrode. We focused on the transient-state behavior at the electrolyte, interfacial electrolyte–Li-metal electrode, and lithium reference electrode–electrolyte–Li-metal electrode to study dynamics and activation energy barriers of the Li + ion, electrochemical and thermal stability of the interface electrode-electrolyte, and potential behavior of the Li-metal electrode, respectively. Our results show that in the most stable state, Li + ions are tetrahedrally coordinated to three TMPs and one FSI – . The inner solvation shell of a Li-ion is composed of three TMP and one FSI – in one contact ion-pair and four TMPs in a solvent-separated ion-pair. On the other hand, Li-ions transport through electrolyte cages takes place when they are coordinated with three or less molecules that could be a combination of TMPs and FSI – . The decomposition pathway of the LiFSI salt when in direct contact with the Li-metal anode starts with defluorination of FSI – , rapidly losing F– to the lithium surface, forming LiF species. The remaining FSO 2 NSO 2 –2 with the addition of 2e – from the Li-metal decomposes into SO 2 –2 and NFSO 2 –2 . SO 2 –2 deposits on the Li-surface and decomposes into Li 2 O and Li 2 S. The remaining NFSO 2 –2 defluorinates, losing F – ion to the lithium surface, resulting in LiF and the remaining NSO 2 –1 deposits on the lithium surface and decomposes in the following picoseconds, forming several binary compounds such as Li 3 N, Li 2 S and Li 2 O. In contrast, when the salt is solvated by the TMP molecules, avoiding a direct contact with the Li metal electrode, only one defluorination occurs, decomposing the FSI – into FSO 2 NSO 2 –2 and a F – . The two anions remain stable as they are solvated by the TMP molecules. Furthermore, we also analyzed the open circuit potential energy (OCPE) of the Li-metal electrode during the SEI formation. OCPE is calculated from the average local potential profile difference within the Li-metal electrode and a pristine Li-crystal reference electrode (LRE). When no SEI is formed, the Li-metal electrode has an average OCPE of +0.36 eV vs LRE. Due to the formation of a SEI, the Li-metal electrode has an average OCPE between -0.07 and -0.21 eV vs LRE. The OCPE of the Li-metal electrode decreases by ~0.42 eV when a SEI is formed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interface chemistry informs about cathode and anode degradation during fast charging

Here, the aim of this study is to examine the development and makeup of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) and Cathode Electrolyte Interphase (CEI) in lithium-ion batteries during rapid charging. Using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and depth profiling, we investigate the chemical modifications occurring on the electrode surfaces during the initial formation and subsequent fast charge-discharge cycles. Our research shows that the anode's SEI initially comprises a thin layer rich in ketones, which then transforms into a thicker layer dominated by carbonaceous compounds during rapid charging cycles. Following assembly, lithium fluoride (LiF) quickly becomes a key element of the SEI, and its presence continues to grow substantially during the formation cycle, remaining the primary component throughout subsequent cycles. Initially, the cathode forms a thin oxide layer rich in ketones, with no noticeable carbonaceous CEI. The CEI primarily comprises LiF, which experiences an increase during the formation cycle and retains a thin layer of carbon coating after the initial rapid discharge. These findings show how the interphase layers impact the performance and stability of lithium-ion batteries, especially during fast charging for electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) vehicles.

Fast charging↗

Designing Moderately‐Solvating Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

New electrolytes are critical for high‐energy lithium (Li)–sulfur (S) batteries (LSBs) to ensure their stability against Li metal anode and polysulfides (PSs) shuttling which hinder the large‐scale application of LSBs. In this study, the design principle of moderately solvating electrolytes (MSEs) for LSBs is demonstrated by using a multiple‐solvent system comprising of a highly solvating solvent, a weakly solvating solvent, and a non‐solvating solvent to create a well‐balanced electrolyte system. This resulting electrolyte significantly improves the cycle life of LSBs, achieving 300 cycles, which is twice as long as that of similar cells with the conventional electrolyte and it also ensures stable calendar life for at least seven months. The optimal MSE forms robust passivation layers enhancing the structural integrity of both S and Li metal electrodes after cycling. These virtues effectively hinder parasitic side reactions and self‐discharge behavior of LSBs. This electrolyte design principle is versatile and can be applied to other battery chemistries, providing a potential path toward the development of a more efficient and stable battery system. By addressing key challenges such as the instability of electrodes and shuttling of polysulfides, this electrolyte approach offers promising solutions for advancing LSB technology.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Probing the Formation of Cathode-Electrolyte Interphase on Lithium Iron Phosphate Cathodes via Operando Mechanical Measurements

Interfacial instabilities in electrodes control the performance and lifetime of Li-ion batteries. While the formation of solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) on anodes has received much attention, there is still lack of understanding about the formation of cathode-electrolyte interface (CEI) on the cathodes. To fill this gap, we report on dynamic deformations on lithium iron phosphate, LiFePO 4 cathodes during charge / discharge by utilizing in-operando digital image correlation, impedance spectroscopy and Cryo X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiFePO4 cathodes were cycled in either LiPF 6 , LiClO 4 or LiTFSI- containing organic liquid electrolytes. Beyond the first cycle, Li-ion intercalation results in a nearly linear correlation between electrochemical strains and the state of (dis)-charge, regardless of the electrolyte chemistry. However, during the first charge in LiPF 6 - containing electrolyte, there is a distinct irreversible positive strain evolution at the onset of anodic current rise as well as current decay at around 4.0V. Impedance studies show the increase in surface resistance in the same potential window, suggesting the formation of CEI layers on the cathode. The chemistry of the CEI layer was characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. LiF is detected in CEI layer starting as early as 3.4 V and Li $x$ PO $y$ F $z$ appeared at voltages higher than 4.0 V during the first charge. In conclusion, our approach offers new insights into the formation mechanism of CEI layers on the cathode electrodes, which is crucial for the development of robust cathode and electrolyte chemistries for higher performance batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Rationally Designed Lithium Ion Batteries Towards Displacing Internal Combustion Engines

Group14 Technologies is leading a word-class team composed of Cabot Corporation, Silatronix, Arkema, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, and Farasis Energy to research, fabricate, test and demonstrate lithium-ion batteries (LIB) implementing ≥30% silicon-carbon (Si-C) composite anode material achieving aggressive next generation automotive energy targets.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Quantitative insights for diagnosing performance bottlenecks in lithium–sulfur batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries hold significant promise for electric vehicles and aviation due to their high energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, understanding the root causes of performance degradation remains a formidable challenge, as the interplay of multiple factors obscures key failure mechanisms. A major limitation has been the inability to quantify soluble sulfur species within practical detection limits accurately and to correlate electrochemical processes with associated physical inventory changes. Here, we introduce the high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectroscopy and gas chromatography sequential characterization (HUGS) toolkit, capable of precisely quantifying seven distinct sulfur and polysulfide species at concentrations as low as 40 ppb. HUGS has been successfully applied to practical coin and pouch cells without requiring cell modification. Furthermore, our self-developed software, Dr HUGS, enhanced the data analysis speed by over 30 times, enabling multi-source data integration and delivering comprehensive analysis results within minutes. Using HUGS, we identify significant capacity losses from inactive lithium and sulfur during initial cycles and sulfide-rich solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation on the anode during later cycles. Notably, our findings reveal that soluble polysulfides have minimal contributions to capacity loss, challenging long-standing assumptions. Moreover, HUGS demonstrates that constant-pressure setups in Li–S pouch cells improve compositional uniformity compared to constant-gap configurations. For sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathodes, unique issues such as non-sulfide SEI formation and lithium pulverization are observed, which can be mitigated through localized high-concentration electrolytes to enhance lithium inventory retention. By enabling precise quantification of critical inventory components, HUGS provides transformative insights into failure mechanisms across various electrolytes and cathode chemistries, guiding rational design strategies for next-generation energy storage systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Probing the Impact of Vacancy Diffusion on Void Dynamics at the Lithium Metal–Solid Electrolyte Interface

Lithium (Li) metal-based solid-state batteries (SSBs) are considered promising candidates for next-generation energy storage due to their superior energy density and enhanced safety compared to conventional Li-ion systems. However, their practical application is limited by challenges such as void formation at the Li-solid electrolyte (SE) interface, which disrupts ion transport and accelerates interfacial degradation. This work investigates how the coupled effects of electro-dissolution kinetics and surface diffusion at the Li metal surface govern the evolution of interfacial morphology during stripping. This work examines the influence of three distinct surface diffusion modes, which are terrace diffusion, step diffusion, and interlayer diffusion, on maintaining interfacial stability. In addition, how the dominant surface diffusion mechanism can overcome the contact loss due to high reaction kinetics is explored. Furthermore, the roughness of the Li metal anode surface is quantified, and the influence of different diffusion mechanisms on the evolution of the dynamic solid–solid interface is examined. The critical role of temperature in enhancing Li surface diffusivity and expanding the regime of stable contact is highlighted. By identifying distinct regimes of interface stability, this study analyzes how non-uniform electrochemical dynamics dictate void morphology evolution and interfacial contact. These insights offer guiding principles for engineering robust Li–SE interfaces in SSBs.

lithium metal anode↗

Development of Next Generation Hierarchical Hybrid Cu-Si anode Batteries via Direct-Ink Writing Application: End of (6th) Month Report - November 2025

Sustainable renewable energy continues to be in dire need to effectively combat global warming. Emerging technology for electric vehicles/ devices remains in high demand that is not only lower in cost, more efficient, but safer in comparison to commercial materials on the market. Although first-generation lithium-ion batteries have exhibited extensive commercial application, conventional graphite no longer meets this increasing demand as an efficient anode material. Due to the fact that graphite has a subpar theoretical specific capacity (372 mAh g -1 ), thus significant limitations in rate capability (for potential faster charging at higher C-rates currently commercially available.). Alternatively, silicon has gained significant attention as a superior candidate to potentially surpass graphite. Due to silicon’s exceedingly high theoretical capacity (4,200 mAh g -1 ) in comparison to standard graphite, its abundance thus in turn it’s low-cost, in addition to exhibiting a significantly low working potential (< 0.4 V vs Li/Li + ). However, one of the main (and most detrimental) challenges is silicon’s tendency to expand in volume (> 300%) upon discharge as it begins the lithiation process. As a direct result, it causes not only for the particles to both crack and pulverize under mechanical stress as the volume continues to expand and contract during cycling. Upon assembling the cell, it needs to undergo ‘charging’ for initially discharging/ ‘activating’ the cell, otherwise commonly known as the ‘formation’ step. As a result a solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer begins to form at the anode surface because some of the electrolyte begins to react during the formation process. However, this (SEI) layer is deemed as a ‘protective’ interlayer because in theory it prevents further reaction as the cell continues to cycle. However, due to the volume change it causes significant degradation at the interface. As cracking starts to occur at the anode surface, it results in a ‘new’ altered surface with each cycle that causes further reaction with the electrolyte as a byproduct quickly consuming active Li/ and more electrolyte. Thus, fracturing this ‘protective layer,’ causing significantly higher impedance as a result, and in turn a decline in capacity due to active Li-loss. In addition to the active material exfoliating off from the current collector, further contributing to the steady decline in capacity and overall performance. Current state of the art Si-anode batteries on the market range between a maximum content of 5-10 Si wt%. It has been previously reported Tesla has utilized SiO x -C anodes containing 5 wt% Si within their ‘Model 3/ Model X’ electric vehicles. However, more recent ‘Model 3’ vehicles have started to incorporate 10 Si wt%, in which they were able to increase their energy density upwards by approximately 30%. Recent effort has been focused on continuing to increase the wt% of Si being utilized, eventually to 100 wt% of Si, to maximize the energy density even further.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Pinned Electrode/Electrolyte Interphase and Its Formation Origin for Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile Cathode in Stable Lithium Batteries

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) represents one of the most promising directions for high-energy-density lithium (Li)-sulfur batteries. However, the practical application of Li||SPAN is currently limited by the insufficient chemical/electrochemical stability of electrode/electrolyte interphase (EEI). Here, a pinned EEI layer is designed for stabilizing a SPAN cathode by regulating the EEI formation mechanism in an advanced LiFSI/ether/fluorinated-ether electrolyte. Computational simulations and experimental investigations reveal that, benefiting from the nonsolvating nature, the fluorinated-ether can not only act as a protective shield to prevent the Li polysulfides dissolution but also, more importantly, endow a diffusion-controlled EEI formation process. It promotes the formation of a uniform, protective, and conductive EEI layer pinning into SPAN surface region, enabling the high loading Li||SPAN batteries with superior cycling stability, wide temperature performance, and high-rate capability. Finally, this design strategy opens an avenue for exploring advanced electrolytes for Li||SPAN batteries and guides the interface design for broad types of battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Molecular design for electrolyte solvents enabling energy-dense and long-cycling lithium metal batteries

Electrolyte engineering is critical for developing Li metal batteries. While recent works improved Li metal cyclability, a methodology for rational electrolyte design remains lacking. In this study, we propose a design strategy for electrolytes that enable anode-free Li metal batteries with single-solvent single-salt formations at standard concentrations. Rational incorporation of –CF 2 – units yields fluorinated 1,4-dimethoxylbutane as the electrolyte solvent. Paired with 1 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide, this electrolyte possesses unique Li–F binding and high anion/solvent ratio in the solvation sheath, leading to excellent compatibility with both Li metal anodes (Coulombic efficiency ~ 99.52% and fast activation within five cycles) and high-voltage cathodes (~6 V stability). Fifty-μm-thick Li|NMC batteries retain 90% capacity after 420 cycles with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.98%. Industrial anode-free pouch cells achieve ~325 Wh kg –1 single-cell energy density and 80% capacity retention after 100 cycles. Our design concept for electrolytes provides a promising path to high-energy, long-cycling Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗