Energy–Performance Trade-offs in Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning on SmartNIC-Enabled HPC Systems
Federated learning (FL) is increasingly deployed on accelerator-rich high-performance computing (HPC) systems, yet the system-level energy cost of privacy-aware FL remains poorly understood, particularly across heterogeneous networking and server-placement options. We present a measurement-driven study of energy–performance trade-offs for FL on GH200-class nodes across three deployment configurations: CPU-Ethernet, CPU-InfiniBand (RDMA-capable), and a DPU-hosted FL server over InfiniBand using a BlueField-3 SmartNIC/DPU. Using NVIDIA FLARE (NVFLARE), we align node-level power telemetry with per-round timing extracted from NVFLARE logs to quantify time-to-solution (TTS), energy-to-solution (ETS), energy-delay product (EDP), and synchronization behavior for three transformer models (ALBERT, DistilBERT, BERT), trained with and without differential privacy (DP). We find that interconnect choice is the dominant driver of runtime and energy: host-managed InfiniBand consistently reduces communication overhead versus Ethernet, yielding lower TTS/ETS/EDP. In contrast, in our NVFLARE deployment, placing the FL server on the DPU does not consistently match CPU-InfiniBand performance and can be slower—especially for larger models—highlighting that server placement alone is not sufficient to guarantee end-to-end gains. Finally, under our fixed-round protocol, DP increases per-round cost and runtime variance; ETS increases largely in proportion to TTS because average node power remains relatively stable across configurations.