Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Physics - Plasma physics , Mathematics and Computing, Physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Initial overview, description, and assessment of the DELFIC atmospheric transport model

We present an overview and description of the atmospheric transport model (ATM) component of the Defense Land Fallout Interpretative Code (DELFIC) and its revision history. In particular, we discuss the hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian model of the DELFIC diffusive transport module (DTM), its assumptions and constraints, and assess its capability for modeling the transport, dispersion, and deposition of nuclear fallout debris. This hybrid model is an efficient transport model for the wide range of particle sizes found in nuclear fallout debris. Furthermore, we validate the 1979 version of DELFIC using the 1979 test case input and output presented in its documentation. Except for some rounding differences and exposure rate differences from the OPM, the DTM output is in very good agreement with the 1979 results. Overall, the DELFIC DTM provides a reasonable and rapid approximation to the transport and deposition of local nuclear fallout debris.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Status of PyGriffin Development for Integration into the NEAMS Workbench

The integration of Griffin into Workbench, by way of the PyGriffin code package, was initiated by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program in FY-2022. PyGriffin was developed as a Python wrapper to Griffin to streamline the complex workflow involving mesh, cross section, and Griffin input generation, code execution, and results postprocessing, by improving user experience with high fidelity neutronics analysis through the Workbench GUI interface. PyGriffin can be used as a standalone application or through the PyARC code suite. FY-2023 saw the continued development of PyGriffin to expand its capabilities including advanced post-processing of simulation results and initial development of the Monte Carlo (MC) cross section generation workflow with the Shift MC code. PyGriffin was also approved for open-source software status in FY-2023, initiating plans to move the code repository into an open location. In addition to PyGriffin development, there were many improvements and developments made in PyARC leading to several software releases (latest version is v2.3.0), but the focus of this report is PyGriffin.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Neutron (and other Particle) Transport at LANL: An Overview [Presentation]

For decades, Los Alamos National Laboratory has been at the forefront of neutron transport methods research and code development. One such code is PARTISN, the LANL parallel time-dependent discrete ordinate neutron transport code. In this presentation, we describe the various research efforts currently underway by the PARTISN and other code teams. Some examples of current research are a block automated mesh refinement scheme, the application of tensor trains to the discretized neutron transport equation, and GPU code porting. The block automated mesh refinement scheme uses cross section information to refine and coarsen the solution mesh to improve time to solution and reduce memory. The tensor train approach expresses discretized transport operators as tensor products of vectors and matrices to compress the size of linear systems being solved by transport codes. Rather than relying on matrix-free methods such as the transport sweep, we have access to an operator that can be inverted, reshaped, or manipulated algebraically. Finally, we describe how PARTISN is used, what problems we are looking to solve, and what the future holds for neutron transport at LANL. In addition to this, we briefly describe the various research efforts in other particle transport teams using both deterministic and Monte Carlo methods. In the presentation, we list possible opportunities for collaboration between the laboratory and faculty and students.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Another Set of Python Tools for Visualizing and Manipulating Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Data: Descriptions and Examples

The GP-SANS, Bio-SANS and EQ-SANS instruments at ORNL utilize drtsans for data reduction. drtsans is built on Python, and it can be run using python scripts and Jupyter notebooks. The flexibility afforded by Python makes it possible to incorporate additional actions into the scripts used for data reduction, such as analysis and visualization. Here, a new set of tools for visualizing and manipulating SANS data that can be incorporated into the data reduction scripts for the ORNL SANS instruments, or employed during post–processing, is presented that expands the capabilities of the two previously-released tool sets.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Improvements to Contributions from Neutron Inelastic Scattering for Next-Event Estimators in MCNP ® Software

An improvement to the handling of contributions from neutron inelastic scattering to next-event estimators has been implemented in the MCNP6 ® software for release with version 6.3.1. The kinematic equations that govern the outgoing energy of inelastic neutron scattering contributions to next-event estimators have two roots. Historically, the implementation in the MCNP coding has only used the upper root to the quadratic equation. This includes all versions predating version 6.3.1 including all versions of MCNP5 and MCNPX software. However, a review of the neutron next-event estimator physics has shown that this does not reproduce the track-length estimator results at low energies. Several examples are presented that test single neutron inelastic scattering reaction types, Level Scattering (Law 3), Tabulated Energy Angle (Law 61), and Kalbach-Mann distribution (Law 44). The test problems compare the track-length estimator (f4 tally) in the MCNP software, with the existing implementation of the neutron next-event estimator (f5 tally), and the modified changes to the neutron next-event estimator implementation. As the MCNP implementation ignores the lower root, the unmodified neutron next-event estimators will generally underestimate the lower energy contribution. However, a second issue with the Kalbach-Mann distribution (Law 44) implementation allows contributions to backward scattering in the center-of-mass frame that is not kinematically possible, thus overestimating backward scattering contributions. A third issue with the way the MCNP implementation handles floating point comparison for scattering directly ahead or directly backward in the center-of-mass frame generally leads to underestimation (except for backwards scattering for Law 44).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Resonance Parameter Evaluation of n + 88 Sr reactions for ENDF/B-VIII.1 Library

An evaluation of n+ 88 Sr reactions up to 950 keV was compiled from a publicly available set of resonance parameters. Starting from the repository of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library, an evaluated nuclear data file was assembled and submitted for inclusion to the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VIII.1 release. This evaluation features an external function representation defined by pole strengths and R ∞ parameters over the entire resolved resonance range. This work improves the modeling of the R-matrix parameterization from multi-Level Breit-Wigner resonance parameters to Reich-Moore formalism, and it also extends thrice the upper energy range of the current ENDF/B-VIII.0 resolved resonance evaluation.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Evaluated Nuclear Data Requirements in Support of Fission and Fusion Applications [Slides]

This presentation touches on thermal scattering cross section and scattering lengths including criticality benchmarks (fission). Secondly, development and completeness of charged ­particle libraries: criticality benchmarks (fission), neutron source (fission/fusion), simulation benchmarks and light elements generation (fusion). Additionally, this presentation details on the covariances (methodology and completeness) with adjustment and optimization of nuclear data libraries (fission/fusion). Finally nuclear data reproducibility and conclusions are discussed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advancements in Validation of TSLs through Inelastic Neutron Scattering and Transmission Measurements [Slides]

This presentation finds that INS measurements are not as variable based on sample composition, because phonon spectra is a properly of the bulk material. Additionally, INS and transmission measurements are and should be the most significant part of TSL validation, as they are the fundamental quantities used by Monte Carlo neutronics codes. Relaying solely on theoretical atomistic calculations for TSL evaluation is not enough, they are highly dependent on inter-atomic potentials (which are not the most accurate depending on the quantity trying to be reproduced) and evaluators knowledge and understanding of the material being studied. When dealing with Crit. benchmarks - While extremely useful for validation of nuclear data at all energies, critical benchmarks are not the best tool to provide a definitive answer on conflicting TSLs. Finally, INS and transmission measurements need to be the basis of validation of TSLs.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

High-Performance Electron Sources: Numerical Methods and Beam Dynamics at the Precision Frontier

Electron sources have a wide range of applications and there are many stakeholders that express continuing need for improvements and performance enhancements. Whether we consider ultra-cold, high-brightness, high-charge or high-average current source needs, there are some common themes from the point of view of the beam dynamics involved. These are the following ones: ability to model accurately the emission processes, including the presence of often complicated cathode and other boundary surfaces with a wide range of spatial scales; ability to deal accurately and efficiently with a large number of particles interacting pair-wise, including the stochastic part of these interactions with a wide range of spatial scales; and ability to propagate the particle distributions in time, including collisions with a wide range of temporal scales. These tasks require high precision and accuracy since the goal is usually generation, transport and preservation of very high-quality beams. This grant addressed one of the rem

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

(U) A Tool to Set Up an MCNP6 Input to Use Correlated Sampling with Batch Statistics

Correlated sampling using batch statistics with MCNP6’s tally fluctuation charts (TFCs) is a powerful means of reducing the statistical uncertainties of various combinations of tallies. Because MCNP6 prints a maximum of 20 entries in the TFCs, at least five inputs must be run to obtain the recommended number of at least 100 batches. A new software tool, MAKE_COSUBS, reads an MCNP6 input file and sets up a sequence of input files to be run. The user runs MAKE_COSUBS for the unperturbed and all perturbed MCNP6 inputs, runs MCNP6 for the inputs, and finally analyzes the outputs using COSUBS.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

A Family of Multi-Dimensional Thermal Radiative Transfer Test Problems

Many thermal radiative transfer (TRT) test problems have been introduced over the years. Here, we will combine the good features of several tests into one new problem. Our goals are to have a multi-dimensional, multi-group TRT problem that stresses the physics and numerics of codes in a realistic way, but the geometry and materials are idealized just enough to be simple to set up in any code. The proposed problem has no connection to any physical experiment; it is simply meant to have a combination of properties that stress the solvers with both the optically thick and thin limits. To achieve this, we are willing to give up any form of analytic solution.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

GEOMWRITER - A Workflow for Automatically Generating MCNP Geometry for Neutron Guide Simulations

This report describes the functionality of the geomwriter.py script, which is a python script for producing complex MCNP CSG geometries from the IGES CAD format. It is specifically written to handle neutron supermirror guides, but can handle more complex objects through utilizing a convex hull algorithm. This work flow reduces the amount of time spent on generating the surface definitions for a complex neutron guide system with hundreds of segments such that changes to the neutron guide system design in McStas can be rapidly incorporated into an MCNP model and integrated with the shielding geometry present in that model.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Internal Material Melting Development Progress [Slides]

Slides for an AFC workshop giving a brief overview of the current status of Bison code development for correct energy balance of melting material. The slides provide background information of why the development is needed. The planned approach of casting the energy balance as a change in enthalpy is described. Status of current code additions is outlined. Extra slides are provided with more mathematical details of the approach derivation and verification.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Preparing Underrepresented Minorities for STEM Careers in Energy

The purpose of the grant was to increase the participation of underrepresented minorities and women in STEM disciplines that are critical for the energy industry. The grant was implemented by the Fort Valley State University’s (FVSU) Cooperative Developmental Energy Program (CDEP). FVSU-CDEP enrolled two cohorts of six academically talented freshmen students into its accelerated five-year 3+2 dual degree STEM program. In the 3+2 dual degree format, students enroll at FVSU for three years and earn bachelor’s degrees in biology, chemistry, or mathematics and transfer to a partnering university for two years to earn second bachelor’s degrees in engineering, geology/geophysics, or health physics. FVSU-CDEP partnering universities consist of Georgia Tech, Grand Valley State University, Penn State University, University of Alabama, University of Arkansas, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, and the University of Texas-Austin. Cohort I enrolled at FVSU fall semester of 2017 and cohort II enrolled fall semester of 2020. All six of the students in cohort I earned bachelor’s STEM degrees at FVSU and transferred to a partnering university. Five of the six who transferred to a partnering university earned the second bachelor’s degree. One student transferred from a partnering university to a non-partner university to continue pursuit of the second degree. All students in cohort I had internships, attended professional meetings, and made presentations. Cohort II enrolled the fall-semester of 2020 in the midst of COVID epidemic. Cohort II was only funded for one year, 2020/2021. The DOE Office of Economic Impact and Diversity informed the PI that there would not be any funding for the fifth and final year (2021/2022) of the project. All six of the students in cohort II earned bachelor’s STEM degrees from FVSU and transferred to one of CDEP’s partnering universities. One of the students in cohort II graduate with an MS degree spring of 2023. Currently, four are pursuing graduate degrees at partnering universities and one withdrew from a partnering school because health reasons. Students in cohort II opportunities to participate in internship were negatively impact by the COVID epidemic (2020-2022). Of the 12 scholarship participants, 8 were females. Fifty percent of the males pursued second degrees in Engineering while only twenty-five percent of the females chose Engineering as their second degree.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Project DarkStar: Vision for LLNL in 2030

DarkStar was a Strategic Initiative (FY2021-FY2024) to investigate applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to scientific problems of complex hydrodynamics, shockwave physics and energetic materials. The research focused on physics and engineering design as a process that can be tremendously accelerated through merging AI with advanced physics simulation on exascale-class platforms, and to experimentally validate this revolutionary new approach through dynamic materials campaigns. A central thread of scientific inquiry was in the application of AI to enable human understanding of how to control hydrodynamic instability (which has impacts to areas such as inertial confinement fusion) via engineering features and time-dependent sources. Motivated by an unfinished line of research started by Dr. Johnny von Neumann, AI-enabled simulation approaches were developed that allowed DarkStar researchers to uncover several ground-breaking discoveries regarding hydrodynamic instability, including how to completely suppress Richtmyer-Meshkov instability (RMI). These S&T discoveries, along with other advances, have shown the way for an entirely new approach to time-dependent problems known as inverse design – the idea that complex systems can be developed directly from a final state that is to be achieved and resolve the initial design via satisfying several constraints simultaneously via AI/ML. Through experimental campaigns conducted across a wide range of facilities in the NNSA complex (the High Explosive Application Facility at LLNL, the Dynamic Compression Sector/Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Lab, and Special Technologies Laboratory at MSTS) the radical new AI/ML approach to engineering complex material dynamics was verified, establishing a new field of study within the realm of shock physics. As advanced manufacturing capabilities continue to develop, the great importance of inverse design as a means to apply that technology effectively for NNSA missions will feature prominently over this decade. DarkStar has positioned NNSA as a world-leader in this newly emerging cross-disciplinary area of AI methods for advanced physics simulation and pioneered multiple novel approaches that have enabled the broader scientific community. By allowing us to see past the horizon, to 2030 and beyond, DarkStar has illuminated the vast potential of AI/ML to impact a wide range of new national security missions and, consequently, multiple areas of further research have already emerged across the NNSA and DOD complex.

42 ENGINEERING↗