Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “PARTITION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 919 records · Page 51
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Uranium Partitioning upon Ammonia Gas Treatment on Phyllosilicate Minerals

In the past, > 200,000 kg of U was released to the Hanford Site vadose zone from disposal and leakage of waste byproducts from plutonium production during World War II and the Cold War (Zachara et al., 2007). U is highly mobile due to the presence of carbonates and oxidizing conditions, with K{sub d} of 0.1 - 8 mL/g at the site (Zachara et al., 2007; Szecsody et al., 2013; Serne et al., 2008). NH{sub 3} (gas) injection is being investigated as a remediation technique as it is an in situ method that will not introduce additional liquid that could drive contaminants deeper into vadose zone towards groundwater. Objectives: To understand the impact of alkaline injection on geochemical processes in the Hanford Site vadose zone, including: 1)Long-term fate of uranium (U); 2)Dissolution and re-precipitation of secondary minerals. Apparent K{sub d}'s increase significantly with NH{sub 3} gas treatment, especially for six-month aging. - K{sub d} decreases after aeration, primarily due to U desorption at lower pH. U removal is still significantly greater than natural conditions (K{sub d} < 8 vs. > 100 mL/g). - Three-day aeration has higher loading than six-month after ammonia gas treatment and aeration. However, significantly greater desorption of U occurs with aeration in the six-month aged sample potentially due to transformation into different, more soluble solid phases with longer term aging. - U removal is primarily due to (1) co-precipitation of U with secondary minerals and (2) adsorption to minerals' surface, although further research is required to identify dominant mechanisms. Future experiments will focus on garnering a better understanding of the solid phase U speciation. Solids will be characterized using SEM-EDS, EMPA, XPS, XAFS, and TEM to better understand the effects of basic treatments on initial minerals and formation of secondary precipitates.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Isotope analysis reveals dietary overlap among sympatric canids

Abstract When colonizing new regions, invading species might compete strongly with phylogenetically related species native to the regions they are colonizing, eventually leading to coexistence or displacement. In the southeast of the United States, recently established coyotes (Canis latrans) compete with red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), although it remains unclear if competition is leading to resource partitioning or displacement by species. Using nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes, we tested the hypothesis that coyotes compete with foxes for food resources, with canids partitioning those resources to mitigate competition. We compared diets of canids in the southeast to those in the Plains region of the United States, a region where all three species historically have coexisted. We analyzed 217 hair samples from both regions pre-1960, prior to coyote colonization of the southeast, and post-2000, after coyotes were ubiquitous there, to assess differences in diet among species for both regions (southeast versus Plains and time periods, pre- versus postcolonization by coyotes). Modeling revealed significant dietary overlap among historical and contemporary populations in the southeast. Historically, all species partitioned resources in the Plains. Contemporarily, red fox and coyotes co-occurring in the Plains overlapped in diet; however, gray fox diet did not overlap with those of red fox and coyotes. Absence of partitioning in diet among co-occurring canids in the southeast indicates that interspecific competition could be strong in the region. Competition among canid populations in the southeast could lead to further resource partitioning among species that promotes coexistence or competitive exclusion of smaller fox species where coyote populations are abundant.

Zoology↗