FY 2013 DOE Budget Request to Congress (Wind Program)
This document reflects the Department of Energy's Wind Program Budget Request to Congress for fiscal year 2013.
budget, 2013, FY13, budget request, Congressional ↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Implementation Plan”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
EERE FY 2014 Budget Request (Water Program)
This is an EERE presentation on the FY 2014 budget request.
budget, FY14, 2014, request, PIR, plans, implement↗
FY 2014 DOE Budget Request to Congress (Water Program)
This document reflects the Department of Energy's FY 2014 Congressional Budget Request.
water, budget, 2014, PIR, congressional budget, re↗
FY 2013 DOE Budget Request to Congress (Water Program)
This document reflects the Department of Energy's FY 2013 Budget Request to Congress.
PIR, water, budget, request, congress, FY13, 2013,↗
Water Peer Review
All programs with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) are required to undertake rigorous, objective peer review of their funded projects on a yearly basis in order to ensure and enhance the management, relevance, effectiveness, and productivity of those projects.
water, hydropower, WWPTO, water power program, con↗
Generic Fortran Containers (GFC)
The Fortran language does not provide a standard library that implements generic containers, like linked lists, trees, dictionaries, etc. The GFC software provides an implementation of generic Fortran containers natively written in Fortran 2003/2008 language. The following containers are either already implemented or planned: Stack (done), Linked list (done), Tree (done), Dictionary (done), Queue (planned), Priority queue (planned).
Liakh, Dmitry↗
QP Statistics Spotlight: Randomization – At Random: The rationale behind randomization, and options when up against constraints
While randomization may seem like a small part of the overall plan for implementing a designed experiment, it is important to protect against systematic bias and to justify the interpretation of the analysis results.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Los Alamos Scientists Support Planetary Defense Efforts Worldwide
Every two years the International Academy of Astronautics brings scientists, engineers, spacecraft developers, disaster specialists, and government officials together to share research and ideas, and to consider how to find, and ultimately deflect or destroy, an asteroid that might be threatening Earth. Attending these Planetary Defense Conferences are scientists from Los Alamos National Laboratory who contribute considerable expertise in the areas of computer modeling and asteroid mitigation technologies. Los Alamos scientists work with NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office to assist in the location and tracking near-Earth objects, characterization of those objects to determine their orbit trajectory, size, shape, mass, composition, rotational dynamics and other parameters, and planning and implementation of measures to deflect or disrupt an object on an impact course, along with measures that can be taken on Earth to protect lives and property include evacuation of the impact area and movement of critical infrastructure. At the Planetary Defense Conferences scientists share research findings, collaborate on planetary defense strategies, and work on hypothetical scenarios that consider the many timelines and options that might occur during an asteroid threat. To be sure, that threat is rare, but these emergency exercises provide officials with valuable information that may one day protect us all during the real thing.
45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
Accelerating Clean Energy @Scale: Place-Based Solutions
Customized, holistic energy modeling and analysis is conducted across a wide range of geospatial scales -- from global to local. We will describe the value and importance of local, place-based solutions, particularly, how scientific insights, decision support, and technical assistance based on integrated, customized modeling and analysis, and in-depth stakeholder engagement can assist communities in translating their ambitions into implementable action plans.
clean energy↗
Public EV Charging Station Site Selection Checklist
The Joint Office of Energy and Transportation (Joint Office) provides technical assistance on planning and implementation of a national network of electric vehicle (EV) chargers and zero-emission fueling infrastructure, as well as zero-emission transit and school buses. There are several considerations that should be addressed when selecting a site for EV charging stations. The following is a checklist to assist with site selection for publicly available EV charging stations.
ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗
Savannah River Remediation Liquid Waste Operations Lifecycle Savings through a Lean Business System at the Savannah River Site - 17245
Savannah River Remediation (SRR) was contracted by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to manage its liquid waste project at the Savannah River Site. The liquid waste project is a unique, high hazard nuclear waste treatment and disposal facility consisting of 51 one million-gallon underground waste tanks, a solvent extraction processing unit, a vitrification facility for the highest radioactive waste, and a grout solidification and disposal facility for lower radioactive decontaminated salt solution. Our Project mission is to treat the nuclear waste and close the associated storage and treatment facilities, of which, 8 tanks have been closed to date. The Lean philosophy took root decades ago in the manufacturing sector and started with the work of W. Edwards Deming and his contemporaries. In more recent years the process has matured in the Toyota Production System and migrated into fields as diverse as services industries, health-care, and now the DOE complex. At SRR, a Lean business management system was adopted to address site inefficiencies, aging infrastructure concerns and budget constraints. With yearly escalation and flat budgets, continuous improvement is taking on a larger role - improving the work accomplished for each dollar. This paper focuses on the program results achieved to date, including the lifecycle savings identified through the Rapid Improvement Event (RIE) process. The RIE process is a Lean tool which creates a cross-functional team to analyze, develop and implement improvements for a given process. DOE-EM has recently emphasized the value of contractor's continuous improvement programs through their implementation of Plan of Action and Milestone (POAM): Goal 2 (Increase Efficiency/Improve Performance) Reduce EM Operations Cost in FY16. POAM Goal 2 was a FY 16 effort to achieve 5% cost savings across most programs. This past year's cost savings initiatives will likely become a trend as DOE and its contractors look to do more with less. In support of our own business objectives, as well as, DOE's motivation to improve efficiencies, SRR has held over one hundred formal Lean events and dozens of 5S events that have driven improvement across the Project, including tank closure and production facilities. These improvements have significantly reduced the time required to process material and achieve the overall goal of hazard reduction and tank closure. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Using Prescribed Fire to Manage the Fernald On-Site Disposal Facility Vegetated Cap - 17401
The Fernald Preserve is a former uranium processing plant that underwent extensive remediation pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). It is situated on a 425 ha (1,050 acre) tract of land, approximately 29 km (18 miles) northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio. Remedial activities and subsequent ecological restoration have converted the site from an industrial production facility to an undeveloped park, encompassing a series of wetlands, prairies, and forested communities. The remediation of buildings and soil contamination was completed in 2006, but aquifer remediation is ongoing. Since 2007, the site has been managed by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management. Portions of the site are open to the public, with approximately 11 km (7 miles) of walking trails that are open year-round and a visitors center. Site remediation included the construction of an On-Site Disposal Facility (OSDF) for the long-term disposal of contaminated soil and building materials. The OSDF consists of eight disposal cells that encompass approximately 30 hectares (75 acres) on the eastern portion of the Fernald site. Cells are lined and capped, and each has a separate leak detection and leachate collection system. The integrated cap is vegetated with native grasses and forbs. Management of the Fernald Preserve includes the monitoring and maintenance of ecologically restored communities and the vegetated OSDF cap, as required by the site's institutional controls plan. Prescribed burning is recognized as the preferred method for prairie management. Prescribed fire has been used at the Fernald site since 2009 for established prairies in restored areas, but not on the OSDF cap. Stakeholders had reservations regarding the safety of using prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. Because of that, vegetation on the cap was managed as a grassland community. It was mowed, raked, and baled to remove thatch, and promote the continued establishment of native grasses and forbs. Since agricultural use is restricted at the site, the resulting hay bales were kept on property and reused as organic matter and mulch. Over time, more hay bales were being generated in a season than were reused. Therefore in 2015, DOE decided to revisit stakeholder acceptance of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. Ongoing relationships with local stakeholders allowed for extensive discussions regarding the current management and proposed use of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. The public was provided information about the planning and implementation of prescribed burns at the site and invited to observe the execution of a successful site burn. This approach led to stakeholder acceptance of DOE's proposal, and vegetation on the caps of cells 4, 5, and 6 was burned in late March 2016. The burn was successful and resulted in several benefits from a land stewardship and cost perspective. This paper details the stakeholder engagement approach and the resulting benefits from the use of prescribed fire on the OSDF cap. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
EPRI Software for Estimating Decommissioning Waste Volumes - 16046
EPRI has adapted computer software that can estimate the volume and activity content of waste resulting from the dismantlement of nuclear facilities. This software, designated as Automatic Estimation of the Radiological Inventory or AERI, was originally developed by Iberdrola for use by ENRESA in Spain. The software estimates the radiological inventory for all the components and civil structures of the plant or other facility that are included in the physical inventory. The radiological inventory shows the internal and external surface contamination, as well as the volumetric contamination. The processes of the software are able to estimate both the specific activity levels (in Bq/g or pCi/g) for each radionuclide and the surface activity (Bq/cm{sup 2} or dpm/100 cm{sup 2}) for components and civil structures located in the radiological areas. AERI allows the user to extrapolate, through a statistical approach, the contamination levels obtained by sampling data in specific components and civil structures to the entire facility. The main benefits and values obtained with AERI are the following: - The radiological inventory of the plant can be obtained from a limited set of radiological sampling data. Using the mathematical models allows for the optimization of the number of sampling and analysis that needs to be done. The uncertainties of the calculations are reduced with more data. The user must balance the level of uncertainty of the calculations and the number of sample data they will use. - The automatic management of radiological data in short computing times allows for the execution of several scenarios in a reasonable time. Therefore, different radioactive waste and decommissioning hypotheses can be tested. For example, inventory and data can be split into two different set. One of them can be used for obtaining radiological inventory for early dismantling (3 years, as example) and the second one for deferred dismantling (25 years.) - The software supports the planning and implementation of decommissioning strategies for nuclear plants. For instance, several decontamination factors can be evaluated, assuming different level for decontamination of materials, and results for materials from several streams and use of different container types may be included in each evaluation. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Demonstration of Wide Area Radiological Decontamination and Mitigation Technologies for Building Structures and Vehicles - 16508
Researchers at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in collaboration with the Department of Homeland Security conducted the 'Wide-Area Urban Radiological Contaminant, Mitigation, and Clean-Up Technology Demonstration' in Columbus, Ohio on June 22-25, 2015. EPA's National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC) demonstrated five wide-area radiological decontamination technologies (including strippable coatings, gels, and chemical foam technologies) on an urban building. Decontamination technologies were applied to remove the contaminants from the building's surfaces by physical, chemical, or other methods, which in practice could reduce radiation exposure level. In addition, NHSRC teamed with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to demonstrate several radiological contaminant mitigation technologies including building and vehicle wash technologies, as well as several approaches to contain wash water and radioactive particles. 'Radiological contaminant mitigation' technologies are measures taken to reduce adverse impacts of radiological contamination on people and the environment, and facilitate such purposes as restoration of first responder services and critical infrastructure. Radiological contaminant mitigation technologies are designed for containing and removing radiological contamination on the surface in the first hours or days following a radiological event (early phase response). Such technologies include 'radiological particle containment', which is design to prevent the spread of particles which might result from vehicle or foot traffic. Radiological particle containment technologies are applicable for early phase response to contain the radionuclides and to reduce radiation dose to responders and the public. Mitigation also includes 'gross decontamination' technologies, which perform a type of decontamination that is conducted with the goal of reducing contamination levels. This reduction may not meet final cleanup levels, but may be useful to mitigate some public hazard or contain contamination. The purpose of the demonstrations was to educate potential end-users and stakeholders of this technology about a 'Toolbox of Options' for radiological decontamination, as well as radiological contaminant mitigation. Both demonstrations were conducted using a 75-year old brick building and the surrounding area (including parking lots) in Columbus, OH. No radioactive contaminants were applied during either demonstration, as the objective was to duplicate and implement realistic operational conditions for these technologies. Surrogate contaminants such as particle tracers were used in several demonstrations. The decontamination technologies were used in a scaled-up setting with application to the building. Contaminant mitigation technologies were demonstrated on the building as well as on vehicles. Example technology application techniques/accessories included an articulating boom lift, repelling boatswain chair, stand-alone surface material structures, high-volume foam applicators, fire truck foam applicator, a vehicle wash tent for vehicles, particle tracers to simulate radiological contaminants, and high- and low-technology liquid containment approaches. Results and stakeholder observations from the demonstration are now publically in a report entitled 'Technical Report for the Demonstration of Radiological Decontamination and Mitigation Technologies for Building Structures and Vehicles' available at http://www.epa.gov/hsresearch Example information that was obtained included decontamination rate, contaminant mitigation and containment capacity, user friendliness of each technology, the required utilities (electric, water, etc.) for each technology, skill of worker required, and the cost. The condition (color, texture, integrity, etc.) of each building material present on the structure along with all structural components such as gutters, windows, doors, etc. were carefully examined and documented. All demonstrations were open to individuals, organizations, and local, state, federal, tribal, and international governments who may be involved with implementing or planning radiological incident response. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Engineering Design of the Geological Disposal Facility for the UK - 18074
This paper discusses plans for implementing UK government policy for the safe geological disposal of higher activity radioactive waste. In order to progress the programme for geological disposal in the absence of a specific site, RWM has developed generic, illustrative disposal system designs for three host geological environments. These geological environments are typical of those being considered in other countries and have been chosen because they represent the range that may need to be addressed when developing the Geological Disposal Facility (GDF) for the UK. This paper provides an overview of the updated 2016 design of the UK geological disposal facility and describes the processes of construction, transport, waste package receipt, handling and emplacement and the design characteristics that the disposal facility will need to include for the waste inventory. The paper provides examples of the approach to ensure confidence in safety over the GDF life cycle and discusses the challenges in the design, construction and operation of a nationally significant infrastructure project with a scheduled waste disposal of more than 150 years. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Development of an Alternative Approach to Demonstrating Environmental Performance in the UK - 19354
European basic safety standards require that exposure of humans to the potentially harmful effects of ionising radiation are optimised so that they are as low as reasonably achievable, taking account of economic and societal factors. In the United Kingdom the responsibility for ensuring that exposures to humans are optimised is split between two regulatory functions. The Office of Nuclear Regulation regulates exposures to workers in all scenarios and to members of the public in the event of an accident. Environmental regulators in each of the four nations comprising the United Kingdom regulate exposures to members of the public from normal operations. Since the early 1990's, all permissions granted to nuclear sites in the UK for the discharge/disposal of radioactive waste to the environment have contained conditions requiring holders to demonstrate that they minimise the generation of radioactive waste, apply appropriate abatement and discharge/dispose of it in a way that minimises impacts on members of the public and the environment. For many years, the industry standard for providing this demonstration, which was heavily influenced by regulatory expectations and feedback, was to undertake one or a series of multi-attribute decision assessments (MADA). Wood's team of environmental specialists has been involved in undertaking such MADA studies for many years. Since the mid-2000's, our team has become increasingly aware of some of the limitations of undertaking MADA to demonstrate environmental performance for large scale new nuclear build projects and, in particular, the next generation of new nuclear power stations that are being planned and implemented in the UK. We have collaborated with the vendors of reactor technologies, the prospective/owner operators of new nuclear power stations and the developers of new facilities on existing sites to develop an alternative approach to demonstrating environmental performance. Our alternative approach comprises three main pillars which are summarised as: - Evolution - benefit from progressive improvements, operational experience and recent permitting activities. Our alternative approach uses the claim, argument, evidence approach which is commonly used for nuclear safety cases and which allows us to 'tell the story' of how environmental performance has been achieved. We have successfully deployed this approach for all new nuclear power stations proposed in the UK. - Integration - ensure that optimisation is integrated into the project programme and forms part of the 'big picture'. Our alternative approach allows environmental performance to be managed better throughout the life cycle of the project and ensures that our outputs are 'living' documents and do not 'sit on the shelf'. We have successfully demonstrated how this can be applied during rationalisation of major schemes and significant design changes on nuclear new build projects. - Opportunity - identify the best time to deliver elements of the programme. Our alternative approach aims to minimise the overall time, trouble and costs associated with demonstrating environmental performance by ensuring that decisions are made at the time when they offer greatest benefit and by minimising unnecessary rework. Our advice has helped to reduce the project costs and minimise delays associated with regulatory queries and interventions. This paper describes the journey that we have taken with our clients in developing our alternative approach to demonstrating environmental performance. We explain the UK regulatory context and explore the need for change. We present a number of case studies related to new nuclear power stations and other new facilities on existing nuclear sites that demonstrate the successful application of our alternative approach. We provide examples of how we have successfully implemented the outputs of our alternative approach into project and corporate management arrangements. Finally, we examine feedback from clients, regulators and other interested parties to propose future refinements. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Technical Issues that Need to Be Addressed in Preparing a Large Program to Transport SNF and HLW - 20093
The U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board) has been interested for many years in the Department of Energy (DOE) activities related to transporting spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). The Board has conducted several public meetings and issued associated reports on this topic. In September 2019, the Board issued a report entitled Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation-Technical Issues that Need to Be Addressed in Preparing for a Nationwide Effort to Transport Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste [1] that focuses on the issues DOE will need to address to plan and implement an integrated transportation program. In its report, the Board describes 30 broad technical issues that DOE needs to address and offers three sets of findings and recommendations to DOE. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
The Importance of Inventory for Informing Waste Strategy - 20280
A waste inventory aims to present the best available information about the nature, quantity and location of radioactive wastes and materials at a facility, site or in a country. Quality inventory data is necessary for developing appropriate strategies and plans for managing radioactive wastes and materials, with high standards of protection for people and the environment. The inventory of wastes will change over time due to a wide range of technical, commercial or policy reasons, for example, if reactor lifetimes are extended, if decommissioning strategies change or if new technologies are introduced for managing waste. Inventory information can also improve as better waste characterisation data becomes available. At a facility or site level, good quality inventory data are needed to underpin decision making about the waste management options and to demonstrate compliance with the chosen treatment or disposal route. At a site and country level, knowledge of the inventory can drive the improvement to waste strategy; waste management asset and service planning; and implementation. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗