235 U(n,f) PFNS and nu-bar evaluations: first release candidate including validation [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Criticality Safety”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Integral Experiment Request 523 Feasibility Study (Summary Report)
This report documents the feasibility phase of the Critical Experiment Design (CED) conducted as part of integral experiment request (IER) 523. The purpose of IER-523 is to explore the effects of using 35 weight percent enriched uranium dioxide-beryllium oxide (UO 2 -BeO) material on critical configurations using the Seven Percent Critical Experiment (7uPCX) at Sandia National Laboratories (Sandia). Preliminary experiment design concepts, neutronic analysis results, and proposed paths for continuing the CED process are presented.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Including Chi-Nu 235 U PFNS Experimental Data into an ENDF/B-VIII.1 Release Candidate Evaluation
This report documents an evaluation of 235 U prompt fission neutron spectra (PFNS) that is a release candidate for the upcoming U.S. nuclear data library, ENDF/B-VIII.1. This evaluation differs from its predecessor, ENDF/B-VIII.0, mainly by the inclusion of 235 U PFNS measured by the Chi-Nu team of LANL and LLNL. This data set is the first one that covers the 235 U PFNS for continuous incident-neutron energies of 1⁻20 MeV and outgoing-neutron energies from 10 keV⁻10 MeV with high precision. Previous data sets were either measured in a limited energy range or with less precision. Hence, these new Chi-Nu data provide decisive information for the evaluation. The resulting evaluated data correspond well to the new experimental PFNS. The evaluated PFNS also produce average mean energies and 239 Pu/ 235 U PFNS in agreement with associated Chi-Nu data. If one uses the new evaluated data to predict the neutron multiplication factor, k eff , of selected ICSBEP critical assemblies, the differences of simulated values compared to those using ENDF/B-VIII.0 is modest (less than 55 pcm). This difference in k eff can be easily accommodated by changes in the 235 U average prompt fission neutron multiplicity that is currently being re-evaluated. In addition to that, the new PFNS predict on average 235 U LLNL pulsed-sphere neutron-leakage spectra better than ENDF/B-VIIII.0 PFNS.
235U↗
Release of Evaluated 235 U(n,f) Average Prompt Fission Neutron Multiplicities Including the CGMF Model
This report documents an evaluation of the average prompt fission neutron multiplicity, $\overline{v}_p$, of 235 U from 200 keV to 15 MeV that is a potential release candidate for the upcoming U.S. nuclear data library, ENDF/B-VIII.1. This evaluation had to be re-done from "scratch", as the input to the $\overline{v}_p$ evaluation of the previous library, ENDF/B-VIII.0, was lost. That means that all available experimental data were re-analyzed and uncertainties were re-estimated. Another major difference to ENDF/B-VIII.0 is that this evaluation includes model information from the Hauser-Feshbach fission fragment decay code CGMF, while ENDF/B-VIII.0 is based purely on experimental data. CGMF links several fission quantities with each other; $\overline{v}_p$ is predicted by assumptions made on, e.g., pre-neutron emission yields as a function of mass, the total kinetic energy, or spin and parity of fission fragments. This allows to perform two types of validation for the new 235 U $\overline{v}_p$: On the one hand, one can employ evaluated CGMF parameters obtained from fitting to experimental 235 U $\overline{v}_p$ to predict yields as a function of mass, the average total kinetic energy, or the mean energy of the prompt fission neutron spectrum. These model-predicted values can then be compared to experimental and evaluated data. The model-predicted fission-observable values using evaluated parameters obtained here are reasonably close to experimental data indicating the evaluated 235 U(n,f) $\overline{v}_p$ are physical. On the other hand, one can validate 235 U $\overline{v}_p$ with respect to integral responses such as fast ICSBEP critical assemblies or LLNL pulsed spheres. LLNL pulsed-sphere neutron-leakage spectra are minimally impacted by the new 235 U $\overline{v}_p$ as these experimental data are shape data and the $\overline{v}_p$ would mostly lead to a change in normalization of the data as the spheres are relatively thin (0.7 and 1.5 mean-free path) and, thus, mostly depend on 235 U $\overline{v}_p$ from 12-15 MeV. The change in the predicted effective neutron multiplication factor, k eff , of selected ICSBEP critical assemblies, however, is large compared to values using ENDF/B-VIII.0 and experimental k eff : The average bias is 108 pcm across all studied k eff values versus 12 pcm for ENDF/B-VIII.0. A reasonable performance in simulating keff (mean bias of 14 pcm) can be retained by tweaking 235 U $\overline{v}_p$ from 3-5 MeV, and combining it with a recent 235 U PFNS evaluation that is also a ENDF/B-VIII.1 release candidate.
235U↗
Validation testing of 239 Pu IAEA INDEN, LANL and LLNL 239 Pu files from May 2022 [Slides]
239 Pu files validated: ENDF/B-VIII.0, ENDF/B-VIII.0 except for 239 Pu from INDEN (p49) which performs the same in crit testing as (p53), ENDF/B-VIII.0 except for 239 Pu from INDEN (p51), ENDF/B-VIII.0 except for 239 Pu from LANL (4/21), ENDF/B-VIII.0 except for 239 Pu from LLNL (5/16); tweaked nu-bar, ENDF/B-VIII.0 except for 239 Pu from LLNL (5/1)
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Comparison of the Baseline USL Calculation Methods for Loosely-Coupled and Novel Neutronic Systems [Slides]
Current work includes reconstructing 187-group ENDF B/VII.1 covariance matrix for comparison study to 44-group ENDF B/VII.1 matrix to determine how covariance matrix structures affect the USL calculations and investigating the exact domination mechanism of region-wise sensitivities in a loosely-coupled system. Future work will involve seeking to understand how bias distributions change with reactivity and how to calculate propagate distribution error into USL calculations, as well as how cross section perturbation studies can be extended to other types of calculations, such as shielding calculations.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Bayesian Optimization Framework for Imperfect Data or Models
Conventional Bayesian optimization methods implicitly assume that the data and model being optimized are “perfect.” This assumption leads to inaccurate posterior probability distribution functions (PDFs) when applied to “imperfect” data or models. The new Bayesian optimization framework presented in this report provides a way to parameterize the effect of imperfections usually encountered in a prior PDF of generalized data or a model on the posterior PDF. The effects of imperfections are parameterized by a set of constraints imposed on the posterior expectation values of deviations between the data and the model and on their covariance matrix elements. A particular set of values for these constraints conveys an evaluator’s best estimate of the effect of imperfections on the corresponding posterior expectation values. When a prior PDF of generalized data is assumed to be normal, an expression for a posterior PDF satisfying an arbitrary set of constraints is derived analytically for linear models. An analogous iterative algorithm is given for nonlinear models. The corresponding posterior PDF should be used to estimate any posterior expectation values in the presence of imperfections parameterized by that set of constraints. A posterior PDF of a conventional Bayesian optimization method is recovered analytically when all evaluator-specified constraints are set to zero (i.e., in the absence of any imperfections). The analytical expressions derived in this report for normal PDFs and linear models were verified numerically by a Metropolis–Hastings Monte Carlo method. The methods presented herein could be applied to any kind of data or models, including differential cross-section data or integral benchmark experiments.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
The First ICNC February 10-12, 1981 [Slides]
The first meeting that became the International Conference on Nuclear Criticality—ICNC—was held at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in February 1981. This presentation includes information on that meeting, including several experiments performed around that time period.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Thermal Neutron Scattering Law (TNSL) Implementation and Testing in FUDGE
Thermal neutron scattering law processing capabilities have been recently implemented in the LLNL code FUDGE (For Updating Data and Generating Evaluations). FUDGE is now capable of producing processed TNSL data for use in Monte Carlo or deterministic transport. To test this new capability, LLNL scientists performed an extensive intercomparison between the Mercury, Ardra, COG and MCNP transport codes. This intercomparison helped probe differences between how TNSL data are handled by the transport codes and by two different processing codes (LLNL’s FUDGE and LANL’s NJOY). This report summarizes recent improvements in FUDGE TNSL capabilities as well as results from the code intercomparison.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Correcting the PFNS for more consistent fission modeling
For FY20, we had a deliverable to write a report detailing efforts to simultaneously evaluate both the prompt neutron multiplicity, $\overline{ν}$, and the prompt neutron fission neutron spectrum, PFNS, using CGMF. CGMF is the LANL-developed fission fragment decay code that consistently evaporates prompt neutrons and γ rays using the Hauser-Feshbach statistical theory of compound reactions. The decay begins by constructing the initial conditions of the fission fragments, then decaying each one from the excited state by neutrons and γ rays, conserving energy, momentum, spin, and parity in each step of the emission. The initial conditions of the fragments, along with the multiplicity, energy, and direction of each emitted neutron or γ ray, are recorded, allowing for the full reconstruction of the fission event. These event histories allow us to reconstruct average quantities, as well as correlations between observables, that can be compared with experimental or evaluated data. In that initial report, although there was already a favorable comparison between $\overline{ν}$ from CGMF, experiment, and the current ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluation, we showed that there was still significant work to be done to improve the PFNS from CGMF. Historically, the PFNS is calculated too soft by Hauser-Feshbach fission models, and CGMF is no exception. The incorrect shape presents a significant challenge in fission modeling, including for our understanding of the fission process and for our ability to consistently calculate and predict a variety of prompt fission observables (such as fission fragment initial conditions, neutron and γ-ray multiplicities and energies, and the correlations between all observables). In our companion report, we detail our success in using CGMF to evaluate $\overline{ν}$. Although not included in the optimization explicitly, we also keep the initial conditions of the fission fragments physical, along with reproducing reasonably well the neutron multiplicity distribution. As we would expect from the sensitivities calculations from, the average neutron energies change very little from the $\overline{ν}$ optimization along with the PFNS (as will be shown in Sec. 2.6). The conclusion was that the global and statistical models would have to be investigated instead of just the fission fragment initial conditions (as is sufficient for $\overline{ν}$). This report details those efforts.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Updates from the Covariance Session Committee [Slides]
The CSEWG covariance session template paper was submitted on June 8, 2021 to journal. CSEWG will not publish adjusted VIII.1, but there is interest in adjustment results from the community. Other focus points for the release for VIII.1 include stringent testing of covariances before their release and missing covariances.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
149 Sm Results from DICER Plus DANCE [Slides]
DICER and DANCE can provide detailed and accurate resonance parameters and on smaller samples than any other facility from sub-thermal energies through the RRR. Many additional experiments of interest to NCSP could easily be performed at DICER and DANCE. DANCE also can provide accurate (n,γ) cross sections in the URR.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
LANL update to 239 Pu in the fast energy range [Slides]
Researchers are in the process of updating the Pu cross sections in the fast energy range (complementing the work of IAEA / INDEN / ORNL lower energy work in the resonance range). LANL is overhauling its evaluation tools (CoH, CGMF, DeCE, Kalman, NEXUS, PySOK, SOK) and focusing on consistency throughout evaluation.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Validating the LANL versus INDEN 239 Pu file in the fast range [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
181 Ta - fast neutron evaluation [Slides]
Reliable fast-neutron evaluation can be entirely encapsulated in the reaction model and related input. Ta181 is a particularly relevant case due to extraordinary coverage of various observables by differential experiments that offer much help and relatively little headache. Differences from the similar ENDF/B-VIII evaluation include: more advanced modeling (CC OMP, MSD, MSC, decay schemes), more careful selection of models and parameters, new experimental data, and isomers. Overall, improved agreement with differential data and hints of better performance in integral testing.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
TN update plans and advances for 16 O and 9 Be [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
Progress on Light-Element Standard Cross Sections at Los Alamos [Slides]
Presenters identified the following statuses of the light-element standards: Extension of N-N scattering analysis to 200 MeV will likely come in time for ENDF/B VIII.1 and new data are to be added even in the energy range up to 100 MeV; for n- 3 He, a more recent 4 He R-matrix analysis from which updated n+ 3 He cross sections could be obtained for ENDF/B VIII.1; for n- 6 Li, more work is required to get a reasonable fit to all data up to E n = 8 MeV. Of particular concern are the t+ 4 He scattering data at E t > 14 MeV. For n- 10 B, new work on the 11 B system has not yet been started and there is much new data to add for n+ 10 B reactions, and maybe also for α + 7 Li reactions. The proliferation of excited-state channels will limit the upper neutron energy of the analysis to a few MeV. For n- 12 C, new elastic and inelastic scattering data from Vanhoy support the results of the present analysis. More work is needed to extend the fit successfully above 6.5 MeV.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
TNSL improvements in FUDGE [Slides]
FUDGE TNSL processing capabilities are improving. New development focuses on reading and writing GNDS, but FUDGE also supports writing to ACE and ENDL. Work provides a chance to compare in-depth with other codes. TNSL processing is mostly complete, but MCGIDI sampling has room for improvement. There are plans to revisit interpolation and to improve strategies for sampling coherent/incoherent elastic.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗