Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “mathematical physics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Coincident Capture through Post-processing PTRAC [Slides]

This presentation discusses the new PTRAC capabilities and workflows. The PTRAC capability in MCNP6.3 has seen a massive overhaul since MCNP6.2. The new HDF5 file format allows for both MPI- and thread-based parallelism. MCNPTools has been updated to handle the new HDF5 PTRAC format and is now open sourced on GitHub. Built-in capabilities, such as the pulse-height tally coincident capture special treatment, can largely be replicated through separate postprocessing scripts that leverage both PTRAC and MCNPTools. This allows for greater flexibility in user-specified and controlled detector response functionality, ultimately using the MCNP code for what it is best at (i.e., particle transport).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Kinetics of particles with short-range interactions

Self-assembly is one of the grand challenges of the 21st century – as the devices and materials we would like to build become too complex or small-scale for top-down manufacturing to be efficient, it is increasingly important to find ways to create these through bottom-up, dynamical approaches. Many particles used in self-assembly have very short-ranged attractive interactions, making simulations expensive or impossible. This proposal develops a set of conceptual and computational tools to study the dynamics of self-assembly for particles with short-ranged interactions, harnessing ideas in differential and computational geometry, and stochastic analysis, to accelerate simulations.

74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Comparison Study of Upper Subcritical Limits Derived Using Sensitivity/Uncertainty Tools: Case Studies of U233-SOL-THERM-001-001, MIX-COMP-THERM-001-001, IEU-MET-FAST-002-001, LEU-COMP-THERM-001-001, LEU-SOL-THERM-004-001

Neutron transport methods used to establish subcriticality require validation by comparison to critical experiments considered to be benchmarks. Whisper is a sensitivity/uncertainty analysis tool developed to assist with the task of validation in nuclear criticality safety. Details on the Whisper methodology can be found in References 1-3 on the MCNP® reference collection website at https://mcnp.lanl.gov. Whisper-1.0 was originally developed in 2014 and used to assist with nuclear criticality safety validation at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Whisper was upgraded in 2016 to Whisper-1.1 and prepared for release with MCNP6.2 [References 3-5]. Whisper contains a library of over 1100 critical experiment benchmarks and quantifies neutronic similarity of an application to benchmarks in the library. Using highest similarity benchmarks, Whisper computes a calculational margin (CM) encompassing of the worst-case bias and bias uncertainty at a 99% confidence level for each application. In addition, portions of the margin of subcriticality (MOS) for nuclear data uncertainty and potential code errors are computed. The baseline upper subcritical limit (USL) computed by Whisper is comprised of the CM, MOS nuclear data , and MOS code errors . The Whisper baseline USL is absent a portion of the MOS due to the area of application, which is applied based upon judgment by the criticality safety analyst. An objective of this paper is to present the baseline USL, CM and portions of the MOS as computed by Whisper for comparison with similar sensitivity/uncertainty tools, such as those used by IRSN and ORNL. An initial comparison involved four critical experiment benchmarks: HEU-MET-FAST-013-001, HEU-SOLTHERM-001-008, PU-MET-FAST-022-001, AND PU-SOL-THERM-001-001, which have been documented in References 10-13. This study extends the comparison to include cases U233-SOL-THERM-001-001, MIX-COMP-THERM-001-001, IEU-MET-FAST-002-001, LEU-COMP-THERM-001-001, LEU-SOL-THERM- 004-001.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Producing ENDF/B-quality Evaluations of 239 Pu(n,f) and 235 U(n,f) Average Prompt Neutron Multiplicities using the CGMF Model

This report documents evaluations of the neutron-induced 239 Pu and 235 U average prompt neutron multiplicities, $\overline{v}_p$, using the CGMF model developed at LANL. These evaluations are not updates of existing ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data, but were both re-done from "scratch". That is, all experimental data were extracted from EXFOR, re-normalized to the newest nuclear data representing monitor observables, and detailed uncertainties were estimated from information in EXFOR as well as from templates of expected measurement uncertainties. We also included experimental data that were not yet available for ENDF/B-VIII.0, for instance, the data of Marini et al. for 239 Pu(n,f) $\overline{v}_p$ or the data of Khoklov et al. for 235 U(n,f) $\overline{v}_p$. Finally, we include the CGMF model; it computes $\overline{v}_p$ based on model parameters that at the same time calculate fission fragments as a function of mass, Y (A), the average total kinetic energy as a function of incident-neutron energy, $\langle TKE \rangle$(E inc ), etc. Such a detailed fission model that ties together many fission quantities has not been used to date for any $\overline{v}_p$ evaluation in ENDF/B. Here, we show that we can get evaluated 235 U(n,f) and 239 Pu $\overline{v}_p$ that not only correspond well to experimental $\overline{v}_p$, but that the associated evaluated model parameters also yield parameterizations of Y (A), $\langle TKE \rangle$(E inc ), etc., that correspond well to their respective experimental data. The new evaluated 239 Pu(n,f) $\overline{v}_p$ was also combined into a 239 Pu test file with the newest nuclear data for the 239 Pu prompt-fission neutron spectrum and fission cross sections. This new 239 Pu file performed reasonably well in predicting PU-MET-FAST assemblies, reaction rates in Jezebel and Flattop and three LLNL pulsed spheres. Due to that, the new 239 Pu(n,f) $\overline{v}_p$ evaluation presented here is being considered for ENDF/B-VIII.1. Hence, we can show here that CGMF is able to produce ENDF/B quality $\overline{v}_p$ nuclear data.

239Pu, 235U, Average Prompt-fission Neutron Multip↗
DOE OSTI2022

Enabling Parallel Execution of System-level Simulations in SAM

This report summarizes the recent code updates related to “element ghosting” in SAM to enable the parallel execution of system-level simulations using multiple processors/cores. Unlike typical MOOSE-based applications, for system-level simulations, SAM mostly deals with a collection of discrete small pieces of meshes, and the connection of physics on these meshes are realized by using “connector” types of components/code structures, such as conjugate heat transfer and flow junctions. The required code implementation is to correctly mark the necessary ghost elements for each type of such components/code structures; thus, the lower-level libraries can correctly perform the necessary data transfer between processors (CPUs) when executed in parallel mode. After the code updates, SAM can now run system-level simulations in the parallel mode. The parallel execution capability was then tested with an ABTR input model with 23k DOFs. Significant speedup was demonstrated when the optimal number of CPUs were used in parallel mode. Future systematic studies on parallelization performance using additional test cases covering different physics/scenarios will be needed to provide additional insights into the scalability of SAM parallelization.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

How can a diverse set of integral and semi-integral measurements inform identification of discrepant nuclear data? [Slides]

Importance of nuclear data to bias changed significantly when including diverse measurement sets. LLNL pulsed sphere measurements provided information for 9 Be nuclear data above 2 MeV and subcritical benchmarks provided information for 240 Pu nuclear data between 100 keV and 10 MeV. Pulsed sphere leakage spectra and neutron noise observables are differently sensitive to nuclear data compared to critical benchmarks. Leakage spectra are sensitive to nuclear data above 5 MeV. Count rate and Feynman Y are more sensitive to nuclear data. A change in bias can help evaluators identify discrepant nuclear data. In the future, EUCLID plans to perform RAFIEKI analysis with additional benchmark and measurement sets.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Comparison of URR Implementations in GNDS Format [Slides]

LLNL implemented infrastructure to include treatment of URR in GNDS. There are two options to store URR probabilities: cross-sections pdf and ACE-like probability tables. Issues were found with both options during verification with criticality benchmarks. Projected future steps include resolving issues in the next year and adding criticality benchmarks sensitive to URR.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Questionable Benchmarks [Slides]

An investigation and initial review of ‘questionable benchmarks’ was performed at LANL. Multiple methods were used, including machine learning techniques, to identify 'questionable benchmarks' and/or benchmarks with low uncertainties. Those benchmarks were then reviewed for obvious errors. This is not a recommendation to ICSBEP, but can be used as a starting point for a more comprehensive review. A journal paper is being written on this work.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Development of a New Fixed-source Sensitivity Tally Capability in the MCNP ® Code [Slides]

Current work includes FSEN capability development, continued verification of adjoint-weighted sensitivity method, and improvement of algorithm speed and parallelism capability. Future work is forecasted to include extensions to non-Boltzmann responses, adding more responses and particle types, and connection to new MCNP6.3 tally backend.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Open-source release of CGMF 1.1 and Integration into the MCNP6.3 ® Code [Slides]

As a result of a multi-year NA-22 project, CGMF was integrated into MCNP6.2 and publicly released. CGMF was open-sourced and publicly released and MCNP6.3 was updated to include the latest version and is in the process of being publicly released. Current and future plans include global optimization and uncertainty quantification within CGMF, model parameter fitting such that CGMF may be used in ENDF/B evaluations, and improving both standalone and MCNP-integrated CGM (non-fission) simulations.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Which nuclear data can be validated with LLNL pulsed-sphere experiments? [Slides]

LLNL pulsed sphere are a very valuable experiment series to validate scattering and fission nuclear data. It would be great if they could be evaluated as benchmarks and make it into SINBAD! We see potential issues in ENDF/B-VIII.0 6 Li, 12 C, 16 O, 24- 26 Mg, 27 Al, 48 Ti, 56 Fe, and 208 Pb nuclear data. Good agreement is found with 1,2 H, 7 Li, 9 Be, 14 N, 235,238 U, and 239 Pu nuclear data.

16O and 12C Spheres↗
DOE OSTI2021

Status of Shift for NCS Applications in SCALE 6.3 [Slides]

Shift can run most KENO V.a and KENO-VI inputs, but beware of small geometry fudge factors. Shift is faster than KENO for fast spectrum systems, but has a higher uncertainty per particle. KENO FoM is higher for thermal systems. KENO V.a in MG is significantly faster than KENO V.a in CE, so this may exacerbate Shift difference. Shift generally has greater speedup for parallel calculations. Shift has only IFP available for TSUNAMI-3D, but parallel calculations are enabled.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Using the “Inner” Array Boundary with KENO-VI [Slides]

Topics include: SGGP Array definition basics, what is meant by the "Inner" Boundary of an array, a critical experiment with flux filter, and NRC verification of criticality calculations with UNF-ST&DARDS.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗