Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “facility”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

A Framework to Assess Advanced Reactor Spent Fuel Management Facility Deployment

Previous planning and prioritization for LWR SNF management investigated the risks and uncertainties of deploying facilities such as consolidated interim storage [1, 2, 3, 4]. As part of that work, activities and milestones were collected into success precedence diagrams that charted a path to achieving facility deployment [1]. In that framework, activities are any research, development, design, or decision required to achieve an intermediate goal; milestones are activity endpoints and mark the completion of deliverables. Milestones can be thought of as achievements required to reach the final goal of facility deployment; activities are the means by which milestones are accomplished. In planning, activities and milestones are compiled into comprehensive flow charts that visualize the steps necessary for deployment. This framework has been used to quantify risks, timelines, and costs of deploying SNF management facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Sub-drain Water Treatment Facility for Reduction of Accumulated Waste Water Amount at the Fukushima NPS Site - 17572

At the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station site, water treatment facility special for sub-drain and groundwater drain has been constructed by Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. and Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd., and it has been operated to remove radionuclides from the pumped groundwater. The facility consists of three kinds of equipment for collecting, purifying and transferring. The purification equipment removes radionuclides contained in the pumped groundwater. The purification equipment consists of filters for removal of solids and colloidal particles, and adsorbents for removal of ionic radionuclides. Five adsorption vessels are installed into the equipment; three vessels have adsorbent to remove Cs and Sr simultaneously, the fourth vessel has adsorbent to remove Sb and for the last has adsorbent to remove heavy metals. The vessels for Cs and Sr are operating as a so-called 'merry-go-round'. For the rational operation of the equipment, a simulation code has been developed to calculate the Sr concentration of outlet water which determines the replacement timings of the Cs-Sr adsorption vessels. The simulation code has been applied to planning of vessel replacement during the water treatment facility operation. The facility started operation in September 2015, and treated the pumped groundwater since then. As of October 2016, about 211,000 m{sup 3} of groundwater had been treated. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Managing work flow and logistic at waste processing facilities using the waste compliance and tracking system - 15392

Work flow and logistics at a busy radioactive waste processing complex or permitted treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) can pose a monumental challenge. An efficient operation requires good communication between engineering, logistics, and waste operators. The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) has implemented an application that facilitates seamless communication of work flow requirements, between engineering, logistics, and waste operations personnel in the field. The Waste Compliance and Tracking System (WCATS), a comprehensive waste management system designed at LANL, provides four key elements to support logistics: (a) the container work path, (b) directed unit operation requests, (c) notification of pending operations, and (d) real-time status tools for office and field workers. The combination of these elements allows everyone to function as a team, with a shared knowledge of what is needed to accomplish facility objectives. The first element is like a road map indicating which unit operations are needed and in what sequence they should be performed; this is referred to as a 'work path'. It automatically routes a waste item or container from operation to operation. For example, a given work path might indicate that waste items require radiological survey, radioassay, and a technical review, in that order. When the work path is assigned to a container, the system enforces the correct order of operations. Directed unit operation 'requests', the second element, fills a gap between pre-planned, formal 'work path' activities and the need for flexibility to direct preparatory operations or deal with unexpected issues, like staging or mining containers in preparation for a shipment or transferring containers from one storage unit to another to clear a path for building maintenance. Logistics engineers prepare these 'requests', and the system monitors the status and completion of the work. The third element, notifications, allows team members to subscribe to and receive notice that an operation is pending, initiated, or complete. This functionality supports a range of communication options, including e-mail, cell phone, pager, or application in-box messaging. Notifications allow waste operations personnel to multi-task, and remain in the loop on the status of facility-wide activities. Finally, the fourth element provides tools that communicate work path pending operations and directed requests to field workers on their mobile computer, allowing them to mine or pick containers from storage units, and leverage the capabilities of a bar-code scanner to avoid selection mistakes. Oversight and summary tools are provided, allowing logistics personnel to monitor work path and request task status, identify work-flow bottlenecks, and maximize the efficiency of waste operations. The Waste Compliance and Tracking System (WCATS) provides an innovative, comprehensive set of tools that allow large-scale radioactive waste processing facilities to manage logistics, maximize efficient use of the workforce, and create a team environment, where everyone from management to the waste handlers have an understanding of the work load and what needs to be accomplished. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Siting considerations for a deep borehole disposal facility - 15403

This paper describes considerations for siting and designing a facility for deep borehole disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and/or high-level radioactive waste (HLW). Technical considerations include geological, hydrogeochemical, and geophysical characteristics that are related to the suitability of the site for deep drilling and borehole construction, waste emplacement activities, waste isolation (seals and surrounding geology), and long-term safety of the deep borehole disposal system. Logistical factors to be considered include: local or regional availability of drilling contractors (equipment, services, and materials) capable of drilling a large-diameter hole to approximately 5,000 m depth; construction of surface facilities and waste handling and emplacement equipment; legal and regulatory requirements associated with drilling, operation, and post-closure; and access to transportation systems. Social and political considerations include the distance from population centers and the support or opposition of local and state entities and other stakeholders to the facility and its operations. These technical, logistical, and socio-political factors are examined in the context of a consent-based siting process for a deep disposal borehole, which would be the first phase in developing an operating facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Cigeo, The French Geological Disposal Facility Project: Preliminary Design (APS) Phase - 16038

The Cigeo project has been in the works for 25 years. Numerous studies have been conducted, increasingly associated with the Meuse/Haute-Marne site, with further specific research thanks to direct access to the Callovo-Oxfordian clay formation from the underground laboratory of Bure-Saudron. These studies and research initially aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of the repository. They also helped gain a high level of understanding of phenomena to support design studies and demonstrate safety. Transition to the industrial phase began with the development of a plan for delivering waste to the facility for disposal. The plan introduced sequencing for the various types of waste to be disposed of, and was optimised to determine the size of inspection, transfer and handling facilities. In describing the life of the repository and therefore the vision for its operation, it has become obvious that our generation should not impose choices on future generations. We must provide them with reference technical solutions, with the financial resources to implement them. It is also our duty to begin the construction and initial operating phases. However, because the facility will operate over several generations, we must leave a degree of flexibility so that they may reassess the options that we define and adopt their own solutions, as necessary. They will also benefit from operational experience gathered as facility operations develop. This is the context in which the preliminary design phase is being finalised in preparation for the detailed design phase, with the aim of gradual commissioning during the latter part of the next decade. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Developing a new criticality methodology to support decommissioning of legacy plutonium facilities

To decommission a legacy plutonium finishing facility, a number of gloveboxes need to be disposed of. These gloveboxes have been in place since the 1960's and were operational until the 1980's. A period of initial clean out and decommissioning took place in the 1990's and the first gloveboxes were removed from the line in the early 2000's. Compliance with downstream waste handling facility requirements meant that the gloveboxes needed to be removed using intensive 'hands-on' methods in order to size reduce them to fit into 200 litre (55 gallon) drums. This is the standard approach for handling waste items known as Plutonium Contaminated Material (PCM) on the Sellafield site and was credited in the criticality safety case for the decommissioning of the gloveboxes as it allowed each waste drum to be individually assayed such that the fissile content of the waste could be known. Not only was this approach time-consuming and laborious but as it involved operators working with cutting tools in a highly contaminated area it was challenged as being overly restrictive to operations and potentially hazardous to the workers. In order to decommission the remaining nine gloveboxes in the facility, a new decommissioning approach and associated criticality methodology has been developed. Instead of intensive size reduction and waste drum assay, the gloveboxes will be removed with little or no size reduction and put into storage crates without assay. The criticality assessor will review the operational history of each glovebox, along with the decommissioning records and relevant plant data, to make an evidence-based judgement that the crated glovebox represents no greater a residual criticality risk than would have been realised from the equivalent number of PCM drums that the standard decommissioning approach would have generated. This method identifies, in conjunction with the plant personnel, a number of review points to ensure that before the glovebox is removed any bulk residue material has been recovered and no more than a safe amount of moderating material (fixative) has been added to fix any remaining fissile contamination. Finally, once these review points have been confirmed to be complete - through a stakeholder meeting with criticality safety, plant operators and project managers - the glovebox will be placed in a crate, and this crate will be declared a Low Criticality Risk crate. No formal assay will be required prior to exporting the crate to the downstream waste handling facility and no fissile mass value will be assigned to the contents of the crate. No further intrusive work will be required on the crate and it can be safely stored without any spacing requirements, pending final disposal. (author)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Environmental Management Waste Management Facility Operations Team Commitment to Safety - 18546

The Environmental Management Waste Management Facility (EMWMF) is an above-grade waste disposal facility that is owned by DOE and operated by URS | CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR), a contractor to DOE's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. The EMWMF landfill is located on the Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR) and has a 2.18 M cubic yard capacity. EMWMF is a key component of the cost-effective ORR cleanup program and accepts remediation waste from across the ORR. Multiple low-level and low-level mixed CERCLA waste streams are disposed at EMWMF, mostly as direct-dumped demolition and remediation debris. EMWMF receives and disposes of a myriad of contaminated waste streams and waste types, including massive structural steel from some of the largest buildings ever constructed, contaminated soils from legacy disposal areas, containers that must be grouted under negative pressure, and special waste that must be tightly controlled. Support activities include managing several million gallons of landfill wastewater per year and driving around 20,000 miles per year to transport leachate to a treatment facility. Even with the wide range of waste accepted and the diversity of support activities, EMWMF Operations has maintained an impressive safety record of no lost workday cases in nearly 16 years of continuous operation and was recently awarded the National Safety Council's Superior Safety Performance Award. This safety record is a testament to the commitment to safety by both workers and management. Several factors are key to the EMWMF Operations safety record. UCOR senior management established safety as a priority and allocates proper funding and resources. EMWMF Operations management embraces safety as an integral part of the work and also 'walks the talk'-emphasizing safety over productivity and showing personal commitment to safety. A stable workforce promotes a culture where safety is valued and helps train new personnel in this culture. The UCOR integrated safety management approach to work control is fully embraced, where worker feedback is highly valued and used to better identify and control job hazards. Finally, job supervisors actively encourage input. Worker concerns, suggestions, and observations are encouraged and positively addressed. As a result, the entire Operations Team is committed to identifying and mitigating hazards. This team commitment to safety results in a culture where safety is not only valued, but is expected. Safety concerns are identified and addressed proactively, and communication is encouraged. This strong safety culture and outstanding safety record have also proven to be good business, with the facility available to receive waste 99.6% of available work hours and outstanding turnaround times on waste shipments. The EMWMF Operations team commitment to safety can be used in other environments to develop an engaged, safety-conscious workforce. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Computer Codes V and V Tests with a Large-Scale Sodium Thermal-Hydraulic Test Facility (STELLA)

The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) is carrying out the design of a 'Prototype Generation IV Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (PGSFR)' in cooperation with Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in the US. In regard to computer codes V and V, a large-scale sodium thermal-hydraulic test program is currently being progressed in parallel with the PGSFR design, which is called STELLA (Sodium Test Loop for Safety Simulation and Assessment). The final objective of this program is to collect a separate and integral effect test database to validate the safety analysis codes and other thermal hydraulic design codes. In the first phase of the STELLA program, the sodium component test loop (hereafter called STELLA-1) was constructed at the KAERI site, and it has been used for performance tests of key sodium heat exchangers in PGSFR. Since this sodium test loop is basically for separate effects tests to verify the performance of key sodium components, the test database obtained from STELLA-1 has been used for the V and V of safety codes as well as heat exchanger design codes. The second phase of the program aiming at an integral effect test is called STELLA-2, which will be used for synthetic review of the key safety issues of PGSFR. The basic and detailed design phases of the STELLA-2 test facility are underway in accordance with the specific design requirements reflecting the whole design features of PGSFR. The facility installation is scheduled to be completed by 2018. Then the main experiments including the start-up tests will begin and the first integral effect test database will be constructed by the end of 2019. Based on the STELLA-2 platform, a simulation of the PGSFR transient will be made to evaluate the plant dynamic behaviors and demonstrate the decay heat removal performance. Multi-dimensional effects coming from a large sodium pool system will be identified as well. The test database obtained from the STELLA-2 experiment will be used for the validation of the safety analysis codes and other thermal hydraulics codes, and this project finally contributes to the specific design phase of PGSFR. This paper presents both the results of heat transfer tests for the key sodium heat exchangers using STELLA-1 and the first results of heat exchanger design codes V and V. The recent progress of the engineering design for the STELLA-2 test section is introduced and its specific design parameters are also presented in this paper with detailed evaluation results of their scaling distortions. A large-scale sodium thermal-hydraulic test program (STELLA) was introduced with the specific activities for separate and integral effects tests. The test database obtained from STELLA-1 was successfully used to validate both the heat exchanger design and safety analysis codes. Specific design features of the integral effects test facility (STELLA- 2) with a scaling ratio of 1/5 in length and 1/125 in volume were also presented. Validation of the STELLA-2 facility design is underway using system codes and CFD tools. Dedicated water-mockup experiments to verify the scaling design of key subsystems are currently being conducted as well. (authors)

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2016

Scaling and Design Analysis of a Sub-Scale, Reduced Temperature Stratified Flow Separate Effects Test Facility for the Experimental Investigation of Air Ingress in a High Temperature Reactor System

High temperature gas reactors (HTGR) are poised to spearhead the next generation of nuclear reactors, due to their passive safety characteristics and their applications flexibility. Able to provide base load power or process heat for industrial applications, HGTRs may be a critical component to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and abroad. However, increased interest and development has also highlighted areas requiring further investigation, one of which being the air-ingress accident. Air ingress may occur following a break in the coaxial cross duct and pressure vessel depressurization. The initial mode of ingress is hypothesized to be density driven cross flow as the cold air enters the lower plenum, at which point molecular diffusion and/or local buoyancy phenomena will dominate until a global natural circulation current is established. While computational simulations support this progression, little or no experimental data exists to validate and support this phenomenology. Therefore, it is necessary to generate such data; this research seeks to do so through the use of a sub-scale separate effects test facility - the Stratified Flow Separate Effects Test Facility (SFSETF). The goal of this facility is more specifically to focus on the transition to global natural circulation starting from air ingress after a double-ended guillotine break (DEGB) while neglecting depressurization. This paper will provide analyses performed in the design of this facility, including the geometric and hydraulic scaling analyses, safety analysis and instrumentation selection. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Subdrain Water Treatment Facility for Reduction of Waste Water Amount at the Fukushima NPS Site - 19318

At the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station site, a water treatment facility dedicated to the subdrain and groundwater drain has been constructed by Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Inc. and Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd. The facility consists of three kinds of equipment for collecting, purifying and transferring contaminated water. The purification equipment removes low concentration radionuclides, such as Cs-137 and Sr-90, contained in the pumped groundwater using adsorption vessels filled with Cs-Sr adsorbent. It is important to lower the operational cost of the facility. We have been developing a cost reduction technique to prolong the operating lifetime of the Cs-Sr adsorption vessels by improving the adsorption performance of the Cs-Sr simultaneous adsorbent. Therefore, pH adjustment for the groundwater by using granular MgO as a pH adjustment agent was investigated. The experimental and the simulation results showed that the distribution coefficient Kd with pH adjustment by MgO was evaluated as approximately 1.8 times higher than Kd without pH adjustment and the replacement timing of the Cs-Sr adsorption vessels with pH adjustment was 2 times longer than the timing without pH adjustment. From these results, we decided to include pH adjustment using MgO as the pH adjustment agent in the purification equipment in order to reduce the amount of Cs-Sr simultaneous adsorbent used and the operational cost of the facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 32: Panel: Bringing First-of-a-Kind Treatment Facilities On-Line: Idaho IWTU Commissioning Approach (2/5)

This panel discussed the activities of bringing a first-of-a-kind treatment facility online: The Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU). The design was designed to treat 900,000 gallons of sodium-bearing liquid waste. Construction of this first-of-a-kind treatment facility was completed in 2012. A new approach was adopted in 2016 after multiple challenges were encountered during facility commissioning. This session focused on the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU), which was constructed to convert the remaining 900,000 gallons of liquid sodium-bearing waste at the Idaho National Laboratory Site, Idaho, USA, to a granular solid. The liquid waste was generated during historic spent nuclear fuel reprocessing campaigns at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and was transferred to three underground storage tanks. The waste was not first-cycle waste but was rather the liquid rinse waste from flushing waste transfer lines between reprocessing runs. IWTU will employ a steam-reforming process to treat the liquid waste. The resulting granular solid will be transferred to stainless steel canisters and then to concrete vaults, which will be stored on site until an off-site national geologic repository is available to accept the waste. Presentation proposed: Bringing First-of-a-Kind Treatment Facilities On-Line: Idaho IWTU Commissioning Approach (Joel Case, US DOE (USA), Leo Thompson, Sterling Engineering and Consulting Group, LLC (USA), Joseph Giebel, Fluor Idaho, LLC (USA), Richard Boardman, Idaho National Laboratory (USA), Kevin O'Neill, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 104: US DOE LLW On-Site Disposal: LLW Disposal Facility Federal Review Group Review Process

The US DOE Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group (LFRG) as the regulatory authority for onsite low-level waste disposal facilities for the complex per DOE Order 435.1. This panel focused on the review process for technical basis documents including the Performance Assessments that are used to issue the disposal authorization statement Presentations proposed include: 1 - Low-Level Waste Disposal Overview (Jhon Carilli, US DOE EM Nevada (USA)); 2 - Factors Influencing Allowable Waste Concentrations and Inventories at Disposal Facilities (Roger Seitz, IEI (USA)); 3 - Low-Level Waste Disposal Facility Federal Review Group - LFRG (Jaffet Ferrer-Torres, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Virtual Simulation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Repackaging Facility Design Concepts - 19479

This paper presents recent implementation of virtual simulation of SNF repackaging facility operation. The development was based on recent wet and dry facility design concepts. The development involved creating equipment and facility models and implementation of discrete event simulation of large-scale facility-level operation. Lastly, it presented how a hardware-in-the-loop simulation is possible and that a good amount of accuracy was retained from virtual simulation to hardware simulation for the tested configuration. It is expected that this type of simulation will act as a proof of concept for system engineers and help them make more informed decisions when considering potential solutions for SNF handling and disposal. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Panel Session 23: Start-up of Three Major DOE Treatment Facilities - SWPF, IWTU and DFLAW

This panel focused on the DOE-EM planning to complete construction and start up three major treatment facilities in the next 18 months. This included the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at Savannah River, the Integrated Waste treatment Unit (IWTU) at Idaho and the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) at Hanford. DOE Site Managers from SC, ID and WA introduced each facility then the DOE Contractor provided the details on their biggest challenges in regulatory issues, construction, start-up and operations of each facility. Panelists with presentations: Lessons in Managing Risks in First of a Kind Nuclear Construction and Start-Up (Pamela Marks); Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (Connie Flohr); IWTI-Fluor (Frederick Hughes); Startup and Commissioning (Tom Fletcher)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Session 078 - Panel: Start-Up of Three Major DOE Treatment Facilities -SWPF, IWTU and DFLAW (2/2) (R2.4)

This panel focused on the successes and challenges of the DOE High-Level radioactive tank waste management program, with an emphasis on the completion of construction and startup of three major treatment facilities - the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) at Savannah River, the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU) at Idaho, and Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) processing at Hanford. As a companion to Session 23, DOE managers and federal project directors discussed the status of facility startup efforts from a federal management and oversight perspective, highlighting readiness planning, challenges and lessons learned. Panelists with presentations: Transitioning Oversight: A Project Becomes an Operating Facility (James Folk); Tools for SU/C (Tom Fletcher); Startup and Commissioning -Integrate Waste Treatment Unit-Federal Perspective (Joel Case)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Special Analyses for the Hanford Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment - 20102

In 2014, the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection and its contractors began to develop a performance assessment for the near-surface disposal of low-level and mixed low-level waste at the Hanford Site's Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). The IDF is a doubly-lined landfill that was constructed between 2004 and 2006 to be the disposal facility for the vitrified low-activity waste that will be produced at the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). IDF is also expected to receive solid secondary waste produced at the WTP and other solid wastes from site activities. The IDF has been in a preoperational state awaiting authorization from DOE and a RCRA permit modification from the State of Washington Department of Ecology to receive waste. Both the Disposal Authorization Statement and permit modification require a performance assessment demonstrating that the system of engineered and natural features will limit releases of radionuclides and hazardous chemicals from the IDF and be protective of human health and the environment. The simulated duration is 10,000 years. Based on the analyses presented in the 2017 Integrated Disposal Facility Performance Assessment, DOE issued a conditional Operating Disposal Authorization Statement for the IDF in June 2018. The long-term performance of the IDF to be protective of human health and the environment was evaluated under the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. Computer simulations were performed to evaluate whether or not the IDF would comply with DOE requirements. In the time that has passed since the performance assessment was approved by DOE, new information has been discovered that had not been considered in the performance assessment. Since this new information has not been evaluated, the potential impact of the changes have not been taken into consideration in DoE's disposal authorization. DOE and its contractors follow a change control process to screen and, when necessary, evaluate new information that could potentially impact the conclusions of the completed performance assessment. This paper will describe the change control process and provide two examples of evaluations performed following the change control process. The first example evaluates a new waste form for liquid secondary waste that was not evaluated in the performance assessment. In the performance assessment, liquid secondary waste was assumed to be solidified with grout. A new recommendation to dispose of the liquid secondary waste after drying it to a powder was evaluated. The second example evaluates inventory implications from changes to the flow sheet that estimates the feed composition to the low-activity waste vitrification facility. The changes result in higher strontium concentrations in the vitrified waste stream. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Implementation of the Glycolate Destruction Process with Sodium Permanganate in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) - 20141

The Savannah River Site (SRS) seeks to replace formic acid with glycolic acid as a chemical reductant in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), where borosilicate glass is mixed with high-level radioactive waste, melted at high temperatures, then poured into stainless steel canisters for safe storage. Prior research and development have demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of the new nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet over the current nitric-formic acid flowsheet to chemically adjust the radioactive sludge slurry waste in the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) prior to vitrification. Use of glycolic acid reduces hydrogen and ammonia generation during the reduction process, thus reducing flammability hazards and purge requirements in the DWPF processing vessels. In addition, glycolic acid will support the new Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) by allowing for receipt of higher volumes of waste due to reduction of flammable gases, increased boil-up rates in the vessels, and easing the processing of future sludge batches containing high levels of mercury. However, during DWPF operations, trace amounts of glycolate are anticipated to be entrained in the recycle stream and sent to the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) via the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT). The RCT receives condensate from the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) and Off-gas Condensate Tank (OGCT) that may contain unreacted glycolate. A literature review found the potential for hydrogen generation due to thermolysis of glycolate in caustic CSTF conditions. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) conducted several tests on simulant and radioactive waste from various tanks at SRS and confirmed that glycolate added to waste at concentrations of approximately 1000 mg/L and higher generates hydrogen through thermolysis. There are potential operating scenarios in the future where glycolate concentration could exceed 1000 mg/L in the 2H Evaporator Drop Tank, the highest accumulation point for DWPF organics received via recycle. These findings presented a need to develop another process to mitigate the impact of glycolic acid to the CSTF. Several DWPF compatible options were evaluated for their ability to destroy glycolate in the DWPF recycle stream under various processing conditions, thereby mitigating its introduction to the CSTF. Downselection testing identified sodium permanganate as the most promising and simplest option to oxidize glycolate. It has been demonstrated to be effective in various RCT simulant compositions, operating temperatures, oxidant addition rates, solution pH, and initial glycolate concentrations. A feasibility study identified existing tanks within the facility that could be used for receiving and storing the commercially available sodium permanganate, as well as feeding it to the RCT for processing. The use of existing equipment as well as the ability to purchase the pre-mixed chemical reduces implementation and operational complexity. The downstream impacts of the sodium permanganate reaction were also evaluated and demonstrated to have minimal impact on other chemical species present in the RCT and CSTF, as well as on the materials of construction of the RCT and CSTF vessels and associated piping and instrumentation. Future work is in progress to validate the glycolate destruction process with testing in actual radioactive RCT waste before implementation in DWPF. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Innovative Approaches to the Decommissioning of a Redundant Plutonium Processing Facility - 20147

At Sellafield, in the North West of the United Kingdom (UK), there are a number of redundant plutonium processing facilities. Over the past three decades several decommissioning strategies have been deployed to clean up these redundant facilities. Whilst there have been many successes previously reported, there remain many challenges. As previously presented at WM2017 (Paper Ref 17081) some of these challenges have recently been addressed through a new approach which introduced a number of innovations. The purpose of these innovations is to seek ways to significantly reduce risks to both decommissioning personnel and the environment by minimising the extent of physical 'hands on' decommissioning activities and by simplifying the waste production process. This paper provides an update on the progress of these innovations since 2017. Additionally, the paper also provides details of the new decommissioning technologies which have been introduced over the past 2 years to enable the most challenging aspects of the redundant plutonium processing facility to be decommissioned. These new decommissioning technologies address challenges associated with the preparation of process vessels and pipework to enable their safe in-situ size reduction by remote means: - New decommissioning techniques have been introduced to allow penetrations to be remotely cut into process vessels and pipework to provide a means of accessing and controlling the venting of any potential hydrogen gas present. - Additionally, a new large scale bespoke remote diamond wire cutting machine has been designed and manufactured to enable the process vessels to be size reduced in situ. Both of these new cutting technologies have involved collaborative working with specialist equipment suppliers including extensive development, trialling demonstration and commissioning prior to bringing the equipment into operational service. Several years of work have now culminated in reaching the final stages of decommissioning of the redundant plutonium processing facility with decommissioning of the final process vessels now underway and completion expected by the end of 2019. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗