SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “LABORATORY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2017

Collaboratory=Collaborate+Laboratory: The Mid-Columbia STEM Education Collaboratory

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory created a network focused on collaboration in STEM education to design and deliver projects, resources, and professional learning opportunities in a testbed environment. How do you uncover and fill gaps in equitable access to high-quality science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education offerings in your local region? Where might you deploy strategies to improve STEM workforce preparation and increase public understanding of STEM-oriented issues? And how can you help to ensure that students, educators, parents, and the community are aware of these programs and know how to access them in schools, colleges, and community venues? If you are the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), you take on the huge goal of designing and implementing an innovative STEM education collaboration project that impacts all levels of local education, both inside and outside of school settings. PNNL is one of the 17 national laboratories funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Operated by Battelle, PNNL has a vested interest in preparing the next generation of scientists and engineers for their future careers, thus building a STEM-capable workforce and creating a STEM-literate community. One of Battelle’s core principles is a commitment to STEM education and its role in business competitiveness and quality of life. PNNL has been active in STEM education for decades, providing internships for future scientists, giving educators in-house lab experiences, and engaging its researchers in STEM outreach activities in classrooms and the community. The Collaboratory is a relatively recent outcome of Battelle’s longstanding efforts in STEM education. The original Collaboratory planning documents, developed by PNNL’s Office of STEM Education (OSE), state the objective to “design, implement, and mature a local STEM education collaboration zone that highlights the power of PNNL and Battelle to impact the educational ecosystem and serve as a model for amplifying and accelerating progress in addressing our STEM education and workforce challenges” (PNNL 2013). In other words, we (the OSE) sought to create a zone of collaboration in which members co-design and deliver STEM education programs, share findings and lessons learned from their experiences, and co-manage and sustain the organization. We started by identifying possible collaborators located nearby in the largely rural southeast corner of Washington State. Recognizing that our potential collaborators had differing norms, values, and relationships within the community, as well as their own areas of expertise and purpose, we convened representatives from K–12 public and private schools, higher education, community-based learning providers, and local business and industry to brainstorm a unified vision to resolve gaps in local STEM education needs. Through discussions with these collaborators, we started hunting for gaps where STEM efforts were lacking but a desire to improve existed. We gave ourselves permission to try things out and built a testbed space where we could experiment with new ideas, gather evidence of feasibility, and treat failures as constructive learning opportunities. Through this generative process and with seed funding from Battelle, inter-organizational teams now work together, both virtually and in real time, to develop, test, and deploy resources to support student success, educators’ effectiveness, and community engagement in STEM. Thus, the Mid-Columbia STEM Education Collaboratory (Collaboratory) was born. This is the story of our beginnings: our challenges, our lessons learned, and emerging indicators of success. For those interested in launching an education–business–community STEM learning ecosystem, we share our story.

Collaboratory↗

DOE OSTI2015

Ensuring a Viable Future for the Weapons Laboratories.

As recognized by the Mies-Augustine report (A New Foundation for the Nuclear Enterprise, Report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise, Nov. 2014), any consideration of governance must begin with an understanding of mission. At first glance, the mission of these three laboratories seems obvious: We are national security laboratories with the core mission being our support of nuclear deterrence. This is certainly true. However, there are nuances here that I believe are very important to consider. Furthermore, I suspect that, if I were to ask you what a “national security laboratory” means, I would get a wide variety of answers.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2018

NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division Contribution to LAFE Field Campaign Report

The Land-Atmosphere Feedback Experiment (LAFE) was conducted between 1 and 31 August, 2017 at the Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP) observatory. The main scientific goal of LAFE was to investigate feedbacks occurring between different land surface types and the overlying atmosphere to improve turbulence parameterizations in numerical weather prediction models. LAFE collaborators included scientists from the following institutions: Cleveland State University Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) Leibniz University Institute of Meteorology and Climatology Marquette University NASA Goddard Space Flight Center National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Pacific Northwest National Laboratories (PNNL) University of Hohenheim Institute of Physics and Meteorology University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI). In addition to helping plan the scientific objectives of LAFE, collaborators deployed several lidars (i.e., temperature, water, vapor, and wind) and remote-sensing instruments (e.g., microwave radiometers, atmospheric emitted radiance interferometers [AERIs], etc.) to complement the suite of instrument platforms already present at the SGP site. The measurement platforms, as well as scientific objectives of LAFE, are summarized in Wulfmeyer et al. (2018). To complement these platforms, the NOAA Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division (ATDD) installed micrometeorological towers to continuously measure fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, latent heat, and CO 2 at 2 m and 10 m above ground level (AGL) at three sites during LAFE. Tower measurements also included temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, pressure, rainfall, soil temperature, and soil moisture. The three micrometeorological towers were installed between 9 and 13 July, 2017 and were removed between 12 and 14 September, 2017. During the experiment, the footprint of Tower 1 included a mixture of soybean and grassland that transitioned to mature soybean crop during the second half of the experiment. Tower 2’s footprint encompassed a field of grazed pasture, and Tower 3’s footprint was a mature soybean crop. The meteorological and flux measurements from these towers were/are being used to: Increase the spatial density of measurement platforms that were already available at the ARM facility and that were deployed during LAFE Improve the characterization of surface fluxes around the SGP site Explore the validity of applying Monin-Obukhov Similarity Theory (MOST) over different land surface types and improve knowledge of flux-gradient relationships Provide initial conditions and be used for verification for large-eddy simulations (LES) Evaluate numerical weather prediction models, e.g., the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR), to identify and correct for biases within these models Evaluate the role of low-level advection at each site, which would be present in the flux-divergence data sets obtained from the three towers.

Southern Great Plains, unmanned aerial systems, su↗

DOE OSTI2016

Idaho National Laboratory Radioisotope Power Systems Nuclear Operations: Readiness Assessments Supporting a Nuclear-enabled NASA Mission

Idaho National Laboratory Radioisotope Power Systems Nuclear Operations: Preparations, Documentation, Readiness Assessments and Conduct of Operations Supporting a Nuclear-enabled NASA Mission Kelly L. Lively, Eric S. Clarke, Robert P. Gomez Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 208-533-7388; Kelly.Lively@inl.gov Abstract. The Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program, located at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is responsible for assembling, testing, and delivering plutonium oxide-fueled RPSs for use in powering missions in remote, harsh environments such as deep space. An informative presentation will be given discussing the preparations, documents, readiness assessments, human capital and conduct of operations involved in performing nuclear operations to support providing these systems to end users for the Department of Energy (DOE). DOE is the start-up authority for performing nuclear operations. Readiness for start-up is determined through independent assessment against established acceptance criteria to ensure activities can be performed safely and within a well defined nuclear safety envelope. There is also an RPS Program approval element requiring additional readiness review before nuclear operations can begin. The programmatic readiness review is performed to ascertain readiness to proceed with nuclear operations from the perspective of product quality. The assessments and reviews are conducted in series in the following order of progression: Management Self Assessment (MSA), Contractor Readiness Assessment (CRA), DOE Readiness Assessment (DOE RA) and lastly, the Programmatic Production Readiness Review (PRR). The CRA, DOE RA, and PRR requires an independent technical review team. Twelve assessment criteria are reviewed and a selection of the criteria is identified for review on a graded approach. Typically, the assessments/review criteria requires, at a minimum, review of operating instructions to ensure technical safety requirements are adequately identified, review of training records to ensure personnel are adequately trained to perform the specified work scope, personnel are interviewed to determine adequacy of level of knowledge for work scope, and a high-fidelity performance of the operation to ensure the operating instructions and conduct of operations are adequate to perform the work scope. As each assessment/review is conducted a formal report delineating any issues in the form of findings, observations, and noteworthy practices will be issued. Before start-up approval is obtained all issues must be resolved to the satisfaction of the individual teams. Start-up notification is formally communicated by memorandum from DOE. Programmatic approval is documented in a Segmented Readiness Review where vested Program representatives in the RPS community (to include DOE NE 75 and DOE ID representatives) ensure personnel, documentation, and materials are in place to perform the activity. The four assessments/reviews can be completed in a 16-week period of time, provided ample resources and a relatively small work scope is identified. RPS assembly and testing operations to support the Mars 2020 Mission, the next planned space mission using a nuclear power system, will require about of year of assessments/reviews before the nuclear operations are performed. Keywords: INL, Operations, Assessments, DOE

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2018

INL ART TDO AGR-5/6/7 PIE at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Technology Development Office (TDO) is currently supporting a tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel development and qualification program, which includes fuel fabrication, test irradiations, and post-irradiation examination (PIE) and safety testing to assess fuel performance during normal irradiation and under accident conditions. PIE work on fuel from the last in the series of test irradiations, Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-5/6/7, will begin at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in approximately September 2020, but because of the complexity of the experiment preparations for the PIE are going to begin in FY2016. The work scope in this memorandum purchase order (MPO) includes Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) providing project management and technical support to PIE-related activities, providing technical input to the moisture furnace design, providing technical support for development of equipment and techniques for planned PIE evolutions, and contributing general expertise to this effort.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Re-establishment of Light-Weight Radioisotope Heater Unit Platinum-30% Rhodium Alloy Components Production at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

During FY2018 the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program completed re-establishment of capability to produce platinum-30% rhodium (Pt-30Rh) alloy components for the Light Weight Radioisotope Heater Unit (LWRHU) Program. These components were last produced at Mound Laboratory in the mid/late-1990s for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Cassini mission. The LWRHU Pt-30Rh Clad Body Subassembly and component fabrication operations are being performed in the iridium alloy Clad Vent Set (CVS) production area at ORNL. Existing equipment (furnaces, electron beam welders, presses, inspection, etc.) are being utilized along with new equipment (two lathes and laser marker) that were purchased for this work. ORNL purchased and qualified an initial quantity of starting materials (Pt powder, Pt-30Rh foil, sheet, and tubing). Equipment, tooling, and materials were procured/fabricated and qualified. Drawings and specifications were updated/modified/developed to the ORNL RPS Program format. Procedures were developed and qualified. All drawings, specifications, and procedures were reviewed/approved by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) RPS Lead Lab Document Configuration Control Board (DCCB). The dimensional inspection operations and special processes (cleaning, heat treating, sintering, dye penetrant inspection, leak testing, and welding) were successfully qualified and documented. This paper will discuss the process of re-establishing LWRHU production at ORNL to provide for future NASA space exploration science mission needs10.

Veach Jr, Rex↗

DOE OSTI2018

Nondestructive Testing Research and Capabilities at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is a United States Department of Energy (DOE) multipurpose laboratory operated by Battelle Memorial Institute. The laboratory maintains several technical and scientific capabilities to meet the diverse and challenging needs of sponsors. The Applied Physics Group maintains significant capabilities of interest to the nondestructive testing (NDT) community and regularly collaborates with other technical disciplines to form unique teams in response to specific challenges. This article provides a brief overview of the capabilities of the Applied Physics Group and highlights some activities to demonstrate the scope of capabilities that span from applied research aimed at improving existing NDT methods or processes to more fundamental research efforts that are focused on developing tools to facilitate future paradigms of structural condition monitoring and awareness.

Nondestructive Testing, NDE, Nuclear Power, Phased↗

DOE OSTI2020

FY 2021 Idaho National Laboratory Site Sustainability Plan

The mission of the Department of Energy (DOE) is to ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. This FY 2021 Idaho National Laboratory Site Sustainability Plan (SSP) was developed to enable and sustain Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) mission to discover, demonstrate, and secure innovative nuclear solutions, clean energy options, and critical infrastructure. The SSP was developed according to the narrative requirements from the “FY 2021 DOE Site Sustainability Plan Guidance” document issued in August 2020. The SSP contains strategies and activities that will lead to continual energy, water, and waste reductions that move INL toward meeting DOE sustainability goals and requirements. The SSP summarizes energy and available fuel use reporting requirements and references criteria for instituting sustainable design. SSP requirements are integrated into each INL contractor’s Integrated Safety Management System and Environmental Management System (EMS). Finally, the Sustainability Program directives, based on this SSP, are integrated into the INL Annual Laboratory Plan Fiscal Year 2020 (INL/LTD-20-59747), and operations and acquisition systems.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

DOE OSTI2021

Urban Energy Systems: Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

In the coming decades, our planet will witness unprecedented urban population growth in both established and emerging communities. The development and maintenance of urban infrastructures are highly energy-intensive. Urban areas are dictated by complex intersections among physical, engineered, and human dimensions that have significant implications for traffic congestion, emissions, and energy usage. In this chapter, we highlight recent research and development efforts at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), the largest multipurpose science laboratory within the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) national laboratory system, that characterizes the interactions between the human dynamics and critical infrastructures in conjunction with the integration of four distinct components: data, critical infrastructure models, and scalable computation and visualization, all within the context of physical and social systems. Discussions focus on four key topical themes: population and land use, sustainable mobility, the energy-water nexus, and urban resiliency, that are mutually aligned with DOE’s mission and ORNL’s signature science and technology capabilities. Using scalable computing, data visualization, and unique datasets from a variety of sources, the institute fosters innovative interdisciplinary research that integrates ORNL expertise in critical infrastructures including energy, water, transportation, and cyber, and their interactions with the human population.

Bhaduri, Budhu↗

DOE OSTI2021

INL ART AGR-5/6/7 PIE at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

The Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) is currently supporting a tristructural isotropic (TRISO) fuel development and qualification program, which includes fuel fabrication, test irradiations, and post-irradiation examination (PIE) and safety testing to assess fuel performance during normal irradiation and under accident conditions. PIE work on fuel from the last in the series of test irradiations, Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-5/6/7, will begin at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in approximately September 2020, but because of the complexity of the experiment preparations for the PIE are going to begin in FY2016. The work scope in this memorandum purchase order (MPO) includes Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) providing project management and technical support to PIE-related activities, providing technical input to the moisture furnace design, providing technical support for development of equipment and techniques for planned PIE evolutions, and contributing general expertise to this effort.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Sensitivity/Uncertainty Comparison Study: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Results

Various methods and tools have been developed over the years to assist Nuclear Criticality Safety practitioners in determining a safe upper subcritical limit (USL) for an application of interest. The Nuclear Criticality Safety Program has funded a task to compare calculated USL methods developed at three laboratories—Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN)—on a small set of benchmark problems. The purpose of this paper is to present the ORNL results using the Tools for Sensitivity Uncertainty Analysis Methodology Implementation (TSUNAMI) from the SCALE 6.2.3 code suite.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2021

FY 2022 Idaho National Laboratory Site Sustainability Plan

The mission of the Department of Energy (DOE) is to ensure America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. This FY 2022 Idaho National Laboratory Site Sustainability Plan (SSP) was developed to enable and sustain Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) mission to discover, demonstrate, and secure innovative nuclear solutions, clean energy options, and critical infrastructure. DOE Order 436.1, “Departmental Sustainability,” provides requirements and assigns responsibilities for managing sustainability within DOE to ensure that DOE missions are carried out in a sustainable manner, to institute wholesale cultural change to factor sustainability into all DOE decisions, and to ensure DOE achieves sustainability goals. DOE Order 436.1 also requires DOE sites to commit appropriate personnel resources, establish a financing plan that prioritizes the use of life-cycle cost effective private-sector financing, optimize the application of appropriations and budgeted funds, and establish specific performance measures and deliverables designed to achieve the listed requirements. The SSP was developed according to the narrative requirements from the “FY 2022 DOE Site Sustainability Plan Guidance” document issued in September 2021. The SSP contains strategies and activities that will lead to continual energy, water, and waste reductions that move the INL site toward meeting DOE sustainability goals and requirements. The SSP summarizes energy and available fuel use reporting requirements and references criteria for instituting sustainable design. SSP requirements are integrated into each INL site contractor’s Integrated Safety Management System and Environmental Management System (EMS). Finally, the Sustainability Program directives, based on this SSP, are integrated into INL/LTD-21-62463, Annual Laboratory Plan 2021, and operations and acquisition systems.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

DOE OSTI2022

Detailed Laboratory Evaluation of Electric Demand Load Shifting Potential of Controlled Heat Pump Water Heaters

The demand profile management of electric end uses is vital research for utilities and policymakers planning greenhouse gas emission reductions. In this study, detailed laboratory research was conducted on the load shifting potential of 4 grid-connected HPWHs and one electric resistance water heaters (ERWH). The testing applied different CTA-2045 shed and critical peak command designs under three water draw profiles. Highly-controlled laboratory experiments were conducted in Florida. One of the four HPWHs was a prototype incorporating the new CTA-2045-B protocol feature allowing ‘advanced’ load-up above tank setpoint. A three-hour morning (6 – 9 AM) and four-hour evening curtailment (4 – 8 PM) were defined as the shed or critical peak periods reflecting high-value control periods for utility coincident load for system-wide electric demand reductions. Tests were performed under baseline conditions (no load shift) and under varied load-shifting schemes, including load up and advanced load up, ahead of shed and critical peak commands. Data were collected from December 2020 – February 2022 in the laboratory and compared with field experiments in Florida and the Pacific Northwest. Grid-connected HPWHs were found to reduce peak demand by up to 0.47 kW compared to uncontrolled HPWH units, depending on time of day, control scheme, draw profile, and temperature cluster. The load up strategy demonstrated the ability of all units to utilize heat pump mode for extended periods ahead of peak events. Demand reductions for the HPWHs were much larger when compared with the ERWH— up to 1.64 kW with large hot water draws in winter.

Fenaughty, Karen↗

DOE OSTI2023

Maximizing Efficiency and Quality: Leveraging Automated Testing for Laboratory Commissioning

The traditional commissioning process for a building often implements sampling rates to select equipment for functional acceptance testing when large quantities of equipment are present. While this approach is generally effective in identifying wide-spread issues, it has several key shortfalls. (1) It provides a one-time validation of equipment operation in which the standard documentation is a simple checklist of pass/fail questions. (2) It fails to evaluate equipment not included in the sample rate selection. During the construction and commissioning process of the new Research and Innovation Laboratory (RAIL) in Golden, CO, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory team engaged Group14 Engineering to implement a Connected Commissioning process using fault detection and diagnostic software for automated functional acceptance testing. The goal of this presentation will be to highlight the advantages offered by automated functional testing in this critical laboratory setting. These are primarily (1) sampling 100% of BAS-connected equipment during functional testing, (2) testing results backed by data beyond the traditional pass/fail checklist, and (3) an automated test process that can be regularly executed by the building management team for ongoing commissioning throughout the life of the building. The presentation will also cover technical challenges associated with connected commissioning and the important conversations with the key stakeholders that need to occur well before functional acceptance testing in order to successfully implement the automated testing processes.

automated testing↗

DOE OSTI2013

Enhancing the actinide sciences in Europe through hot laboratories networking and pooling: from ACTINET to TALISMAN

Since 2004, Europe supports the strengthening of the European actinides sciences scientific community through the funding of dedicated networks: (i) from 2004 to 2008, the ACTINET6 network of excellence (6. Framework Programme) gathered major laboratories involved in nuclear research and a wide range of academic research organisations and universities with the specific aims of funding and implementing joint research projects to be performed within the network of pooled facilities; (ii) from 2009 to 2013, the ACTINET-I3 integrated infrastructure initiative (I3) supports the cost of access of any academics in the pooled EU hot laboratories. In this continuation, TALISMAN (Trans-national Access to Large Infrastructures for a Safe Management of Actinides) gathers now the main European hot laboratories in actinides sciences in order to promote their opening to academics and universities and strengthen the EU-skills in actinides sciences. Furthermore, a specific focus is set on the development of advanced cutting-edge experimental and spectroscopic capabilities, the combination of state-of-the art experimental with theoretical first-principle methods on a quantum mechanical level and to benefit from the synergy between the different scientific and technical communities. ACTINET-I3 and TALISMAN attach a great importance and promote the Education and Training of the young generation of actinides scientists in the Trans-national access but also by organizing Schools (general Summer Schools or Theoretical User Lab Schools) or by granting students to attend International Conference on actinide sciences. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2015

The Dresden Felsenkeller shallow-underground accelerator laboratory for nuclear astrophysics - Status and first physics program

Favored by the low background in underground laboratories, low-background accelerator-based experiments are an important tool to study nuclear reactions involving stable charged particles. This technique has been used for many years with great success at the 0.4 MV LUNA accelerator in the Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy, protected from cosmic rays by 1400 m of rock. However, the nuclear reactions of helium and carbon burning and the neutron source reactions for the astrophysical s-process require higher beam energies than those available at LUNA. Also the study of solar fusion reactions necessitates new data at higher energies. As a result, in the present NuPECC long range plan for nuclear physics in Europe, the installation of one or more higher-energy underground accelerators is strongly recommended. An intercomparison exercise using the same High-Purity Ge detector at several sites has shown that, with a combination of 45 m rock overburden, as can be found in the Felsenkeller underground site in Dresden, and an active veto against the remaining muon flux, in a typical nuclear astrophysics setup a background level can be achieved that is similar to the deep underground scenario as in the Gran- Sasso underground laboratory, for instance. Recently, a muon background study and geodetic measurements were carried out by the REGARD group. It was estimated that the rock overburden at the place of the future ion accelerator is equivalent to 130 m of water. The maximum muon flux measured was 2.5 m{sup -2} sr{sup -1} s{sup -1}, in the direction of the tunnel entrance. Based on this finding, a used 5 MV pelletron tandem accelerator with 250 μA up-charge current and external sputter ion source has been obtained and transported to Dresden. Work on an additional radio-frequency ion source on the high voltage terminal is in progress and far advanced. The installation of the accelerator in the Felsenkeller is expected for the near future. The status of the project and the planned access possibilities for external users will be reported, together with the instrumentation to be installed and proposals for the first solar physics measurements to be done at this new low-background facility. (authors)

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Commissioning of a GeoMelt Vitrification Plant at the Central Laboratory on the Sellafield Site - 17561

The National Nuclear Laboratory (NNL) and Kurion Veolia (Kurion) have installed a GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV){sup R} radioactive waste treatment system in the Central Laboratory Active Rig Hall at Sellafield. This installation was completed in 2016. GeoMelt incorporates a range of patented and proprietary vitrification processing technologies that are configured in a variety of ways depending on the project and the waste. GeoMelt transforms hazardous chemical and radioactive wastes into an inert vitreous monolith. Hazardous organics are destroyed by pyrolysis and heavy metals and radionuclides are immobilized within the glass matrix where they are not preferentially leached into the environment. GeoMelt IVC produces a durable wasteform for a large variety of input wastes. The batch nature of the process which involves single-use refractory offers a wide range of process benefits over traditional vitrification technologies including: - a wide range of waste chemistries allowing high waste loadings; - compatibility with heterogeneous wastes including wastes with high metal content; - a technological simple solution without stirrers, bubblers, etc.; - No refractory corrosion concerns or melter drain failure scenarios; - Flexibility in glass chemistry and melter/disposal container configuration allows the wasteform to be specifically tailored to the storage or disposal site requirements. As part of the 2016 system commissioning at NNL's Central Laboratory, three demonstration melts were performed, one funded by Sellafield Ltd. and two by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). The first melt processed inactive soil with an inactive caesium tracer. The second melt processed inactive soil with a Cs-137 tracer. The third melt processed active waste soil from a variety of NDA nuclear licensed sites. The work conducted during commissioning was multi-purpose; it successfully demonstrated the benefits that the GeoMelt technology could bring to the UK NDA estate while performing equipment testing/troubleshooting and operator training. A significant benefit of the GeoMelt ICV technology is volume reduction for wastes which would otherwise experience a volume increase if encapsulated. Another benefit is the ability to treat difficult radioactive waste streams not amenable to encapsulation (e.g., reactive and/or organic wastes) with a very low energy consumption. The purpose of the first commissioning melt, Plant Performance Demonstration (PPD)-1, was to operate the GeoMelt system under typical conditions and to perform a post-melt mass balance of the caesium as a surrogate for Cs-137 in order to access retention of caesium in the final glass product. The melt processed a mixture of inactive soil obtained near the Sellafield site (as analogue for contaminated Sellafield soil), additives, and glass frit. An inactive caesium tracer was added to this melt as Cs{sub 2}CO{sub 3}. The purpose of the second commissioning melt, PPD-2, was to operate the GeoMelt system under typical conditions and to perform a post-melt activity balance using a Cs-137 tracer in order to assess retention of Cs-137 in the final glass product. Materials processed were inactive soil, glass frit, additives, and a radioactive caesium tracer (CsCl). The purpose of the third melt, Experiment-1 (EX-1) was to treat active waste and inactive waste simulant, as a demonstration of simultaneous processing of multiple waste streams. EX-1 consisted of processing active soil, Magnox sludge simulant, inactive soil, additives, and frit. The active soil used for this melt was obtained from the Hunterston A, Bradwell, Capenhurst, and Sellafield nuclear licensed sites. Since most soils are high in silica, the concept for this experiment was to use the active soils to provide glass formers while co-processing Magnox sludge simulant which does not contain glass formers. Beyond demonstration of capability areas of focus of this series of demonstrations included processing efficiency (kWh/kg treated) and caesium retention (%). This paper summarizes operations and results of the three melts. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Installing Deep Groundwater Monitoring Wells in a Volcanic Dominated Rift Basin: Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico - 17594

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL, or the Laboratory) is located in northern New Mexico near the west margin of the Espanola Basin. LANL is underlain by a complex basin-fill sequence of alluvial fan deposits, volcanic tuff, basaltic and dacitic lavas, and riverine deposits. On-going environmental remediation and characterization activities have evolved to improve the performance of groundwater monitoring wells, ensuring they yield representative groundwater and core samples. Groundwater occurs as canyon-fill alluvial water, perched intermediate-depth water associated with the basalts and other local-scale perching horizons, and as a regional-scale aquifer that is the main water supply for the area. Anthropogenic contaminants are found in all three groundwater zones. The regional aquifer below LANL is nominally 1000-1400 feet below ground surface (bgs). Monitoring wells at the Laboratory, are therefore, among the deepest routinely installed in the US. Logistical challenges at LANL include steep terrain, widespread cultural sites, and threatened and endangered species habitat restrictions. Additionally, the cost of installing monitoring wells is high because of groundwater depths and the variable drilling techniques that are required to characterize and install wells in a complex geologic environment. A major challenge to the characterization approach at LANL has been to meet sample quality requirements while minimizing drilling costs. In the late 1990's threaded drill-casing was advanced by rotary drilling methods using compressed air as the only circulation fluid. This resulted in relatively low impacts to the geochemical integrity of rock and groundwater samples, but led to frequent episodes of stuck casing. Additional fluids were introduced to the air-rotary program, improving penetration rates, but also resulting in non-representative groundwater samples due to long-term impacts to the aquifer in the vicinity of the well screen. Mud-rotary drilling was incorporated into the program, but it also had significant long-term impacts on groundwater quality, and often inhibited identification of perched groundwater zones and accurate identification of the water table in the regional aquifer. Current drilling practice makes limited use of fluid additives (e.g. foam) to supplement air circulation methods in order to advance drill casing through the vadose zone. Starting about 100 feet above the water table, drill casing is advanced to the target horizon in the regional aquifer using only air and municipal water (when needed) for circulation. Additionally, the threaded drill casing couplings have been replaced with welded connections, significantly reducing the occurrence of stuck casing. Careful observations of water production and water levels during drilling, coupled with the ability to retract casing for video and geophysical logs, now allows for robust characterization of perched groundwater systems and accurate definition of the top of regional saturation. Recent advances in the drilling program include combined dual-rotary/sonic drilling to depths up to 1150 feet and dual-rotary casing advance at angles up to 25 deg. from vertical. The former allows for core collection with minimal fluid addition, thereby preserving pore water chemistry. The latter method allows for well installation into portions of the aquifer otherwise inaccessible due to constraints at the surface (e.g., cultural sites or topography). Similar to the development of drilling techniques, both well design and groundwater sampling system design have evolved throughout the program. Current well design emphasizes a minimal annulus of filter pack, maximum screen slot size based on formation sieve analyses, and thorough well development to mitigate formation damage due to drilling. To sample groundwater at multiple levels in the same well, earlier sampling systems included Westbay{sup R} multi-zone systems and dual-screen single-pump and dual-screen dual-pump systems designed in collaboration with Baski, Inc. These multi-zone sampling systems proved difficult to develop and maintain given the depth to groundwater, and most current well installations are configured with a single screen and a submersible pump. The ability to purge from a well-developed single-screen well has substantially improved the collection of representative groundwater samples. A carefully crafted groundwater characterization program in target aquifers at depths ranging from 1,000 to 1,400 feet bgs within a complex geologic setting, while also retaining the ability to collect representative core and groundwater samples, may have application at a number of sites throughout the environmental industry. Optimizing each well to meet program objectives while reducing total project costs benefits all environmental investigations. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗