Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “spallation neutron source”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Shielding development for the spallation neutron source VENUS instrument

VENUS is a neutron imaging instrument that will use a broad range of neutron wavelengths, from epithermal to cold energies, and will include enhanced contrast mechanisms. It will offer novel energy-selective imaging techniques directly connecting complex engineering materials and systems’ structures, properties, and functions to reveal practical and fundamental answers about their real-world performance. Here, the instrument will be built at SNS beamline 10, facing the decoupled poisoned hydrogen moderator. The driving cost for the instrument is the beamline and instrument cave shielding. Final analyses were performed to evaluate the thickness and composition of shielding materials for the instrument cave and beamline to meet radiation safety criteria for the instrument to start up in 2024 after completing the SNS proton power upgrade.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Machine learning at the Spallation Neutron Source accelerator and target

We describe the ongoing efforts to apply Machine Learning techniques to improve the performance of our accelerator and target. Specially, we are looking to minimize halo beam losses in the absence of a proper physics model, automatically detect and log anomalies in the target support systems such as cooling, and detect and prevent errant beam pulses in the linac. We also describe the infrastructure we use to acquire and stream data to the GPU cluster for training, our code development cycle, and edge computing for model inference. To minimize halo beam losses, we use a Reinforcement Learning technique tested on a virtual accelerator. The target anomaly detection is trained on archived data using incomplete physics models and is made part of the existing target reporting system. The errant beam prevention analyzes beam current and beam phase waveforms as well as accelerator configuration data to predict errant pulses. We also develop continual learning to adapt to changes in the accelerator.

Accelerator Physics↗

First Experiments: New Science Opportunities at the Spallation Neutron Source Second Target Station (abridged)

This brochure is an abridged version of a more comprehensive companion report. DOE proposes to build a Second Target Station (STS) at SNS to produce beams of cold neutrons with world-leading peak brightness at a repetition rate of 15 Hz, providing broad energy/wavelength ranges that can be used simultaneously. Construction of the STS will provide transformative capabilities that allow thousands of users from national laboratories, universities, and industry to address grand scientific challenges [Hemminger 2015], advance energy research, and accelerate industrial innovations through the combination of cold (long-wavelength) neutrons of unprecedented peak brightness and short neutron pulses with broad ranges of usable wavelengths or energy. The STS Project, now in progress at ORNL, will design, construct, install, and commission the facilities and equipment needed to create a world-leading source of cold neutrons of unprecedented peak brightness at SNS. Key aspects of the STS design, including preliminary descriptions of an illustrative suite of eight instruments, are presented in the section “The STS at SNS.” The capabilities offered by the STS instruments (22 when fully built out) will complement those of the FTS and HFIR, providing the United States with unparalleled resources for neutron scattering at the world’s leading high–peak brightness cold neutron source.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Actinides and Neutron Scattering at the Spallation Neutron Source and High Flux Isotope Reactor

The importance of actinides for science, technology, and medicine is widely recognized and does not require a lengthy introduction. However, the fundamental understanding of actinides and their chemical and physical properties lags behind the knowledge of most other elements in the periodic table. Most actinides (89 ≤ Z ≤ 103) are man-made and were produced in particle accelerators or nuclear reactors in the second half of the 20th century. Although trends in bonding and electronic structure are well characterized and documented across the periodic table, fundamental questions remain regarding the chemistry and physics of the actinides. This lack of knowledge is largely because most isotopes of actinides are intensely radioactive, which greatly increases the difficultly in handling them.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Spallation Neutron Source Proton Power Upgrade (PPU) Project: Lessons Learned for CD-4

The SNS PPU project goals were to design, build, install and test the equipment necessary to double the accelerator power from 1.4 MW to 2.8 MW and to deliver a 2.0 MW qualified target. PPU also included the provision of a stub-out in the SNS accumulator-ring-to-target tunnel to facilitate a rapid connection to a new proton beamline for the Second Target Station (STS) project. The power capability was doubled by increasing the proton beam energy by 33% and the peak beam current by 50%, relative to pre-PPU accelerator performance. The project also included modifications to some buildings and services. The PPU project accomplished the energy upgrade by fabricating and installing new superconducting radiofrequency (RF) cryomodules, with supporting RF equipment, in the existing linac tunnel and klystron gallery, respectively. The High Voltage Converter Modulators (HVCM) and klystrons for some of the existing installed RF equipment were upgraded to handle the higher beam current. The increased beam power of 2 MW on the First Target Station (FTS) was enabled by the addition of a new high-volume gas injection system for pressure pulse and cavitation mitigation in the mercury target and a redesigned mercury target vessel.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

Overview of Shielding Analyses at Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Spallation Neutron Source Second Target Station

The Neutronics Group of the Second Target Station project at Oak Ridge National Laboratory is responsible for all neutronics analyses related to design and construction. This paper provides an overview of four neutronics analyses performed for the Second Target Station project, which is representative of all the ongoing work but especially tasks related to shielding. These analyses extend from the proton accelerator through the target monolith and bunker to the end of a neutron beamline. Each example highlights the tools and methods the Neutronics Group uses for analysis. The primary tool is the Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNP 6.2, but this is augmented by other codes that supplement the input of MCNP. The other codes specifically highlighted in this paper include Attila4MC, ADVANTG, and AARE.

Miller, Thomas↗

The ORNL Moderator Test Station Science Case

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosts two world-leading slow neutron sources, the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), and is currently developing the technical design for a Second Target Station (STS) for the SNS. Upon completion of the STS project, ORNL will be uniquely positioned to optimize each of its three neutron sources, the SNS First Target Station (FTS), the STS, and HFIR, in a complementary way. Among the essential aspects of a re-imagined FTS and the current STS design are high-brightness parahydrogen moderators—moderators which are optimized for high per-unit-area neutron brightness rather than integrated-across-large-area neutron intensity. The high-brightness moderators proposed for the STS will, for the brightness metric, significantly outperform the coupled moderators currently on the FTS for appropriately optimized neutron beamlines, provided the moderating hydrogen is converted to near-equilibrium levels of parahydrogen (approximately 99.8% at 20 K). The original FTS moderators, by contrast, were conservatively designed to be relatively insensitive to the exact ortho:para ratio, with a consequent loss in performance. As a result, a redesign of the FTS moderators assuming fully converted parahydrogen could result in significant performance improvements on the FTS coupled moderators, and more consistent performance over time for all hydrogen moderators. This “parahydrogen problem” is a long-standing challenge for the effective implementation of hydrogen cold moderators at high-power neutron sources. In addition, the development of new moderator concepts, whether based on previously unused materials, structured heterogeneous arrays, or even simply on changes in overall shape and size is significantly restricted at a large-scale production facility intended to use the resulting neutron beams. Accordingly, moderators for production neutron sources are often designed in a very conservative, low-risk fashion, even though this compromises the absolute neutronic performance. Advanced moderator concepts worthy of study include features that could not be tested without redesigning and redeploying the entire existing reflector, shielding, and neutron beamline installation, making such development efforts far more expensive than building a stand-alone test facility.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

A Moderator Test Station at ORNL

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosts two world-leading slow neutron sources, the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) and the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), and is currently developing the technical design for a Second Target Station (STS) for the SNS. Upon completion of the STS project, ORNL will be uniquely positioned to optimize each of its three neutron sources, the SNS First Target Station (FTS), the STS, and HFIR, in a complementary way. Among the essential aspects of a reimagined FTS and the current STS concept are high-brightness parahydrogen moderators—moderators which are optimized for high per-unit-area neutron brightness rather than integrated-across-large-area neutron intensity. The high-brightness moderators proposed for the STS will significantly outperform the coupled moderators currently on the FTS for appropriately optimized neutron beamlines, provided the moderating hydrogen is converted to near-equilibrium levels of parahydrogen (approximately 99.8% at 20 K). The original FTS moderators, by contrast, were conservatively designed to be relatively insensitive to the exact ortho:para ratio, with a consequent loss in performance. As a result, a redesign of the FTS moderators assuming fully converted parahydrogen could result in significant performance improvements on the FTS coupled moderators, and more consistent performance over time for all hydrogen moderators. This “parahydrogen problem” is a long-standing challenge for the effective implementation of hydrogen cold moderators at high-power neutron sources. In addition, the development of new moderator concepts, whether based on previously unused materials, structured heterogeneous arrays, or even simply on changes in overall shape and size is significantly restricted at a large-scale production facility intended to use the neutron beams so produced. Accordingly, moderators for production neutron sources are often designed in a very conservative, low-risk fashion, even though this compromises the absolute neutronic performance. Advanced moderator concepts worthy of study include features that could not be tested without redesigning and redeploying the entire existing reflector, shielding, and neutron beamline installation, making such development efforts far more expensive than building a stand-alone test facility. We propose a Moderator Test Station (MTS) at the SNS with which we will verify such performance gains and test new moderator concepts. These concepts include both high-brightness and large-volume parahydrogen moderators, as well as moderators with tailored ortho:para hydrogen levels, heterogeneous moderator concepts such as the convoluted moderator or pelletized moderators, and moderators made of materials like ammonia, ethane, and oxygen clathrates, which have not been widely tested let alone deployed at neutron source facilities.

42 ENGINEERING↗