Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “process flowsheets”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

A Novel Approach to Modeling Biomass Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor

A novel approach to simulating biomass pyrolysis in a fluidized bed of mostly inert material is presented. The bed is assumed to be externally heated, although simulation of autothermal operation with partial oxidation of the products is a future objective. Combining pyrolysis reaction kinetics developed by the CRECK Modeling Group and a previously published component properties model, material and energy balances are closed by tracking the residence time of biomass particles without regard for their exact spatial distribution. The model is used to simulate a pilot-scale fluidized bed pyrolysis process being developed at Iowa State University, and model predictions are compared with experimental results for red oak and corn stover feedstocks. The results are in general agreement, with the model typically predicting more noncondensable gas and less low-boiling liquid products. The differences are ascribed to the limitations of the kinetics model. This model provides a rigorous energy balance for fluidized bed pyrolysis processes that can be incorporated into commercial flowsheet models with the capacity for future addition of partial oxidation reactions and implementation of improved kinetics models.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Recovery of Rare Earth Elements (REEs) from Coal Mine Drainage, Phase 2

Phase 1 research identified a two-step refining train, acid leaching of AMD precipitate feed followed by solvent extraction (SX), to produce a 2% TREE product. For the Phase 2 bench scale system, the objective was to get the acid leaching step to operate in batch-mode with sufficient storage capacity to feed an aqueous, enriched REE liquor to a pilot SX plant operating in continuous-mode at a feed rate capable of producing 3 g/hr 2% TREE. Important process variables included feed rate, extractant makeup, flowsheet configuration, and stripping conditions. Operating parameters were optimized through a feedback-capable SCADA system configured for the SX bench scale plant. These conditions were met and exceeded. TREE grades approaching 90% were produced while our Techno-Economic Assessment indicated highly favorable economic returns. The project led to the design of a pilot facility for producing roughly 500 kg/TREE/year. That plant is now in the procurement stage with constructed expected to begin in late 2020.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Recovery of Rare Earth Elements (REEs) from Coal Mine Drainage, Phase 2

Phase 1 research identified a two-step refining train, acid leaching of AMD precipitate feed followed by solvent extraction (SX), to produce a 2% TREE product. For the Phase 2 bench scale system, the objective was to get the acid leaching step to operate in batch-mode with sufficient storage capacity to feed an aqueous, enriched REE liquor to a pilot SX plant operating in continuous-mode at a feed rate capable of producing 3 g/hr 2% TREE. Important process variables included feed rate, extractant makeup, flowsheet configuration, and stripping conditions. Operating parameters were optimized through a feedback-capable SCADA system configured for the SX bench scale plant. These conditions were met and exceeded. TREE grades approaching 90% were produced while our Techno-Economic Assessment indicated highly favorable economic returns. The project led to the design of a pilot facility for producing roughly 500 kg/TREE/year. That plant is now in the procurement stage with constructed expected to begin in late 2020.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Increased Fissile Loading Flowsheet Review

A request was made by H-Canyon Process Engineering to assess the impact of blending dissolved, neutralized Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) with future sludge batches and their impact on downstream processing facilities including the Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities (CSTF), the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), Saltstone, and the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). The purpose of this change is to accelerate the deinventory of SNF which is currently stored in the L-Area Disassembly Basin. The addition of SNF increases the mass of fissiles in each future sludge batch, due to their high enrichment. This high enrichment has the potential to complicate the programs to eliminate criticality events in the downstream processing facilities and will increase the number of canisters produced by DWPF because of the SNF mass increase. A separate report addressed the impacts to glass. The review and subsequent calculations were based on average predicted compositions of Accelerated Basin Deinventory (ABD) slurry, average compositions for predicted future sludge batches, average past salt batches and average past recycle batches to predict the feeds that will be processed in SWPF, DWPF, Saltstone, the 2H evaporator and ETF. Each of the processes was evaluated for potential issues.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Increased Fissile Loading Flowsheet Review

A request was made by H-Canyon Process Engineering to assess the impact of blending dissolved, neutralized Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) with future sludge batches and their impact on downstream processing facilities. The purpose of this change is to accelerate the deinventory of SNF which is currently stored in the L-Area Disassembly Basin.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Analysis of the Sludge Batch 9 (Macrobatch 11) DWPF Pour Stream Glass Sample

A pour stream (PS) sample taken near the end of processing of Sludge Batch 9 (SB9, Macrobatch 11) with the Nitric-Formic Acid Flowsheet was analyzed by the Savannah River National Laboratory to comply with the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Glass Product Control Program. The SB9 PS sample was taken on 5/28/2022 during Melter Feed Batch 815 associated with glass canister S04741, and was transferred to SRNL in Primary Container PC0136.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Low Purge and Mercury Recovery Testing with Sludge Batch 10 Tank 40 Simulant

Researchers at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) have completed testing as requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to perform experiments to determine the impact of using a lower or inert purge in Sludge Batch (SB) 10 processing under the Nitric-Glycolic Acid (NGA) flowsheet. A key objective of this testing was also to determine the mercury speciation and recovery during each experiment. The testing was performed as part of the SB10 Technical Task Request (TTR) and Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). Two sets of tests were performed, and a Run Plan was approved prior to each set of experiments to document the planned testing. Three initial experiments were completed to determine whether a low air purge would be beneficial to CPC processing at higher acid stoichiometry (110%) based on the Koopman minimum acid (KMA) equation (116% Hsu). One of the tests, an inert nitrogen purge experiment, was also completed to demonstrate that excluding oxygen did not introduce any new hazards. The experiments were designed to be identical except for the change in purge gas and purge flowrate from run to run. After reviewing the results from the initial three experiments, six additional tests were proposed by SRNL to support the lower purge study and to look for processing alternatives for improving mercury recovery. These additional six tests were all completed at a very low acid stoichiometry to mimic the pH experienced during processing in DWPF (~7). DWPF is processing SB10 sludge at an acid stoichiometry of 90% based on the Hsu equation. The additional SRNL experiments were performed at an acid stoichiometry of 62.5% KMA stoichiometry (66.3% Hsu) to produce a Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) product with a pH of about 7. All experiments used simulants of both SWPF streams, although no entrained solvent was added during any of the experiments

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Solubility Testing to Support the Addition of Sodium Reactor Experiment Material to Sludge Batch 10

The Savannah River Site H-Canyon Facility is planning to discard dissolved Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material into Tank 51 prior to Sludge Batch 10 (SB10). SB10 with the SRE material will be processed in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) using the Nitric-Glycolic Acid (NGA) flowsheet. The DWPF Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluation (NCSE) protects a 14:1 mass ratio of manganese to equivalent uranium-235 in both the solid and liquid phases during processing by requiring a 70:1 mass ratio in the feed. A concern was raised that freshly precipitated manganese in the SRE material will behave differently from the manganese in sludge during DWPF processing and potentially invalidate the criticality control. To mitigate risks to the DWPF criticality controls, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed a metals solubility test applicable to recently precipitated manganese and uranium, as would be expected with SRE transfers to SB10. The objective of this analysis is the tracking of partitioning of the primary fissile component (uranium-235) with the credited poison (manganese) between the aqueous and insoluble phases.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

System Configuration Evaluation for Process Settling of Hanford Waste Solid Particles

Direct Feed High-Level Waste (DFHLW) is a potential flowsheet operations approach to initiating high-level waste (HLW) vitrification prior to completion of the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Pretreatment Facility. A settle/decant process has been proposed to concentrate solids prior to delivery to the WTP HLW Facility during DFHLW operations, wherein the solids in a settled layer would be remixed with the supernatant liquid remaining after decanting operations to provide the feed at required solids concentrations. Settling would be used in lieu of purpose-built filtration or other solids separation equipment. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is providing baseline technical support to the Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) Flowsheet Integration group. To support planning for DFHLW, WRPS previously requested that PNNL evaluate the current data set available to predict the time needed for HLW solids to settle and the solids concentration and strength of that settled layer, to identify gaps in the understanding and predictive capability of HLW solids waste settling times, and to provide scoping estimates of the potential settling times. Eight technical gaps were identified for predicting settling times and characteristics of the formed sediment layers. In addition to the data gaps, an overarching observation was made that there is significant variation in behavior of settling rate and settled layer data. The settling time required to concentrate solids via a settle/decant process was determined from the limited data to have a difference of potentially more than a factor of 5,000 in the estimated settling times, varying from 0.2 to 1,060 days for example depending on process vessel depth and final sediment solids concentration. In contrast, successful processes of liquid-forward output streams resulting from in-tank settling and decanting forward liquid have been reported for operations conducted at the Hanford Site. The purpose of this current report is to further support DFHLW planning by evaluating double-shell tank (DST) and alternate vessel equipment and operational configurations to enable optimization of the settle/decant process to concentrate solids. Hanford waste processing behavior specific to liquid feed availability following a slurry transfer in a DST is summarized, including process stream characteristics and process equipment configurations. The performance of DST process equipment configurations is evaluated for possible improvements using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and simple analytical models. Potential new vessel design(s) specific to enabling effective settle/decant processes, and cursory summary of other separate and inline solids separations processes, are also provided. The CFD results indicated that improvement in outflow solids concentration was promoted by a reduction in the slurry flow rate, angling the distributor nozzles downward, and lifting the transfer pump. The solid-liquid analysis evaluating particle trajectory confirmed that the potential for particle ingestion (in the transfer pump) was decreased with increased radial separation between the inlet and outlet (transfer pump inlet), decreased inlet flow, and decreased liquid density and viscosity for a neutrally buoyant inlet flow. An assessment was also made of the potential for inflow configuration changes to result in the discrete mounding or piling of solids within the tank. Based on the characterization of the settled waste to date, HLW sediments will be unlikely to sustain a substantial angle of repose to facilitate significant variations in the elevation of the settled solids.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Evaluation of Thermolytic Production of Hydrogen from Glycolate and Common Tank Farm Organics in Simulated Waste

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has performed testing to investigate the thermolytic production of hydrogen gas from organic species present in the Savannah River Site (SRS) Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF). SRNL designed an experimental apparatus to measure the timedependent concentration of hydrogen in the headspace over a reacting mixture of simulated caustic waste media and organic compounds as well as a methodology to calculate a steady-state hydrogen generation rate (HGR) from this data. Special focus was given to glycolate, which is not currently present in CSTF waste but will be contained in the recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) under the upcoming alternate reductant flowsheet.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

FY24 Task 4: Studies of Phosphate and Fluoride Solubility for Dissolution of High Phosphate Tank Waste

Knowledge gaps have been identified in phosphate solubility in almost every single- and multi-component system, and particularly for aluminate in phosphate/hydroxide, where uncertainties in predicted values of aluminum solubility are greater than 50%. Solubility data of multicomponent, aqueous electrolytes containing sodium hydroxide, sodium fluoride, sodium phosphate, sodium nitrite, sodium nitrate, and dissolved gibbsite are also sparse. For example, for solutions of (i) sodium nitrate and sodium phosphate, data are only available at 30 and 50 °C, and for (ii) dissolved gibbsite in sodium hydroxide and sodium phosphate, only two data points are available at 20 and 40 °C. There is no data available on mixtures of sodium hydroxide, sodium phosphate, sodium fluoride, and dissolved gibbsite. These knowledge gaps were identified in a technical review of waste solubility data and the impact of dilution on solution stabilities and will be addressed in this work to predict aluminum hydroxide and sodium phosphate solubility in multicomponent electrolytes upon dilution, and upon variation of temperature. Results will provide the technical basis to develop accurate models for (i) gibbsite solubility and mass transfer of aluminum between solid and liquid forms following the sluicing of sludge and saltcake with water; and (ii) further blending of these suspensions with bismuth from bismuth phosphate waste, and zirconium and uranium left from the fuel decladding. This work will be essential to developing a disposition path for retrieval solutions from bismuth phosphate wastes. This effort would also support sludge washing to further reduce phosphate concentration if that process were to be added back to the flowsheet in the future.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DISSOLUTION OF SURROGATE U-Zr FUEL USING ALNIFLEX CONDITIONS

Non-aluminum clad spent nuclear fuel (NASNF) stored in L Basin at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is widely varied in fuel composition, design, packaging, and physical condition. The complexity of the NASNF inventory presents significant challenges, and technology development is necessary for successful disposition. One such fuel in the inventory is metallic uranium-zirconium (U-Zr) alloy fuel, the focus of this study. Electrolytic or nitric acid only dissolution of metallic U-Zr alloy can form insoluble zirconium oxide, which results in up to 52% loss of U to insoluble solids, and can be subject to potentially uncontrolled oxidation reactions [1, 2]. The AlNiflex process was determined to be a viable dissolution flowsheet for the U-Zr alloy fuel. Under a narrow set of solution concentrations, a combination of hydrofluoric acid (HF), nitric acid (HNO3), aluminum nitrate (Al(NO3)3), and hexavalent chromium can safely dissolve U-Zr intermetallic alloys, keep Zr soluble, and not significantly corrode stainless steel (SS) vessels [3, 4.

Gogolski, Jarrod M. [Savannah River National Labor↗

Studies on the Vitrification Potential of High Risk Spent Nuclear Fuels

This research explored vitrification of U-Zr nuclear fuel that exhibits an explosion hazard when processed by common nitric acid dissolution. Glass frits were chosen based on properties that had been previously measured as well as being demonstrated successfully in production at the Defense Waste Process Facility (DWPF). Zirconium and Aluminum metal powders were chosen to represent the spent fuels after literature demonstrated that the potential phase that causes the issue for explosive reaction in the effluent stream is tied to the Zirconium-III phase field. DSC measurements were carried out on various simulants and waste forms to better understand thermal behavior of these materials. Zirconium (Zr) was tested with both nitric acid and the new effluent flowsheet that is under development by the SRNL Chemical Process Control (CPC) group. The nitric acid test did show the expected exothermic behavior as well as how the behavior is affected by particle size of the powders used. In contrast, the effluent samples did not show an exothermic peak. However, the concentration of metal in the samples was orders of magnitude lower than in the nitric acid testing and further testing of the effect of concentration on the exothermicity that could be measured confirmed a dampened signal. Tests were run that included frit, both DWPF Frit 510 and Iron Phosphate frit, exhibiting complex curves that included multiple endothermic and exothermic peaks during heating and cooling. The final crucible samples appear similarly to the bulk glasses pointing to these peaks being a part of the dissolution of the simulant into the base glasses.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

CoDCon Project (Final Report)

The co-decontamination (CoDCon) project was established in FY 2016 with the objectives of (a) evaluating the uncertainty in the uranium (U)/plutonium (Pu) ratio in a mixed U/Pu product from a tributyl phosphate (TBP)–based solvent extraction flowsheet, and (b) developing and demonstrating on-line optical spectroscopy for real-time monitoring of key components (e.g., Pu, U, and HNO 3 concentrations) in the process solutions. We were interested in assessing the accuracy and precision to which a specific uranium-to-plutonium (U/Pu) ratio can be achieved, which for the purposes of this project was set at a U/Pu mass ratio of 7/3. The uncertainty associated with achieving this specific target U/Pu ratio was investigated during five flowsheet tests using laboratory-scale solvent extraction equipment. In addition, optical spectroscopic techniques were incorporated into the CoDCon solvent extraction testing system, allowing real time monitoring of all input and output process streams. Two CoDCon flowsheet tests were performed in FY 2018 using a simple dissolved fuel simulant containing only U (~1 M) and Pu (~15 mM) in nitric acid (HNO 3 ; ~3 M). In FY 2019, two additional flowsheet tests were performed. For the first of these (CoDCon Run 3), the dissolved fuel simulant was similar to that used in the first two tests, with the inclusion of 1 mM neptunium (Np). The second test conducted in FY 2019 (CoDCon Run 4) used a more representative dissolved fuel simulant, including addition of non-radioactive fission product elements. A fifth CoDCon flowsheet test (CoDCon Run 5) was conducted in FY 2020, with the following additional objectives: (1) routing of the technetium (Tc) in the simulated dissolved fuel solution to the solvent extraction raffinate, and (2) routing of the Np in the simulated dissolved fuel solution to the U/Pu product. All tests used a bank of sixteen 2 cm centrifugal contactors. The tests involved first loading the solvent (30 vol% TBP dissolved in n-dodecane) with U and Pu (and Np, for Run 5), then the Pu (and Np) was stripped from the loaded solvent with a U(IV) solution (~50 mM) and the flowsheet conditions were adjusted such that some U partitioned into the Pu-containing product stream. The amount of U accompanying the Pu was monitored in real time using optical spectroscopic techniques coupled with chemometric modeling. Based on the real-time spectroscopic measurement of the U/Pu ratio, adjustments were made to the flowrate of the fresh TBP solvent phase used to scrub U from the aqueous Pu-containing product. This proved to be a very effective way to control the U/Pu mass ratio in the product. This report presents the results of the CoDCon Run 5 test. The flowsheet tested in Run 5 was substantially different than that run in the prior tests, especially the solvent loading section of the flowsheet. Two key changes were made. First, based on the objective to extract all the Np and route it with the U/Pu product, pentavalent vanadium [V(V)] was added to the feed and scrub solutions. The purpose of the V(V) was to convert all the Np to the +6 oxidation state, which is extractable by TBP. Second, a high acid (8 M HNO 3 ) scrub was added to the flowsheet to scrub the Tc from the solvent. This was followed by a low acid scrub (0.05 M HNO 3 ) to reduce the residual HNO 3 concentration in the solvent prior to the Pu stripping step. The output from the low acid scrub was collected separately, rather than routing towards the raffinate. The modifications to the solvent loading part of the flowsheet were only partially successful. The treatment with V(V) was effective at converting the Np to Np(VI). Only 1.3% of the Np remained in the raffinate solution. However, ~40% of the Np stripped out of the solvent in the low acid scrub step; nearly 20% of the Pu also was stripped from the solvent during the low acid scrub. For further development, either modifications to the flowsheet, or concentration and recycle of the low acid stream into the

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Flowsheet Development for the University of Tokyo YAYOI (UTY) Fuel

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by H-Canyon Engineering to determine the flowsheet parameters needed to dissolve and store the YAYOI Material Test Reactor (MTR) uranium fuel safely and efficiently. In response to this request, a literature review of existing SRNL MTR dissolution flowsheets and general fuel dissolution literature in the nuclear fuel processing industry was performed to evaluate chemical dissolution parameters required to dissolve the YAYOI fuel and the tin-plated carbon steel product cans (PC). Based on past dissolutions of similar fuel in the H-Canyon and open literature reviews on chemical dissolution of spent nuclear fuel (SNF), the following conclusions and flowsheet recommendations were made.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Process Systems Engineering-Informed Design and Scale-Up of Multi-stage Diafiltration Cascades for Lithium and Cobalt Recovery from Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries

These slides present work jointly completed by Tasks in PrOMMiS. The first half of the presentation motivates the importance of critical materials for national security and how the recovery of critical minerals via membrane separations can be more cost effective than currently used technology. The second half of the presentation presents cost-optimal results for the custom cost model for diafiltration using the superstructure flowsheet developed by CMU. These results highlight how PSE can inform process targets (i.e., product purity targets) and suitable design strategies for scaled-up membrane cascades.

critical materials↗

Impact of gel concentration on filter fluxes in microfiltration of Hanford tank wastes and simulants

Abstract Treatment processes have been proposed that will utilize crossflow filtration to concentrate sludge waste streams at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site. Challenges associated with solid–liquid separation of the waste streams drive a necessary evaluation of available Hanford high level waste (HLW) filtration data. Limiting flux conditions during crossflow filtration are elucidated with the formation of a cake layer on the membrane surface. A mass transfer coefficient between the gel and bulk concentrations plays a critical role in determining filter flux. A correlation between the gel concentration and mass transfer coefficient is made to assist in determining filter performance of select HLW streams. As a process alternative to crossflow filtration, gravity settling of waste streams may be deployed as a solid–liquid separation technique. However, this results in a contrasting performance with the centrifuged solids concentration. A method was developed to estimate expected filtration and settling performance based on physical characterization data for Hanford tank waste samples. By assessing the estimated processing performance of HLW, technical support can be provided during flowsheet planning.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

SRNL Sludge Batch 10 Qualification SRAT and SME Off-Gas Results

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) completed a small-scale demonstration of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Chemical Process Cell (CPC) utilizing the nitric-glycolic acid (NGA) flowsheet to support Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) qualification. The demonstration utilized a Tank 51 slurry sample washed by SRNL (with added H-canyon material). The purpose of this document is to report the observed off-gas results from the demonstration. With the NGA flowsheet, DWPF has a CPC hydrogen generation limit of 2.4×10 -2 lb/h. The peak observed rate was nearly 90 times less than that limit during SRNL testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗