Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “microfluidic cell”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

75 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Electrolytic Oxygen Recovery System for Advanced Life Support

The oxygen (O2) recovery system for the International Space Station (ISS) can recover approximately 50 percent of O2 from metabolic carbon dioxide (CO2). Increasing the O2 recovery rate and closing the open loop for future long duration crewed missions in space beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is essential. There are several developmental efforts underway to increase the recovery rate. However, most of these technologies result in a complex, heavy, and power consuming system. The desired exploration O2 recovery system would be reliable and efficient with maximum O2 recovery. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) is currently investigating an electrolytic O2 recovery approach that will increase the O2 recovery to greater than 70 percent as well as lowering the complexity, mass, and power consumption than most other technologies currently under development. The electrolytic O2 recovery system consists of a Microfluidic Electrochemical Reactor (MFECR) that is based on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to O2 and ethylene (C2H4) using water (H2O) as precursor and operates at standard condition with a theoretical recovery rate of 73 percent. In 2016, NASA’s Game Changing Development Program awarded the University of Texas Arlington (UTA) a grant to initiate the development of the MFECR. Since 2019, MSFC and UTA have been collaborating with the current goals of increasing the O2 recovery efficiency, advancing the technology readiness to a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 4, and maturing the system to process CO2 of one crew-member. Based on the results from UTA’s initial efforts, the following were identified as key areas of improvement in order to maximize O2 recovery for the system: further development of the anode material and cathode catalyst, model-based cell design optimization, and the addition of a separation system and fuel cell. This paper will present the current developmental efforts of the electrolytic system including MFECR design and overall system enhancements as well as results from single cell stack testing.

Brittany R Brown↗
NASA NTRS2016

Instrumentation for Examining Microbial Response to Changes In Environmental Pressures

The Automated Adaptive Directed Evolution Chamber (AADEC) is a device that allows operators to generate a micro-scale analog of real world systems that can be used to model the local-scale effects of climate change on microbial ecosystems. The AADEC uses an artificial environment to expose cultures of micro-organisms to environmental pressures, such as UV-C radiation, chemical toxins, and temperature. The AADEC autonomously exposes micro-organisms to selection pressures. This improves upon standard manual laboratory techniques: the process can take place over a longer period of time, involve more stressors, implement real-time adjustments based on the state of the population, and minimize the risk of contamination. We currently use UV-C radiation as the main selection pressure, UV-C is well studied both for its cell and DNA damaging effects as a type of selection pressure and for its related effectiveness as a mutagen; having these functions united makes it a good choice for a proof of concept. The AADEC roadmap includes expansion to different selection pressures, including heavy metal toxicity, temperature, and other forms of radiation.The AADEC uses closed-loop control to feedback the current state of the culture to the AADEC controller that modifies selection pressure intensity during experimentation, in this case culture density and growth rate. Culture density and growth rate are determined by measuring the optical density of the culture using 600 nm light. An array of 600 nm LEDs illuminate the culture and photodiodes are used to measure the shadow on the opposite side of the chamber.Previous experiments showed that we can produce a million fold increase to UV-C radiation over seven iterations. The most recent implements a microfluidic system that can expose cultures to multiple different selection pressures, perform non-survival based selection, and autonomously perform hundreds of exposure cycles. A scalable pump system gives the ability to pump in various different growth media to individual cultures and introduce chemical toxins during experimentation; AADEC can perform freeze and thaw cycles. We improved our baseline characterization by building a custom UV-C exposure hood, a shutter operates on a preset timer allowing the user to set exposure intensity consistently for multiple iterations.

Environment↗
NASA NTRS2015

Formation and Control of Fluidic Species

This invention generally relates to systems and methods for the formation and/or control of fluidic species, and articles produced by such systems and methods. In some cases, the invention involves unique fluid channels, systems, controls, and/or restrictions, and combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the invention allows fluidic streams (which can be continuous or discontinuous, i.e., droplets) to be formed and/or combined, at a variety of scales, including microfluidic scales. In one set of embodiments, a fluidic stream may be produced from a channel, where a cross-sectional dimension of the fluidic stream is smaller than that of the channel, for example, through the use of structural elements, other fluids, and/or applied external fields, etc. In some cases, a Taylor cone may be produced. In another set of embodiments, a fluidic stream may be manipulated in some fashion, for example, to create tubes (which may be hollow or solid), droplets, nested tubes or droplets, arrays of tubes or droplets, meshes of tubes, etc. In some cases, droplets produced using certain embodiments of the invention may be charged or substantially charged, which may allow their further manipulation, for instance, using applied external fields. Non-limiting examples of such manipulations include producing charged droplets, coalescing droplets (especially at the microscale), synchronizing droplet formation, aligning molecules within the droplet, etc. In some cases, the droplets and/or the fluidic streams may include colloids, cells, therapeutic agents, and the like.

Link, Darren Roy↗