A case study of denoising microseismic data in the Farnsworth, TX CO 2 EOR site
As geologic carbon sequestration projects begin to be funded with a higher degree of frequency, microseismic monitoring will become more necessary to establish caprock integrity and induced seismicity risk. The Farnsworth, TX site, which hosts enhanced oil recovery operations, provides an ideal laboratory to test essential components of microseismic monitoring such as surface station placement, denoising, and different autopicker methods. We find that despite careful optimization, the surface station placement at the Farnsworth site was insufficient given the high level of background noise from the industrial operations at the oil field. Thus, we use only borehole geophone data in our processing. Two denoising techniques were examined: the DeepDenoiser and the continuous wavelet transform. The continuous wavelet transform was shown to be a valuable tool in converting between raw waveforms to processed denoised waveforms for microseismic monitoring. In the case of the noisy waveforms, only ten detections are found, compared with 90 in the denoised data for a two-hour window. The DeepDenoiser suffered from the fact that the training data was regional earthquake data. In addition, the PhaseNet machine-learning autopicker was applied to both the noisy and the denoised data, and this algorithm detected thousands of more arrivals in the data denoised with the continuous wavelet transform technique.