NASA NTRS2019
The typical multiwavelength aerosol lidar data set for inversion of optical to microphysical parameters is composed of three backscatter coefficients (β ) at 355, 532, and 1064 nm and two extinction coefficients (α ) at 355 and 532 nm. This data combination is referred to as 3β +2α or 3+2 data set. This set of data is sufficient for retrieving some important microphysical particle parameters if the particles have spherical shape. Here, we investigate the effect of including the particle linear depolarization ratio (δ) as a third input parameter to the inversion of lidar data. The inversion algorithm is generally not used if measurements show values of δ that exceed 0.10 at 532 nm, i.e. in the presence of non-spherical particles such as desert dust, volcanic ash, and under special circumstances biomass-burning smoke.We use experimental data collected with instruments that are capable of measuring δ at all three lidar wavelengths with an inversion routine that uses the theory of light scattering by randomly oriented spheroids to replicate scattering properties of non-spherical particles. This is the first systematic test of the effect of using all theoretically possible combinations of δ taken at 355, 532, and 1064 nm as input in the lidar data inversion. We find that depolarization information at least at one wavelength already provides useful information in the in version of optical data that describe light-scattering by nonspherical particles. However, any choice of δ(λ) will give lower values of the single-scattering albedo than the traditional 3+2 data set. We find that input data sets that include 355 give a non-spherical fraction that closely resembles the dust ratio we obtain from using β(532) and δ(532) in a methodology applied in aerosol-type separation. The use of 355 in data sets of two or three reduces the fraction of non-spherical particles that is retrieved when using δ(532) and δ(1064). Use of the latter two without accounting for 355 generally leads to high fractions of non-spherical particles that we consider not trustworthy. The use of three δ(λ) instead of two δ(λ) including the constraint that one of these is measured at 355 nm does not provide any advantage over using 3+2+δ(355). Because of the technical challenges involved with accurately measuring δ(1064) we conclude that — depending on measurement capability — the future standard input for inversion using spheroid kernels might be 3+2+δ(355) or 3+2+δ(355)+δ(532).