Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “fuel burnup”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Development of MCNP Training Modules for Safeguards Practitioners [Abstract]

The Monte-Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) software developed at LANL is the most widely used neutron transport code in the world. It is an essential tool for a variety of applications including detector development and design, nuclear fuel burnup simulation, criticality safety, and nondestructive assay system optimization. For this reason, it is indispensable within the safeguards and materials control & accountability (MC&A) communities. Multiple MCNP training courses have been created and taught over the last several decades by the MCNP development team at LANL, however there are no existing courses that cover specialized topics considered fundamental to NDA and safeguards models. To fill this gap, the MCNP team and Safeguards Science and Technology group at LANL have co-created a set of training modules customized to meet the specialized needs of the safeguards and MC&A communities. The basic modules cover concepts such as NDA system optimization, He-specific and other capture tallies, and tools for improved theoretical understanding. An advanced module was also created to cover topics including variance reduction for active interrogation simulations, use of the LANL MCNPTools post-processor, PTRAC (particle tracking) and list-mode data simulations, and fuel burnup simulations. The training modules teach to the latest and most state-of-the-art MCNP features and tools released by the development team at LANL and are intended to be taught jointly by the developers and safeguards experts. Ultimately, we hope that creation of these modules will serve to capture and convey the safeguards modeling and MCNP expertise at LANL, and that we will be able to share the modules more broadly with the MC&A and safeguards communities.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Coupled Thermal-Hydraulic and Fuel Performance Simulations of the TWIST LOCA Commissioning Test Series in TREAT

As the nuclear industry is looking to increase light water reactor (LWR) burnup limits, Idaho National Laboratory has developed an experiment vehicle for the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) to support high burnup fuel safety testing. One of the main purposes of this vehicle, known as the Transient Water Irradiation System for TREAT (TWIST), is to perform in-pile loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) experiments on high burnup LWR fuel to investigate phenomena termed fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD). Prior to performing experiments on high burnup fuel specimens, a commissioning test series will be performed. The main purpose of the Loss-of-Coolant-Commissioning (LOC-C) test series is to qualify the TWIST device and validate the power coupling between TREAT and the TWIST fuel rod as well as validation of the thermal-hydraulic and fuel performance simulation predictions.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

HIGH BURNUP FUEL-COOLANT INTERACTION ANALYSIS SUPPORTING FUEL SAFETY TESTING AT IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY

In the near future, experiments on HBu fuel under loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) conditions will be performed within the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These experiments will be performed using the Transient Water Irradiation System for TREAT (TWIST) experiment vehicle. To support these experiments, analysis of fuel-coolant interaction (FCI) energetics is underway. This paper discusses FCIs in the context of light water reactor (LWR) safety, differentiating between the severe accident focus of commercial reactors and experimental RIA test programs where FCIs have occurred. However, it is highlighted that as the nuclear industry aims for increased burnup limits, the FCI events observed in RIA test programs may become relevant to commercial LWR safety analysis. The paper then presents developments to the UW-FCI computer program to enable simulation of FCIs initiated by solid fuel particles dispersing into the coolant during RIAs.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assessment of Core Physics Characteristics of Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuels using the Polaris/PARCS Two-Step Approach. Vol. I: PWR Fuel

Nuclear fuel with extended enrichment (235U enrichment within 5-8 wt%) is one of the evolutionary changes that have been pursued in recent years by commercial light water reactor operators and fuel vendors to improve the fuel cycle economy and operation performance of a nuclear plant. This work assesses the performance of the Polaris/PARCS two-step approach in core physics modeling of the pressurized water reactor cores with extended enrichment fuel, referred to as “LEU+” in this report. A representative LEU+ core with a 24-month fuel cycle developed by Southern Nuclear Company (SNC) was modeled using this two-step approach. A representative LEU core with an 18-month fuel cycle was also modeled to provide a reference for the LEU+ core. As expected, significantly more burnable poison absorbers were used in the LEU+ core to accomodate its higher fuel enrichment. Nine different fuel assembly types were modeled using Polaris for each core to generate the assembly cross sections, which were then processed by GenPMAX to prepare the cross-section data for PARCS. The average specific powers of each fuel batch in each core were derived from VERA results and higher specific powers in fresh assemblies were found in the LEU core due to its less total uranium loading included in the VERA LEU model, given that the total core power was assumed to be the same for both cores. PARCS models were developed to simulate the steady-state operations of both cores. PARCS results on the LEU+ core were first compared with the VERA results for verification purpose; good agreements were seen in soluble boron and burnup distribution results, indicating that the Polaris/PARCS modeling and simulation were correctly implemented. Core physics parameters calculated by PARCS, at zero power physics tests, beginning of cycle (BOC), and end of cycle conditions (EOC), were compared between the LEU+ core and the LEU core, including soluble boron concentration, burnup distributions, assembly and pin power peaking factors, fuel temperature reactivity coefficients, moderator temperature and density reactivity coefficients, control rod worth, and shut down margin. The main differences in PARCS results between the LEU+ and the LEU cores are summarized below: 1)The critical boron concentrations were found to be much higher in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core (1582 vs. 1335 ppm for peak values). 2)Higher assembly radial power peaking factors (1.4 vs. 1.3 for peak values), 2D pin peaking factors (1.53 vs. 1.42 for peak values), and 3D pin peaking factors (1.89 vs. 1.81 for peak values) were found in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core. 3)Significantly higher reactivity coefficients of moderator temperature (and density) were found in LEU+ than in LEU.4)Significantly lower control rod worth at EOC were found in LEU+ than LEU for all but one control banks.5)Significantly lower shut down margins were found in the LEU+ core than in the LEU core. The Polaris/GenPMAX/PARCS code suite was found to be capable of modeling the LEU+ PWR core for steady-state operations and no unexpected results in core physics parameters were observed, in spite of that a) several bugs in PARCS were identified and workarounds were used; b) several features were found lacking in the current version of PARCS that would be useful for core modeling. A list of requests for bug fixes and feature upgrades for PARCS originated from this work were transmitted to the code developers. The assessments on the performance of the Polaris/PARCS two-step approach in core modeling for boiling water reactor with LEU+ fuel is ongoing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

High Burnup Transient Fission Gas Release Testing and Post-Test Examinations

The contribution of transient fission gas release (tFGR) to the burst behavior of high burnup fuel during a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) for commercial light water reactors is a complex phenomenon that is not fully understood. During the temperature ramp associated with a LOCA, there is significant additional transient fission gas release in excess of the steady state fission gas release from normal operation. An addition to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Severe Accident Test Station (SATS) was created to explore the different conditions that impact transient fission gas release. Four tests on commercially irradiated zirconium clad uranium dioxide nuclear fuel were performed to support transient fission gas release study. These experiments and their post-test analyses are discussed. The first test on high burnup fuel revealed a LOCA relevant transient fission gas release of 5.3% for an unpressurised segment. Subsequent tests have measured transient fission gas release at different conditions that span from 4.8% to 14.4 % transient fission gas release.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

High volume packing fraction TRISO-based fuel in light water reactors

We report that for a decade, fully ceramic microencapsulated (FCM) fuel, containing tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fuel particles in a silicon carbide (SiC) matrix, has been investigated as an accident-tolerant fuel for light water reactors (LWRs). Other examples exist of TRISO-based concepts for LWR fuels with different matrix materials. Previous studies assumed TRISO particle volume packing of approximately 0.44 in SiC (or another) matrix, the highest realistic packing fractions possible with conventional manufacturing. Recent advances in advanced manufacturing have yielded the development and demonstration of a fuel form that consists of conventionally manufactured TRISO particles in a 3D-printed SiC matrix with significantly higher possible TRISO packing fractions (0.5–0.7). This increased uranium loading enhances the viability of using TRISO-based particle fuel forms in LWRs. The viability of high-packing-fraction TRISO-based particle fuel forms in LWRs is assessed from the perspective of fuel cycle length, achievable fuel burnup, reactivity coefficients, and fuel cycle performance. Higher-packing-fraction TRISO-based fuel enables either longer cycle lengths (by ~25% at a packing fraction of 0.55 relative to 0.44) at a constant enrichment or decreased enrichments (by ~25% at a packing fraction of 0.55 relative to 0.44) at a constant cycle length. Studies of different fuel kernel types (uranium nitride, uranium oxycarbide, and uranium carbide) yield similar results, although the cycle length of uranium oxycarbide is shorter than for uranium nitride or uranium carbide (due to the lower density of uranium oxide). This work also characterized the production of 14 C resulting from neutron absorption in 14 N during operation for uranium mononitride fuel kernels; the ratio of 14 C/N was 1–2 at. % at discharge. For the fuel cycle evaluation, the activity of spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste at 100 and 100,000 years was lower for high-packing-fraction fuels than for conventional LWR fuel. Environmental impact metrics were similar overall, but higher on the front end of the fuel cycle and lower on the back end of the fuel cycle. Reactivity coefficients of higher-packing-fraction TRISO-based fuel were reasonable compared with those of conventional fuels.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assessment of Core Physics Characteristics of Extended Enrichment and Higher Burnup LWR Fuels using the Polaris/PARCS Two-Step Approach (Vol. 2: BWR Fuel)

Nuclear fuel vendors and utilities are currently investigating changes to fuel contents and fuel designs for more economical and safer reactor operations. Extending cycle lengths beyond 18-month cycles for pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and 24-month cycles for boiling water reactors (BWRs) requires extending fuel enrichments beyond the current 5 wt % 235U limit. Therefore, low-enriched uranium plus (LEU+) fuel is expected to be used in current light-water reactor fleets in the near term. LEU+ is a subset of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and is a term to describe fuel enrichments above 5% up to 10%. A series of studies were conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to compare low-enriched uranium (LEU) with LEU+ fuel with respect to isotopic fuel content, lattice parameters, and core physics to identify any challenges in operation, storage, and transportation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

High-Burnup Spent Fuel Data Project Sibling Pin Test Campaign Closeout Summary

The Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) was established within the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) to conduct research and development (R&D) activities associated with storage, transportation, and disposal of used or spent nuclear fuel (UNF or SNF) and high-level radioactive waste.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Mesoscale modeling of restructuring in high burnup UO 2 fuel

Here, this work aims to simulate the restructuring behavior observed in different regions of high burnup fuel, providing a first-of-its-kind restructuring model for the dark zone and rim region of high-burnup UO 2 fuel. We employed a grand-potential-based phase-field model to concurrently evaluate subgrain formation and the growth of fission gas bubbles within the fuel. An energy-based subgrain formation criterion was introduced to simulate the restructuring process. The effects of different initial conditions and different modeling parameters were systematically studied to capture how each of these parameters influences the characteristics of the restructured fuel. Subgrain formation was observed to begin around existing fission gas bubbles and proceed toward triple junctions, grain boundaries, and grain interiors. Restructuring was demonstrated to be influenced by a combination of initial dislocation densities, burnup rate, subgrain formation rate, and temperature. Under a given subgrain formation rate, the rate of restructuring increases with rising fuel temperature. A restructuring bias was observed within the microstructure, due to the variation in defect accumulation when comparing different grains. Microstructures corresponding to the dark zone and rim region can be obtained by parameterizing the model with the appropriate defect production rate, as determined based on the burnup rate and temperature. Furthermore, bubble size and distribution do not significantly affect the rate of restructuring. The predicted microstructures are consistent with experimental observations of the restructured regions. Finally, we present a correlation demonstrating the evolution of the restructuring volume fraction as a function of local burnup.

UO2↗

Compare predictions of transient fission gas release by empirical and mechanistic models to experiments in high burnup UO 2 fuel

Understanding and predicting fuel performance at high burnup require improving our understanding of transient fission gas release. High-burnup operations enable new mechanisms of fission gas release, which affect fuel performance. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has recently published its interpretation of existing fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal data in a research information letter. There, transient fission gas release was identified as one of the main factors that contributes to fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal, and therefore limits fuel extension to high burnup. However, transient fission gas release is a complex phenomenon that cannot be fully described by simple empirical descriptions. This report summarizes the development of a mechanistic model for high-burnup transient fission gas release in the fuel performance code BISON. This research was supported by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation program during fiscal year 2023 to improve our understanding of high-burnup transient fission gas release and ability to predict it as a function of operation history. To support the development of a mechanistic transient fission gas release model, the existing Simple Integrated Fission Gas Release and Swelling (Sifgrs) model in BISON has been completely refactored to make it more modular and extensible. This effort supports the model's application to high-burnup conditions, its extension to other fuel forms, and the continuous improvement of its current features. Once refactoring was completed, models for high-burnup structure formation, fission gas transfer from non-restructured fuel to high-burnup structure, high-burnup structure intragranular and intergranular fission gas behavior, high-burnup structure bubble evolution, fuel pulverization, and the resulting transient fission gas release were tested and implemented in the Simple Integrated Fission Gas Release and Swelling (Sifgrs) model or tightly coupled to it. The new mechanistic model was then compared to an empirical model developed in parallel by a Nuclear Energy University Program project using a Studsvik high-burnup loss-of-coolant-accident assessment case. Finally, the report details the preliminary BISON results for a benchmark activity organized by the Nuclear Energy Agency to evaluate fuel performance codes' predictive capabilities for burst fission gas release. This work represents an important step toward a mechanistic understanding of fission gas release in high-burnup conditions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Multi-scale simulation of high burnup UO2 nuclear fuel during loss-of-coolant accident conditions

To improve the economics of commercial nuclear energy generation, U.S. utilities are currently seeking licensing approval to operate UO2 fuel to higher burnups. One significant safety issue that must be addressed to obtain approval is the potential for fine fragmentation/pulverization of the fuel during a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). It has been hypothesized that pulverization is caused by the rapid increase of pressure in fission gas bubbles in the high burnup region of the fuel during a LOCA. To better understand this phenomenon, a novel phase-field model of the fission gas bubble microstructure in UO2 has been developed and implemented in Idaho National Laboratory (INL)'s Marmot application for phase-field simulation of nuclear materials. Simulations of the bubble response to steady-state and transient conditions were conducted, and the results were used to inform a mechanistic model of pulverization in BISON, INL’s fuel performance simulation code.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

On-the-Fly Energy Condensation for Whole-Core Multiphysics Simulations

As the nuclear energy industry considers ways to achieve improved economics in the current fleet of light-water reactors (LWRs), one possible approach is to operate each cycle longer. This causes a greater portion of the fuel to be burned and reduces the frequency of outages, which ultimately reduces the cost to operate the reactor. However, this also leads to higher burnup fuels than have traditionally been allowed in these reactors. There are concerns about integrity of high-burnup (HBu) fuel, especially during accident conditions such as loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), as shown by Capps et al. To investigate these concerns, advanced modeling and simulation capabilities are under development to determine the susceptibility of HBu fuel to fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersion (FFRD). Improvements have previously been made to fuel performance capabilities to model these phenomena more accurately; multiphysics simulations have also been conducted to determine the power and burnup histories of the HBu fuel, which are needed as inputs to the fuel performance calculations. Most recently, new statistical approaches have been developed to identify a subset of fuel rods that have greater FFRD susceptibility, reducing the total number of fuel performance simulations required.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Coupled Decay Heat and Thermal Hydraulic Capability for Loss-of-Coolant Accident Simulations

As the nuclear energy industry considers ways to achieve improved economics in the current fleet of light-water reactors (LWRs), one possible approach is to operate each cycle for longer durations. This causes a greater portion of the fuel to be burned and reduces the frequency of outages, which ultimately reduces the cost to operate the reactor. However, this also leads to higher burnup fuels than has traditionally been allowed in these reactors. Thus, there are concerns about integrity of high-burnup (HBu) fuel, especially during accident conditions such as loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), as shown by Capps et al.. To investigate these concerns, advanced modeling and simulation capabilities are being leveraged to determine the susceptibility of HBu fuel to fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersion (FFRD). Improvements have previously been made to fuel performance capabilities to more accurately model these phenomena; multiphysics simulations have also been conducted to determine the power and burnup histories of the HBu fuel, which are needed as inputs for the fuel performance calculations. Most recently, new statistical approaches have been developed to identify a subset of fuel rods that have greater FFRD susceptibility, reducing the total number of fuel performance simulations required. Prior LOCA simulations have relied on the TRACE systems code, which can model the core and primary loop during accident conditions. TRACE includes many models for various aspects of the primary loop, but two sets of models are important for this report. First, TRACE uses a lumped-fuel approach for modeling the core. This approximates the ~50,000 fuel rods in the core with a much smaller number of rods. The rods can be lumped in various ways as determined by the user. For example, one lumped rod may be used to represent all rods in an assembly, sometimes with an additional rod representing the hottest fuel rod. However, due to runtime constraints and complexity of modeling, a more common approach is to group several assemblies or larger regions of the core into single lumped rods. These lumping schemes apply not only to fuel rods but to flow channels as well. Second, TRACE has several different models for treating decay heat, ranging from pregenerated decay heat curves based on an ANSI/ANS-5.1 standard (hereinafter abbreviated simply as ANSI) to explicit time-dependent heat inputs from the user. None of these models account for differences in isotopics between different rods, which is an approximation the work in this report seeks to eliminate. This report focuses on the implementation of coupled decay heat capabilities in the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications (VERA) code suite to address a gap identified in previous LOCA simulations. This constitutes an improvement for both the lumped-fuel and decay heat models in TRACE. VERA has been developed to perform high-fidelity, whole-core multiphysics simulations for LWRs. Previously, during the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of LWRs (CASL) program, the emphasis was on providing accurate steady-state analysis—with a secondary focus on reactivity insertion accident (RIA) analysis—to address operational challenges in the nuclear energy industry. Under the Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, these capabilities are being extended to a broader range of transient analyses with the goal of quantifying the risk of fuel failures such as FFRD. To properly model such conditions with VERA, decay heat calculations have been integrated with the multiphysics to enable rod-by-rod thermal hydraulic (TH) conditions to be driven by the decay heat in long-running accidents such as LOCAs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Equibiaxial flexural strength determination of UO 2 using a ball-on-ring test

To increase nuclear fuel performance and reliability, their mechanical properties require an accurate and statistically relevant assessment. Biaxial flexural strength tests provide an alternative to bend bar techniques for assessing mechanical behavior; namely, the transverse rupture strength (TRS) of ceramic samples. Biaxial test samples require simple geometries and minimal surface preparation, reducing fabrication costs and handling hazards. This study investigated the TRS of polycrystalline UO 2 fuel forms at room temperature using a ball-on-ring test fixture. Here, pellets were fabricated from UO 2 powder using conventional powder processing and sintering techniques. The TRS and Weibull parameters were obtained through Weibull statistics on over 60 UO 2 samples tested under equibiaxial flexure. The larger sample size in this study enabled a more robust Weibull statistical analysis than alternative test methods, which may not capture the stochastic failure of typical ceramics. Furthermore, two different loading ball diameters were employed to assess the impact of contact damage on fracture strength. While Hertzian contact damage was observed with the smaller loading ball, the fracture strength remained unaffected. A fracture analysis of the tested UO 2 samples indicated a mixture of intergranular and transgranular fracture that transitions to transgranular fracture with increasing distance from the fracture origin. The characteristic strength of the combined data sets was determined to be 148 MPa, and the Weibull modulus was determined to be 9.1. The TRS values and Weibull parameters were close to values found in the literature for alternative testing techniques using samples with similar microstructure and density. The findings in this study validate the ball-on-ring method used to obtain the TRS of UO 2 with a sample geometry more representative of nuclear fuels. Additionally, experimental TRS results from this study can be implemented in modeling codes to predict fuel performance, which is critical to fuel burnup extension and advanced nuclear fuel technologies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Experiment to Investigate the On-set of Transient Fission Gas Release Under Simulated LOCA Conditions

Continuing efforts to better understand the phenomenon of transient fission gas release in irradiated commercial light water reactor fuel undergoing a simulated loss of coolant accident (LOCA) will be discussed in this work. During heating associated with LOCA conditions there is an additional release of fission gas beyond what is typically released during steady state operation. The exact timing of this release could impact the cladding balloon and rupture as the LOCA progresses in an actual accident. Recent experiments performed on the upgraded Severe Accident Test Station at Oak Ridge National Laboratory have expanded the current assessment of transient fission gas release. This system evaluates fission gas release by sweeping fission gas out of the LOCA test furnace and into cryogenically cooled cold traps where radioactive noble gas fission products are measured by gamma spectrometry. Additionally, the sweep gas can be monitored by a gas mass spectrometer to provide additional data on noble gas release and changes in the sweep gas atmosphere during heating. Several different conditions have been evaluated that explored the response of irradiated fuel to different thermal ramp conditions and different overpressure conditions. This further confirmed the impact of an overpressure in suppressing transient fission gas release. Further experiments are planned to evaluate the on-set temperature of transient fission gas release under a known overpressure. This test will progressively step through different temperature conditions while maintaining hydrostatic pressure on the fuel that is representative of high burnup fuel conditions. The available results from this type of testing will be discussed. Post-test microscopy will be compared to other transient fission gas release and standard LOCA tests to further understand the microstructural source of transient fission gas release.

Harp, Jason [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000253458440)↗