Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “core drill”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Ultrasonic Drilling and Coring

A novel drilling and coring device, driven by a combination, of sonic and ultrasonic vibration, was developed. The device is applicable to soft and hard objects using low axial load and potentially operational under extreme conditions. The device has numerous potential planetary applications. Significant potential for commercialization in construction, demining, drilling and medical technologies.

Bar-Cohen, Yoseph↗

Evolution of fluid–rock interaction in the Reykjanes geothermal system, Iceland: Evidence from Iceland Deep Drilling Project core RN-17B

We describe the lithology and present spatially resolved geochemical analyses of samples from the hydrothermally altered Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP) drill core RN-17B. The 9.3 m long RN-17B core was collected from the seawater-dominated Reykjanes geothermal system, located on the Reykjanes Peninsula, Iceland. The nature of fluids and the location of the Reykjanes geothermal system make it a useful analog for seafloor hydrothermal processes, although there are important differences. Here, the recovery of drill core from the Reykjanes geothermal system, as opposed to drill cuttings, has provided the opportunity to investigate evolving geothermal conditions by utilizing in-situ geochemical techniques in the context of observed paragenetic and spatial relationships of alteration minerals.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

Remote Technology to Retrieve Waste Below the 324 Building at the Hanford Site - 19622

The Waste Technology Engineering Laboratory (324 Building) is a Category 2 Nuclear Facility at Hanford. The 324 Building Disposition Project is responsible for the removal and remedial actions under CERCLA. Additionally, there are RCRA Dangerous Waste Management Units which the CERCLA actions are presumed to satisfy. The Radiochemical Engineering Complex (REC) is a group of four hot cells (A, B, C and D Cells) with an interconnecting airlock inside of the 324 Building. Underneath the REC B-Cell are contaminated soils that have an estimated 12,793 R/Hr dose rate and remediation is under CERCLA 300-FF-2 Operable Unit. The current action consists of debris removal from the floor of B-Cell, B-Cell floor removal, and excavation of the soils beneath the floor to a depth of up to twelve feet with four Remote Excavator Arms (REA). This paper provides insight into the preparation and performance of high tolerance core drilling into a hot cell complex. Installation of the REA Through Support (REA TS) mechanism through the 4'-6' concrete shield walls is a complex series of tasks with demanding tolerances at each of four locations around the perimeter of B-Cell. The use of training mock ups was included in the completion of this work. The REA TS is two 11 inch diameter high strength steel sleeves that have expandable collars at each end allowing the interstitial space between the outside of the sleeve and inside of the core drill to be grouted to form a substantial structural connection, and a 10 inch pipe with hydraulic hoses to power the REA. There are three cores required for each REA location. The REAs themselves are customized excavator arms, mounted on support columns to be used in the excavation and transfer of the contaminated soil into storage facilities. The tasks for the installation of the REA TSs are: 1) Characterization of B-Cell Cubicles. 2) Embedded Pipe Fill. 3) Interference Removal. a. Internal Walls, b. External Walls. 4) Core Drilling. 5) Go/No-Go gauge, and video inspection. 6) Installation of REA Through Support Assembly. The 324 Building REC Hot Cells have internal, external, and embedded utilities throughout the shield walls in conflict with the REA TS locations. Some of the embedded utilities have connection points inside of the B-Cell Cubicles. There were two separate issues at the conflicted locations. The first issue was the core drill cooling water would flow along the embedded utility potentially spreading legacy chemical and radiological contamination to areas of the facility that was unwanted. The second issue was that the REA TS required a substantial structural connection to the B-Cell wall, the cored diameter is larger than the REA TS and these interstitial areas required a full grouted connection. The embedded utilities posed a hazard that if unfilled, the interstitial grout would flow into the embedded utility and destabilize the required grouted structural connection. The B-Cell Cubicles had not been opened in over 10 years. A mockup was completed to install a glovebag over the cubicle opening and then to verify functionality and port requirements. The embedded utility pipe connections in the cubicles were then opened inside a glovebag to verify the correct connection points, connection method for future embedded pipe fill material delivery system, radiological characterization, and air flow to show that the embedded utility pipes were not blocked and would not pressurize. The embedded pipe fill material and grout system was mocked up and run several times to verify methodology and functionality. The B-Cell Cubicles were then reentered and the embedded utility pipe fill was completed using a hand pump. External interferences at the core drill locations were removed using standard interference removal techniques. Internal interferences at the core drill locations were removed using a remote cutting tool that was controlled through the use of the B-Cell crane, remote cameras and remote lighting. The core drilling was mocked up two separate times, the project's purpose built 'Mock Up Facility' was core drilled to verify tolerances and methodology prior to subcontract award, the core drill subcontractor built a 'dummy wall' to train and practice on achieving the demanding tolerances, coordinated alignments between the cores, short term and long term dose shielding techniques, and contamination control techniques. A core drill template, and additional anchoring techniques were used to maximize accuracy and precision of the REA TS core drills. A 'Go/No-Go' gauge was built and installed at each of the four REA TS locations to verify that the core drill met tolerances. The core drill locations were visually inspected using a boroscope. The REA TS installation was mocked up at the projects 'Mock Up Facility' beginning with basic hazard controls, then with intermediate hazard controls, and finally with full occupational safety, industrial hygiene, and radiological controls. The REA TSs were installed and grouted into place. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Ultrasonic/Sonic Mechanisms for Drilling and Coring

Two apparatuses now under development are intended to perform a variety of deep-drilling, coring, and sensing functions for subsurface exploration of rock and soil. These are modified versions of the apparatuses described in Ultrasonic/Sonic Drill/Corers With Integrated Sensors (NPO-20856), NASA Tech Briefs, Vol. 25, No. 1 (January 2001), page 38. In comparison with the drilling equipment traditionally used in such exploration, these apparatuses weigh less and consume less power. Moreover, unlike traditional drills and corers, these apparatuses function without need for large externally applied axial forces.

Bar-Cohen, Yoseph↗

Mock-Up activities for the extraction of samples from a salt-stone disposal unit - 15502

Mock-up testing with respect to the core-drilling of simulant salt-stone grout was conducted to support the future retrieval of field-emplaced salt-stone samples from salt-stone Disposal Unit (SDU) Cell 2A. The primary objectives of extracting samples from SDU Cell 2A are to enable measurement of field-emplaced samples with respect to properties that influence long-term performance, such as saturated hydraulic conductivity, and to compare the measured properties for field-emplaced and comparable samples prepared in the laboratory. Initial mock-up activities (Phases 1 and 2) were conducted in Fiscal Years (FY) 2013 and 2014 in order to demonstrate the viability of standard core-drilling techniques that are typically employed for sampling concrete structures. The primary requirement for the core-drilling technique was that it should minimize the potential of physical or chemical sample changes that would artificially degrade key grout properties. Mock-up activities were aimed at optimizing the techniques for core-drilling, and subsequent sample extraction, using a set-up that mimicked, to the extent practical, both the physical characteristics, and operational complexities, of core-drilling salt-stone grout from the roof of the SDU. Samples extracted from the grout monolith were subsequently characterized with respect to saturated hydraulic conductivity and compressive strength, and compared to data for cast samples prepared using the same simulant salt-stone material. The comparison of these properties for the two sample types was expected to highlight potential flaws (e.g., micro-cracking) introduced by the core-drilling process. While the data for saturated hydraulic conductivity were virtually identical (approximately 2 E-09 cm/sec), the compressive strength of the core-drilled samples (approximately 3.5 MPa (500 psi)) was on average half that measured for the cast samples. It was suspected that increased water saturation and surface scoring of the core-drilled samples might account for the disparate compressive Strength data. During Phases 1 and 2 it was determined that cores could be successfully drilled and extracted to a depth of approximately 0.9 meters (3 feet) below the grout surface. Phase 3 (FY 2105) has been initiated and is primarily directed at demonstrating the ability to core-drill through approximately 1.8 meters (6 feet) of overlying grout to retrieve the desired sample from the SDU. The original drill depth of 0.6 - 0.9 meters (2-3 feet) was based on an SDU fill height of 5.6 meters (18.5 feet) and sample location of approximately 4.9 meters (16 feet); recently the allowable fill height in the SDUs has been increased to 6.5 meters (21.25 feet); hence the increased depth of overlying grout above the samples to be retrieved. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Volcanic stratigraphy and age model of the Kimama deep borehole (Project Hotspot): Evidence for 5.8 million years of continuous basalt volcanism, central Snake River Plain, Idaho

The Snake River Plain of central Idaho represents the world’s best example of a mantle hotspot track impinging upon continental crust and provides a record of bimodal volcanism extending over 12 Ma to the present. Project Hotspot recovered almost 2 km of continuous drill core from the Kimama borehole, located in central Idaho on the axial volcanic zone. The Kimama drill core represents the most complete record of mafic volcanism along the Yellowstone–Snake River Plain hotspot track. A total of 432 basalt flow units, representing 183 basalt flows, 78 basalt flow groups, and 34 super groups, along with 42 sediment interbeds are recognized using volcanic facies observations, stratigraphic relationships, borehole geophysical logs, and paleosecular variation in magnetostratigraphy. Rhyolite and other non-basaltic volcanic materials were not encountered in the drill core. Ages for six basalt lava flows were determined by 40 Ar/ 39 Ar using incremental heating experiments. Paleomagnetic inclination was measured on over 1200 samples collected at roughly 2-m-depth intervals, yielding mean values of paleosecular variation between ±50° to ±70° in Kimama flow groups, close to the expected 61° axial dipole average for the Kimama borehole location. Twenty-three magnetic reversals were identified and correlated to dated geomagnetic chrons and subchrons and compared with the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar radiometric ages. A linear fit to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dates, geomagnetic chron and subchron boundaries, and volcanogenic zircon U-Pb ages defines a mean accumulation rate of ~320 m/m.y. and extrapolates to a bottom hole age of 6.3 Ma. Average thicknesses of lithologic units increase from 2.7 m (sediment), 4 m (flow units), 10 m (flows), 23 m (flow groups), to 53 m (super groups). On average, one lava flow inundated the Kimama borehole location every 33 k.y. Intercalated sediments, ranging from 0.06 to 24.5 m thick, make up roughly 6% of the drill core and indicate lulls in local volcanic activity that may have lasted up to 77 k.y. Neutron and gamma-ray logs supplement observations from the drill cores: neutron logs document individual flow units through the contrast between massive flow interiors and more porous flow surfaces, and gamma-ray logs document the depth and thickness of sedimentary interbeds and high–K-Fe basalts. The 5.8 m.y. duration of basaltic volcanism in the Kimama drill core implies a steady rate of volcanism, indicating a relatively stable rate of mantle upflow along the lithosphere-mantle boundary in the wake of Yellowstone–Snake River Plain plume volcanism.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

Removal of the Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor - 13031

The 309 Facility housed the Plutonium Recycle Test Reactor (PRTR), an operating test reactor in the 300 Area at Hanford, Washington. The reactor first went critical in 1960 and was originally used for experiments under the Hanford Site Plutonium Fuels Utilization Program. The facility was decontaminated and decommissioned in 1988-1989, and the facility was deactivated in 1994. The 309 facility was added to Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) response actions as established in an Interim Record of Decision (IROD) and Action Memorandum (AM). The IROD directs a remedial action for the 309 facility, associated waste sites, associated underground piping and contaminated soils resulting from past unplanned releases. The AM directs a removal action through physical demolition of the facility, including removal of the reactor. Both CERCLA actions are implemented in accordance with U.S. EPA approved Remedial Action Work Plan, and the Remedial Design Report / Remedial Action Report associated with the Hanford 300-FF-2 Operable Unit. The selected method for remedy was to conventionally demolish above grade structures including the easily distinguished containment vessel dome, remove the PRTR and a minimum of 300 mm (12 in) of shielding as a single 560 Ton unit, and conventionally demolish the below grade structure. Initial sample core drilling in the Bio-Shield for radiological surveys showed evidence that the Bio-Shield was of sound structure. Core drills for the separation process of the PRTR from the 309 structure began at the deck level and revealed substantial thermal degradation of at least the top 1.2 m (4LF) of Bio-Shield structure. The degraded structure combined with the original materials used in the Bio-Shield would not allow for a stable structure to be extracted. The water used in the core drilling process proved to erode the sand mixture of the Bio-Shield leaving the steel aggregate to act as ball bearings against the core drill bit. A redesign is being completed to extract the 309 PRTR and entire Bio-Shield structure together as one monolith weighing 1100 Ton by cutting structural concrete supports. In addition, the PRTR has hundreds of contaminated process tubes and pipes that have to be severed to allow for a uniformly flush fit with a lower lifting frame. Thirty-two 50 mm (2 in) core drills must be connected with thirty-two wire saw cuts to allow for lifting columns to be inserted. Then eight primary saw cuts must be completed to severe the PRTR from the 309 Facility. Once the weight of the PRTR is transferred to the lifting frame, then the PRTR may be lifted out of the facility. The critical lift will be executed using four 450 Ton strand jacks mounted on a 9 m (30 LF) tall mobile lifting frame that will allow the PRTR to be transported by eight 600 mm (24 in) Slide Shoes. The PRTR will then be placed on a twenty-four line, double wide, self powered Goldhofer for transfer to the onsite CERCLA Disposal Cell (ERDF Facility), approximately 33 km (20 miles) away. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Utah FORGE: Deep Well 58-32 (MU-ESW1) Core Data

These datasets, images, and graphics were derived from core drilling and core that was extracted from Utah Forge deep well 58-32 (originally called MU-ESW1), near Roosevelt Hot Springs.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

Maia Mapper: high definition XRF imaging in the lab

Here, Maia Mapper is a laboratory μXRF mapping system for efficient elemental imaging of drill core sections serving minerals research and industrial applications. It targets intermediate spatial scales, with imaging of up to ~80 M pixels over a 500×150 mm 2 sample area. It brings together (i) the Maia detector and imaging system, with its large solid-angle, event-mode operation, millisecond pixel transit times in fly-scan mode and real-time spectral deconvolution and imaging, (ii) the high brightness MetalJet D2 liquid metal micro-focus X-ray source from Excillum, and (iii) an efficient XOS polycapillary lens with a flux gain ~15,900 at 21 keV into a ~32 μm focus, and (iv) a sample scanning stage engineered for standard drill-core sections. Count-rates up to ~3 M/s are observed on drill core samples with low dead-time up to ~1.5%. Automated scans are executed in sequence with display of deconvoluted element component images accumulated in real-time in the Maia detector. Application images on drill core and polished rock slabs illustrate Maia Mapper capabilities as part of the analytical workflow of the Advanced Resource Characterisation Facility, which spans spatial dimensions from ore deposit to atomic scales.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

Project HOTSPOT: Kimama Well Core and Drill Site Photos

The Snake River Plain (SRP), Idaho, hosts potential geothermal resources due to elevated groundwater temperatures associated with the thermal anomaly Yellowstone-Snake River hotspot. Project HOTSPOT has coordinated international institutions and organizations to understand subsurface stratigraphy and assess geothermal potential. Over 5.9km of core were drilled from three boreholes within the SRP in an attempt to acquire continuous core documenting the volcanic and sedimentary record of the hotspot: (1) Kimama, (2) Kimberly, and (3) Mountain Home. The Kimama drill site was set up to acquire a continuous record of basaltic volcanism along the central volcanic axis and to test the extent of geothermal resources beneath the Snake River aquifer. This submission includes photos of the core samples taken from the Kimberly drill hole. Data submitted by project collaborator Doug Schmitt, University of Alberta *Note - The archive file "kimPhotos.zip" contains all of the photos associated with this submission in a more easily downloaded format

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

Project HOTSPOT: Mountain Home Well Core and Drill Site Photos

The Snake River Plain (SRP), Idaho, hosts potential geothermal resources due to elevated groundwater temperatures associated with the thermal anomaly Yellowstone-Snake River hotspot. Project HOTSPOT has coordinated international institutions and organizations to understand subsurface stratigraphy and assess geothermal potential. Over 5.9km of core were drilled from three boreholes within the SRP in an attempt to acquire continuous core documenting the volcanic and sedimentary record of the hotspot: (1) Kimama, (2) Kimberly, and (3) Mountain Home. The Mountain Home drill hole is located along the western plain and documents older basalts overlain by sediment. This submission includes photos of the core samples taken from the Mountain Home drill hole. Data submitted by project collaborator Doug Schmitt, University of Alberta *Note - The archive file "MH Photos.zip" contains all of the photos associated with this submission in a more easily downloaded format

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗

The Auto-Gopher Deep Drill

Subsurface penetration by coring, drilling or abrading is of great importance for a large number of space and earth applications. An Ultrasonic/Sonic Drill/Corer (USDC) has been in development at JPL's Nondestructive Evaluation and Advanced Actuators (NDEAA) lab as an adaptable tool for many of these applications. The USDC uses a novel drive mechanism to transform the high frequency ultrasonic or sonic vibrations of the tip of a horn into a lower frequency sonic hammering of a drill bit through an intermediate free-flying mass. The USDC device idea has been implemented at various scales from handheld drills to large diameter coring devices. A series of computer programs that model the function and performance of the USDC device were developed and were later integrated into an automated modeling package. The USDC has also evolved from a purely hammering drill to a rotary hammer drill as the design requirements increased form small diameter shallow drilling to large diameter deep coring. A synthesis of the Auto-Gopher development is presented in this paper.

Badescu, Mircea↗

Core sample depth relationships - Apollo 14 and 15.

The depth relationships for the Apollo 14 and 15 core tubes and the Apollo 15 drill core are presented, as determined from laboratory simulation studies. Sample at a depth of 40 cm in the Apollo 14 double core tube (virtually the same as the Apollo 12 tubes) represents material from a depth of approximately 58 cm in the lunar surface. The new design of the Apollo 15 core tube results in much less sample disturbance and the depth relationship is practically one-to-one, with sample recovery approaching 100%. The depth relationship for the drill core is also probably close to one-to-one, and its recovery ratio was also 100%.

Carrier, W. D., III↗

Near Real Time Prospecting for Lunar Volatiles: Demonstrating RESOLVE Science in the Field

The Regolith and Environment Science and Oxygen & Lunar Volatile Extraction (RESOLVE) project aims to demonstrate the utility of "in situ resource utilization". In situ resource utilization (ISRU) is a way to rebalance the economics of spaceflight by reducing or eliminating materials that must be brought up from Earth and placed on the surface of the Moon for human use. RESOLVE is developing a rover-borne payload that (1) can locate near subsurface volatiles, (2) excavate and analyze samples of the volatile-bearing regolith, and (3) demonstrate the form, extractability and usefulness of the materials. Such investigations are important not only for ISRU but are also critically important for understanding the scientific nature of these intriguing lunar polar volatile deposits. Temperature models and orbital data suggest near surface volatile concentrations may exist at briefly lit lunar polar locations outside persistently shadowed regions. A lunar rover could be remotely operated at some of these locations for the 4-7 days of expected sunlight at relatively low cost. In July 2012 the RESOLVE project conducted a full-scale field demonstration. In particular, the ability to perform the real-time measurement analysis necessary to search for volatiles and the ability to combine the various measurement techniques to meet the mission measurement and science goals. With help from the Pacific International Space Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES), a lunar rover prototype (provided by the Canadian Space Agency) was equipped with prospecting instruments (neutron spectrometer and near-infrared spectrometer), subsurface access and sampling tools, including both an auger and coring drill (provided by CSA) and subsurface sample analysis instrumentation, including a sample oven system, the Oxygen and Volatile Extraction Node (OVEN), and Gas Chromatograph / Mass Spectrometer system, the Lunar Advanced Volatile Analysis (LAVA) system. Given the relatively short time period this lunar mission is being designed to, prospecting needs to occur in near real-time. The two prospecting instruments are the neutron and NIR spectrometers. In the field demo a small radioactive source was provided the neutron flux. The NIR spectrometer, which includes its own light source, looks at surface reflectance for signatures of bound H20/0H and general mineralogy. Once a "hot spot" was found by the prospecting instruments, the drill could either auger or core. The auger drill worked to a depth of 50 cm and is monitored with a drill camera and the NIR spectrometer. As cuttings are brought up the NIR spectra is monitored. If a particular location is considered of high -interest then the decision to core could be made. The coring drill (a push-tube) allowed a meter sample to be acquired processed by the OVEN/LAVA sys-tem. This presentation will provide details as how these instruments worked together and how and if the planned measurements and science was obtained.

Elphic, Richard↗

Ar-40/Ar-36 variations in Apollo 15 and 16 regolith

Values of Ar-40/Ar-36 have been determined for a large number of Apollo 15 and Apollo 16 fines, including samples from a range of depths in the Apollo 15 and 16 deep drill cores. Most of the Ar-40 in these samples is 'excess Ar-40' in that it has not been produced by in situ decay of K. Values of Ar-40/Ar-36 range from 0.74 to 4.35 and demonstrate that the regolith is not well mixed over depths of several cm or over surface distances greater than about 100 m. However, fines collected over surface distances of less than a few tens of meters tend to possess similar ratios. Values of Ar-40/Ar-36 in the Apollo 15 drill core increase with depth by nearly a factor of four (0.74 to 2.86) in the 0 to 80 cm depth range, then decrease for greater depths. Values of Ar-40/Ar-36 in the Apollo 16 drill core are nearly constant at about 1.3, except for the deepest sample analyzed (about 2.7). Concentrations of glass-bonded agglutinate particles in the fines tend to correlate with lower Ar-40/Ar-36, and may indicate that dynamic regolith processes also affect the trapped Ar-40/Ar-36.

Bogard, D. D.↗

Feedback on Forty-year Long Clean-up Operations of a Contaminated Soil for Environmental Purpose - 20026

One of the CEA facilities in France is the place of miscellaneous mapping and clean-up operations since the 1980's. The final purpose of the conducted work deals with the environmental remediation of the building. In France, the absence of a regulatory framework for the management of sites polluted by radioactive substances, especially as the lack of release thresholds, has led to develop different approaches of soil radiological characterization. The geostatistical approach is part of them. Preliminary investigations are an unavoidable step prior to clearance and remediation. First, historical analysis enables to define site perimeters to investigate as well as to precisely locate expected contaminated parts. For radioactive pollutants, the media (water, soil, air) and transfer routes participate in the definition of the investigation perimeter and thus also need to be identified through a geological study. At the same time, functional analysis leads to choose the best measurement means which could provide useful information when combined with visual inspection. An equipment well adapted to easy-to-measure radionuclides as gamma emitters, such as gamma probe or on-site gamma spectrometry, is usually selected as a non-destructive assay. Coupled with spatial positions, processed on-site radiological data can be mapped. Data processing consists in mapping and kriging before a geostatistical analysis in order to identify the zones of interest to be targeted. Selected zones are not only linked to high level count rates but also to low level ones so that a pollution-free reference is known in the area. This data processing also enables to categorize waste types according to their origin and contamination levels. An expected volume of different waste then follows as well as the waste characterization equipments. In-depth investigations, e.g. core drillings and samplings, naturally ensue to aim at remediation optimization through the assessment of environmental impact. After clean-up operations, non-destructive assays as well as destructive samplings enable to check the effective clearance. Following this methodology in the present remediation work, results of the first non-destructive assay campaign highlighted a long-lived transuranic radionuclides contamination in the concrete flagstone. Successive non-destructive assays were then performed in the defined zones of interest. Count rates measured with a surface probe were first mapped. The best localization of destructive assays, i.e. core drillings at a 1 meter depth, came from this surface mapping followed by a geostatistical analysis. The concrete flagstone was totally removed. Then, the depth of soil to remove under the flagstone was optimized from the results of radiological activities measured in core drillings samples. A new surface mapping was then drawn after this partial soil excavation. The sand and demolition rubble samples, homogeneously constituted from the flagstone fragments, were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Meanwhile, waste drums and other containers were also measured by gamma spectrometry and passive neutron measurement devices. All these results have brought miscellaneous pieces of information. In this context, major issues appear in terms of physical constraints such as the premises tininess as well as of soil sampling techniques and in terms of measurement performances assessment and the representativeness of homogeneous samples. The choice of radiological soil and waste characterization devices is described in the light of enhanced performances by keeping in mind radiation protection requirements and a willing to always optimize waste categories (very low level waste) and volume. The improvement of the characterization methods appears through this forty-year long work while sharing the feedback of encountered difficulties. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗