Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “composite solid electrolytes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

A solid electrolyte interphase to protect the sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) composite for Li–S batteries: computational approach addressing the electrolyte/SPAN interfacial reactivity

This study addresses the reactivity of multiple solvents and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) at the interface with sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) in multiple stages of lithiation via ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Here, both ether 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) proved stable on the lithiated SPAN surface regardless of the lithium content, meaning that neither of these species likely contributes to growing a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) coating to protect the SPAN composite. Conversely, cyclic carbonates, ethylene carbonate (EC) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) are shown to be very active. The EC reduction occurs only on a highly lithiated surface with a 3.0 Li/S molar ratio, the equivalent of the SPAN composite in an over-discharge regime with voltages close to 0.0 V vs. Li/Li + . The FEC reduction starts with a 2.0 Li/S molar ratio and above, suggesting that FEC could act as a useful additive in electrolyte formulations with EC. Both EC and FEC follow multiple reduction mechanisms to produce complex reduction products and LiF in the FEC case. We provide a mechanistic description for each detected decomposition path. The LiFSI salt also proves reactive against the lithiated SPAN surface. The FSI – defluorination is the dominant reduction path. However, the SO 2 NSO 2 F – and SO 2 NSO 2 2– species proved stable against S–N cleavage. This behavior makes the LiFSI salt a potential candidate for SPAN-based Li–S batteries because it produces LiF without releasing SO 2 .

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Understanding ion-selective Li/Na metal plating behavior in hybrid Li-Na battery

This study investigates ion-selective Li/Na metal plating behavior in hybrid Li-Na battery systems, revealing the critical role of electrolyte solvents in these processes. Using a hybrid battery design with a LiFePO 4 cathode, Na metal anode, and NaPF 6 -based electrolytes, we observed contrasting effects of carbonate- and ether-based electrolyte solvents. While ether-based electrolytes showed expected Na plating/stripping, carbonate-based electrolytes surprisingly favored a Li-dominant plating/stripping reaction despite the Na-rich environment. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that this selectivity is linked to the composition of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer, with carbonate electrolytes forming Li-based inorganic-rich SEI layers that facilitate Li-ion diffusion while screening Na ions. In conclusion, these findings challenge the conventional understanding of metal plating in multi-ion environments and offer insights for designing future hybrid battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Interfacial Reactivity of Silicon Electrodes: Impact of Electrolyte Solvent and Presence of Conductive Carbon

Silicon (Si) is a promising high-capacity material for lithium-ion batteries; however, its limited reversibility hinders commercial adoption. Approaches such as particle and crystallite size reduction, introduction of conductive carbon, and use of different electrolyte solvents have been explored to overcome these electrochemical limitations. Herein, operando isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) is used to probe the influence of silicon particle size, electrode composition, and electrolyte additives fluoroethylene carbonate and vinylene carbonate on the heat flow during silicon lithiation. In this work, the IMC data are complemented by X-ray photoelectron and Raman spectroscopies to elucidate differences in solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) composition. Nanosized (~50 nm, n-Si) and micrometer-sized (~4 μm, μ-Si) silicon electrodes are formulated with and without amorphous carbon and electrochemically lithiated in ethylene carbonate (EC), fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), or vinylene carbonate (VC) based electrolytes. Notably, n-Si electrodes generate 53–61% more normalized heat relative to their μ-Si counterparts, consistent with increased surface area and electrode/electrolyte reactivity. Introduction of amorphous carbon significantly alters the heat flow profile where multiple exothermic peaks and increased normalized heat dissipation are observed for all electrolyte types. Notably, the VC-containing electrolyte demonstrates the greatest normalized heat dissipation of the electrode compositions tested showing as much as a 50% increase compared to the EC or FEC counterparts. The results are relevant to the understanding of silicon negative electrode function in the presence of electrolyte additives and provide insight relative to silicon containing cell reactivity and safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Developing Materials for High-Energy-Density Solid State Li-S Batteries

Solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries are considered to be the next-generation power source for vehicle applications due to their high energy density (up to 3 times more than current Li-ion) and low cost of sulfur (100 times less than conventional cobalt oxide). However, issues with solid-state electrolyte stability, conduction pathways in the sulfur cathode, and the interface between solid-state electrolyte and sulfur cathode must be solved in order to allow commercialization. This project demonstrates the creation of new, advanced materials which overcome these inherent issues. Current approaches based on polymer or liquid electrolyte with additives have been able to improve stability at the cost of efficiency. In contrast, by creating new hybrid materials it is possible to achieve both stability and efficiency. We developed a novel sulfide-based solid electrolyte, a sulfur-carbon composite cathode, and explored various additives to stabilize the interface of solid electrolyte and cathode. After the desired properties were achieved, these materials were integrated into a high-performance solid-state battery, bringing low-cost high-energy solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries one step closer to reality.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Understanding implications of cathode architecture on energy density of solid-state batteries

Next generation solid-state batteries (SSB) will need to leverage high voltage cathodes, as well as metallic anodes to achieve the realistic performance targets necessary to replace liquid electrolyte-based batteries in cutting-edge applications including electric vehicles. However, limitations arising from mass and charge transports, kinetics and chemo-mechanical degradation at the electrode | electrolyte interface limit the performance of present day SSBs. Optimizing composite cathode architecture, which is an integral part of solid-state batteries, is vital to realize the high-energy density and high-performance goals for next-generation solid-state batteries. Additionally, cathode architecture needs to be optimized for high loadings of active material, well-percolated ion and electron transport pathways and increased resilience against electrochemical stresses. This paper provides a first report of framework for geometric modeling of composite cathode architectures and evaluates the impact of cathode architecture on cell-level energy density using hierarchical models. Packing around primary and secondary active material particles are simulated for a range of active material particle size and solid electrolyte size distributions in the composite cathode. Impact of packing architecture on processing parameters of a given cathode composition and thickness, as well as on achievable energy density is evaluated for a range of commonly used solid electrolyte and cathode materials. Overall, the proposed framework offers a facile exploratory methodology for establishing initial metrics for scalable processing of practical and competent SSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Effect of temperature on capacity fade in silicon-rich anodes

Coin half-cells containing 80 wt% silicon electrodes are assembled and cycled at the similar to C/10 rate in the temperature range of 25-55 degrees C. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the effect of temperature is reported for such high-silicon-containing cells. Two different electrolytes are used in this study, a baseline electrolyte and the baseline electrolyte +10 wt% fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). Analysis of the capacity vs. cycle count data by curve fitting reveals that the addition of FEC markedly affects the capacity loss mechanism. Without FEC, the kinetic rate law for the capacity loss mechanism can be described as the sum of two logistic growth models. With the addition of FEC, the rate law depends on ln(t). Clearly, the addition of FEC has a profound effect on the mechanism of capacity loss. Interestingly, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) shows that the composition of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer changes markedly from mostly organic to mostly inorganic in the presence of FEC and how it varies at the different temperatures tested, especially in the absence of FEC.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Cross‐Linked Flexible Metaferroelectrolyte Regulated by 2D/2D Perovskite Heterostructures for High‐Performance Compact Solid‐State Sodium Batteries

Abstract To address the issues of limited ionic conductivity and poor interface stability at room and low temperatures in solid‐state electrolytes, a robust intrinsic ferroelectrolyte or nanoferroelectrolyte strategy for engineering solid‐state flexible ferroelectric composite electrolytes utilizing strongly coupled intrinsic ion conducting 2D/2D sodium‐rich anti‐perovskite (NaRAP)/ferroelectric perovskite heterostructures is introduced. Herein, highly scalable PVDF‐based metaferroelectrolytes with Na 2.99 Ba 0.005 OCl/Ca 2 Na 2 Nb 5 O 16 − (CNNO − ) nanosheets into a ferroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride‐co‐hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF‐HFP) matrix, through an in situ cross‐linking and spontaneous bridging method, for compact solid‐state sodium batteries (SSBs), are reported. Benefiting from unique well‐dispersed 3D ferroelectric coupled network and the Na 2.99 Ba 0.005 OCl/CNNO − ‐induced PVDF‐HFP ferroelectric β phase, the Na + flux is regulated, thereby inhibiting Na dendrite growth at the interface. Notably, the optimized PH‐5% NC metaferroelectrolyte exhibits rapid ion transport (1.11 × 10 −4 S cm −1 at 25 °C), a wide electrochemical window (> 4.8V), superior conformal mechanical compatibility, improved flexibility, good elasticity and flame retardancy. The solid‐state Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /PH‐5% NC/Na batteries present a stable cycling performance (remaining 56.4 mAh g −1 after 500 cycles at 1 C) even at 0 °C, potential for cost‐effective, safe, stable and compact SSB energy storage over 600 Wh L −1 , vastly surpassing 365 Wh L −1 of the current commercial sodium‐ion liquid‐electrolyte batteries.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2022

Evaluating the roles of electrolyte components on the passivation of silicon anodes

A protocol was recently developed to compare calendar life using a constant potential while monitoring the electrical current required to maintain the potential. Here, this calendar life protocol is used with electrolyte formulations containing various mole fractions of ethylene carbonate (EC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), and LiPF 6 to elucidate the role each component plays in passivation for high silicon anodes. Together, EC and LiPF 6 lead to higher currents, and thus poorer passivation, whereas EMC acts as a spectator. The variation of the components' mole fraction also changes the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) composition, as measured by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Importantly, higher LiPF 6 content leads to increased LiF as well as increased current, indicating that higher LiF content does not enhance the passivation of the silicon surface. Finding that EC did not yield a passivating SEI, instead ethylene sulfite, sulfolane, and propylene carbonate (PC) were used in place of EC. Using ethylene sulfite and sulfolane resulted in poorer passivation compared to EC, whereas PC resulted in superior passivation. As a result, the superior passivation may be related to more stable lithium-solvent complexes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Universal Design of Lithium Anode via Dynamic Stability Strategy for Practical All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery (ASSLB) chemistry with thin solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) membranes features high energy density and intrinsic safety but suffers from severe dendrite formation and poor interface contact during cycling, which hampers the practical application of rechargeable ASSLB. Here, we propose a universal design of thin Li‐metal anode (LMA) via a dynamic stability strategy to address these issues. The ultra‐thin LMA (20 μm) is in situ constructed with uniform highly Li‐ion conductive solid‐electrolyte interphase and composite‐polymer interphase (CPI) via electroplating process. As a result, the passivation layer with poor Li‐ion conduction on Li anode can be dissolved and small surface resistance can be achieved due to the good compatibility of CPI to SSEs. The cycling of Li symmetric cell with Li 6 PS 5 Cl thin film electrolyte (<100 μm) shows a high critical current density of >2.0 mA cm −2 with excellent cycling stability at 1.0 mA cm −2 . The ASSLBs paring with Ni‐rich LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode demonstrated the feasibility of engineered LMA design by presenting good rate capability from 0.1 C to 1.0 C at room temperature, as well as long‐term cycling stability (81 % retention after 100 cycles). This work represents a general pathway to make thin dendrite‐free LMA available for high‐energy‐density ASSLBs.

Deng, Tao [Department of Chemical and Biomolecular↗
DOE OSTI2025

A Universal Design of Lithium Anode via Dynamic Stability Strategy for Practical All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract All‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery (ASSLB) chemistry with thin solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) membranes features high energy density and intrinsic safety but suffers from severe dendrite formation and poor interface contact during cycling, which hampers the practical application of rechargeable ASSLB. Here, we propose a universal design of thin Li‐metal anode (LMA) via a dynamic stability strategy to address these issues. The ultra‐thin LMA (20 μm) is in situ constructed with uniform highly Li‐ion conductive solid‐electrolyte interphase and composite‐polymer interphase (CPI) via electroplating process. As a result, the passivation layer with poor Li‐ion conduction on Li anode can be dissolved and small surface resistance can be achieved due to the good compatibility of CPI to SSEs. The cycling of Li symmetric cell with Li 6 PS 5 Cl thin film electrolyte (<100 μm) shows a high critical current density of >2.0 mA cm −2 with excellent cycling stability at 1.0 mA cm −2 . The ASSLBs paring with Ni‐rich LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode demonstrated the feasibility of engineered LMA design by presenting good rate capability from 0.1 C to 1.0 C at room temperature, as well as long‐term cycling stability (81 % retention after 100 cycles). This work represents a general pathway to make thin dendrite‐free LMA available for high‐energy‐density ASSLBs.

Deng, Tao [Department of Chemical and Biomolecular↗
DOE OSTI2025

Analysis of Degradation and Electrochemical Behavior of Lithium–Oxygen Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions

Lithium-oxygen batteries have garnered much attention in the past decades due to their high energy density and active material abundancy. Decreasing the electrolyte volume is critical to achieving a high energy density for practical applications. Recent works have demonstrated a serious performance limitation at lower electrolyte fillings. Here, in this work, we study specifically the difference between flooded and lean electrolyte lithium-oxygen batteries by systematically tracing the source of performance degradation. We find that the key contributor to the decrease in performance under lean electrolyte conditions stems from the lithium metal anode rather than the cathode. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) compositionally appears to be the same from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy but the coverage is less uniform, and impedance is much higher under lean electrolyte conditions. Such an effect likely produced the observed poorer cycle performance at 10 μL cm -2 (similar to 28% cathode's pore volume filled) vs 100 μL cm -2 (278% of cathode's pore volume) at a capacity of 1.0 mAh cm -2 (0.1 mAh cm -2 ) using an electrolyte composition of 1 M LiTFSI in TEGDME.

Córdoba, Daniel [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Fireproof, Lightweight, Polymer–Polymer Solid-State Electrolyte for Safe Lithium Batteries

Safety issues in lithium-ion batteries have raised serious concerns due to their ubiquitous utilization and close contact with the human body. Replacing flammable liquid electrolytes, solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) is thought to address this issue as well as provide unmatched energy densities in Li-based batteries. However, among the most intensively studied SSEs, polymeric solid electrolyte and polymer/ceramic composites are usually flammable, leaving the safety issue unattended. Here, we report the first design of a fireproof, ultralightweight polymer–polymer SSE. The SSE is composed of a porous mechanic enforcer (polyimide, PI), a fire-retardant additive (decabromodiphenyl ethane, DBDPE), and a ionic conductive polymer electrolyte (poly(ethylene oxide)/lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide). The whole SSE is made from organic materials, with a thin, tunable thickness (10–25 μm), which endorse the energy density comparable to conventional separator/liquid electrolytes. The PI/DBDPE film is thermally stable, nonflammable, and mechanically strong, preventing Li–Li symmetrical cells from short-circuiting after more than 300 h of cycling. LiFePO 4 /Li half cells with our SSE show a high rate performance (131 mAh g –1 at 1 C) as well as cycling performance (300 cycles at C/2 rate) at 60 °C. Most intriguingly, pouch cells made with our polymer–polymer SSE still functioned well even under flame abuse tests.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Identification of LiH and nanocrystalline LiF in the solid–electrolyte interphase of lithium metal anodes

A comprehensive understanding of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) composition is crucial to developing high-energy batteries based on lithium metal anodes. A particularly contentious issue concerns the presence of LiH in the SEI. In this work, we report on the use of synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction and pair distribution function analysis to identify and differentiate two elusive components, LiH and LiF, in the SEI of lithium metal anodes. LiH is identified as a component of the SEI in high abundance, and the possibility of its misidentification as LiF in the literature is discussed. LiF in the SEI is found to have different structural features from LiF in the bulk phase, including a larger lattice parameter and a smaller grain size (<3 nm). These characteristics favour Li + transport and explain why an ionic insulator, like LiF, has been found to be a favoured component for the SEI. Finally, pair distribution function analysis reveals key amorphous components in the SEI.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Challenges for and Pathways Toward Solid-State Batteries

Solid-state batteries utilizing lithium metal anodes have the potential to enable batteries with a specific energy of >500 Wh/kg and an energy density of >1,500 Wh/L for thousands of cycles. When optimized they will improve the energy efficiency, operating temperature range, sustainability, and safety at a lower cost compared to projections for advanced Li-ion batteries. This improved performance is critical for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles and may enable future applications such as electric aviation. Expectations for solid-state batteries are high, there are significant materials and processing challenges that need to be overcome. Some of these challenges are well known; others are more subtle and are just becoming known. The challenges and their solutions must be clearly identified to realize high-energy solid-state Li metal batteries. In the United States, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) funds the majority of energy storage research and development, including solid state battery research. Web of Science publication analysis shows that worldwide DOE is second largest funder. Work on solid state batteries is distributed across different arms of DOE and is coordinated at headquarters to ensure a broad national portfolio for advanced batteries, including lithium batteries and solid-state battery devices. We note that university and national laboratory researchers in the US with a long-standing interest in solid state batteries is a small, integrated community with recognized impact for publications, patents and startup companies. The opportunity for this group to engage for research with international colleagues is growing, fostered by periodic bilateral meetings supported by DOE and by the recent joint US German research program for lithium battery interface studies. These are valuable opportunities to speed solid-state battery development. The ORNL led virtual workshop, overviewed here, confirms the community’s shared vision of the exciting advances, opportunities, and challenges. Further, we are seeing that this workshop has spawned several new informal collaborations and draft proposals. This encourages us to propose future discussion. On May 11, 2020, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) hosted a 6-hour, on-line national workshop to discuss recent advances and most the prominent obstacles to realizing solid-state Li metal batteries. The workshop included more than 30+ experts from national laboratories, universities, and companies, all of whom have worked on solid-state batteries for multiple years. The participants shared recent advances, many not yet in print, illustrating that the community has gained significant new insights for solid-state Li battery materials over the last 5 years. In this report, the major outcomes of the workshop are organized to identify the gaps in our scientific knowledge for four core materials science areas: (1) Li metal anodes, (2) the solid electrolyte in contact with Li metal, (3) active cathode materials and solid-state composite cathodes, and (4) solid electrolytes. Illustrative examples and discussions are reported with the more comprehensive issues in the report. Discussion of additional challenges related to processing of solid-state battery materials and to the designs and architectures for mechanically robust, long-lived batteries received less attention due to time constraints. These are good themes for deeper discussion at a follow-on workshop, where a complete list of critical research topics can be identified.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗