Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “co2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Assessing feasible H2–CO2 sources in the US as Feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Precursors: Acetic Acid and Ethanol Production via Hydrogenotrophic Pathways

The environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions is significant, and research is focused on mitigating these emissions and developing eco-friendly technologies in line with green chemistry principles. Waste-to-energy technologies play a crucial role in converting waste into renewable energy and valuable biofuels and bioproducts. This study specifically explores the utilization of waste gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide, from various sources in the United States for the production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) precursors, such as ethanol and acetic acid. The study categorizes and quantifies the volumes of carbon dioxide emissions into three types: non-biogenic, biogenic, and biogenic emissions from ethanol production facilities. Stoichiometric calculations are applied to compare the amounts of carbon dioxide from each category with the available hydrogen production capacity, determining if sufficient hydrogen is present for converting carbon dioxide into SAF precursors. The study reveals two key findings. Firstly, there is a significant reserve of carbon dioxide, approximately 1648 million metric tons per year (MMTy), combining all three categories, which would require a substantial increase of approximately 35–40 times in the existing hydrogen production capacity of 4.988 MMTy. This increased hydrogen production has the potential to yield approximately 1067.82 MMTy of acetic acid and 189.19 MMTy of ethanol annually. Secondly, upon analyzing the quality and application of the three sources of carbon dioxide with the currently available hydrogen production capacity, it is found that biogenic carbon dioxide from ethanol plants is the most suitable choice for immediate production of SAF precursors. This would theoretically result in an annual production of 1.36 MMTy of ethanol and 1.772 MMTy of acetic acid. The other two sources of carbon dioxide can be considered potential reserves for future utilization when additional hydrogen production facilities are established. The study provides a foundation for assessing the aggregation potential required for acetic acid and ethanol production. By optimizing the use of waste gases as raw materials, the study not only enables the production of SAF precursors but also contributes to the passive reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Carbon Dioxide↗
DOE OSTI2022

A Geospatial Cost Comparison of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Power and Geologic CO2 Storage

CO 2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) power plants can use gigatonne-levels of CO 2 sequestration to generate electricity, but it is unknown if the resources that support low-cost CPG power align with the resources that support low-cost CO 2 sequestration. Here, we estimate and compare the geospatially-distributed cost of CPG and CO 2 storage across a portion of North America. We find that the locations with lowest-cost CO 2 storage are different than the locations with lowest-cost CPG. There are also locations with low-cost CO 2 storage (<$5/tCO 2 ) that do not support CPG power generation due to insufficient reservoir transmissivity or temperature. Thus, CPG development may require electricity prices that are greater than the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) to offset the increased cost of sequestration. We introduce the “Additional Cost of Electricity (ACOE)” metric to account for this cost and add it to the LCOE to calculate breakeven electricity prices that are required for CPG development. We find that breakeven prices are lower when new CO 2 injection wells are drilled specifically for CPG (i.e., “greenfield” CPG development) compared to if only existing CO 2 sequestration injection wells are used (i.e., “brownfield” CPG development). This is because comparatively few wells are needed for sequestration-only, and the increased power capacity from having more CPG wells outweighs the increased costs from more drilling. We also find that sequestered CO 2 could be used to approximately triple the United States geothermal electricity power capacity via a single CPG “sweet spot” in South Dakota, but that breakeven electricity price for this development is on the order of $200/MW e h.

15 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY↗