The effect of various propellants and propellant mixtures on an MPD arc jet.
Propellants and propellant mixtures effects on MPD arc jet performance in test for ions and neutrals mixture acceleration to high velocity
NEUTRAL PARTICLE↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “arc jet”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Cost and Throughput Analysis for the NASA Ames Arc Jet Modernization Program
NASA Ames Center is currently evaluating alternatives to modernize the Arc Jet Complex, a critical part of testing for NASA’s planetary missions. NASA’s Arc Jet Complex facilities “are used to simulate the aerothermodynamic heating that a spacecraft endures throughout hypersonic atmospheric entry, and to test candidate thermal protection system (TPS) materials and systems. “Because planetary mission schedules often have tight windows due to planetary alignment constraints, a small increase in schedule could result in a two-year delay. Such a delay could increase the cost of a $1billionmissionbyhundreds of millions of dollars due to project personnel pay and clean room storage. To avoid these costs, the authors support NASA Ames in evaluating return on investment (ROI) and effectiveness of alternatives for modernizing the complex. The first input into the ROI is the deconstruction and construction cost estimates, which are developed using independent research on highly specialized subsystems, vendor quotes, and Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), depending on the facility and work package. One of the measures of effectiveness is throughput analysis of the test bays, as a main goal of the modernization is to increase the number of possible test runs per year. This analysis is conducted via a probabilistic simulation and accounts for a variety of stochastic factors that influence the sequence of test runs, such as the facility availability; test complexity; the need to pause to assess test results; test failure; and the possibility of a system failure. The methodologies for both these analyses are discussed, along with the challenges presented due to the unique nature of the highly specialized test equipment.
Jennifer Scheel↗
CFD Simulations for Arc-Jet Panel Testing Capability Development Using Semi-Elliptical Nozzles
This paper reports computational simulations in support of arc-jet panel testing capability development using semi-elliptical nozzles in a high enthalpy arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center. Two different semi-elliptical nozzle configurations are proposed for testing panel test articles. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed to provide estimates of achievable panel surface conditions and useful test area for each configuration. The present analysis comprises three-dimensional simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfields in the semi-elliptical nozzles, test box and flowfield over the panel test articles. Computations show that useful test areas for the proposed two nozzle options are 20.32 centimeters by 20.32 centimeters (8 inches by 8 inches) and 43.18 centimeters by 43.18 centimeters (17 inches by 17 inches). Estimated values of the maximum cold-wall heat flux and surface pressure are 155 watts per centimeters squared and 39 kilopascals for the smaller panel test option, and 44 watts per centimeters squared and 7 kilopascals for the larger panel test option. Other important properties of the predicted flowfields are presented, and factors that limit the useful test area in the semi-free jet test configuration are discussed.
TPS↗
CFD Simulations for Arc-Jet Panel Testing Capability Development Using Semi-Elliptical Nozzles
This paper reports computational simulations in support of arc-jet panel testing capability development using semi-elliptical nozzles in a high enthalpy arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center. Two different semi-elliptical nozzle configurations are proposed for testing panel test articles. Computational fluid dynamics simulations are performed to provide estimates of achievable panel surface conditions and useful test area for each configuration. The present analysis comprises three-dimensional simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfields in the semi-elliptical nozzles, test box and flowfield over the panel test articles. Computations show that useful test areas for the proposed two nozzle options are 20.32 centimeters by 20.32 centimeters (8 inches by 8 inches) and 43.18 centimeters by 43.18 centimeters (17 inches by 17 inches). Estimated values of the maximum cold-wall heat flux and surface pressure are 155 watts per centimeters squared and 39 kilopascals for the smaller panel test option, and 44 watts per centimeters squared and 7 kilopascals for the larger panel test option. Other important properties of the predicted flowfields are presented, and factors that limit the useful test area in the semi-free jet test configuration are discussed.
CFD↗
The effect of various propellants and propellant mixtures on an MPD arc jet
Propellant mixtures effects on magnetoplasma arc jet, and velocity measurements of ions and neutrals
Bowen, F. W.↗
Arc jet tests of metallic TPS materials
Arc jets tests of thoria dispersed nickel base alloys and cobalt base alloys for space shuttle metallic thermal protection system
Centolanzi, F. J.↗
Real time mass flow computer for Arc Jet Wind Tunnel
Experiments at the Arc Jet Tunnel at Ames Research Center have typical run times of 5-10 sec during which the test model is subjected to an environment simulating reentry into Jupiter. Previous real-time determination of mass flow required off-line manual computations from taped or strip chart data. The present paper describes a computer which provides personnel with real-time computations of mass flow. Using an 8-bit microprocessor and standard TTL interface circuitry, the unit interrogates temperature and pressure instruments with other parameters to compute mass flow.
Vidal, J.↗
Cesium fueled mpd arc jet engine performance.
MPD arc thrustor operated with cesium plasma and external magnetic field
ARC JET↗
Viscous reacting flows with wall slip and catalysis applied to spheres in arc jets and flight
The influence of wall slip and catalytic atom-recombination on the flow field and wall heat flux are calculated for high altitude flight and arc jet flow conditions. Boundary equations, which include velocity slip, temperature jump, and wall catalytic atom recombination, are coupled to the viscous reacting multicomponent Navier-Stokes equations. These equations are solved using a time-dependent finite difference technique applied to spheres in an arc jet flow (Reynolds number of 550) and a high altitude flight case representative of the Space Shuttle Orbiter (Reynolds number of 450). The results indicate that catalysis strongly influences the temperature jump, but not the velocity slip. Slip increases the atom fraction and temperature at both the wall and the flow field. Likewise, the shock stand-off distance, the wall heat flux, and friction coefficient are increased over the nonslip cases. The reacting gas calculations confirm the chemically frozen nature of the shock layer in arc jet flows.
Scott, C. D.↗
Boeing: Arc Jet Exposure of Ablative Non-Oxide CMC TPS for Planetary Probe and Sample Return Applications
NASA Game Changing Development (GCD) provided Boeing support under a Space Act Agreement (SAA) for arc jet sample design, CFD support and arc jet test time of stagnation and shear models for 3 Boeing TPS materials: BLA (Boeing Lightweight Ablator, 18, 21 and 22 densities), BPA (Boeing Phenolic Ablator, standard, graded density, or without reinforcement) and Non-oxide high temperature ceramic composite for structurally integrated TPS (SITPS). Results: For BLA, tested successfully to 500 W/cm² heat flux and heat loads up to 12 kJ/cm² with shear loads up to 370 Pa. The BPA 2017 formulation tested successfully to 1500 W/cm² and 80 kJ/cm², with shear loads up to 250 Pa. For SITIPS, Boeing fabricated C/SiC laminate materials survived testing in shear.
commercial space↗
Analysis of Probe Surveys Conducted in the 10-MW TP3 Arc-Jet Facility 15-Inch Nozzle Flow
Computational simulations and analysis of flow characterization tests in a high enthalpy arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center are reported. These tests were conducted in the 10-MW TP3 facility 15-inch conical nozzle, and pitot pressure and heat flux probes are used to survey test flow downstream of the nozzle exit. Two 1.59-cm (0.625 in) diameter hemisphere probes were used: one with a stagnation-point pressure port, the other with a Gardon heat flux gage. Calibration data were also obtained using 20.32-cm flat-faced slug calorimeters. Experimental surveys of arc-jet test flow with pitot pressure and heat flux probes were obtained at eight arc-heater conditions, covering wide ranges in arc current (316–1756 A) and mass flow rate (32–500 g/s, without any cold-gas injection at the arc-heater plenum) and providing assessment of the flow uniformity in the facility. The present analysis comprises computational fluid dynamics simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfield in the facility nozzle and test box, including the models tested. These simulations take into account non-uniform total enthalpy and mass flux profiles at the nozzle inlet as well as the expansion waves emanating from the nozzle exit and their effects on the model flowfields. Comparisons of computations with the experimental measurements are presented, showing reasonably good agreement. The probe survey data and accompanying analysis show that the test flow in the TP3 15-inch nozzle is highly non-uniform at most conditions, and the extent of flow non-uniformity depends on arc current and mass flow rate.
Arc-jets↗
Analysis of Probe Surveys Conducted in the 10-MW TP3 Arc-Jet Facility 15-Inch Nozzle Flow
Computational simulations and analysis of flow characterization tests in a high enthalpy arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center are reported. These tests were conducted in the 10-MW TP3 facility 15-inch conical nozzle, and pitot pressure and heat flux probes are used to survey test flow downstream of the nozzle exit. Two 1.59-cm (0.625 in) diameter hemisphere probes were used: one with a stagnation-point pressure port, the other with a Gardon heat flux gage. Calibration data were also obtained using 10.16-cm iso-q and 20.32-cm flat-faced slug calorimeters. Experimental surveys of arc-jet test flow with pitot pressure and heat flux probes were obtained at eight arc-heater conditions, covering wide ranges in arc current (316–1756 A) and mass flow rate (32–500 g/s, without any cold-gas injection at the arc-heater plenum) and providing assessment of the flow uniformity in the facility. The present analysis comprises computational fluid dynamics simulations of the nonequilibrium flowfield in the facility nozzle and test box, including the models tested. These simulations take into account non-uniform total enthalpy and mass flux profiles at the nozzle inlet as well as the expansion waves emanating from the nozzle exit and their effects on the model flowfields. Comparisons of computations with the experimental measurements are presented, showing reasonably good agreement. The probe survey data and accompanying analysis show that the test flow in the TP3 15-inch nozzle is highly non-uniform at most conditions, and the extent of flow non-uniformity depends on arc current and mass flow rate.
Arc-jets↗
Arc Jet Testing
This course will cover an overview of the Entry Systems and Technology Division (TS) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) and descriptions of the extensive arc jet testing complex managed within the branch. After a quick look at the Earth and Planetary Entry projects supported by TS, along with the inventions and software developed within the division, a description of the entry environments to which thermal protection systems (TPS) are exposed will be discussed. The question of "How do we insure TPS survival?" will be answered with descriptions of the various test facilities across the agency and beyond and their applicability. The Ames Arc Jet Complex will then be described, starting with how an arc heater works, adding in the associated infrastructure required to run an arc heater, and the capabilities of each of the test tunnels. Finally, examples of TPS test articles will round out the course.
arc jet testing↗
Arc-Jet Power Supply And Starting Circuit
Power efficiency high, current regulated, and starting automatic. New circuit for starting arc jets and controlling them in steady operation capable of high power efficiency and constructed in lightweight form. Feedback control system keeps arc-jet current nearly constant, once arc struck by starting pulse. Circuit made of commercially available components. Design capable of high power efficiency.
Gruber, Robert P.↗
Extending mARC II Arc-Jet Test Duration via Design and Implementation of Model System Cooling Sleeve
The mARC II is a 30 kW arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center used to generate high-enthalpy flows for low-cost thermal protection system (TPS) technology development. Sustained operation of downstream instrumentation and material samples is constrained by thermal loading transmitted through the arc-jet test environment, limiting achievable run times and experimental throughput. This work presents the design, integration, and validation of a cooling sleeve implemented on the sweep arm drive motor feedthrough to mitigate thermal accumulation during testing. The addition of the cooling sleeve is a simple, robust upgrade that translates directly into enhanced facility capability by supporting longer run durations, reduced turnaround time, and higher throughput.
numerical simulations↗
Extending mARC II Arc-Jet Test Duration via Design and Implementation of Model System Cooling Sleeve
The mARC II is a 30 kW arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center used to generate high-enthalpy flows for low-cost thermal protection system (TPS) technology development. Sustained operation of downstream instrumentation and material samples is constrained by thermal loading transmitted through the arc-jet test environment, limiting achievable run times and experimental throughput. This work presents the design, integration, and validation of a cooling sleeve implemented on the sweep arm drive motor feedthrough to mitigate thermal accumulation during testing. The addition of the cooling sleeve is a simple, robust upgrade that translates directly into enhanced facility capability by supporting longer run durations, reduced turnaround time, and higher throughput.
sting arm↗
Boundary Layer Protuberance Simulations in Channel Nozzle Arc-Jet
Two protuberance designs were modeled in the channel nozzle of the NASA Johnson Space Center Atmospheric Reentry Materials and Structures Facility with the Data-Parallel Line Relaxation computational fluid dynamics code. The heating on the protuberance was compared to nominal baseline heating at a single fixed arc-jet condition in order to obtain heating augmentation factors for flight traceability in the Boundary Layer Transition Flight Experiment on Space Shuttle Orbiter flights STS-119 and STS-128. The arc-jet simulations were performed in conjunction with the actual ground tests performed on the protuberances. The arc-jet simulations included non-uniform inflow conditions based on the current best practices methodology and used variable enthalpy and constant mass flow rate across the throat. Channel walls were modeled as fully catalytic isothermal surfaces, while the test section (consisting of Reaction Cured Glass tiles) was modeled as a partially catalytic radiative equilibrium wall. The results of the protuberance and baseline simulations were compared to the applicable ground test results, and the effects of the protuberance shock on the opposite channel wall were investigated.
Marichalar, J. J.↗
Flowfield Analysis of a Small Entry Probe (SPRITE) Tested in an Arc Jet
A novel concept of small size (diameter less than 15 inches) entry probes named SPRITE (Small Probe Re-entry Investigation for TPS Engineering) has been developed at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC). These flight probes have on-board data acquisition systems that have also been developed in parallel at NASA ARC by Greg Swanson1. Flight probes of this size facilitate testing over a wide range of conditions in arc jets available at NASA ARC, thereby fulfilling a 'test what you fly' paradigm. As indicated by the acronym, these probes, with suitably tailored trajectories, are primarily meant to be robotic flight test beds for TPS materials, although the design is flexible enough to accommodate additional objectives of flight-testing other vehicle subsystems. A first step towards establishing the feasibility of the SPRITE concept is to arc-jet test fully instrumented models at flight scale. In a follow-on to the Large-Scale Article Tests (LSAT2) performed in the 60 MW Interaction Heating Facility (IHF) in late 2008/early 2009, a full-scale model of Deep Space-2 (DS23) made of red oak was tested in the 20 MW Aerodynamic Heating Facility (AHF). There were no issues with mass capture by the diffuser for blunt bodies of roughly 15 inches diameter tested in the 18-inch nozzle of the AHF. Building on this initial success, two identical test articles - SPRITE-T1-1 and SPRITE-T1-2 (T1 indicating the choice of back shell geometry) - were fabricated, and one of them, SPRITE-T1-1, was tested in the AHF recently. Both these test articles, 14 inches in diameter, have a 45deg sphere-cone (like DS2) made of PICA bonded on to a 1/8th inch thick aluminum shell using RTV. The aft portion of the test article is a conical frustum (15deg cone angle) with LI-2200 bonded on to the aluminum shell. Each model is fully instrumented with: (a) thermocouples imbedded in plugs in the heat shield, (b) thermocouples bonded to the aluminum substructure; the thermocouples are distributed over the entire shell, and (c) a few strain gages. Data from some of the thermocouples and gages are acquired by the on-board data acquisition system (DAS), while data from the others are routed to the facility-provided DAS, thereby enabling a cross check on the in situ measurement capability. as inputs to v2.6.1 of the in-house materials thermal response code, FIAT
atmospheric entry↗