In Situ Visualization for the Large Scale Computing Initiative Milestone.
Abstract not provided.
Mauldin, Jeffrey↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “Visualization”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Large-Scale Visualization on Exascale Hardware Technical Advances in the Era of Big Data Analysis and Visualization LDAV 2020 Panel.
Abstract not provided.
Moreland, Kenneth D.↗
The Impact of Operated Window Shading on Visual Comfort, Non-Visual Health, and Energy Demand from Electric Lighting
This paper introduces a simulation-based workflow to assess annual circadian lighting performance, glare risk and energy demand for an array of seated view positions under operated shading and electric lighting conditions. This workflow uses a combination of 9-band and 81-band simulations to represent daylight and electric lighting respectively. Annual daylight-driven calculations rely on a python-based code provided in the LARK simulation engine which was used to run 180-degree high dynamic range (HDR) renderings with 9-bands of spectral resolution. The results reveal the impact of shading systems on equivalent melanopic lux (EML) and daylight glare probability (DGP) over time and the energy demand (kWh) from electric lighting systems to supplement eye-level recommendations from the WELL v2 Building Standard.
Rockcastle, Siobhan↗
HD 202772A b: A Transiting Hot Jupiter around a Bright, Mildly Evolved Star in a Visual Binary Discovered by TESS
We report the first confirmation of a hot Jupiter discovered by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission: HD 202772A b. The transit signal was detected in the data from TESS Sector 1, and was confirmed to be of planetary origin through radial velocity (RV) measurements. HD 202772A b is orbiting a mildly evolved star with a period of 3.3 days. With an apparent magnitude of V = 8.3, the star is among the brightest and most massive known to host a hot Jupiter. Based on the 27 days of TESS photometry and RV data from the CHIRON, HARPS, and Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph, the planet has a mass of 1.017{sub −0.068}{sup +0.070} M{sub J} and radius of 1.545{sub −0.060}{sup +0.052} R{sub J}, making it an inflated gas giant. HD 202772A b is a rare example of a transiting hot Jupiter around a quickly evolving star. It is also one of the most strongly irradiated hot Jupiters currently known.
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
Using Eye Tracking Metrics and Visual Saliency Maps to Assess Data Visualizations.
Abstract not provided.
Matzen, Laura E.↗
Data Visualization Saliency Model: A Tool for Evaluating Abstract Data Visualizations Supplemental Materials.
Abstract not provided.
Matzen, Laura E.↗
Visual Cognition: Human Comprehension of Data Visualizations.
Abstract not provided.
Haass, Michael Joseph↗
Evaluation of Visualization Heuristics
Heuristics have been used since the early 1990's in the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) domain, for evaluating user interfaces. Most notably, heuristics developed by Nielsen and Molich (1990) have been used by the HCI community. Forsell and Johansson (2010) used the same methodology as Nielsen and Molich and developed a set of 10 heuristics for information visualization. Currently, neither the information visualization or the visual analytics community has adopted these heuristics. However, several studies have been conducted using heuristics. Hearst et al. (2015) found that using the heuristics for visualizations along with asking questions about the data resulted in complementary results as the questions about the data could compensate for heuristics that were difficult to understand and apply. Heli Väätäjä et al. (2016) found that heuristics related to interaction, veracity, and aesthetics needed to be added to the Forsell and Johansson (2010) set. They also noted that a lack of domain knowledge caused the evaluators issues in conducting a heuristic evaluation. We conducted a controlled experiment to determine what factors might impact the expert evaluators' capability to conduct a heuristic evaluation of a static information visualization. In particular, we wanted to understand how their familiarity with the visualizations and their experience in conducting heuristic evaluations impacted their evaluations of visualizations. We recruited 10 participants who were domain experts in the visualization field each having experience with one of more of the following: user experience design or research, user interface development, and human computer interaction research. We used a heuristic set proposed by Forsell and Johansson. Participants were also asked to complete a demographic survey in which they rated their experience with each visualization type generally, their experience conducting heuristic evaluations, their experience using each visualization type to extract information, and their experience developing and creating each visualization type. The participants were shown a series of 5 common visualizations (Scatterplots, Sunbursts, Tree Maps, Parallel Sets, and Area Graphs) all displaying the VAST 2008 Mini Challenge Two- Migrant Boats data . Participants were given a suggested analytical question related to each visualization to keep in mind as they applied the 10 heuristics to each visualization. They were asked if they could find any usability problems in the visualizations and which heuristic(s) helped them to identify these problems. The participants were asked to rate how relevant each heuristic was for evaluating each visualization along with rating how confident they felt in their ability to apply the heuristic to evaluate each visualization. At the conclusion of the study, participants provided qualitative feedback on the usability issues of each visualization. Additionally, we collected eye tracking data on 6 of the 10 participants. We will be using this data to determine how long participants looked at the various visualizations and what parts of the visualizations they focused on. We had two hypotheses for this empirical evaluation: 1.The Forsell and Johansson heuristics of Orientation and help, Data set reduction, and Prompting are less useful for static visualizations because they require some interaction in order to test completely. 2.Participants that do not have experience with heuristic evaluation will provide lower evaluation scores for the heuristics compared to those that have experience. Related to hypothesis 1, as our study used only static visualizations, interaction-related usability challenges should be harder to identify. This should result in lower usefulness ratings for those heuristics. Preliminary results indicate that participants found it more difficult to apply heuristics to unfamiliar visualizations.
Williams, Ryan G.↗
User-Centered Evaluation of Visual Analytics
Visual analytics systems are becoming very popular. More domains now use interactive visualizations to analyze the ever-increasing amount and heterogeneity of data. More novel visualizations are being developed for more tasks and users. We need to ensure that these systems can be evaluated to determine that they are both useful and usable. A user-centered evaluation for visual analytics needs to be developed for these systems. While many of the typical human-computer interaction (HCI) evaluation methodologies can be applied as is, others will need modification. Additionally, new functionality in visual analytics systems needs new evaluation methodologies. There is a difference between usability evaluations and user-centered evaluations. Usability looks at the efficiency, effectiveness, and user satisfaction of users carrying out tasks with software applications. User-centered evaluation looks more specifically at the utility provided to the users by the software. This is reflected in the evaluations done and in the metrics used. In the visual analytics domain this is very challenging as users are most likely experts in a particular domain, the tasks they do are often not well defined, the software they use needs to support large amounts of different kinds of data, and often the tasks last for months. These difficulties are discussed more in the section on User-centered Evaluation. Our goal is to provide a discussion of user-centered evaluation practices for visual analytics, including existing practices that can be carried out and new methodologies and metrics that need to be developed and agreed upon by the visual analytics community. The material provided here should be of use for both researchers and practitioners in the field of visual analytics. Researchers and practitioners in HCI and interested in visual analytics will find this information useful as well as a discussion on changes that need to be made to current HCI practices to make them more suitable to visual analytics. A history of analysis and analysis techniques and problems is provided as well as an introduction to user-centered evaluation and various evaluation techniques for readers from different disciplines. The understanding of these techniques is imperative if we wish to support analysis in the visual analytics software we develop. Currently the evaluations that are conducted and published for visual analytics software are very informal and consist mainly of comments from users or potential users. Our goal is to help researchers in visual analytics to conduct more formal user-centered evaluations. While these are time-consuming and expensive to carryout, the outcomes of these studies will have a defining impact on the field of visual analytics and help point the direction for future features and visualizations to incorporate. While many researchers view work in user-centered evaluation as a less-than-exciting area to work, the opposite is true. First of all, the goal is user-centered evaluation is to help visual analytics software developers, researchers, and designers improve their solutions and discover creative ways to better accommodate their users. Working with the users is extremely rewarding as well. While we use the term “users” in almost all situations there are a wide variety of users that all need to be accommodated. Moreover, the domains that use visual analytics are varied and expanding. Just understanding the complexities of a number of these domains is exciting. Researchers are trying out different visualizations and interactions as well. And of course, the size and variety of data are expanding rapidly. User-centered evaluation in this context is rapidly changing. There are no standard processes and metrics and thus those of us working on user-centered evaluation must be creative in our work with both the users and with the researchers and developers.
intelligence analysis↗
Data Visualization Saliency v. 1.0
Evaluating the effectiveness of data visualizations is a challenging undertaking and often relies on one-off human subject studies that test a visualization in the context of one specific task. Researchers across the fields of data science, visualization, and human-computer interaction are calling for foundational tools and principles that could be applied to assessing the effectiveness of data visualizations in a more rapid and generalizable manner. The visual saliency model for data visualizations described here addresses this need for evaluation tools. Visual saliency models assess the visual features (e.g. color, contrast, edges) of an image to predict which areas of that image will draw a viewer’s attention. Providing predictions of where viewers will look in a visualization based on the saliency of the various regions and elements in that image could help designers to assess whether or not their design will draw the viewer’s attention as intended. The Data Visualization Saliency model, a saliency model for data visualizations, consists of two parts: a text saliency map and a modified version of the Itti, Koch and Niebur model [1]. The final saliency map is a linear combination of the two. The text saliency map is created from an algorithm that computes the likelihood of belonging to a text region for each pixel of an input visualization image. The modified Itti model transforms the original input image to a representation in CIE LAB color space, which provides an accurate representation of perceptual color opponency. For a given input data visualization image, the Data Visualization Saliency model computes and returns the visualization saliency map highlighting areas of the data visualization that will draw a viewer’s attention. It also returns the lower level saliency maps for text and the modified Itti model.
Haass, Michael↗
Modeling human comprehension of data visualizations
This project was inspired by two needs. The first is a need for tools to help scientists and engineers to design effective data visualizations for communicating information, whether to the user of a system, an analyst who must make decisions based on complex data, or in the context of a technical report or publication. Most scientists and engineers are not trained in visualization design, and they could benefit from simple metrics to assess how well their visualization's design conveys the intended message. In other words, will the most important information draw the viewer's attention? The second is the need for cognition-based metrics for evaluating new types of visualizations created by researchers in the information visualization and visual analytics communities. Evaluating visualizations is difficult even for experts. However, all visualization methods and techniques are intended to exploit the properties of the human visual system to convey information efficiently to a viewer. Thus, developing evaluation methods that are rooted in the scientific knowledge of the human visual system could be a useful approach. In this project, we conducted fundamental research on how humans make sense of abstract data visualizations, and how this process is influenced by their goals and prior experience. We then used that research to develop a new model, the Data Visualization Saliency Model, that can make accurate predictions about which features in an abstract visualization will draw a viewer's attention. The model is an evaluation tool that can address both of the needs described above, supporting both visualization research and Sandia mission needs.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Prenatal and postnatal polybrominated diphenyl ether exposure and visual spatial abilities in children
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are associated with impaired visual spatial abilities in toxicological studies, but no epidemiologic study has investigated PBDEs and visual spatial abilities in children. The Health Outcomes and Measures of the Environment Study, a prospective birth cohort (2003–2006, Cincinnati, OH), was used to examine prenatal and childhood PBDEs and visual spatial abilities in 199 children. PBDEs were measured at 16±3 weeks gestation and at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 years using gas chromatography/isotope dilution high-resolution mass spectrometry. We used the Virtual Morris Water Maze to measure visual spatial abilities at 8 years. In covariate-adjusted models, 10-fold increases in BDE-47, −99, and −100 at 5 years were associated with shorter completion times by 5.2 s (95% Confidence Interval [CI] −9.3, −1.1), 4.5 s (95% CI −8.1, −0.9), and 4.7 s (95% CI −9.0, −0.3), respectively. However, children with higher BDE-153 at 3 years had longer completion times (β=5.4 s, 95% CI −0.3, 11.1). Prenatal PBDEs were associated with improved visual spatial memory retention, with children spending a higher percentage of their search path in the correct quadrant. Child sex modified some associations between PBDEs and visual spatial learning. Longer path lengths were observed among males with increased BDE-47 at 2 and 3 years, while females had shorter paths. In conclusion, prenatal and postnatal BDE-28, −47, −99, and −100 at 5 and 8 years were associated with improved visual spatial abilities, whereas a pattern of impairments in visual spatial learning was noted with early childhood BDE-153 concentrations. - Highlights: • The VMWM test was used to assess visual spatial abilities in children at 8 years. • BDE-153 at 3 years was adversely associated with visual spatial learning. • BDE-47, −99, and −100 at 5 years was associated with better visual spatial learning. • Prenatal PBDEs were associated with improved visual spatial memory retention. • Male children were observed to perform more poorly on the VMWM than females.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Portable interactive visualization of large-scale simulations in geotechnical engineering using Unity3D
Development in large-scale geotechnical engineering simulation places tremendous demand for efficient visualization of such simulation data. This study presents a lightweight software tool, i.e. Geotechnical Interactive Visualization (GIV), as a solution to this challenge, which achieves efficient interactive visualization of large-scale simulations data in geotechnical engineering. Visualization data flow and algorithms specifically optimized for common geotechnical engineering applications are implemented in GIV. GIV can visualize geotechnical structure models with time-varying attributes attached to mesh with fixed topology, and also models with time-varying mesh topologies but no attributes attached, the two most common visualization tasks in geotechnical engineering. Furthermore, challenges for large-scale simulation data visualization, including parallel simulation data redundancy, massive data size, dynamic user interaction, and portability are overcome via specifically designed algorithms for simulation data preprocessing and optimized visualization modules using the powerful 3D rendering and interactive game engine Unity3D. Comparison of GIV with several widely used visualization tools for the visualization of large-scale idealized datasets and realistic geotechnical simulations highlights the visualization efficiency, smooth interactivity, and lightweight features of GIV.
42 ENGINEERING↗
SNL ATDM Visualization (ECP ST Capability Assessment Report)
The SNL ATDM Data and Visualization work consolidates existing ATDM activities in scalable data management and visualization. Part of the responsibilities of the SNL ATDM Data and Visualization Project is the maintenance and development of visualization resources for ATDM applications on Exascale platforms. The ATDM Scalable Visualization project provides visualization and analysis required to satisfy the needs of the ASC/ATDM applications on next-generation, many-core platforms. This involves many activities including the re-engineering of visualization algorithms, services, and tools that enable ASC customers to carry out data analysis on ASC systems and ACES platforms. Current tools include scalable data analysis software released open source through ParaView, VTK, and Catalyst. We are also both leveraging and contributing to VTK-m, a many-core visualization library, to satisfy our visualization needs on advanced architectures. The scope of the Scalable Visualization under ATDM at SNL is R&D for the programming model and implementation of visualization code for ASC/ATDM projects and ASC/ATDM application support.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
A Heuristic Approach to Value-Driven Evaluation of Visualizations
Recently, an approach for determining the value of a visualization was proposed, one moving beyond simple measurements of task accuracy and speed. The value equation contains components for the time savings a visualization provides, the insights and insightful questions it spurs, the overall essence of the data it conveys, and the confidence about the data and its domain it inspires. This articulation of value is purely descriptive, however, providing no actionable method of assessing a visualization's value. In this work, we create a heuristic-based evaluation methodology to accompany the value equation for assessing interactive visualizations. We refer to the methodology colloquially as ICE-T, based on an anagram of the four value components. Our approach breaks the four components down into guidelines, each of which is made up of a small set of low-level heuristics. Evaluators who have knowledge of visualization design principles then assess the visualization with respect to the heuristics. We conducted an initial trial of the methodology on three interactive visualizations of the same data set, each evaluated by 15 visualization experts. As a result, we found that the methodology showed promise, obtaining consistent ratings across the three visualizations and mirroring judgments of the utility of the visualizations by instructors of the course in which they were developed.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Modeling and evaluating user behavior in exploratory visual analysis
Empirical evaluation methods for visualizations have traditionally focused on assessing the outcome of the visual analytic process as opposed to characterizing how that process unfolds. There are only a handful of methods that can be used to systematically study how people use visualizations, making it difficult for researchers to capture and characterize the subtlety of cognitive and interaction behaviors users exhibit during visual analysis. To validate and improve visualization design, however, it is important for researchers to be able to assess and understand how users interact with visualization systems under realistic scenarios. This paper presents a methodology for modeling and evaluating the behavior of users in exploratory visual analysis. We model visual exploration using a Markov chain process comprising transitions between mental, interaction, and computational states. These states and the transitions between them can be deduced from a variety of sources, including verbal transcripts, videos and audio recordings, and log files. This model enables the evaluator to characterize the cognitive and computational processes that are essential to insight acquisition in exploratory visual analysis, and reconstruct the dynamics of interaction between the user and the visualization system. We illustrate this model with two exemplar user studies, and demonstrate the qualitative and quantitative analytical tools it affords.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Mapping and Characterizing the Visual Impacts of the Existing US Wind Turbine Fleet
Visual impacts of wind turbines have been a persistent concern for wind energy development in the United States (US) for decades and remain a major source of project delays and cancellations. Assessments of visual impacts are frequently performed at a local scale for individual projects, but a comprehensive understanding of broader geographic patterns in visual impacts across the US is lacking. This paper presents a visual impact assessment of the existing land-based wind turbine fleet of the contiguous United States (CONUS). The assessment combines geographic information systems and 3D simulation methods to account for key factors driving the visual magnitude of impacts from the installed turbines. The results indicate that, despite the deployment of approximately 70,000 turbines and over 144 gigawatts of land-based wind in the CONUS, the visual impacts are very small when measured as a proportion of land area, population, and sensitive visual resources. Nonetheless, visual impacts are not evenly distributed: people experience a concentrated share in a small number of natural settings, primarily including plains, prairies, and deserts. Finally, we find that although increased density of wind development consistently leads to visual impacts across a greater proportion of land, it does not always lead to impacts to a greater share of the population. These findings suggest that visual impacts from wind energy are generally well-mitigated across the CONUS to date but also highlight the need for a deeper understanding of landscape sensitivity and individual perceptions of wind turbines in the most heavily impacted natural settings.
3D simulation↗