Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “TTT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overlap Preservation Using Loosely-Coupled Boundary Conditions for Body-Fitted Structured Overset Grids

Several improvements are made to overlap preservation in the automated approach to generating overset structured meshes. A loosely-coupled boundary condition (LCBC) is introduced to maintain optimal overlap for surface meshes generated from overlapping initial curves. Extension of the LCBC scheme to three-dimensional volume meshing is also presented. Test cases include various rotary wing vehicles from NASA’s Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) project, and the wing-body geometry from the NASA Juncture Flow Experiment. Results demonstrate improvements in donor stencil quality from the enhanced overlap between neighboring surface and volume meshes.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

1st AIAA CFD Transition Modeling and Prediction Workshop: OVERFLOW Results for the SST and Langtry-Menter Models

This paper reports the results of CFD simulations of the test cases for the AIAA 1stCFDTransition Modeling and Prediction Workshop held at the AIAA Scitech Forum on 21-22January, 2021 using the NASA solver OVERFLOW. The Langtry-Menter transition model was used in combination with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. The testcases include the ERCOFTAC zero-pressure-gradient flat plate cases T3A and T3B with by-pass transition, the natural laminar flow NLF(1)-0416 airfoil, the DLR inclined 6:1 prolate spheroid, and the NASA Common Research Model with wing design optimized for natural laminar flow transition (CRM-NLF). OVERFLOW load and transition predictions obtained using best practices are compared with experiments and prior simulations. Additional results are provided for modified turbulence model boundary specifications to improve alignment to reference data and assess model sensitivity.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Lift Common Research Model: RANS, HRLES and WMLES Perspectives for CLmax Prediction Using LAVA

A unified assessment of three turbulence treatments: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS), Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) and Equilibrium Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation(WMLES) is presented for the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). For the free-air configuration, steady-state RANS simulations show very accurate drag polar predictions in the low-𝛼linear regime. However, strong grid sensitivity is reported near the maximum lift-state(𝐶𝐿max), with finer-grids showing larger errors and predicting erroneous flow topologies on the wing. Our RANS simulations show that several corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA)turbulence model widely used in the community lead to more erroneous results compared to the baseline closure, without exception. Both scale-resolving methods (HRLES and WMLES)address these drawbacks and predict an outboard separation pattern on the main element that is in good agreement with the oil flow photographs taken from the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments, when LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are used. While RANS simulations with the baseline SA closure do not show any wing-root separation post𝐶𝐿max, both HRLES and WMLES show onset of corner flow separation with varying degrees of progression, along with a weak pitch break in the wing-contribution of the overall pitching moment. This post-𝐶𝐿max pitch break seen in the free-air simulations is weaker than the break observed in experiments, with a weaker break reported in WMLES for each iteration of grid-refinement. In-tunnel simulations using both SA-baseline RANS and WMLES show a much stronger post-𝐶𝐿max break with the WMLES predictions showing excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of both the flow-topology observed and the pressure-coefficients at various spanwise stations. Sensitivity to the tunnel wall boundary layer is characterized via comparisons between viscous and inviscid treatments for the tunnel walls. WMLES predictions show moderate sensitivity at the predicted inboard flow-state at 𝐶𝐿max along with the progression towards a post-𝐶𝐿max stall; however, this stalled state at 𝛼≈20◦(inside the tunnel) obtained with both tunnel wall treatments appears to be largely identical.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall Modeled Large Eddy Simulations for NASA’s Jet Noise Consensus Database of Single-Flow, Round, Convergent Jets

A campaign of wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) using structured curvilinear overlapping grids has been performed with the Launch Ascent and Vehicle Aerodynamics(LAVA) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software to predict jet noise for single-stream axisymmetric round jets. The simulations address the new Prediction Uncertainty Reduction(PUR) technical challenge within the context of NASA’s Commercial Supersonic Technology(CST) project. The goal of PUR is to quantify and reduce uncertainties from scale-resolving simulations to assess noise characteristics of next generation quiet supersonic commercial jets during takeoff and landing conditions where the noise from the exhaust jet dominates. The focus of this effort is to generate a simulation database for single-stream axisymmetric round nozzles at several conditions both for static (no ambient co-flow), which is the focus of this article, and in-flight (flight stream co-flow) conditions, which are beyond the current scope. Nine different flow conditions ranging in jet exit Mach number from 0.38 to 1.0 with nozzle temperature ratios (NTR) from 0.84 to 2.7 have been conducted. Details of the structured overset grids, numerical discretization and wall-model are provided. Near-field comparisons to PIV data show great agreement for both velocity and normal stresses, however a systematic TKE overshoot at the nozzle exit is seen in the lip line shear-layer. A permeable Ffowcs Williams Hawkings (FWH) surface, enclosing the jet, is used to predict far-field noise from the simulated flow-field. Comparison of CFD predictions to microphone array measurements demonstrate excellent agreement within the resolved frequency range. A systematic under-prediction of far-aft observer angles larger than 150 degrees has been observed across all simulations. We achieved a cost reduction of an order of magnitude for these WMLES compared to an earlier study of this configuration due to algorithmic and software improvements. The accuracy of the results and short turnaround time demonstrate that WMLES within the LAVA framework is a cost-effective approach for jet noise predictions that could soon be incorporated into the design cycle of jet noise reduction technologies.

CST↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Medium-Fidelity CFD Modeling of Multicopter Wakes for Airborne Sensor Measurements

A steady-state multicopter simulation capability leveraging automated Cartesian grid generation and a blade element source term rotor model was used to investigate multi-rotor aerodynamics in and out of ground effect. Simulations demonstrated that this model is able to predict reasonably accurate thrust in ground effect for both single and multiple propeller cases. The method yielded accurate lift and drag predictions for a commercial quadcopter when compared to recent wind tunnel test data. This aircraft was then simulated in a variety of flight conditions, including both hover and edgewise forward flight, to determine if generalized guidelines for airborne sensor placement could be developed. Velocity perturbation magnitudes showed large regions of affected air upstream of the vehicle at low speeds, which contracted as the vehicle’s speed was increased. Placing the sensors more than one characteristic length ahead of or above the aircraft reduces errors from rotor-induced flow at higher speeds. For low-speed forward flight, the entrainment of flow into the propeller wakes introduces significant flow turning above the aircraft, suggesting that a forward location, with more moderate perturbations, could be advantageous for these conditions.

ARMD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HLPW-4/GMGW-3: Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann Technology Focus Group Workshop Summary

A summary of the nine submissions to the Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann(WMLESLB) Technical Focus Group (TFG) at the 4th High lift Prediction Workshop is provided. The focus of this TFG was to assess the current capabilities of WMLES and Lattice-Boltzmann methods on a complex high-lift configuration across a wide range of angles of attack. Preliminary analysis of the submitted data suggests that>250𝑀spatial degrees of freedom are needed to accurately predict pitching moments at high angles of attack due to large pressure gradients present on the outboard slat and main element for𝛼 >17◦(corrected for free-air).While some scatter is reported in pitching moments at the low-angles of attack (𝛼 <11◦) - likely caused by differences in flap separation possibly due to low Reynolds number effects - excellent agreement is observed between the submissions near the𝐶𝐿,max state. Objective superiority over steady state RANS can be seen in terms of lack of excess outboard separation; a majority of the good quality WMLES and LB submissions predict wedge-shaped separation patterns consistent with the experimental oil flow. Differences in the onset of stall mechanism in the free-air configuration for𝛼 >20◦is reported with two distinct topologies observed. Topology A is characterized by the onset of corner-flow separation which progressively grows to produce a pitch break in free-air with an angle of attack increase from𝛼=20.55◦to𝛼=21.47◦+𝜖where𝜖is a small perturbation (varying between submissions and likely to be within±0.3◦). Topology Bis characterized by boundary layer weakness emanating from the inboard side of the wing-pylon juncture substantially larger than any weakness in the wing-body juncture (due to corner-flow);submissions in this category do not show any tendency for occurrence of a pitch break for the free-air configuration within the vicinity of𝛼=21.47◦. The in-tunnel simulations submitted by3 participants using different discretizations, grids and closure models show excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of a) integrated loads, b) surface flow-topology, and c) mechanism for the onset of inboard stall. Further evidence is provided to demonstrate both qualitative and quantitative superiority of all 3 WMLES submissions over a single steady state RANS submission to the workshop.

TTT↗
NASA NTRS2023

HLPW-4: Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann Technology Focus Group Workshop Summary

A summary of the nine submissions to the Wall-Modeled LES and Lattice-Boltzmann(WMLESLB) Technical Focus Group (TFG) at the 4th High lift Prediction Workshop is provided. The focus of this TFG was to assess the current capabilities of WMLES and LB methods on a complex high-lift configuration across a wide range of angles-of-attack. Analysis of the submitted data suggests that>250𝑀spatial degrees of freedom are needed to accurately predict pitching moments at high angles-of-attack due to large pressure gradients present on the outboard slat and main element for 𝛼 >17◦(corrected for free-air). While some scatter is reported in pitching moment coefficient at the low-angles of attack (𝛼 <11◦) - excellent agreement is observed between submissions near the 𝐶𝐿,max state. Objective superiority of WMLES methods over RANS can be seen in terms of lack of excess outboard separation; a majority of the WMLES and LB submissions predict wedge-shaped separation patterns consistent with the experimental oil flow. The in-tunnel simulations show excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of a) integrated loads, b) surface flow-topology, and c) mechanism for the onset of inboard stall. Further evidence is provided to demonstrate both qualitative and quantitative superiority of the WMLES submissions over RANS.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using the LAVA Framework

An in-depth assessment of the High Lift-Common Research Model (HL-CRM) aerodynamic performance is made using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology. Results presented here were produced in support of the 4th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop(HLPW-4), with additional simulation results and analysis used to support findings from the workshop. Mesh resolution, RANS closure models, and tunnel effects were among the sources of simulation sensitivity addressed, all in the pursuit of evaluating best-practice simulation methods for complex high-lift configurations. In general, free-air simulations using RANS yield accurate predictions of integrated loads in the pre-stall regime for the HL-CRM, while strong sensitivity to simulation method is observed near CLmax. Additionally, a study assessing changes in aerodynamic performance due to flap deflection angle indicated strong sensitivity to turbulence model closure and mesh resolution, particularly at the highest deflection setting. Several available corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model were tested and generally introduced more error relative to the experiment in comparison to the baseline SA closure model. The Standard Menter Baseline Two-Equation (k-ωBSL) turbulence model was also explored, which arguably yielded results highly consistent with experiment, but at a substantially higher computational cost. Therefore, as a compromise between computational cost and accuracy, the baseline SA closure model was selected for additional HL-CRM studies that assess alternative solution methods. These strategies include “warm start” approaches, which initialize the simulation from a previously converged solution at a nearby angle of attack, unsteady calculations, and simulations that model the experimental wind tunnel. Results from these studies would reinforce the shortcomings of RANS in predicting aircraft performance at high-lift conditions, namely at high-αand highly loaded flap conditions, while also answering questions about appropriate modeling techniques to minimize the errors associated with RANS where possible

TTT↗