Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Sludge”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

SRNL Sludge Batch 10 Qualification SRAT and SME Off-Gas Results

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) completed a small-scale demonstration of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Chemical Process Cell (CPC) utilizing the nitric-glycolic acid (NGA) flowsheet to support Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) qualification. The demonstration utilized a Tank 51 slurry sample washed by SRNL (with added H-canyon material). The purpose of this document is to report the observed off-gas results from the demonstration. With the NGA flowsheet, DWPF has a CPC hydrogen generation limit of 2.4×10 -2 lb/h. The peak observed rate was nearly 90 times less than that limit during SRNL testing.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Chemical Characterization Results for Tank 40 Sludge Batch 10 Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS) Sample

A 3-L sample (HTF-40-23-24) obtained from Tank 40 following transfer of Tank 51 to achieve the final Sludge Batch 10 processing composition was received by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). SRNL was tasked with characterization of the sample in accordance with requirements for reporting the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications. A representative subsample, approximately 500 mL, was prepared by continuously agitating the 3-L sample via a mixing blade inserted into the bottle. This subsample was then used for the chemical and physical characterization reported here. This characterization includes the following: (1) Supernate and slurry density; (2) Weight percent solids; (3) Mercury Analysis (supernate and slurry); (4) Anions; (5) Total Organic/Inorganic Carbon; (6) Free Hydroxide; (7) Other Base; (8) Elementals; (9) Volatile Organic Analysis and Semi-volatile Organic Analysis; and (10) Fissile Radionuclides and Uranium Enrichment. The results of this physical and chemical characterization of the sample are documented in this report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Sludge Batch 11 Assembly: Tank 35

Savannah River Mission Completion Nuclear Safety and Engineering Integration (SRMC-E) has requested that Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) perform Tank 35 characterization analyses in support of Sludge Batch 11 (SB11) assembly. Two Tank 35 samples were delivered to SRNL and composited into a single sample in April 2023. The composite sample was analyzed for the following: density, weight percent solids, chemical composition, radionuclides, supernate corrosion control tests, and x-ray diffraction for burkeite, gibbsite, and boehmite.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Analysis of the Sludge Batch 9 (Macrobatch 11) DWPF Pour Stream Glass Sample Collected During the Nitric-Glycolic Acid Flowsheet Transition

A pour stream (PS) sample taken near the end of processing of Sludge Batch 9 (SB9, Macrobatch 11) during the transition to the nitric-glycolic acid (NGA) flowsheet was analyzed by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL). The SB9 NGA PS sample was taken on 12/18/2022 during Melter Feed Batch 823 associated with glass canister S04773 and was transferred to SRNL in Primary Container PC0139 in February 2023.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Sludge Batch 11 Assembly: Tank 35

Savannah River Mission Completion Nuclear Safety and Engineering Integration (SRMC-E) has requested that Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) perform Tank 35 characterization analyses in support of Sludge Batch 11 (SB11) assembly. Two Tank 35 samples were delivered to SRNL and composited into a single sample in April 2023. The composite sample was analyzed for the following: density, weight percent solids, chemical composition, radionuclides, supernate corrosion control tests, and x-ray diffraction for burkeite, gibbsite, and boehmite.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Determination of Reportable Radionuclides for Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Sludge Batch 10 (Macrobatch 12)

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was tasked with the radionuclide characterization of the Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) Tank 40 sample (HTF-40-23-24) in accordance with requirements for reporting the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS). The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is required to report all radionuclides with half-lives greater than ten years and which comprise greater than 0.05% of the total activity inventory for a given waste form at certain specified “index years”. DWPF complies with the requirements by considering the half-life requirement (t1/2 > 10 years) and radionuclides with concentrations greater than 0.01% of the total inventory from the approximate time of production through 1,100 years.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production via Catalytic Upgrading of Carbohydrates in Paper Sludge

A full-plant model was developed using correlations from a rigorous mass and energy balance and based on experimental results to determine the MFSP and its Sensitivity Analysis in the production of a hydrocarbon product from Paper Sludge. In this base case a preliminary MFSP of $5.97/GGE has been determined. This value is higher than the results reported in recent NREL reports. The difference is explained since much larger capacity plants are considered in those reports, and because we are not considering the production of co-products that bring the fuel costs down. The obtained model is being used to guide the next steps in our laboratory work since the team is now aware of which are the more sensitive process parameters "impacting" the MFSP of the final product.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2020

Investigating Uranium Corrosion in Magnesium-containing Sludge Using X-ray Tomography - 20042

One of the current primary concerns within the British nuclear community is the decommissioning of legacy storage ponds in Sellafield Cumbria, where nuclear fuel cladding material (a Mg-Al alloy) resides along with fuel metallic swarf. Corrosion of the immersed metallic elements, which has been occurring over the storage period, has resulted in the formation of what is commonly known as Corroded Magnox Sludge. The behaviour of uranium metal within this particular environment and, more significantly, the identity of the corrosion products that may have formed is currently unknown. The present study attempts to shed some light on these aspects by investigating simplified surrogate systems, mimicking storage ponds. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2026

Evaluation of coal-associated sediments, wastes, and AMD sludge in the Southern Appalachian Basin as feedstock materials for REE and Li recovery

Critical minerals (CM) such as rare earth elements (REE+) and Lithium (Li) are essential to technological innovation, energy transitions, global economic and defense security, necessitating the search for unconventional resources and efficient recovery methods to avert supply chain disruptions. Here, this study evaluates coal-associated sediments (underclay and roof rock) and wastes from the Pennsylvanian Pottsville Formation of the Southern Appalachian Basin (SAB) as potential feedstocks for CM recovery. A total of 34 samples (15 underclays, 12 roof rocks, 5 Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) sludges, and 2 coal mining wastes) were characterized using XRD, XRF, ICP-MS, and μ-XRF analytical methods. The REE+ and Li concentrations of these materials ranged from 46.8 to 334.4 ppm and from 11.1 to 519 ppm, respectively, with one underclay sample (Hendrix 3456) yielding the highest values for both. Bulk mineralogy for all samples was dominated by aluminosilicate clay phases, particularly illite and kaolinite. All samples exhibited REY def, rel% values >26% and C outl indices that ranged from 0.69 to 0.94, classifying their REE ore potential as Category II (Promising) as defined by Seredin and Dai (2012). Extractability tests (EPA method 3051 A) yielded low REE+ and Li recoveries, with maximum values of 3.3% and 3.6%, respectively, suggesting associations with resistant minerals like clay and phosphates. Elemental mapping indicates that REE+ is associated with phosphate, whereas statistical analysis suggests that REE+ are associated with aluminosilicates, suggesting heterogeneous associations or minimal phosphate contribution. Li also correlated positively with Al 2 O 3 , indicating an aluminosilicate host. This study highlights the potential of coal-associated sediments in the SAB.

Clay minerals↗
DOE OSTI2020

Calculation for T Plant Estimated PTE with Receipt of K Basin Sludge and Filter Media

The purpose of this environmental calculation is to: (1) show compliance with the WAC 173-400-110, New Source Review (NSR) for Sources and Portable Sources requirements and (2) provide the methodology, assumptions and calculation used to estimate the potential to emit (PTE) and Total Effective Dose Equivalent to the Maximally Exposed Individual (TEDE to the MEI) radionuclide airborne emissions associated with the receipt of K Basin sludge and filter media for storage at T Plant.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) Acceptance Evaluation: Radionuclide Concentrations in Tank 51 Washed Qualification Sample

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) has been tasked with the radionuclide characterization of the washed Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) qualification sample. The washed SB10 qualification sample is based on SRR Engineering guidance and the sample slurry is expected to be similar in composition to Tank 51 slurry after final preparations for transfer to Tank 40. Forty-four radionuclides along with total alpha and beta activity have been reported herein. These radionuclide measurements are required for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Radiological Evaluation Program, DWPF Technical Safety Requirements (TSR)/Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) Evaluation, and the DWPF Solid Waste Characterization Program.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Phosphate and Fluoride Processing Options for Hanford Sludge

The Direct Feed High-Level Waste (DFHLW) strategy represents an alternative flowsheet to bypass the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Pretreatment Facility. Key processing functions previously captured during baseline pretreatment operations include leaching and washing prior to solids concentration and should be considered in the new DFHLW flowsheet to maximize waste feed loading, minimize high-level waste (HLW) volume, and mitigate corrosion challenges associated with vitrification of high phosphate and fluoride concentrations. The effectiveness and efficiency of sludge washing can have a substantial impact on DST space and mission duration. Two target species that benefit significantly from washing are phosphate and fluoride. Commonly present in many high-level wastes at Hanford, phosphate and fluoride are found predominately in the form of salt precipitates and can have adverse and detrimental effects on glass waste loading. Additionally, fluoride produces melter off-gas that creates corrosion risks in the off-gas system piping. Determining the solubilities of fluoride and phosphate salts, as well as the dissolution kinetics under potential HLW processing conditions will help to mitigate future operational risks and mature flowsheet technical bases.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Analysis of the Sludge Batch 9 (Macrobatch 11) DWPF Pour Stream Glass Sample

A pour stream (PS) sample taken near the end of processing of Sludge Batch 9 (SB9, Macrobatch 11) with the Nitric-Formic Acid Flowsheet was analyzed by the Savannah River National Laboratory to comply with the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Glass Product Control Program. The SB9 PS sample was taken on 5/28/2022 during Melter Feed Batch 815 associated with glass canister S04741, and was transferred to SRNL in Primary Container PC0136.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mercury Testing with Sludge Batch 10 Tank 40 Simulant

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) requested that researchers at Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) perform testing designed to examine why the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is not collecting elemental mercury in the Mercury Water Wash Tank (MWWT). In order for DWPF to recover mercury, mercuric oxide must first be reduced to elemental mercury. The elemental mercury must then be steam stripped, condense, and coalesce in the Mercury Water Wash Tank (MWWT) during chemical processing in the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT). The efficiency of these steps was investigated in a series of laboratory scale SRAT experiments under the nitric-glycolic and nitric-formic flowsheets utilizing Momentive Y-17112 and Antifoam 747. Mercury speciation in the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) and condensate streams was also examined. The key conclusions from these experiments are as follows: Mercury II Oxide may not be fully reduced to elemental mercury during acid addition at 93°C. Higher temperatures, i.e., boiling may be necessary to fully reduce Mercury II Oxide. The highest percent mercury recovery (71 %) in the MWWT was observed in the MS-NGA-17112 experiment (nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet with Momentive Y-17112), which is how DWPF is currently operating the SRAT.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) Diagram for a Sludge Batch 9 Glass Composition Based on Coupled-Operation with the Salt Waste Processing Facility

The amorphous structure of a glass waste form has the potential to rearrange into crystalline phases at temperatures between the liquidus temperature and the glass transition temperature (Tg). Certain phases that can form will be detrimental to the durability of the glass and it is important to know the conditions that promote devitrification. The canister-centerline-cooling (CCC) profile is used to replicate the area within the center of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister with the slowest cooling during the initial cool down after pouring, which has the greatest potential for crystallization. Other time-temperature conditions that cause significant changes in either phase structure or phase composition are identified by a time-temperature-transformation (TTT) study. The phase stability of a waste form must be determined as a part of the Waste Acceptance Product Specifications (WAPS) if it is to eventually be stored in a geologic repository. This requires the creation of a TTT diagram and analysis of the Tg, as defined by the Department of Energy (DOE). The previous TTT study for a DWPF glass waste form was completed in 2010 prior to coupled operation with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). SWPF transfers two high activity waste streams to DWPF for vitrification: a cesium-containing strip effluent and a stream containing monosodium titanate/sludge solids. These SWPF streams were first transferred to DWPF for vitrification during Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) in 2021. The impact of these SWPF streams on crystallization behavior was not determined in previous studies and the need for data to satisfy WAPS Specification 1.4 for SB9 was identified.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗