Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “PROPELLANT STORAGE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1995

Fuel cell systems for First Lunar Outpost-reactant storage option

The office of Space, DOE, appointed a Lunar Surface Power Working Group to review candidate systems for the First Lunar Outpost habitat. The working group met for a total of five days in the fall of 1992 and concluded that the candidate involving a photovoltaic unit, a fuel cell, a regenerator to recycle the reactants, and storage of oxygen and hydrogen gases was the most attractive for this application. Most of the volume (97 percent) and weight (63 percent) are taken up by the reactants and their storage tanks. Therefore, in my work for the Group, and in this report, I have concentrated on finding ways to reduce these volumes and weights. Three options were considered: (1) the baseline case considered in the preliminary system design, that of separate high pressure (200 bar) storage tanks; (2) the use of two of the descent storage propellant tanks wrapped with graphite fibers to increase the pressure capability; and (3) the use of cryogenic storage of reactants in the propellant tanks. The first option results in high storage tank mass and volume. The second option saves 90 percent of the volume by making use of the propellant tanks, but it has little if any weight advantages; the weight saved by not providing extra tanks for reactant storage is nearly entirely added back by the weight of the additional material (graphite fibers) to strengthen the propellant tanks. Use of the descent storage propellant tanks for storage of the fuel cell reactants as cryogenic liquids requires a gas liquefaction system. The weight of this system is expected to be less than that of the storage tanks but it would require development and testing to prove its reliability. The solar array would have to be 40 percent larger and the heat projection range would be 170 percent larger than for storage of reactants as high pressure gases. For a high power system (greater than 20 kW) the larger energy storage requirement would probably favor the cryogenic storage option.

Nelson, P. A.↗
NASA NTRS1965

Cryogenic technology research at MSFC

Cryogenic technology research dealing with fluid mechanics, propellant storage, and instrumentation in support of space vehicle programs

FLUID MECHANICS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility and Utility of a Cryogenic Integrated RCS

Traditional in-space propulsion systems use storable propellants, such as MMH/NTO, for applications beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Modern advancements in Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) technologies opens the door for use of more efficient cryogenic propellants, such as LOX/LCH4 or LOX/LH2, in these long-duration missions beyond LEO. As these Main Propulsion Systems (MPS) transition to cryogenic propellants, a cryogenic solution for Reaction Control Systems (RCS) becomes attractive for several reasons. A mixed-fluid vehicle solution with cryogenic (cool) MPS and storable (warm) RCS complicates thermal management. Additionally, a vehicle with common cryogenic propellant across the MPS and RCS could take advantage of shared hardware such as tanks, thermal management equipment, and pressurization system, reducing mass and development time. The fluid system design proposed in this presentation features shared hardware, leading to the designation of Cryogenic Integrated Reaction Control System (iRCS). The iRCS design stores cryogenic propellant in the low-pressure (10’s psia) MPS tanks, creates steady high-pressure (100’s psia) flow through an electric pump (e-pump), feeds pulse-firing RCS thrusters, and returns any excess flow to the tank through a pressure control device on a recirculation line. This iRCS design is inspired by the automotive fuel-rail, where similar elevated-pressure and pulse-firing requirements are levied. This design has several inherent advantages. Because this design is pump-fed rather than pressure-fed, heavy, high-pressure propellant storage is not required. The RCS propellant can therefore be stored by increasing MPS tank volume. Furthermore, by increasing the pressure of the circulated fluid through an e-pump, the propellant quality moves further into the sub-cooled regime. Sub-cooled liquid is desirable for accurate pressure and flow control at the thruster inlet. Lastly, the iRCS allows the distribution system hardware to maintain cryogenic temperatures by slowly recirculating liquid in a low-energy “Idle Mode”. Altogether, the iRCS concept enables a more efficient cryogenic vehicle design.

Integrated Reaction Control System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility and Utility of a Cryogenic Integrated RCS

Traditional in-space propulsion systems use storable propellants, such as MMH/NTO, for applications beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Modern advancements in Cryogenic Fluid Management (CFM) technologies opens the door for use of more efficient cryogenic propellants, such as LOX/LCH4 or LOX/LH2, in these long-duration missions beyond LEO. As these Main Propulsion Systems (MPS) transition to cryogenic propellants, a cryogenic solution for Reaction Control Systems (RCS) becomes attractive for several reasons. A mixed-fluid vehicle solution with cryogenic (cool) MPS and storable (warm) RCS complicates thermal management. Additionally, a vehicle with common cryogenic propellant across the MPS and RCS could take advantage of shared hardware such as tanks, thermal management equipment, and pressurization system, reducing mass and development time. The fluid system design proposed in this presentation features shared hardware, leading to the designation of Cryogenic Integrated Reaction Control System (iRCS). The iRCS design stores cryogenic propellant in the low-pressure (10’s psia) MPS tanks, creates steady high-pressure (100’s psia) flow through an electric pump (e-pump), feeds pulse-firing RCS thrusters, and returns any excess flow to the tank through a pressure control device on a recirculation line. This iRCS design is inspired by the automotive fuel-rail, where similar elevated-pressure and pulse-firing requirements are levied. This design has several inherent advantages. Because this design is pump-fed rather than pressure-fed, heavy, high-pressure propellant storage is not required. The RCS propellant can therefore be stored by increasing MPS tank volume. Furthermore, by increasing the pressure of the circulated fluid through an e-pump, the propellant quality moves further into the sub-cooled regime. Sub-cooled liquid is desirable for accurate pressure and flow control at the thruster inlet. Lastly, the iRCS allows the distribution system hardware to maintain cryogenic temperatures by slowly recirculating liquid in a low-energy “Idle Mode”. Altogether, the iRCS concept enables a more efficient cryogenic vehicle design.

Integrated↗
NASA NTRS2019

SINDA/FLUINT and Thermal Desktop Multi-Node Settled and Unsettled Propellant Tank Modeling of Zero Boil Off Test

Cryogenic propellant storage tank self-pressurization involves complex physical phenomena which are usually analytically modelled via complex multidimensional CFD codes. Unfortunately these codes, even when modelling axisymmetric domains, may takes weeks or longer to obtain transient pressure and temperature information for relatively short periods of time (several seconds to several hours). Propellant tank storage end-to-end mission simulations can last a duration of days to weeks to months. Multi-node modelling of propellant tanks is a viable alternative to traditional CFD modelling and presents the advantage of greatly reduced run times on the order of hours and days compared to the weeks or longer for CFD codes. A multi-node model represents the fluid within the storage tank, as well as the storage tank itself, as a fluid-thermal network. This type of setup is not necessarily geometrically based. This can be accomplished using a commercial generalized fluid-thermal network code, such as SINDA/FLUINT (SF). The advantage of using a fluid-thermal network code like SF lies in its extensive ability to model the external environment of the storage tank through the graphical user interface, Thermal Desktop (TD). The total heat load into the tank may be a function of heaters and a complex radiative environment as well. Thermal Desktop may be used to address the detailed radiative environment of the tank as well as building a geometrically accurate depiction of the storage tank itself.

Sakowski, Barbara↗
NASA NTRS2019

SINDA/FLUINT and Thermal Desktop Multi-Node Settled and Unsettled Propellant Tank Modeling of Zero Boil Off Test

Cryogenic propellant storage tank self-pressurization involves complex physical phenomena which are usually analytically modelled via complex multidimensional CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) codes. Unfortunately these codes, even when modelling axisymmetric domains, may take weeks or longer to obtain transient pressure and temperature information for relatively short periods of time (several seconds to several hours). Propellant tank storage end-to-end mission simulations can last a duration of days to weeks to months. Multi-node modelling of propellant tanks is a viable alternative to traditional CFD modelling and presents the advantage of greatly reduced run times on the order of hours and days compared to the weeks or longer for CFD codes. A multi-node model represents the fluid within the storage tank, as well as the storage tank itself, as a fluid-thermal network. This type of setup is not necessarily geometrically based. This can be accomplished using a commercial generalized fluid-thermal network code, such as SINDA/FLUINT (SF). The advantage of using a fluid-thermal network code like SF lies in its extensive ability to model the external environment of the storage tank through the graphical user interface, Thermal Desktop (TD). The total heat load into the tank may be a function of heaters and a complex radiative environment as well. Thermal Desktop may be used to address the detailed radiative environment of the tank as well as building a geometrically accurate depiction of the storage tank itself.

Thermal Desktop↗
NASA NTRS2017

Pressurization of a Flightweight, Liquid Hydrogen Tank: Evaporation and Condensation at a Liquid Vapor Interface

Evaporation and condensation at a liquidvapor interface is important for long-term, in-space cryogenic propellant storage. Yet the current understanding of interfacial physics does not predict behavior or evaporation condensation rates. The proposed paper will present a physical model, based on the 1-D Heat equation and Schrages equation which demonstrates thin thermal layers at the fluidvapor interface.

Cryogenic hydrogen↗
NASA NTRS2017

Pressurization of a Flightweight, Liquid Hydrogen Tank: Evaporation and Condensation at a Liquid Vapor Interface

Evaporation and condensation at a liquid-vapor interface is important for long-term, in-space cryogenic propellant storage. Yet the current understanding of inter-facial physics does not consistently predict behavior of evaporation or condensation rates. The proposed paper will present a physical model, based on the 1-D Heat equation and Schrage's equation, which demonstrates thin thermal layers at the fluid vapor interface.

cryogenic hydrogen↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA Cryocooler Technology Developments and Goals to Achieve Zero Boil-Off and to Liquefy Cryogenic Propellants for Space Exploration

NASA's interest in human exploration of Mars has driven it to invest in 20K cryocooler technology to achieve zero boil-off of liquid hydrogen and 90K cryocooler technology to achieve zero boil-off liquid oxygen or liquid methane as well as to liquefy oxygen or methane that is produced on the surface of Mars. These investments have demonstrated efficiency progress, mass reductions, and integration insights. A history of the application of cryocooler technology to zero boil-off propellant storage is presented. A trade space on distributed cooling is shown, along with the progress of reverse turbo-Brayton cycle cryocoolers, where the specific power and specific mass have dropped, decreasing the mass and power of these cryocoolers. Additionally, the cryocooler technology advancements of recuperators and compressors are described. Finally, NASA's development ideas with respect to zero boil-off technology are discussed.

zero boil-off↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA Cryocooler Technology Developments and Goals to Achieve Zero Boil-Off and to Liquefy Cryogenic Propellants for Space Exploration

NASAs interest in human exploration of Mars has driven it to invest in 20K cryocooler technology to achieve zero boil-off of liquid hydrogen and 90K cryocooler technology to achieve zero boil-off liquid oxygen or liquid methane as well as to liquefy oxygen or methane that is produced on the surface of Mars. These investments have demonstrated efficiency progress, mass reductions, and integration insights. A history of the application of cryocooler technology to zero boil-off propellant storage is presented. A trade space on distributed cooling is shown, along with the progress of reverse turbo-Brayton cycle cryocoolers, where the specific power and specific mass have dropped, decreasing the mass and power of these cryocoolers. Additionally, the cryocooler technology advancements of recuperators and compressors are described. Finally, NASAs development ideas with respect to zero boil-off technology are discussed.

reverse turbo-Brayton cycle cryocooler↗
NASA NTRS1987

Large capacity cryopropellant orbital storage facility

A comprehensive study was performed to develop the major features of a large capacity orbital propellant storage facility for the space-based cryogenic orbital transfer vehicle. Projected propellant usage and delivery schedules can be accommodated by two orbital tank sets of 100,000 lb storage capacity, with advanced missions expected to require increased capacity. Information is given on tank pressurization schemes, propellant transfer configurations, pump specifications, the refrigeration system, and flight tests.

Schuster, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Power considerations for an early manned Mars mission utilizing the space station

Power requirements and candidate electrical power sources were examined for the supporting space infrastructure for an early (2004) manned Mars mission. This two-year mission (60-day stay time) assumed a single six crew piloted vehicle with a Mars lander for four of the crew. The transportation vehicle was assumed to be a hydrogen/oxygen propulsion design with or without large aerobrakes and assembled and checked out on the LEO Space Station. The long transit time necessitated artificial gravity of the crew by rotating the crew compartments. This rotation complicates power source selection. Candidate power sources were examined for the Lander, Mars Orbiter, supporting Space Station, co-orbiting Propellant Storage Depot, and alternatively, a co-orbiting Propellant Generation (water electrolysis) Depot. Candidates considered were photovoltaics with regenerative fuel cells or batteries, solar dynamics, isotope dynamics, and nuclear power.

Valgora, Martin E.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Power considerations for an early manned Mars mission utilizing the Space Station

Power requirements and candidate electrical power sources were examined for the supporting space infrastructure for an early (2004) manned Mars mission. This two-year mission (60-day stay time) assumed a single six crew piloted vehicle with a Mars lander for four of the crew. The transportation vehicle was assumed to be a hydrogen/oxygen propulsion design with or without large aerobrakes and assembled and checked out on the LEO Space Station. The long transit time necessitated artificial gravity of the crew by rotating the crew compartments. This rotation complicates power source selection. Candidate power sources were examined for the Lander, Mars Orbiter, supporting Space Station, co-orbiting Propellant Storage Depot, and, alternatively, a co-orbiting Propellant Generation (water electrolysis) Depot. Candidates considered were photovoltaics with regenerative fuel cells or batteries, solar dynamics, isotope dynamics, and nuclear power.

Valgora, Martin E.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Method of injecting fluid propellants into a rocket combustion chamber

A rocket injector is provided with multiple sets of manifolds for supplying propellants to injector elements. Sensors transmit the temperatures of the propellants to a suitable controller which is operably connected to valves between these manifolds and propellant storage tanks. Additional valves are opened to furnish propellants to more of the manifolds when cryogenic propellant temperatures are sensed. Only a portion of the valves are opened to furnish propellants to some of the manifolds when lower temperatures are sensed.

Schneider, Steven J.↗
NASA NTRS2008

Active Co-Storage of Cryogenic Propellants for Lunar Explortation

Long-term storage of cryogenic propellants is a critical requirement for NASA's effort to return to the moon. Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen provide the highest specific impulse of any practical chemical propulsion system, and thus provides the greatest payload mass per unit of launch mass. Future manned missions will require vehicles with the flexibility to remain in orbit for months, necessitating long-term storage of these cryogenic liquids. For decades cryogenic scientific satellites have used dual cryogens with different temperatures to cool instruments. This technology utilizes a higher temperature cryogen to provide a stage that efficiently intercepts a large fraction of the heat that would otherwise be incident on the lower temperature cryogen. This interception reduces the boil-off of the lower temperature cryogen and increasing the overall life-time of the mission. The Active Co-Storage concept is implemented similarly; the 101 K liquid oxygen thermally shields the 24 K liquid hydrogen. A thermal radiation shield that is linked to the liquid oxygen tank shrouds the liquid hydrogen tank, thereby preventing the liquid hydrogen tank from being directly exposed to the 300 K external environment. Modern cryocooler technology can eliminate the liquid oxygen boil-off and also cool the thermal radiation shield thereby reducing the liquid hydrogen boil-off to a small fraction of the unshielded rate. The thermal radiation shield can be a simple conductive shroud or a more sophisticated but lighter Broad Area Cooling (BAC) shroud. The paper describes the design impact of an active co-storage system for the Altair Descent Vehicle. This paper also compares the spacecraft-level impacts of the conductive shroud and the BAC shroud active co-storage concepts with a passive storage option in the context of the different scales of spacecraft that will be used for the lunar exploration effort - the Altair Ascent and Descent Vehicles, the Orion, and the Ares V Earth Departure Stage. The paper also reports on a subscale test of this active co-storage configuration. The test tank is 0.7 m in diameter, approximately one-third the dimension of tanks that would be needed in a lunar ascent module. A thin-walled fiberglass skirt supports and isolates the tank from a 100 K stage. A similar thin-walled skirt supports the lOOK stage from the ambient temperature structure. An aluminum shield with a heavy MLI blanket surrounds the tank and is attached at the 100 K stage. In this initial phase of the project, there is no tank on the 100 K stage, but it is actively cooled by a single-stage cryocooler similar in design to the one used on the RHESSI mission. The test configuration includes a number of innovative elements, including a helical support heat exchanger and an external thermodynamic vent/heat interception system. To avoid the complexity of an explosive gas handling system, testing will be done with liquid helium and liquid neon as simulant fluids. The properties of these fluids bracket the properties of liquid hydrogen. Instrumentation allows tank temperature and shield temperature profiles, tank liquid levels, and pressure drops through the flow lines, to be measured.

Mustafi, S.↗
NASA NTRS1983

Test program to demonstrate the stability of hydrazine in propellant tanks

The suitability of stainless steels and Inconel for long-term hydrazine propellant-storage tanks is investigated. Rectangular coupon samples cut from propellent tanks were sealed with a measured amount of hydrazine in glass capsules, stored at 43 or 60 C, and removed after 6 to 24 months, when corrosion of the coupon and decomposition of the hydrazine was determined, and SEM and electron spectroscopy were performed on some coupons. Corrosion was found to be unmeasurably low for all the coupons, and hydrazine decomposition produced less than 1.0 cu cm of gas per sq cm of wetted surface per year, except in those few cases when catalysis or contamination were detected. Especially good stability was observed for type 304L stainless steel. The decomposition rates determined in the coupon tests are confirmed by preliminary results of actual tank storage trials.

Moran, C. M.↗