Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “PAuS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Towards Verification and Validation for Increased Autonomy

This presentation goes over the work we have performed over the last few years on verification and validation of the next generation onboard collision avoidance system, ACAS X, for commercial aircraft. It describes our work on probabilistic verification and synthesis of the model that ACAS X is based on, and goes on to the validation of that model with respect to actual simulation and flight data. The presentation then moves on to identify the characteristics of ACAS X that are related to autonomy and to discuss the challenges that autonomy pauses on VV. All work presented has already been published.

Giannakopoulou, Dimitra↗
NASA NTRS2010

The Value of Identifying and Recovering Lost GN&C Lessons Learned: Aeronautical, Spacecraft, and Launch Vehicle Examples

Within the broad aerospace community the importance of identifying, documenting and widely sharing lessons learned during system development, flight test, operational or research programs/projects is broadly acknowledged. Documenting and sharing lessons learned helps managers and engineers to minimize project risk and improve performance of their systems. Often significant lessons learned on a project fail to get captured even though they are well known 'tribal knowledge' amongst the project team members. The physical act of actually writing down and documenting these lessons learned for the next generation of NASA GN&C engineers fails to happen on some projects for various reasons. In this paper we will first review the importance of capturing lessons learned and then will discuss reasons why some lessons are not documented. A simple proven approach called 'Pause and Learn' will be highlighted as a proven low-impact method of organizational learning that could foster the timely capture of critical lessons learned. Lastly some examples of 'lost' GN&C lessons learned from the aeronautics, spacecraft and launch vehicle domains are briefly highlighted. In the context of this paper 'lost' refers to lessons that have not achieved broad visibility within the NASA-wide GN&C CoP because they are either undocumented, masked or poorly documented in the NASA Lessons Learned Information System (LLIS).

Dennehy, Cornelius J.↗
NASA NTRS2019

A Summary of NASA Rotary Wing Research: Circa 2008–2018

The general public may not know that the first “A” in NASA stands for Aeronautics. If they do know, they will very likely be surprised that in addition to airplanes, the “A” includes research in helicopters, tiltrotors, and other vehicles adorned with rotors. There is, arguably, no subsonic air vehicle more difficult to accurately analyze than a vehicle with lift-producing rotors. No wonder that NASA has conducted rotary wing research since the days of the NACA and has partnered, since 1965, with the U.S. Army in order to overcome some of the most challenging obstacles to understanding the behavior of these vehicles. Since 2006, NASA rotary wing research has been performed under several different project names [Gorton et al., 2015]: Subsonic Rotary Wing (SRW) (2006–2012), Rotary Wing (RW) (2012–2014), and Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) (2014–present). In 2009, the SRW Project published a report that assessed the status of NASA rotorcraft research; in particular, the predictive capability of NASA rotorcraft tools was addressed for a number of technical disciplines. A brief history of NASA rotorcraft research through 2009 was also provided [Yamauchi and Young, 2009]. Gorton et al. [2015] describes the system studies during 2009–2011 that informed the SRW/RW/RVLT project investment prioritization and organization. The authors also provided the status of research in the RW Project in engines, drive systems, aeromechanics, and impact dynamics as related to structural dynamics of vertical lift vehicles. Since 2009, the focus of research has shifted from large civil VTOL transports, to environmentally clean aircraft, to electrified VTOL aircraft for the urban air mobility (UAM) market. The changing focus of rotorcraft research has been a reflection of the evolving strategic direction of the NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD). By 2014, the project had been renamed the Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Project. In response to the 2014 NASA Strategic Plan, ARMD developed six Strategic Thrusts. Strategic Thrust 3B was defined as the “Ultra-Efficient Commercial Vehicles—Vertical Lift Aircraft.” Hochstetler et al. [2017] uses Thrust 3B as an example for developing metrics usable by ARMD to measure the effectiveness of each of the Strategic Thrusts. The authors provide near-, mid-, and long-term outcomes for Thrust 3B with corresponding benefits and capabilities. The importance of VTOL research, especially with the rapidly expanding UAM market, eventually resulted in a new Strategic Thrust (to begin in 2020): Thrust 4—Safe, Quiet, and Affordable Vertical Lift Air Vehicles. The underlying rotary wing analysis tools used by NASA are still applicable to traditional rotorcraft and have been expanded in capability to accommodate the growing number of VTOL configurations designed for UAM. The top-level goal of the RVLT Project remains unchanged since 2006: Develop and validate tools, technologies and concepts to overcome key barriers for vertical lift vehicles. In 2019, NASA rotary wing/VTOL research has never been more important for supporting new aircraft and advancements in technology. 2 A decade is a reasonable interval to pause and take stock of progress and accomplishments. In 10 years, digital technology has propelled progress in computational efficiency by orders of magnitude and expanded capabilities in measurement techniques. The purpose of this report is to provide a compilation of the NASA rotary wing research from ~2008 to ~2018. Brief summaries of publications from NASA, NASA-funded, and NASA-supported research are provided in 12 chapters: Acoustics, Aeromechanics, Computational Fluid Dynamics (External Flow), Experimental Methods, Flight Dynamics and Control, Drive Systems, Engines, Crashworthiness, Icing, Structures and Materials, Conceptual Design and System Analysis, and Mars Helicopter. We hope this report serves as a useful reference for future NASA vertical lift researchers.

Yamauchi, Gloria K.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Characterizing Effects of Potential Build Induced Artifacts in L-PBF Components

Additive manufacture (AM) is utilized for rocket engine component production. Witness marks are visible lines across the surface of an AM part that result from variation in build process. Witness marks have been used as justification to scrap a part with little to no evidence. The probability of witness mark occurrence is relatively high and greatly increases AM part production costs and schedule risks. The objective of this study was to quantify the impact of witness marks generated by intentional build pauses and characterize functional characteristics of the AM components. CT, μ-CT, metallographic, and mechanical test results indicate that witness marks are a surface phenomenon that do not propagate into the bulk of a part and had no statistically significant change on microstructure or properties in AlSi10Mg.

Omar R Mireles↗
NASA NTRS2020

TESS Data Release Notes:Sector 31, DR47

TESS Sector 31 observations include physical orbits 69 and 70 of the spacecraft around the Earth. Data collection was paused for 1.40 days between the orbits to download data. Astar tracker anomaly occurred at UTC 2020-11-16 10:37, which led to the instrument being turned off. As a result, the data collection period in orbit 70 ended 2.08 days earlier than scheduled; there is no other effect on the data. The cameras were turned on and returned to normal operations on 2020-11-20, at the beginning of Sector 32. In total, there are 24.03days of science data collected in Sector 31

TESS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Preliminary Results Using Galvanic Vestibular Reduction as a Non-Pharmaceutical Tool for Motion Sickness Mitigation

Introduction: Alterations in vestibular sensory processing following G-transitions lead to motion sickness and spatial disorientation upon return to Earth’s gravity. The use of non-pharmaceutical mitigation for motion sickness has several potential advantages over drug treatment options. The purpose of this study was to validate a non-pharmaceutical tool using galvanic vestibular reduction (GVR) to mitigate G-transitional induced motion sickness and spatial disorientation. Methods: Using a repeated measures counter-balanced design, motion sickness and perception are obtained during Coriolis cross-coupling stimuli on a rotating chair across three GVR treatment interventions: throughout stimulus testing (prevention), following symptom onset (rescue), and placebo control. Subjects perform up to 10 sets of pitch head movements during constant rotation. For each set, head movement is cued every 10 seconds, alternating between pitch forward (chin resting to chest) and pitch backward (head upright) for a total of 7 forward and backward movements. During each head movement, subjects are asked to use a joystick to record the magnitude of their perceived rotation along all three axes. During the 2-minute pause between sets, motion sickness symptom scoring was obtained using the Pensacola Diagnostic Index and subject discomfort (0-20) ratings. Performance on a sensorimotor and cognitive test battery is measured during a fourth session to map changes in GVR level with functional performance. Results: Fifteen of 30 subjects have completed testing to date. Preliminary findings suggest GVR may be more effective in reducing symptoms in subjects who self-report less susceptibility on a pre-test motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire. Based on the joystick measures, GVR significantly reduces both the magnitude (mean 22% - 34%) and duration (mean 42% - 49%) of perceived roll and pitch sensation with head movements during constant rotation. It is important to note that comparable levels of GVR (up to 2.5mA) does not impair performance on a functional test battery including mobility and balance tasks. Discussion: Our preliminary findings suggest GVR may be useful in reducing disorienting roll and pitch illusions associated with Coriolis cross-coupling stimuli. While transfer to post-flight treatment will need to be validated, the potential advantages of our non-pharmaceutical countermeasure approach would be to provide rapid therapeutic effect while allowing continuous titration of GVR amplitude during recovery to maintain operational performance.

Gaurav Pradhan↗
NASA NTRS2022

Artemis I Countdown 101

Before the Artemis I mission launches on its way around the Moon, the launch team at Kennedy Space Center and supporting teams across the country will begin the launch countdown about two days before liftoff. The launch countdown contains "L Minus” and "T Minus" times. "L minus" indicates how far away we are from liftoff in hours and minutes and does not include built-in holds. “T minus” time is a sequence of events that are built into the launch countdown where counting and holds are inserted. The 730,000 gallons of propellants that will be loaded into the rocket are liquid oxygen (LO2) and liquid hydrogen (LH2). Pauses in the countdown, or "holds," are built into the countdown to allow the launch team to target a precise launch window, and to provide a cushion of time for certain tasks and procedures without impacting the overall schedule. For the Artemis I countdown, planned built-in holds vary in length and occur at the following times: L-8 hours, 40 minutes, and L-40 minutes.

Madison Elizabeth Tuttle↗
NASA NTRS2021

Long-Duration Wear Testing of the ASTRAEUS Thruster, Phase I: 50 kg Xe Throughput

The thruster component of the Ascendant Sub-kW Transcelestial Electric Propulsion System successfully completed a propellant throughput demonstration of 50 kg Xe. The thruster was operated for a total of 3,287 h, of which 97.9% was spent at 300 V – 1000 W, and generated 790 kN-s of total impulse. Thrust, telemetry, and temperature measurements periodically recorded at four operating conditions spanning 200 – 500 V and 200 – 1000 W revealed constant performance across the full test duration. High-fidelity plasma simulations of the erosion of the thruster’s downstream faces suggest a theoretical lifetime capability of >30 kh, corresponding to propellant throughput of >450 kg Xe and a total impulse of >7 MNs, at the 300 V – 1000 W operating condition. The test was voluntarily paused after 50 kg Xe throughput to take these erosion measurements before the test was resumed at a different operating condition.

Goebel, Dan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cost and Throughput Analysis for the NASA Ames Arc Jet Modernization Program

NASA Ames Center is currently evaluating alternatives to modernize the Arc Jet Complex, a critical part of testing for NASA’s planetary missions. NASA’s Arc Jet Complex facilities “are used to simulate the aerothermodynamic heating that a spacecraft endures throughout hypersonic atmospheric entry, and to test candidate thermal protection system (TPS) materials and systems. “Because planetary mission schedules often have tight windows due to planetary alignment constraints, a small increase in schedule could result in a two-year delay. Such a delay could increase the cost of a $1billionmissionbyhundreds of millions of dollars due to project personnel pay and clean room storage. To avoid these costs, the authors support NASA Ames in evaluating return on investment (ROI) and effectiveness of alternatives for modernizing the complex. The first input into the ROI is the deconstruction and construction cost estimates, which are developed using independent research on highly specialized subsystems, vendor quotes, and Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), depending on the facility and work package. One of the measures of effectiveness is throughput analysis of the test bays, as a main goal of the modernization is to increase the number of possible test runs per year. This analysis is conducted via a probabilistic simulation and accounts for a variety of stochastic factors that influence the sequence of test runs, such as the facility availability; test complexity; the need to pause to assess test results; test failure; and the possibility of a system failure. The methodologies for both these analyses are discussed, along with the challenges presented due to the unique nature of the highly specialized test equipment.

Jennifer Scheel↗
NASA NTRS2023

Galvanic Vestibular Reduction Modifies Perception of Coriolis Cross-Coupling and Delays Motion Sickness Onset

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in vestibular sensory processing following G-transitions lead to head movement sensitivity and motion sickness upon return to Earth’s gravity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a non-pharmaceutical tool using galvanic vestibular reduction (GVR) could suppress disorienting illusions and mitigate motion sickness. A similar approach using anodal (inhibitory) currents delivered to both ears has been shown to result in a selective reversible ablation of irregular vestibular afferents [1]. METHODS: Using a repeated measures counter-balanced design, motion sickness and perception were obtained in 26 subjects during Coriolis cross-coupling stimuli on a rotating chair across three GVR treatment interventions: throughout stimulus testing (prevention), following symptom onset (rescue), and placebo control. The GVR peak current was maintained at 2.5 mA across subjects and across prevention / rescue sessions. Subjects performed up to 10 sets of pitch head movements during constant rotation. For each set, head movement was cued every 10 seconds, alternating between pitch forward (chin resting to chest) and pitch backward (head upright) for a total of 7 forward and backward movements. During each head movement, subjects were asked to use a joystick to record the magnitude of their perceived rotation along three axes. During the 2-minute pause between sets, motion sickness symptom scoring was obtained using the Pensacola Diagnostic Index and subject discomfort (0-20) ratings. Performance on a sensorimotor and cognitive test battery was measured during a fourth session to map changes in GVR level with functional performance. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 26 subjects were not susceptible to the motion stressor (i.e., did not reach an endpoint in the control condition). While the time to endpoint, or number of head movements, did not significantly vary across the three GVR conditions in the remaining subjects, the symptom levels were significantly lower through the third set of head movements when GVR was on throughout the testing. Initiating GVR following symptom onset did not appear to alter the symptom progression nor time to motion sickness endpoint. Based on the joystick measures, GVR significantly modified the perceived roll and pitch sensation during head movements, reducing the amplitude of tilt in most subjects. It is important to note that comparable levels of GVR did not impair performance on a functional test battery including mobility, balance and cognitive tasks. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest GVR may be useful in reducing disorienting roll and pitch illusions and delaying the onset of motion sickness. Further enhancements will be required to individualize the stimulation amplitude and optimize the waveform delivery. Adapting this non-pharmaceutical countermeasure approach to allow self-administered titration of current amplitude during recovery would enable transfer to post-flight treatment of motion sickness. [1] Minor L. B. and Goldberg J. M. (1991) J Neurosci 11, 1636-48. 109, 889-894.

G N Pradhan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

To the Moon! Space Launch System Modal Testing with Video and Motion Magnification

MIT Lincoln Laboratory and NASA Marshall Space Flight Center have been collaborating on using video camera measurements and motion magnification for modal testing of large aerospace components for several years. This presentation will discuss results from the Space Launch System Integrated Modal Test (IMT) and Dynamic Rollout/Rollback Test (DRRT) in support of the Artemis I mission. During the IMT, the data collection focused on operational mode shapes. In addition, the cameras were repositioned mid-test to better understand the physics of a low-frequency torsion mode. The non-contact nature of video data capture allowed for the quick redeployment of the cameras while not causing any delay in test schedule, whereas traditional instrumentation would have required a pause in testing to attach the sensors to the test article. The motion magnification analysis was able to find the low-frequency operational mode shapes and help the test team better understand the physics of the torsion mode. Building upon the success of the IMT motion magnification work, a camera system was used during the DRRT to find operational mode shapes, if the physics of the low-frequency torsion mode remained with different boundary conditions, and relative deflection of the vehicle and ML tower during the roll. In this paper we will present operational mode shape results, discuss the physics of the torsion mode, and review experimental setup idiosyncrasies to help the community in designing video camera measurement systems.

optical↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation of Transient Spacecraft Refueling Model with Gateway Breadboard Test Data

The ability to refuel spacecraft on-orbit is a key enabling technology for deep space human exploration. On-orbit refueling requires priming a pressurized liquid propellant from a source tank into fluid transfer lines at vacuum conditions, which could result in excessive surge pressures beyond the system’s qualified operating limits and potentially damage hardware. Another source of potentially damaging surge pressures is the water hammer transient that occurs when the isolation valves are closed to pause or end the refueling operation. Therefore, it is imperative to employ numerical models during the development of flight hardware to parametrically characterize system performance over a wide range of operating conditions to minimize the risk of exceeding pressure limits during flight. Since rapid pressure transients can be difficult to model accurately, it is important to validate those models with test data. As part of the Gateway bipropellant refueling system development, a simplified fluidic breadboard system was created using water as a simulant for fuel to support early program risk reduction of refueling operations. The objectives of breadboard testing were to gather performance data to characterize and demonstrate critical refueling operations and to validate numerical models that can be extended to predicting flight system performance. A description of the breadboard test article and the results of numerical model validation is presented. The model is shown to have very good agreement with test data.

Refueling↗
NASA NTRS2025

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase V – Buffet Test Report

This test report summarizes work performed by the Boeing Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team in the Phase V Transonic Truss-Braced Wing contract task. The task was awarded in September 2020, and ended at the end of September 2022. As a part of the SUGAR Phase V contract task, Boeing developed a wind tunnel test plan, model requirements, then fabricated and conducted a dedicated transonic buffet wind tunnel test. The test focused on the investigation of buffet onset, and the ability to accurately predict buffet onset for the TTBW configuration. This report summarizes the results and post-test analysis of the 9% scale, semispan, Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) transonic buffet model tested at the NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT) 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (11-Ft TWT) facility located at Moffett Field, CA. It was tested from January 24, 2022, through February 18, 2022. The wind tunnel test was successful in capturing buffet onset at the model design dynamic pressure. Multiple configurations were tested starting in the wing-body-strut configuration and ending with the full configuration including wing-body-strut-nacelle/pylon, and flap hinge. The test also measured the effect of control surface deflections (ailerons and spoilers), as well as the effect of an outboard strut flap. Steady data collected during the test included standard force and moment measurements, as well as wing, strut, nacelle, and body (fuselage) static pressures. These data were collected in a standard pitch-pause mode. Unsteady data captured in the test, collected in continuous pitch mode, included wing and strut dynamic pressures, accelerations, and strains. According to test data, previous concerns regarding critical buffet onset on the strut (at low vehicle lift coefficient) and in the wing-strut channel have been mitigated. Buffet onset on the TTBW appears to follow conventional wing-induced buffet onset mechanisms. However, the critical station where buffet onset first occurs has moved inboard to the wing-strut juncture span location (55-60% span) from the typical ~70% span location. Test data obtained by unsteady pressure transducers provided a good match to expected buffet onset modes. An assessment of different tools and methodologies for predicting buffet onset was conducted. Reasonable agreement was found for buffet boundary predictions between most of the methods examined when using a forward trip location, with the greatest discrepancies from the pitching moment break and trailing edge pressure divergence methods. When an aft trip location was used the buffet boundary predictions diverged more significantly from unsteady pressure measurements. In addition, good agreement between the buffet onset trends were found when the Reynolds number, configuration, or spanload was changed.

strut↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Learning About Routine Successful Pilot Techniques Using A Cued Retrospective Think-Aloud Task

Self-report can be a valuable method for collecting data about people’s goals and perceived motivations – data about aspects of crew thinking that are not otherwise readily observable. One of the challenges associated with collecting self-report data on routine successful performance, however, is that details may go unreported, be deemed unimportant, or may not be recalled. We report a study in which commercial airline flight crews participated in a video-cued retrospective think aloud after flying a high-fidelity simulated arrival into Charlotte airport. One day after flying the simulated arrival, crews were shown a video recording of their flight. The video was paused after each minute, and crew members were each asked to describe what they were doing and thinking during that interval. Reported data analysis focused on aspects of performance that are often ambiguously described as “pilot technique” or “airmanship,” in an attempt to provide more detail around these types of behaviors.

Jon Holbrook↗
NASA NTRS2021

Long-Duration Wear Testing of the ASTRAEUS Hall Thruster, Phases II & III: 72 kg Xe Throughput & 1.2 MN-s Total Impulse

The thruster component of the Ascendant Sub-kW Transcelestial Electric Propulsion System successfully completed a propellant throughput demonstration of 72 kg Xe in a long-duration wear test planned to eventually exceed 100 kg. The thruster has been operated for a total of 5450 h over three operating conditions: 3287 h at 300 V – 1000 W, 1745 h at 500 V – 1000 W, and 417 h at 400 V – 600 W. A total of 1.2 MN-s of impulse has been demonstrated to date. Thrust, telemetry, and temperature measurements periodically recorded at four operating conditions spanning 200 – 500 V and 200 – 1000 W revealed constant performance across the full test duration. The erosion of the downstream faces of the thruster was observed to be higher than anticipated after the first 5032 h of thruster operation. This issue was traced to the application of sub-nominal magnetic field strengths throughout the LDWT, caused by an electrical-related ground-support equipment issue, which resulted in a downstream shift of the discharge plasma and enhanced erosion of the thruster’s pole covers. Nevertheless, the thruster performance and operational behaviour remained unaffected. High-fidelity plasma simulations of the erosion of the thruster’s downstream faces, supported by prior short-duration wear testing, suggest a theoretical lifetime capability of >30 kh, corresponding to propellant throughput of >450 kg Xe and a total impulse of >7 MNs, at the 300 V – 1000 W operating condition. The test was voluntarily paused after 68 kg Xe and 72 kg Xe throughput, respectively, to take these erosion measurements at the 500 V and 400 V operating conditions before the test was resumed at a different operating condition.

Goebel, Dan↗
NASA NTRS2023

TESS Data Release Notes: Sector 61, DR86

TESS Sector 61 observations include physical orbits 129 and 130 of the spacecraft around the Earth. Data collection was paused for a total of 0.63 days to download data. Data were downloaded approximately every seven days, once near apogee of each orbit and once near perigee. In total, there are 24.80 days of science data collected in Sector 61.

TESS↗
NASA NTRS2023

TESS Data Release Notes: Sector 62, DR88

TESS Sector 62 observations include physical orbits 131 and 132 of the spacecraft around the Earth. Data collection was paused for a total of 0.63 days to download data. Data were downloaded approximately every seven days, once near apogee of each orbit and once near perigee. In total, there are 25.08 days of science data collected in Sector 62.

TESS↗
NASA NTRS2023

TESS Data Release Notes: Sector 58, DR83

TESS Sector 58 observations include physical orbits 123 and 124 of the spacecraft around the Earth. Data collection was paused for a total of 0.63 days to download data. Data were downloaded approximately every seven days, once near apogee of each orbit and once near perigee. In total, there are 27.09 days of science data collected in Sector 58.

TESS↗