SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This presentation covers Oak Ridge National Labatory (ORNL) integral experiment work for fiscal year 2022. The talk highlights the three main Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) funded tasks for 2022.
This lecture covers Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) R-matrix analyses for non-fissile materials within Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). This presentation includes a Strontium and Chlorine evaluation.
This presentation is on the status of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Thermal Scattering Evaluation (TSL) evaluations. A focus of this presentation centers on the preliminary work on Teflon and Polyethylene evaluation validation.
This letter report is in submission of completion of the Level 3 milestone number within the larger Advanced Reactor Technologies Gas Cooled Reactor program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The focus of this year’s efforts is the aggregation of background information about the irradiation experiments for property change in H-451 graphite, getting the irradiation-induced property change of IG-110 and ETU-10 written up in journal articles for publication, and involvement with ASTM D02.F0 Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Products and the ASME Working Group on Nonmetallic Design and Materials (SG HTR)(BPV III). This report will document the status of these activities.
This presentation is on the Oak Ridge National Labatory (ORNL) S/U capabilities for critical experiment design. It covers a brief intro to TSUNAMI analysis for NCS validation. Additionally, it shows similarity indices and historical use of TSUNAMI for critical experiment design. It concludes with recent designs: IER-441, IER-304, and IER-554 (on-going).
This presentation opens with a ORNL definition of ENDF/B-VIII.1β1. Following with keff results for CE calculations with VALID. Additionally provided are Preliminary Root Cause Analysis (RCA) results. This presentation then concludes with future plans for additional validation.
This presentation covers the ORNL FY22 NCSP Time-of-Flight measurements. Key take-aways from this presentation include that the process was initiated in FY22. The Lease starts Mar. FY23 (delayed). Finally, that there has been a 30% increase in cost to sample fabrication.
ORNL has developed an ASIC intended for reading out arrays of Silicon Photomultipliers coupled to scintillator materials that exhibit neutron/gamma pulse shape discrimination. The ASIC's basic properties: power consumption, linearity, PSD FoM, and timing resolution have all been measured and the results are presented here.
This presentation focuses on ORNL Integral Experiment and DOE-EM work during FY 23. Which includes: CeDT support, IE designs leads, and a DOE-EM summary.
This presentation is titled ORNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Contribution to NCSP (ND-2). This lecture includes resonance evaluations, SAMMY fitting results, and resonance evaluation features. The presentation finishes with evaluations in alkaline earth-metals and halogens.
This presentation goes over the ORNL NCSP training and education support for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023. It includes a look at approved training and education tasks set up for FY2023. This lecture also covers revisions and updates to proposals and the LA-12808 LA-12808 Nuclear Criticality Safety Guide.
This is a presentation to provide a brief overview of UNF processing off-gas treatment research at ORNL, intended for a broad audience.
The performance of the ORNL ASIC and its readout system was tested with pixelated organic scintillators. We use a pixelated trans-Stilbene scintillator array from Inrad Optics and a pixelated organic glass scintillator array developed at Sandia National Laboratories to characterize the energy and timing resolutions and the pulse-shape discrimination (PSD) figure-of-merit (FoM). The results are compared to previous work in which the same metrics were measured on waveforms digitized at 250 MHz with 14-bit resolution. We found that the PSD FoM at 340 keVee of the ASIC configuration compared to waveform data varied with the scintillator type. We measured a PSD FoM of 1.12 ± 0.14 with the ASIC configuration versus 1.39 ± 0.23 with waveform data using the trans-Stilbene array. We measured a PSD FoM of 0.52 ± 0.18 with the ASIC configuration versus 1.25 ± 0.19 with waveform data using the the organic glass scintillator array. The coincidence timing resolution was measured using two 6x6x6 mm 3 cubes of trans-Stilbene. It was measured to be 805 ± 9 ps with the ASIC configuration versus 300 ps on average with waveform data.
A collaborative research and development effort in support of the Alloy 709 Code Case qualification in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, High Temperature Reactors is being carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Idaho National Laboratory (INL), and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Key testing data for the Alloy 709 100,000-hr near-term Code Case submittal to ASME is expected to be completed by the end of 2024, with design parameters anticipated to be finalized in FY 2025. This report summarizes the testing results for three commercial heats of Alloy 709 conducted across three laboratories, reviews the current testing status, and outlines the remaining data needed to support the first Alloy 709 Code Case submittal to ASME. The Alloy 709 Code Case plan remains on schedule.
This report offers a comprehensive view of data streams currently generated at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory, Argonne National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory set to integrate into the evolving Multi-Dimensional Data Correlation framework at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Developed by the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program, the Multi-Dimensional Data Correlation framework serves as a cutting-edge software to manage data relevant to advanced manufacturing and material behavior in advanced reactors. The report defines data streams, highlights their generation methods and visualization methods both for experimental and computational aspects relevant to the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies project. A logical next step for this work is to integrate the MDDC framework into PNNL’s, INL’s, ANL’s, LANL’s and ORNL’s fabrication, experimentation, and modelling workflows. This would require setting up the MDDC framework at PNNL, INL, ANL, and LANL and integrating it into the data collection and storage for these different activities.
In an effort to upgrade and provide a unified and improved instrument control and data acquisition system for the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) instrument suite—biological small-angle neutron scattering instrument (Bio-SANS), the extended q-range small-angle neutron scattering diffractometer (EQ-SANS), the general-purpose small-angle neutron scattering diffractometer (GP-SANS)—beamline scientists and developers teamed up and worked closely together to design and develop a new system. We began with an in-depth analysis of user needs and requirements, covering all perspectives of control and data acquisition based on previous usage data and user feedback. Our design and implementation were guided by the principles from the latest user experience and design research and based on effective practices from our previous projects. In this article, we share details of our design process as well as prominent features of the new instrument control and data acquisition system. The new system provides a sophisticated Q-Range Planner to help scientists and users plan and execute instrument configurations easily and efficiently. The system also provides different user operation interfaces, such as wizard-type tool Panel Scan, a Scripting Tool based on Python Language, and Table Scan, all of which are tailored to different user needs. The new system further captures all the metadata to enable post-experiment data reduction and possibly automatic reduction and provides users with enhanced live displays and additional feedback at the run time. We hope our results will serve as a good example for developing a user-friendly instrument control and data acquisition system at large user facilities.
Under a DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) task involving Analytical Methods, three Laboratories collaborated in a comparison of results obtained from Sensitivity/Uncertainty (S/U) packages relevant to validation of transport codes. The task involves Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) comparing results of MORET 5/MACSENS V3.0, MCNP6.2/Whisper-1.1, and SCALE 6.2.3/TSUNAMI/USLSTATS respectively. All Monte Carlo transport code results utilize nuclear data from ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluation.
Under a DOE Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) task involving Analytical Methods, three Laboratories collaborated in a comparison of results obtained from Sensitivity/Uncertainty (S/U) packages relevant to validation of transport codes. The task involves Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) comparing results of MORET 5/MACSENS V3.0, MCNP6.2/Whisper-1.1, and SCALE 6.2.3/TSUNAMI/USLSTATS respectively. All Monte Carlo transport code results utilize nuclear data from ENDF/B-VII.1 evaluation. This study examines five cases from the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments (ICSBEP Handbook) selected as application models: IEU-MET- FAST-002-001, LEU-COMP-THERM-001-001, LEU-SOL-THERM-004-001, MIX-COMP- THERM-001-001, and U233-SOL-THERM-001-001. This is a continuation of a previous study to examine Pu and HEU cases: HEU-MET-FAST-013-001, HEU-SOL-THERM-001-008, PU-MET- FAST-022-001, and PU-SOL-THERM-001-001. Ultimately, comparison is made between Upper Subcritical Limits (USLs) obtained using each code package for each application case. Since differences exist in whether packages take into account margin of subcriticality (MOS), the USL is computed using only bias and bias uncertainty, also known as the calculational margin (CM) in ANSI/ANS-8.24. Results comparison appears to show that benchmark selection has a greater influence on the USL than the method used for calculation of bias and bias uncertainty.