Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “GASIFICATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

A Step toward Process Electrification: Microwave-Assisted Co-Gasification of Waste Plastics and Biomass to Produce Clean Energy

Barely 9% of the 353 million metric tons of plastic waste produced worldwide over the last two decades has been recycled, with the majority of it being either landfilled or incinerated. Recycling and upcycling plastic waste is thus essential in mitigating environmental pollution. Gasification is the thermochemical conversion of solid carbon feedstock at high temperatures using a gasifying agent to produce hydrogen-rich syngas. Existing gasification technologies are energy-intensive and require high operating temperatures (>1000 °C), leaving them uncommercial. Microwave heating has sparked attention in a variety of chemical processes due to its specific advantages over traditional heating technologies, such as rapid and selective heating to improve process efficiency. NETL’s research team recently investigated the synergistic advantages of corn stover and mixed plastics in producing hydrogen-rich syngas via microwave heating. As a continuation of the research, this study provides an outlook over the non-catalytic versus catalytic effects of plastic-corn stover gasification via process electrification to enhance H2 production, minimize undesired tar, and improve process efficiency. Our aim is to provide complete electrification of the existing gasification process by using waste plastics as a starting block to produce valuable fuel and support the nation’s net zero goals.

Abedin, Ashraf↗
DOE OSTI2026

Tar Formation and Mitigation in Pressurized Biomass and Cofired Gasification

Biomass gasification with CO2 capture has the potential to provide carbon-negative heat, power, and feedstock for sustainable hydrocarbon fuels. In a pressurized gasifier, precombustion solvent systems can capture CO2 with less energy than needed for amine-based postcombustion CO2 capture, and pressurized syngas is generally more suitable for fuel synthesis. Although precombustion capture has been used for many decades in large-scale fossil-based plants, it has not been well-demonstrated in smaller-scale biomass gasification. Precombustion solvents and product streams could be particularly impacted by tar and other organic compounds that tend to form in high concentrations during low-temperature biomass gasification. A pressurized pilot-scale gasifier was used to examine tar formation and fate when using CO2 capture with various blends of biomass and coal. The syngas was fully conditioned to remove particulate matter; capture sulfur; adjust syngas chemistry using water-gas shift; quench out moisture and condensable organics; and capture CO2. Tar concentrations were measured in the raw syngas, the product gas, and in the liquid streams over the course of several weeks. The gasifier was operated both as a high-pressure oxygen-blown system to mimic large-scale centralized gasification and at lower pressures under air-blown conditions to mimic a more likely small-scale system. A second high-temperature stage with oxidant injection was used to crack tars. The overall results showed how gasifier and CO2 capture performance change as fuel is blended between coal to biomass and what the fate of tar is through a precombustion CO2 capture system.

Strege, Josh [University of North Dakota EERC] (OR↗
DOE OSTI2012

Advanced Gasification (Annual Report)

The Advanced Gasification team is addressing many factors that impact the current and future development and deployment of gasification-based power generation. For example, the service life of gasifiers does not meet the performance needs of users, failing to achieve an online gasifier availability of 85-95 percent in utility applications and 95 percent in applications such as chemical production. The inability to meet these goals has created a potential roadblock to widespread acceptance and commercialization of advanced gasification technologies, with refractory liners, sensors, and syngas coolers among key components identified as negatively impacting gasifier availability. Ash originating from impurities in gasifier carbon feedstock is the root cause of many problems; attacking or fouling components, leading to their unplanned shutdowns for repair, replacement, or cleaning. Technology gaps exist in the understanding of how fuel properties impact carbon conversion, slag viscosity, and downstream fouling. Fuel flexibility has potential advantages for gasifier operators to lower fuel cost or impact future carbon emission credits, but operators need to know how feedstock changes impact gasifier operation. Mixed feedstock combinations have not been studied as to how ash properties impact gasifier operation, efficiency, and capacity factors. Further gaps exist in technology which specifically target reducing the cost of multiple and mixed feed stocks at 90 percent capture, including low-rank coal (half the U.S. coal supply) and affordable gas clean-up technology.

Additives↗
DOE OSTI2017

Steam-air blown bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasification (BFBBG): Multi-scale models and experimental validation

During fluidized bed biomass gasification, complex gas-solid mixing patterns and numerous chemical and physical phenomena make identification of optimal operating conditions challenging. In this work, a parametric experimental campaign was carried out alongside the development of a coupled reactor network model which successfully integrates the individually validated sub-models to predict steady-state reactor performance metrics and outputs. The experiments utilized an integrated gasification system consisting of an externally-heated, bench-scale, 4-in., 5 kWth, fluidized bed steam/air blown gasifier fed with woody biomass equipped with a molecular beam mass spectrometer to directly measure tar species. The operating temperature (750-850°C) and air/fuel equivalence ratio (ER = 0-0.157) were independently varied to isolate their effects. Elevating temperature is shown to improve the char gasification rate and reduce tar concentrations. In conclusion, air strongly impacts the composition of tar, accelerating the conversion of lighter polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons into soot precursors, while also improving the overall carbon conversion.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Biomass char gasification kinetic rates compared to data, including ash effects

This investigation provides both experimental and theoretical analyses of biomass char gasification kinetics over 1150–1350 °C in the environment of CO 2 , H 2 O and combinations of these reactants. The experimental data include continuous measurements of particle mass, external and internal temperatures, shape, and size with periodic but not continuous measurements of char porosity, pore size distribution, and pore surface area. The model describes heterogeneous char gasification for poplar wood, corn stover and switchgrass in different shapes and industrially relevant sizes (12.5 mm and smaller). Nonlinear least-squares regression produces optimized power-law model parameters for global kinetics that describe biomass char gasification with respect to both CO 2 and H 2 O separately and in combination. A single set of kinetic parameters describes reaction rates for all three fuels. Model simulations agree with measured data at all stages of char conversion even though the observed mass loss rates change significantly with conversion. In conclusion, the change in rate with conversion depends strongly on ash content, and this investigation provides a simple and theoretically based reaction rate expression that includes the effect of inert ash occupying an increasing portion of the reactive surface with increased conversion.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2012

The O{sub 2}-enriched air gasification of coal, plastics and wood in a fluidized bed reactor

Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer The effect of the O{sub 2} in the gasification stream of a BFB gasifier has been studied. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Main advantage of the O{sub 2}-enriched air is the increasing of the bed temperature. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer No remarkable effects on tar reduction. Decreasing of recognized PAHs. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Gasification reactions completed inside the dense bed and splashing zone. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Polycondensation reactions occur mainly in the freeboard region. - Abstract: The effect of oxygen-enriched air during fluidized bed co-gasification of a mixture of coal, plastics and wood has been investigated. The main components of the obtained syngas were measured by means of on-line analyzers and a gas chromatograph while those of the condensate phase were off-line analysed by means of a gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The characterization of condensate phase as well as that of the water used as scrubbing medium completed the performed diagnostics. The experimental results were further elaborated in order to provide material and substances flow analyses inside the plant boundaries. These analyses allowed to obtain the main substance distribution between solid, gaseous and condensate phases and to estimate the conversion efficiency of carbon and hydrogen but also to easily visualise the waste streams produced by the process. The process performance was then evaluated on the basis of parameters related to the conversion efficiency of fuels into valuable products (i.e. by considering tar and particulate as process losses) as well as those related to the energy recovery.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Fluid bed gasification – Plasma converter process generating energy from solid waste: Experimental assessment of sulphur species

Highlights: • We investigate gaseous sulphur species whilst gasifying sulphur-enriched wood pellets. • Experiments performed using a two stage fluid bed gasifier – plasma converter process. • Notable SO{sub 2} and relatively low COS levels were identified. • Oxygen-rich regions of the bed are believed to facilitate SO{sub 2}, with a delayed release. • Gas phase reducing regions above the bed would facilitate more prompt COS generation. - Abstract: Often perceived as a Cinderella material, there is growing appreciation for solid waste as a renewable content thermal process feed. Nonetheless, research on solid waste gasification and sulphur mechanisms in particular is lacking. This paper presents results from two related experiments on a novel two stage gasification process, at demonstration scale, using a sulphur-enriched wood pellet feed. Notable SO{sub 2} and relatively low COS levels (before gas cleaning) were interesting features of the trials, and not normally expected under reducing gasification conditions. Analysis suggests that localised oxygen rich regions within the fluid bed played a role in SO{sub 2}’s generation. The response of COS to sulphur in the feed was quite prompt, whereas SO{sub 2} was more delayed. It is proposed that the bed material sequestered sulphur from the feed, later aiding SO{sub 2} generation. The more reducing gas phase regions above the bed would have facilitated COS – hence its faster response. These results provide a useful insight, with further analysis on a suite of performed experiments underway, along with thermodynamic modelling.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Influence of Pelletization and Moisture Content of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches (EFBs) on Dynamic Gasification Performance

Wet-ground empty fruit bunches (EFBs), dry-ground EFB, and pelletized EFB were gasified in a laboratory-scale updraft fixed-bed reactor at differing temperatures and equivalent ratios (ERs) between 0.19 and 0.78 to evaluate the performance and quality of the syngas under autothermal operating conditions. In addition, the theoretical estimation of the key performance indicator of the ashes on the performance of the gasification process was obtained. The results show that for ERs > 0.4 the autothermal operating condition was achieved for pretreatments with pelletized and dry-ground EFBs, with reactor operating temperatures T > 700 °C. With wet EFB, this condition is achieved at any ER value. The average composition of the syngas from pelletized EFB presented the best average concentrations of the combustible species CO, H2, and CH4 when the ER values were between 0.25 and 0.40. The highest hot and cold thermal efficiency values were obtained for the gasification of EFB pellets with ER values between 0.25 and 0.40. For ground EFB, increases in the ER value led to improvements in hot thermal efficiency. Finally, during the EFB pellet gasification tests, no agglomeration and sintering problems were evidenced in comparison with wet-ground and dry-ground EFBs that showed slag formation, especially at ER < 0.46.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2014

Gasification of refinery sludge in an updraft reactor for syngas production

The study probes into the investigation on gasification of dry refinery sludge. The details of the study includes; influence of operation time, oxidation temperature and equivalence ratios on carbon gas conversion rate, gasification efficiency, heating value and fuel gas yield are presented. The results show that, the oxidation temperature increased sharply up to 858°C as the operating time increased up to 36 min then bridging occurred at 39 min which cause drop in reaction temperature up to 819 °C. This bridging was found to affect also the syngas compositions, meanwhile as the temperature decreased the CO, H{sub 2}, CH{sub 4} compositions are also found to be decreases. Higher temperature catalyzed the reduction reaction (CO{sub 2}+C = 450 2CO), and accelerated the carbon conversion and gasification efficiencies, resulted in more solid fuel is converted to a high heating value gas fuel. The equivalence ratio of 0.195 was found to be the optimum value for carbon conversion and cold gas efficiencies, high heating value of gas, and fuel gas yield to reach their maximum values of 96.1 % and 53.7 %, 5.42 MJ Nm{sup −3} of, and 2.5 Nm{sup 3} kg{sup −1} respectively.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2016

Effect of small-scale biomass gasification at the state of refractory lining the fixed bed reactor

The article deals with the influence of biomass gasification on the condition of the refractory lining of a fixed bed reactor. The refractory lining of the gasifier is one part of the device, which significantly affects the operational reliability and durability. After removing the refractory lining of the gasifier from the experimental reactor, there was done an assessment how gasification of different kinds of biomass reflected on its condition in terms of the main factors affecting its life. Gasification of biomass is reflected on the lining, especially through sticking at the bottom of the reactor. Measures for prolonging the life of lining consist in the reduction of temperature in the reactor, in this case, in order to avoid ash fusion biomass which it is difficult for this type of gasifier.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2012

Assessment of the SRI Gasification Process for Syngas Generation with HTGR Integration – White Paper

This white paper is intended to compare the technical and economic feasibility of syngas generation using the SRI gasification process coupled to several high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) with more traditional HTGR-integrated syngas generation techniques, including: • Gasification with high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE), • Steam methane reforming (SMR), and • Gasification with SMR with and without CO 2 sequestration.

03 NATURAL GAS↗
DOE OSTI2012

Biomass Gasification Technology Assessment: Consolidated Report

Harris Group Inc. (HGI) was commissioned by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to assess gasification and tar reforming technologies. Specifically, the assessments focused on gasification and tar reforming technologies that are capable of producing a syngas suitable for further treatment and conversion to liquid fuels. HGI gathered sufficient information to analyze three gasification and tar reforming systems. This report summarizes the equipment, general arrangement of the equipment, operating characteristics, and operating severity for each technology. The order of magnitude capital cost estimates are supported by a basis-of-estimate write-up, which is also included in this report. The report also includes Microsoft Excel workbook models, which can be used to design and price the systems. The models can be used to analyze various operating capacities and pressures. Each model produces a material balance, equipment list, capital cost estimate, equipment drawings and preliminary general arrangement drawings. Example outputs of each model are included in the Appendices.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Alstom’s Limestone Chemical Looping Gasification Process for High Hydrogen Syngas Generation

Alstom Power Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the General Electric Company (GE), is developing Limestone-based Chemical Looping (LCL™) Processes, utilizing limestone derived calcium sulfate as an oxygen carrier to transport oxygen from air to the fuel. The LCL™ process is a breakthrough technology with the potential to capture CO 2 and SO 2 from new and existing coal-fired power plants at reduced costs while maintaining high plant power generation efficiency. Chemical looping is a next generation advancement to oxy-combustion which would not require the significant investment in a cryogenic distillation type oxygen production plant. Instead of the energy-consuming oxygen plant, chemical looping uses a benign material to directly remove oxygen from the air and bring that oxygen into contact with the fuel. This "game changing" technology is the lowest cost-of-electricity technical approach that GE Power has identified to date for coal power with carbon capture. The technology has significantly lower capital costs compared to a conventional steam power plant with first generation carbon capture technologies. This new power plant concept is based on a hybrid combustion-gasification process utilizing high temperature chemical and thermal looping technology. In the air reactor, a solid oxygen carrier picks up oxygen from air through an oxidation reaction and leaves nitrogen behind. The hot oxygen-carrying solid carrier is then transported to a fuel reactor, where it releases oxygen. The released oxygen then converts the coal in the fuel reactor into combustion gases. The solid carrier is recycled back to the air reactor for regeneration completing the “chemical loop.” The regeneration step produces heat from which steam is produced for power generation while the process results in a concentrated carbon dioxide stream in which the carbon is captured for use or sequestration (CCUS). Limestone as a precursor for the oxygen carrier is abundant, benign, low cost, and is used in CFB and PC boilers for sulfur control. Challenges associated with this carrier include a complex reaction mechanism with possible side reactions leading to the release of SO 2 . The development of the Limestone Chemical Looping Gasification (LCL-G™) technology was co-funded by the Department of Energy under the DOE/NETL Cooperative Agreement No. DE- FE0023497, in parallel with the collaborative combustion (LCL-C™) program. In this report, the LCL-G™ experimental testing from the electrically-heated, once-through, 100 kW Pilot-Scale Test Facility (PSTF) is analysed and reviewed. The PSTF Oxidizer is a 50-foot tall, 100-mm diameter transport reactor, while the PSTF Reducer reactor is based upon a bubbling-bed design. The experimental data from four (4) test campaigns (denoted “Weeks”) are reviewed and discussed. The LCL-G™ (DE-FE0023497) project objectives for gasification are >90% carbon gasified in the Reducer and a H 2 :CO molar generation ratio of 2:1. These project performance metrics were not met by a single coal test, but they were individually approached in two separate tests.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2011

Evaluation of syngas production unit cost of bio-gasification facility using regression analysis techniques

Evaluation of economic feasibility of a bio-gasification facility needs understanding of its unit cost under different production capacities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the unit cost of syngas production at capacities from 60 through 1800Nm 3/h using an economic model with three regression analysis techniques (simple regression, reciprocal regression, and log-log regression). The preliminary result of this study showed that reciprocal regression analysis technique had the best fit curve between per unit cost and production capacity, with sum of error squares (SES) lower than 0.001 and coefficient of determination of (R 2) 0.996. The regression analysis techniques determined the minimum unit cost of syngas production for micro-scale bio-gasification facilities of $0.052/Nm 3, under the capacity of 2,880 Nm 3/h. The results of this study suggest that to reduce cost, facilities should run at a high production capacity. In addition, the contribution of this technique could be the new categorical criterion to evaluate micro-scale bio-gasification facility from the perspective of economic analysis.

Bio-gasification↗
DOE OSTI2017

chapter 40 - Gasification Technologies, "Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation"

Gasification is an enabling technology for the clean-up of fossil and biomass fuels for energy production. A history of gasifier development is told from the perspective of a technology evolving to meet the ever changing market needs. The chemistry and physics of coal conversion includes pyrolysis, combustion, gasification, mineral transformations as well as a discussion of the materials developed to meet the most challenging gasifier applications. Integrated gasification and combined cycle processes are discussed with respect to electrical power production. The distinguishing features for different types of gasifiers are described including fixed bed, fluidized bed, entrained flow, transport gasifiers. The twelve major gasifiers being marketed today are described. The hydrodynamics and kinetics of each are reviewed along with salient differences in performance, such as gas composition, when using a variety of fuels under different conditions. Critical operational features that are discussed include oxidizing media, air or oxygen blown; the system pressure; fuel feed stock; and downstream clean-up. Thermal integration is discussed with respect to its impact on the gasifier performance. Gas clean-up is also considered with respect to the removal of potential pollutants and the shifting to environmentally benign transportation and process fuels.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2012

Comparison of gasification kinetics parameters of different types of nuclear graphite

A chemical-reaction kinetics model of nuclear graphite gasification has recently been developed and successfully validated with gasification rate measurements for nuclear graphite grades of IG-110, IG-430, NBG-18 and NBG-25. The model employs 4 elementary chemical reactions with applicable parameters, including the values and Gaussian-like distributions of the specific activation energies, the pre-exponential coefficients for adsorption of oxygen and desorption of CO and CO{sub 2} gases, and the surface area of free active sites. These parameters are determined from the reported measurements of the total gasification and transient weight loss using a multi-parameter optimization algorithm. The determined chemical kinetics parameters for IG-100 and NB-25 are nearly the same, but slightly different from those for NBG-18 and IG-430. The initial specific area of free active sites is inversely proportional to the square root of the mass or volume of the graphite specimens used in experiments. The recommended chemical kinetics parameters in this paper for these grades of nuclear graphite should be applicable to future safety analysis of high-temperature gas cooled reactors in the unlikely event of a massive air ingress accident. (authors)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2012

Diffusion velocity correlation for nuclear graphite gasification at high temperature and low Reynolds numbers

The safety analysis of High-Temperature and Very High Temperature gas-cooled Reactors requires reliable estimates of nuclear graphite gasification as a function of temperature, among other parameters, in the unlikely event of an air ingress accident. Although the rates of the prevailing chemical reactions increase exponentially with temperature, graphite gasification at high temperatures is limited by the oxygen diffusion through the boundary layer. The effective diffusion velocity depends on the total flow rate and pressure of the bulk air-gas mixture. This paper develops a semi-empirical Sherwood number correlation for calculating the oxygen diffusion velocity. The correlation is based on a compiled database of the results of convective heat transfer experiments with wires and cylinders of different diameters in air, water and paraffin oil at 0.006 {<=} Re {<=} 1,604 and 0.068 {<=} Sc {<=} 35.2, and of mass transfer experiments at 4.8 {<=} Re {<=} 77 and 1,300 {<=} Sc {<=} 2,000. The developed correlation is within {+-} 8% of the compiled database of 567 data points and consistent with reported gasification rate measurements at higher temperatures in experiments using different size specimens of nuclear graphite grades of NBG-18 and NB-25, IG-11, IG-110 and IG-430 in atmospheric air at 0.08 {<=} Re {<=} 30. Unlike the Graetz solution that gives a constant Sh of 3.66 at Re {<=} 1.0, the present correlation shows Sh decreases monotonically to much lower values with decreasing Re. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Modeling biomass gasification system using multistep kinetics under various oxygen–steam conditions

Biomass gasification is an effective method to convert low‐value lingocellulosic biomass into useful gas products. The ability to predict the gas composition is important to process design. In this study, simulations of biomass gasification were carried out for various feedstocks at different operating conditions, and the model results were validated using experimental data. A multistep kinetics model was developed to predict the syngas composition using different biomass feedstocks under various oxygen‐enriched air and steam conditions. The oxygen level in the gasifying agent ranged from 21% (air) to 45% (pure oxygen). Five different biomass materials were used, including pine, maple–oak mixture, seed corn, corn stover, and switchgrass. The fluidized bed gasifier was maintained at 800°C. The present kinetics model was able to predict the concentrations of H 2 , CO, CO 2 , H 2 O, CH 4 , and N 2 in the syngas, and the predicted compositions were in good agreement with the experimental data. The results show that the model was sensitive to the variation in the oxygen level, steam flow rate, and the composition of the biomass material. As the oxygen level increased, the model also predicted the increase in H 2 , CO, CH 4 , and the H 2 /CO ratio. The mechanism on improving the syngas quality was also explained by analyzing the reaction equations. The increase in hydrogen is believed to be due to the use of steam for gasification. The present model can further be integrated into the process simulation model for predicting the performance of a biorefinery to help utilize biomass energy. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1148–1155, 2015

Banerjee, Sudhanya↗