Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Fission Space Reactor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

81 records · Page 5

Thermal Neutron Scattering Law Evaluation for Zirconium Carbide and Critical Mass Calculations

Zirconium carbide (ZrC) is a candidate material for use in advanced high temperature reactors, including space nuclear thermal propulsion applications. Thermal neutron scattering laws (TSLs) are generated for carbon bound in ZrC, C(ZrC), and zirconium bound in ZrC, Zr(ZrC), using ab initio lattice dynamics methods. These evaluations are to be submitted for inclusion in ENDF/B-VIII.1 and use the incoherent approximation for inelastic scattering as well as the new mixed elastic scattering treatment. The application of disordered alloy theory is introduced to appropriately capture the isotopic composition of Zr and C in the elastic scattering cross section. Localized higher energy vibrations in the C(ZrC) phonon density of states that are separated from lower energy modes result in quantized oscillations in the inelastic contributions to the TSL with a significant likelihood of large energy down-scattering and up-scattering interactions, where the latter increases in probability with temperature. The quanta of energy transfer during neutron thermalization is substantially greater than classically expected within the thermal neutron energy range. MC21 critical mass calculations of ZrC mixtures with high-enriched uranium demonstrate an impact of the TSLs when compared to free-gas treatment for 235 U concentrations less than 0.2 g/cm 3 . Additional MC21 critical mass calculations with homogenous mixtures of ZrC and reactor-grade graphite also demonstrate sensitivity to the ZrC TSL for thermal spectrum driven fission systems.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Cluster Dynamics Simulations of Intra-Granular Fission Gas Bubble Size and Pressure Evolution in UO 2

Fission gases such as xenon (Xe) play a critical role in determining the behavior and response of nuclear fuel. Given that Xe has little solubility in UO 2 , it accumulates and forms bubbles, which significantly impact fuel performance. Intra- and inter-granular bubble nucleation and growth can lead to fuel swelling, and once bubbles interconnect at grain boundaries, fission gas can be released into the plenum. At low temperatures, limited uranium vacancy mobility can restrict swelling, therefore causing the bubbles to become highly pressurized. Consequently, this can induce micro-cracking, promote fission gas release (increasing the likelihood of cladding failure), and even lead to fuel pulverization under accident conditions such as a loss of coolant accident. As bubble evolution is strongly influenced by local temperature and fission rate, markedly different behavior occurs across the radial profile of the fuel pellet. Capturing the mechanisms that underpin bubble evolution is therefore important to predict these behaviors in the fuel. Previous models describing important mechanisms informed by lower length scale simulations have been developed under the NEAMS program. These can describe the evolution of a single bubble type (i.e., single value for radius and pressure) at each position in the pellet, for instance using the Centipede cluster dynamic code. However, in reality, a full distribution in bubble sizes and pressures exists within the microstructure at a given position in the pellet. To address this the cluster dynamics code Xolotl, which can predict Xe and vacancy phase space (i.e., bubble distributions) for intra-granular bubbles, has been used before. Prior work benchmarked the Xolotl code against the Centipede cluster dynamics code to ensure compatibility and to verify that mobile defect properties are adequately transferred between the two codes, along with some physics improvements. In this work, we go further by introducing a physics-based set of improvements that will allow us to accurately predict bubble size distributions and internal bubble pressures under representative UO 2 irradiation conditions. The improvements include (i) coupling bubble-defect reaction energies to a virial equation of state (EOS), (ii) including a bubble surface tension contribution, (iii) incorporating radiation-induced re-solution of Xe and vacancies, (iv) enabling pressure-driven dislocation loop punching through an effective emission of interstitial clusters informed by interstitial loop energetics, (v) accounting for radiation induced athermal diffusion of Xe, and (vi) implementing a Booth-type grain boundary sink representation for all mobile defects and defect clusters. After these modifications, we observe good agreement of Xolotl fission gas bubble size and concentration predictions with legacy experimental measurements. Additionally, it allows the distribution of Xe bubble pressures and radius to also be predicted and compared to data produced through the Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC) program. Here, we have done this by running simulations under conditions similar to the AFC post-irradiation examination (PIE) samples irradiated at North Anna 2 light water reactor (LWR). Our results shows excellent agreement with these experimental measurements.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Fuel-cladding chemical interaction of a prototype annular U-10Zr fuel with Fe-12Cr ferritic/martensitic HT-9 cladding

As an alternative fuel form, the annular metallic fuel design eliminates the liquid sodium bond between the fuel and the cladding, providing back-end fuel cycle and other benefits. The fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) of annular fuel also presents new features. In this work, state-of-the-art electron microscopy and spectroscopy techniques were used to study the FCCI of a prototype annular U-10wt%Zr (U-10Zr) fuel with ferritic/martensitic HT-9 cladding irradiated to 3.3% fission per initial heavy atom. Compared with sodium-bonded solid fuels, negligible amounts of lanthanides were found in the FCCI layer in the investigated helium-bonded annular fuel. Instead, most lanthanides were retained in the newly formed UZr 2 phase in the fuel center region. The interdiffusion of iron and uranium resulted in tetragonal ( U ,Zr) 6 Fe phase (space group I4/mcm) and cubic ( U ,Zr)( Fe ,Cr) 2 phase (space group Fd 3 ¯ m). The ( U ,Zr)( Fe ,Cr) 2 phase contains a high density of voids and intergranular uranium monocarbides of NaCl-type crystal structure (space group Fm 3 ¯ m). At the interdiffusion zone and inner cladding interface, a porous lamellar structure composed of alternating Cr-rich layers and U-rich layers was observed. Next to the lamellar region, the unexpected phase transformation from body-centered cubic ferrite (α-Fe) to tetragonal binary Fe-Cr σ phase (space group P4 2 /mnm) occurred, and tetragonal Fe-Cr-U-Si phase (space group I4/mmm) was identified. Due to the diffusion of carbon into the interdiffusion zone, carbon depletion inside the HT-9 led to the disappearance of the martensite lath structure, and intergranular U-rich carbides formed as a result of the diffusion of uranium into the cladding. These detailed new findings reveal the unique features of the FCCI behavior of annular U-Zr fuels, which could be a promising alternative fuel form for high burnup fast reactor applications.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Second Report of the Nuclear Data Subcommittee of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee

The central importance of the nuclear data curated by the US Nuclear Data Program (USNDP) for clean energy generation, national security, nonproliferation, medical applications, and space exploration as well as basic science was described in a prior report issued by the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee subcommittee on Nuclear Data (NSAC-ND) in September 2022. In this report, we present a set of fourteen (14) recommendations that will enhance and advance DOE-NP's stewardship of nuclear data. The first three recommendations focus on the existing core USNDP capabilities, namely: 1) Support the nuclear structure evaluation workforce to improve the currency, consistency, and accessibility of the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF); 2) Enhance nuclear reaction evaluation within the USNDP in support of the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF) through expansion of the workforce and integration of high-performance computing, automation, and machine learning and; 3) Continue atomic mass evaluation in support AME and NUBASE databases. This is followed by eight (8) recommendations representing new cross-cutting initiatives involving both measurement and evaluation to address outstanding nuclear data needs. These new initiatives require a highly trained, diverse workforce that includes personnel with expertise from both inside and outside the nuclear physics community from which evaluators have traditionally been recruited. As such, many of these initiatives are accomplished via a Topical Nuclear Data Collaborations (TNDC). A TNDC is made up of domestic and international stakeholders, subject matter and nuclear data experts, and nuclear data evaluators and features a workforce development plan to ensure that nuclear data evaluators maintain currency in the relevant applications and are seen as equity partners in the endeavor. These include: 1) Establish a coordinated effort to improve evaluation and modeling in nuclear astrophysics for stellar dynamics, multi-messenger astronomy and nucleosynthesis; 2) Initiate a TNDC to develop and maintain nuclear structure evaluation beyond discrete states, including nuclear level densities, photon strength functions and photonuclear data for improved reaction modeling, and exploring nuclear structure at finite temperature; 3) Create a TNDC to perform correlated fission data evaluation, including cross sections, fragment yields, v(A), v(E n ) for nuclear energy, national security, nonproliferation and basic science; 4) From a panel of subject matter experts to establish and annually update a roster of key decay data to nurture its accelerated dissemination including both measurement and evaluation for targeted high-value nuclides for national security, nonproliferation and medical applications; 5) Comprehensive, consistent neutron-induced structure and reaction data for nuclear energy, national security, nonproliferation and planetary nuclear spectroscopy; 6) Charged-particle stopping powers for detector design, space effects and ion beam therapy; 7) High-energy reactions for space exploration and medical nuclide production, and; 8) The creation of an infrastructure for open data and data preservation for use by the entire nuclear physics community. All told, these initiatives require approximately $6.5M increase in NP support of the USNDP in fiscal year 2023 dollars and would require at least 3-5 years to carry out due to the length of time needed to recruit and train new nuclear data researchers. This relatively modest investment would help ensure that the fruits of the nuclear data research carried out by DOE-NP and its collaborators would be brought to bear to address some of the most important needs of our nation and the world. To ensure effective execution of this plan, we present an overview of recruitment, training, and retention goals for the USNDP, the centerpiece of which is a mutually agreed upon code of conduct. Finally, we identify the facility and instrumentation needed to perform the recommended experimental activities. This includes a short review of target fabrication capabilities, reactors, neutron beam, light- and heavy-stable ion, gamma-ray, high-energy and radioactive ion beam facilities. Lastly, a more complete appendix of experimental facilities previously compiled is included with new input provided for 6 facilities.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Design considerations for high entropy alloys in advanced nuclear applications

The demanding operating environments of advanced nuclear reactors require the development of new nuclear materials that can withstand their increased physical, chemical, thermal, and radiation-related challenges. High-entropy alloys (HEAs) have shown often-impressive mechanical, thermomechanical, and corrosion-resistant properties, and offer a massive, unexplored compositional space which allows for the targeted development of application-specific materials. Furthermore, although still in a nascent stage, research has shown that HEAs may exhibit unique irradiation tolerance, including reduced defect production and resistance to irradiation-induced swelling and hardening. The mechanisms behind this increased tolerance are not yet well-understood, although the HEA-specific attributes of a complex energy landscape, reduced thermal conductivity, and shift in defect migration energies and pathways provide promising explanations. Here this work assesses the current and future challenges faced by structural nuclear materials, identifying the specific applications in which HEAs may provide a competitive advantage compared to industry-standard materials with the aid of Ashby material selection maps. Considerations are provided for the design of future nuclear HEAs, including calculations of nuclear-relevant properties to assist in the initial down-selection of elements depending on application requirements (e.g., low neutron capture for in-core applications), narrowing the existing compositional space of HEAs to a manageable scope.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Hot Hydrogen Exposure of U x Zr 1-x C y Nuclear Fuel: The Effect of Additional Carbon

Nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) using hydrogen as propellant in a solid-state fission reactor to reach temperatures of up to 3000K can achieve significantly higher specific impulse than chemical propulsion. A promising fuel that is again considered for NTP is U x Zr 1-x C y . To reduce the overall mass loss as well as the uranium fuel loss, a range of experiments using additional carbon in hot hydrogen (2600 K, 6 SLPM flow rate) were performed for up to 5-6 h. Both a CH 4 addition (0.1 and 0.2 vol%) in the hydrogen stream and the use of sacrificial graphite pieces upstream of the samples were tested, with sample compositions from 5 at% UC to 30 at% UC. The results showed a strong reduction of mass loss, up to a factor of 3, as well as a reduction of surface uranium losses in the presence of additional carbon in the atmosphere. Even with additional carbon in the atmosphere, material with 30 at% UC was not stable, but material with 20 at% UC was stable for up to 6h. The sample surfaces showed texturing after processing, possibly by grain growth on the surface. This led to a separation into grains with high uranium content close to the (100)-orientation, and with low uranium content in grains close to the (111)-orientation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 36, No. 2, July-December 1995]

Nuclear Safety is a journal that covers significant issues in the field of nuclear safety. Its primary scope is safety in the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power reactors worldwide and the research and analysis activities that promote this goal, but it also encompasses the safety aspects of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing and handling, and nuclear waste disposal, the handling of fissionable materials and radioisotopes, and the environmental effects of all these activities. Table of Contents for this issue follows. THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT: 195 The Chornobyl Accident Revisited, Part III: Chernobyl Source Term Release Dynamics and Reconstruction of Events During the Active Phase, A. R. Sich; GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 218 Second ANS Workshop on the Safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, R. A. Bari; 234 Elements of a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, C. M. Hopper; 243 Rickover, Excellence, and Criticality Safety Programs, R. E. Wilson; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 249 Transient Analysis of the PIUS Advanced Reactor Design with the TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Code, B. E. Boyack, J. L Steiner, S. C. Harmony, H. J. Stumpf, and J. F. Lime; 278 The Hierarchy-By-Interval Approach to Identifying Important Models that Need Improvement in Severe-Accident Simulation Codes, T. J. Heames, M. Khatib-Rahbar, J. E. Kelly, R. P. Jenks-Johnson, and Y.-S. Chen; 290 RELAP5/MOD3 Code Coupling Model, R. P. Martin; 299 Missiles Caused by Severe Pressurized-Water Reactor Accidents, R. Krieg; DESIGN FEATURES: 310 Validation of COMMIX with Westinghouse AP-600 PCCS Test Data, J. G. Sun, T. H. Chien, J. Ding, and W T. Sha; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 321 Spent Nuclear Fuel Characterization for a Bounding Reference Assembly for the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel, S. D. Kahook, R. L. Garrett, L. R. Canas, and M J. Beckum; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 332 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION AND ANALYSES: 335 Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf Creek on September 17, 1994, J. V. Kauffman and S. L. Israel; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 344 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Oueener; 349 Proposed Rule Changes as of June 30, 1995; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 320 Symposium on Acceptability of Risk From Radiation—Application to Manned Space Flight; 320 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; 361 Radiation Biology and Radiation Protection— Modern Developments and Tendencies in Radiation Biology; 362 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 354 The Authors; 360 Reviewers of Nuclear Safety, Vol. 36.

05 NUCLEAR FUELS↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 36, No. 2, July-December 1995]

Nuclear Safety is a journal that covers significant issues in the field of nuclear safety. Its primary scope is safety in the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power reactors worldwide and the research and analysis activities that promote this goal, but it also encompasses the safety aspects of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing and handling, and nuclear waste disposal, the handling of fissionable materials and radioisotopes, and the environmental effects of all these activities. Table of Contents for this issue follows. THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT: 195 The Chornobyl Accident Revisited, Part III: Chernobyl Source Term Release Dynamics and Reconstruction of Events During the Active Phase, A. R. Sich; GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 218 Second ANS Workshop on the Safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, R. A. Bari; 234 Elements of a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, C. M. Hopper; 243 Rickover, Excellence, and Criticality Safety Programs, R. E. Wilson; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 249 Transient Analysis of the PIUS Advanced Reactor Design with the TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Code, B. E. Boyack, J. L Steiner, S. C. Harmony, H. J. Stumpf, and J. F. Lime; 278 The Hierarchy-By-Interval Approach to Identifying Important Models that Need Improvement in Severe-Accident Simulation Codes, T. J. Heames, M. Khatib-Rahbar, J. E. Kelly, R. P. Jenks-Johnson, and Y.-S. Chen; 290 RELAP5/MOD3 Code Coupling Model, R. P. Martin; 299 Missiles Caused by Severe Pressurized-Water Reactor Accidents, R. Krieg; DESIGN FEATURES: 310 Validation of COMMIX with Westinghouse AP-600 PCCS Test Data, J. G. Sun, T. H. Chien, J. Ding, and W T. Sha; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 321 Spent Nuclear Fuel Characterization for a Bounding Reference Assembly for the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel, S. D. Kahook, R. L. Garrett, L. R. Canas, and M J. Beckum; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 332 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION AND ANALYSES: 335 Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf Creek on September 17, 1994, J. V. Kauffman and S. L. Israel; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 344 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Oueener; 349 Proposed Rule Changes as of June 30, 1995; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 320 Symposium on Acceptability of Risk From Radiation—Application to Manned Space Flight; 320 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; 361 Radiation Biology and Radiation Protection— Modern Developments and Tendencies in Radiation Biology; 362 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 354 The Authors; 360 Reviewers of Nuclear Safety, Vol. 36.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

AGR-3/4 TRISO Fuel Compact Ceramography

The combined third and fourth irradiation in the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program (AGR-3/4) contained tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuel and designed-to-fail (DTF) fuel particles. The DTF particles were only coated with highly anisotropic pyrocarbon (PyC) so they would purposely fail during the AGR-3/4 irradiation and provide a source of fission products for measurement. To observe the post-irradiation morphology of these DTF particles and the TRISO-coated particles, three AGR-3/4 compacts were mounted in epoxy, sectioned above their centerlines, and ground/polished. Three rounds of grinding/polishing and optical microscopy were performed so that the particles could be observed at multiple planes. Each compact contained approximately 1,872 TRISO particles and exactly 20 DTF particles. The three AGR-3/4 compacts examined covered a wide temperature range and featured both the hottest average irradiation temperature (1375°C) and the coldest/lowest burnup (872°C and 5.5% fissions per initial metal atom) of any compacts to undergo post-irradiation examination (PIE) in the AGR program to date. A total of 29 DTF particles were located and observed via microscopy across the three compacts. All the DTF particles observed via microscopy had completely failed PyC coatings. Some different DTF kernel and PyC morphologies were observed that have been attributed to the differences in irradiation temperature and/or burnup. At low and medium irradiation temperatures (roughly 850 to 1050°C), it appears irradiation-induced dimensional changes in the DTF PyC caused it to fracture and fold in on itself, and the kernel deformed to accommodate this PyC deformation. The extent of DTF kernel deformation to accommodate DTF PyC buckling tended to be greater for the medium-temperature fuel compared to the cold fuel. In the high-irradiation-temperature compact (1375°C), the DTF PyC layer appears to have completely reacted chemically with the kernel material. The only material surrounding the DTF particles in this hot compact resembles the compact matrix material. Observations of the TRISO-coated driver fuel particles and fuel compact graphitic matrix were also made. The TRISO particle kernels in the medium-temperature compact (1047°C), and many in the high-temperature compact (1375°C), showed morphologies consistent with what was seen in AGR-1 and AGR-2. In other TRISO particles from the high-temperature compact, a spatial gradient in the kernel appearance was evident. Here the cool side of the kernel (away from the center of the compact) had a much darker appearance (like that of the buffer and pyrocarbon). This is the first observation of this kind of kernel spatial gradient in AGR fuel. It is believed that the high irradiation temperature of that compact (an average of 1375°C) activates or accelerates an unidentified chemical reaction, and the temperature gradient within the fuel causes a sharp spatial gradient. The low-temperature/low-burnup compact also showed unique kernel morphologies where the TRISO-coated particles had clearly distinguishable oxide and carbide phases at the center of the kernel, an oxide rind surrounding this, and remnants of a carbide skin surrounding the oxide rind. These are features observed in the as-fabricated fuel that are no longer present in higher burnup fuel. Occasional gaps between the outer pyrolytic carbon (OPyC) and graphitic matrix material were observed in all compacts. Gaps were most often found in the small, matrix-filled spaces between adjacent particles. Finally, buffer morphologies in AGR-3/4 TRISO particles were like those observed in AGR-1 and AGR-2, and the buffer fracture frequencies in AGR-3/4 and AGR-2 TRISO particles were plotted versus fast neutron fluence and irradiation temperature. In AGR-3/4 the buffer fracture rate was highest (23%) for an irradiation temperature of 1047°C and a fast fluence of 5.18E25 n/m 2 . Increasing the irradiation temperature to 1375°C reduced the buffer fracture rate to 14%. Reducing the irradiation temperature to 872°C and the fast fluence by a factor of 3 reduced the buffer fracture rate to 7%. The temperature and fluence dependencies observed for AGR-3/4 buffer fracture were consistent with those observed in AGR-2. Lower fluences and/or higher temperatures significantly reduced the buffer fracture frequencies. Lower buffer fracture frequencies were also observed at lower temperatures as long as the fluence was also significantly reduced. This is believed to be due to lower fluence resulting in less irradiation-induced dimensional change (shrinkage) of the buffer, and a higher temperature promoting enhanced creep relaxation of stresses within the buffer, leading to less buffer fracture.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗