SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Li3FeOF3 is Caswellsilverite-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are six inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form LiF6 octahedra that share corners with six LiF6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with ten LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 1–4°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.11 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form LiF6 octahedra that share corners with two FeO3F3 octahedra, corners with four LiF6 octahedra, and edges with twelve LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–6°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.11 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form LiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with two LiF6 octahedra, corners with four FeO3F3 octahedra, edges with six LiO4F2 octahedra, and edges with six FeO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–5°. All Li–O bond lengths are 2.10 Å. There are one shorter (2.27 Å) and one longer (2.29 Å) Li–F bond lengths. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to one O2- and five F1- atoms to form LiOF5 octahedra that share corners with three LiF6 octahedra, corners with three FeO3F3 octahedra, edges with three equivalent FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with nine LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 1–11°. The Li–O bond length is 2.03 Å. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 2.09–2.15 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form LiF6 octahedra that share corners with six LiF6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with ten LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 1–4°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.10 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to one O2- and five F1- atoms to form LiOF5 octahedra that share corners with three LiF6 octahedra, corners with three FeO3F3 octahedra, edges with three equivalent FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with nine LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 1–11°. The Li–O bond length is 2.03 Å. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 2.09–2.15 Å. There are two inequivalent Fe2+ sites. In the first Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form FeO3F3 octahedra that share corners with six LiF6 octahedra, edges with four FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with eight LiO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 4–11°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.15 Å. There are one shorter (2.23 Å) and two longer (2.25 Å) Fe–F bond lengths. In the second Fe2+ site, Fe2+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form FeO3F3 octahedra that share corners with six LiF6 octahedra, edges with four FeO3F3 octahedra, and edges with eight LiF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 4–11°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.15 Å. There are one shorter (2.23 Å) and two longer (2.25 Å) Fe–F bond lengths. There are two inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form OLi3Fe3 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with four FLi5Fe octahedra, edges with five OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with seven FLi4Fe2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–9°. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and three Fe2+ atoms to form OLi3Fe3 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with four FLi6 octahedra, edges with five OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with seven FLi5Fe octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–9°. There are six inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded to six Li1+ atoms to form FLi6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with five FLi5Fe octahedra, and edges with twelve FLi6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–2°. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom to form FLi5Fe octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with five FLi6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with ten FLi6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–8°. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded to four Li1+ and two equivalent Fe2+ atoms to form FLi4Fe2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with four FLi6 octahedra, edges with five OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with seven FLi4Fe2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–9°. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded to six Li1+ atoms to form FLi6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with five FLi6 octahedra, and edges with twelve FLi6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–2°. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Fe2+ atom to form FLi5Fe octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with five FLi5Fe octahedra, edges with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with ten FLi6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–8°. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded to four Li1+ and two equivalent Fe2+ atoms to form FLi4Fe2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLi3Fe3 octahedra, corners with four FLi5Fe octahedra, edges with five OLi3Fe3 octahedra, and edges with seven FLi6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–9°.
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Li3Fe2(OF)3 is Aluminum carbonitride-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to one O2- and four F1- atoms to form distorted LiOF4 tetrahedra that share corners with nine LiOF4 tetrahedra and edges with three equivalent FeO4F trigonal bipyramids. The Li–O bond length is 2.41 Å. There is one shorter (1.91 Å) and three longer (1.93 Å) Li–F bond length. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to one O2- and three equivalent F1- atoms to form LiOF3 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent FeO6 octahedra and corners with nine LiOF3 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 65–66°. The Li–O bond length is 2.00 Å. There is one shorter (1.95 Å) and two longer (1.96 Å) Li–F bond length. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form corner-sharing LiF4 tetrahedra. There is one shorter (1.93 Å) and three longer (1.95 Å) Li–F bond length. There are two inequivalent Fe3+ sites. In the first Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiOF3 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent FeO4F trigonal bipyramids, and edges with six equivalent FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.05–2.19 Å. In the second Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- and one F1- atom to form FeO4F trigonal bipyramids that share corners with three equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with six equivalent FeO4F trigonal bipyramids, and edges with three equivalent LiOF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 58–59°. There is three shorter (1.89 Å) and one longer (1.92 Å) Fe–O bond length. The Fe–F bond length is 2.24 Å. There are three inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and three equivalent Fe3+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three equivalent Fe3+ atoms to form OLiFe3 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent FLi4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent OLiFe3 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent OFe4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three equivalent OFe4 trigonal pyramids. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe3+ atoms to form distorted OFe4 trigonal pyramids that share a cornercorner with one FLi3Fe tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent OLiFe3 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent OFe4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three equivalent OLiFe3 tetrahedra. There are three inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded to four Li1+ atoms to form corner-sharing FLi4 tetrahedra. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded to three equivalent Li1+ and one Fe3+ atom to form distorted FLi3Fe tetrahedra that share corners with nine FLi4 tetrahedra and a cornercorner with one OFe4 trigonal pyramid. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded to four Li1+ atoms to form FLi4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent OLiFe3 tetrahedra and corners with nine FLi4 tetrahedra.
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations
Computed materials data using density functional theory calculations. These calculations determine the electronic structure of bulk materials by solving approximations to the Schrodinger equation. For more information, see https://materialsproject.org/docs/calculations