Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Data parallel computing clusters”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Multi-node and Multi-core Performance Studies of a Monte Carlo code RMC

Over the past 15 years the architecture of high-performance computing systems has become increasingly heterogeneous with individual computing cores being subdivided into nodes and even auxiliary co-processing units such as graphics processing units or the Intel many integrated core co-processors. In fact, future computer platforms is moving toward a larger number of nodes and cores with lower memory available per node. Today, several production Monte Carlo codes use some types of hybrid parallelism strategy that makes use of shared-memory parallelism within a computing node and message-passing parallelism between nodes, which enables the codes to utilize available computing resources as much as possible, both among and within computing nodes on a cluster. The so-called hybrid parallelization is also possible with Reactor Monte Carlo Code RMC by activating both MPI and OpenMP parallel algorithms together. On HPC' which typically consists of several or several-ten thousand nodes equipping 16-32 computing intra-cores per node, simulation of RMC can be carried out in the hybrid parallelization with the MPI inter-node parallelization and the OpenMP intra-node parallelization. RMC has adopted a hybrid message-passing and shared-memory approach to parallelism, which enables the code to utilize available computing resources, both among and within computing nodes on a cluster. Shared-memory parallelism is especially valuable for large-model simulations because it enables multiple compute cores within a node to share common model information such as the geometry description, material, cross section and tally data, thus reducing the memory usage per processor. The calculation on the Tianhe-2 supercomputer took 6144 cores, resulting in a rate of 173,314,000 neutrons/minute for BEAVRS benchmark. While pin-wise full core H-M benchmark burnup calculations with millions of depletion regions was selected using MPI/OpenMP parallelism, the speed of 6,144 cores reach 1,843,200 burnable regions per minute. Keeping up with the continuing trend for increases in the number of computing resources within modern HPC systems is a significant challenge for teams that develop and maintain high-performance MC radiation transport solvers. order to address this challenge, RMC has adopted a hybrid message-passing and shared-memory approach to parallelism, which enables the code to utilize available computing resources, both among and within computing nodes on a cluster. Shared-memory parallelism is especially valuable for large-model simulations because it enables multiple compute cores within a node to share common model information such as the geometry description, material and composition definitions, and cross section data, thus reducing the memory usage per processor. The parallel performance has been studied by using two complex and representative benchmarks, H-M and BEAVRS benchmark. All simulations were run on Intel Xeon E5-2692 12 core, 2.2 GHz processors at MilkyWay-2 Super Computer with up to 12,288 available computing cores. While employing MPI parallelism, excellent parallel efficiency is achieved even above 12,000 processors and RMC reaches the parallel efficiency of 96% on 12,288 cores for the pin-by-pin computation of the BEAVRS benchmark. While BEAVRS criticality benchmark was selected using MPI/OpenMP parallelism, the speed of 6,144 cores reach 173,314,000 particles per minute. While pin-wise full core H-M benchmark burnup calculations with millions of depletion regions was selected using MPI/OpenMP parallelism, the speed of 6,144 cores reach 1,843,200 burnable regions per minute. Results from these studies demonstrate that RMC, using the hybrid parallel model described in this paper, is able to handle pin-wise full core burnup calculations with millions of depletion regions and scales well through thousands of processors. (authors)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

A Highly Parallel Implementation of K-Means for Multithreaded Architecture

We present a parallel implementation of the popular k-means clustering algorithm for massively multithreaded computer systems, as well as a parallelized version of the KKZ seed selection algorithm. We demonstrate that as system size increases, sequential seed selection can become a bottleneck. We also present an early attempt at parallelizing k-means that highlights critical performance issues when programming massively multithreaded systems. For our case studies, we used data collected from electric power simulations and run on the Cray XMT.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Scheduling Tasks In Parallel Processing

Algorithms sought to minimize time and cost of computation. Report describes research on scheduling of computations tasks in system of multiple identical data processors operating in parallel. Computational intractability requires use of suboptimal heuristic algorithms. First algorithm called "list heuristic", variation of classical list scheduling. Second algorithm called "cluster heuristic" applied to tightly coupled tasks and consists of four phases. Third algorithm called "exchange heuristic", iterative-improvement algorithm beginning with initial feasible assignment of tasks to processors and periods of time. Fourth algorithm is iterative one for optimal assignment of tasks and based on concept called "simulated annealing" because of mathematical resemblance to aspects of physical annealing processes.

Price, Camille C.↗

GMH: A Message Passing Toolkit for GPU Clusters

Driven by the market demand for high-definition 3D graphics, commodity graphics processing units (GPUs) have evolved into highly parallel, multi-threaded, many-core processors, which are ideal for data parallel computing. Many applications have been ported to run on a single GPU with tremendous speedups using general C-style programming languages such as CUDA. However, large applications require multiple GPUs and demand explicit message passing. This paper presents a message passing toolkit, called GMH (GPU Message Handler), on NVIDIA GPUs. This toolkit utilizes a data-parallel thread group as a way to map multiple GPUs on a single host to an MPI rank, and introduces a notion of virtual GPUs as a way to bind a thread to a GPU automatically. This toolkit provides high performance MPI style point-to-point and collective communication, but more importantly, facilitates event-driven APIs to allow an application to be managed and executed by the toolkit at runtime.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗

Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Graph Clustering Methods

Hyperspectral imagery is a challenging modality due to the dimension of the pixels which can range from hundreds to over a thousand frequencies depending on the sensor. Most methods in the literature reduce the dimension of the data using a method such as principal component analysis, however this procedure can lose information. More recently methods have been developed to address classification of large datasets in high dimensions. This paper presents two classes of graph-based classification methods for hyperspectral imagery. Using the full dimensionality of the data, we consider a similarity graph based on pairwise comparisons of pixels. The graph is segmented using a pseudospectral algorithm for graph clustering that requires information about the eigenfunctions of the graph Laplacian but does not require computation of the full graph. We develop a parallel version of the Nyström extension method to randomly sample the graph to construct a low rank approximation of the graph Laplacian. With at most a few hundred eigenfunctions, we can implement the clustering method designed to solve a variational problem for a graph-cut-based semi-supervised or unsupervised classification problem. We implement OpenMP directive-based parallelism in our algorithms and show performance improvement and strong, almost ideal, scaling behavior. The method can handle very large datasets including a video sequence with over a million pixels, and the problem of segmenting a data set into a pre-determined number of classes.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

A Parallel Processing Algorithm for Remote Sensing Classification

A current thread in parallel computation is the use of cluster computers created by networking a few to thousands of commodity general-purpose workstation-level commuters using the Linux operating system. For example on the Medusa cluster at NASA/GSFC, this provides for super computing performance, 130 G(sub flops) (Linpack Benchmark) at moderate cost, $370K. However, to be useful for scientific computing in the area of Earth science, issues of ease of programming, access to existing scientific libraries, and portability of existing code need to be considered. In this paper, I address these issues in the context of tools for rendering earth science remote sensing data into useful products. In particular, I focus on a problem that can be decomposed into a set of independent tasks, which on a serial computer would be performed sequentially, but with a cluster computer can be performed in parallel, giving an obvious speedup. To make the ideas concrete, I consider the problem of classifying hyperspectral imagery where some ground truth is available to train the classifier. In particular I will use the Support Vector Machine (SVM) approach as applied to hyperspectral imagery. The approach will be to introduce notions about parallel computation and then to restrict the development to the SVM problem. Pseudocode (an outline of the computation) will be described and then details specific to the implementation will be given. Then timing results will be reported to show what speedups are possible using parallel computation. The paper will close with a discussion of the results.

Gualtieri, J. Anthony↗

PoPLAR: Portal for Petascale Lifescience Applications and Research

Background: We are focusing specifically on fast data analysis and retrieval in bioinformatics that will have a direct impact on the quality of human health and the environment. The exponential growth of data generated in biology research, from small atoms to big ecosystems, necessitates an increasingly large computational component to perform analyses. Novel DNA sequencing technologies and complementary high-throughput approaches–such as proteomics, genomics, metabolomics, and meta-genomics–drive data-intensive bioinformatics. While individual research centers or universities could once provide for these applications, this is no longer the case. Today, only specialized national centers can deliver the level of computing resources required to meet the challenges posed by rapid data growth and the resulting computational demand. Consequently, we are developing massively parallel applications to analyze the growing flood of biological data and contribute to the rapid discovery of novel knowledge. Methods: The efforts of previous National Science Foundation (NSF) projects provided for the generation of parallel modules for widely used bioinformatics applications on the Kraken supercomputer. We have profiled and optimized the code of some of the scientific community’s most widely used desktop and small-cluster-based applications, including BLAST from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), HMMER, and MUSCLE; scaled them to tens of thousands of cores on high-performance computing (HPC) architectures; made them robust and portable to next-generation architectures; and incorporated these parallel applications in science gateways with a web-based portal. Results: This paper will discuss the various developmental stages, challenges, and solutions involved in taking bioinformatics applications from the desktop to petascale with a front-end portal for very-large-scale data analysis in the life sciences. Conclusions: This research will help to bridge the gap between the rate of data generation and the speed at which scientists can study this data. The ability to rapidly analyze data at such a large scale is having a significant, direct impact on science achieved by collaborators who are currently using these tools on supercomputers.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

ParChain: a framework for parallel hierarchical agglomerative clustering using nearest-neighbor chain

This paper studies the hierarchical clustering problem, where the goal is to produce a dendrogram that represents clusters at varying scales of a data set. We propose the ParChain framework for designing parallel hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) algorithms, and using the framework we obtain novel parallel algorithms for the complete linkage, average linkage, and Ward's linkage criteria. Compared to most previous parallel HAC algorithms, which require quadratic memory, our new algorithms require only linear memory, and are scalable to large data sets. ParChain is based on our parallelization of the nearest-neighbor chain algorithm, and enables multiple clusters to be merged on every round. We introduce two key optimizations that are critical for efficiency: a range query optimization that reduces the number of distance computations required when finding nearest neighbors of clusters, and a caching optimization that stores a subset of previously computed distances, which are likely to be reused. Experimentally, we show that our highly-optimized implementations using 48 cores with two-way hyper-threading achieve 5.8--110.1x speedup over state-of-the-art parallel HAC algorithms and achieve 13.75--54.23x self-relative speedup. Compared to state-of-the-art algorithms, our algorithms require up to 237.3x less space. Our algorithms are able to scale to data set sizes with tens of millions of points, which existing algorithms are not able to handle.

Computer Science↗

The Portals 4.2 Network Programming Interface

This report presents a specification for the Portals 4 network programming interface. Portals 4 is intended to allow scalable, high-performance network communication between nodes of a parallel computing system. Portals 4 is well suited to massively parallel processing and embedded systems. Portals 4 represents an adaption of the data movement layer developed for massively parallel processing platforms, such as the 4500-node Intel TeraFLOPS machine. Sandia's Cplant cluster project motivated the development of Version 3.0, which was later extended to Version 3.3 as part of the Cray Red Storm machine and XT line. Version 4 is targeted to the next generation of machines employing advanced network interface architectures that support enhanced offload capabilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

The Portals 4.0.2 Networking Programming Interface

This report presents a specification for the Portals 4 network programming interface. Portals 4 is intended to allow scalable, high-performance network communication between nodes of a parallel computing system. Portals 4 is well suited to massively parallel processing and embedded systems. Portals 4 represents an adaption of the data movement layer developed for massively parallel processing platforms, such as the 4500-node Intel TeraFLOPS machine. Sandia's Cplant cluster project motivated the development of Version 3.0, which was later extended to Version 3.3 as part of the Cray Red Storm machine and XT line. Version 4 is targeted to the next generation of machines employing advanced network interface architectures that support enhanced offload capabilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

The Portals 4.3 Network Programming Interface

This report presents a specification for the Portals 4 network programming interface. Portals 4 is intended to allow scalable, high-performance network communication between nodes of a parallel computing system. Portals 4 is well suited to massively parallel processing and embedded systems. Portals 4 represents an adaption of the data movement layer developed for massively parallel processing platforms, such as the 4500-node Intel TeraFLOPS machine. Sandia's Cplant cluster project motivated the development of Version 3.0, which was later extended to Version 3.3 as part of the Cray Red Storm machine and XT line. Version 4 is targeted to the next generation of machines employing advanced network interface architectures that support enhanced offload capabilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

High Performance Computing Based Parallel HIearchical Modal Association Clustering (HPAR HMAC)

For many applications, clustering is a crucial step in order to gain insight into the makeup of a dataset. The best approach to a given problem often depends on a variety of factors, such as the size of the dataset, time restrictions, and soft clustering requirements. The HMAC algorithm seeks to combine the strengths of 2 particular clustering approaches: model-based and linkage-based clustering. One particular weakness of HMAC is its computational complexity. HMAC is not practical for mega-scale data clustering. For high-definition imagery, a user would have to wait months or years for a result; for a 16-megapixel image, the estimated runtime skyrockets to over a decade! To improve the execution time of HMAC, it is reasonable to consider an multi-core implementation that utilizes available system resources. An existing imple-mentation (Ray and Cheng 2014) divides the dataset into N partitions - one for each thread prior to executing the HMAC algorithm. This implementation benefits from 2 types of optimization: parallelization and divide-and-conquer. By running each partition in parallel, the program is able to accelerate computation by utilizing more system resources. Although the parallel implementation provides considerable improvement over the serial HMAC, it still suffers from poor computational complexity, O(N2). Once the maximum number of cores on a system is exhausted, the program exhibits slower behavior. We now consider a modification to HMAC that involves a recursive partitioning scheme. Our modification aims to exploit divide-and-conquer benefits seen by the parallel HMAC implementation. At each level in the recursion tree, partitions are divided into 2 sub-partitions until a threshold size is reached. When the partition can no longer be divided without falling below threshold size, the base HMAC algorithm is applied. This results in a significant speedup over the parallel HMAC.

Patlolla, Dilip R↗

Visualization of unsteady computational fluid dynamics

A brief summary of the computer environment used for calculating three dimensional unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) results is presented. This environment requires a super computer as well as massively parallel processors (MPP's) and clusters of workstations acting as a single MPP (by concurrently working on the same task) provide the required computational bandwidth for CFD calculations of transient problems. The cluster of reduced instruction set computers (RISC) is a recent advent based on the low cost and high performance that workstation vendors provide. The cluster, with the proper software can act as a multiple instruction/multiple data (MIMD) machine. A new set of software tools is being designed specifically to address visualizing 3D unsteady CFD results in these environments. Three user's manuals for the parallel version of Visual3, pV3, revision 1.00 make up the bulk of this report.

Haimes, Robert↗

The Portals 4.1 Network Programming Interface

This report presents a specification for the Portals 4 networ k programming interface. Portals 4 is intended to allow scalable, high-performance network communication betwee n nodes of a parallel computing system. Portals 4 is well suited to massively parallel processing and embedded syste ms. Portals 4 represents an adaption of the data movement layer developed for massively parallel processing platfor ms, such as the 4500-node Intel TeraFLOPS machine. Sandia's Cplant cluster project motivated the development of Version 3.0, which was later extended to Version 3.3 as part of the Cray Red Storm machine and XT line. Version 4 is tar geted to the next generation of machines employing advanced network interface architectures that support enh anced offload capabilities.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

Computing with Beowulf

Parallel computers built out of mass-market parts are cost-effectively performing data processing and simulation tasks. The Supercomputing (now known as "SC") series of conferences celebrated its 10th anniversary last November. While vendors have come and gone, the dominant paradigm for tackling big problems still is a shared-resource, commercial supercomputer. Growing numbers of users needing a cheaper or dedicated-access alternative are building their own supercomputers out of mass-market parts. Such machines are generally called Beowulf-class systems after the 11th century epic. This modern-day Beowulf story began in 1994 at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. A laboratory for the Earth and space sciences, computing managers there threw down a gauntlet to develop a $50,000 gigaFLOPS workstation for processing satellite data sets. Soon, Thomas Sterling and Don Becker were working on the Beowulf concept at the University Space Research Association (USRA)-run Center of Excellence in Space Data and Information Sciences (CESDIS). Beowulf clusters mix three primary ingredients: commodity personal computers or workstations, low-cost Ethernet networks, and the open-source Linux operating system. One of the larger Beowulfs is Goddard's Highly-parallel Integrated Virtual Environment, or HIVE for short.

Cohen, Jarrett↗

EJFAT: Towards Intelligent Compute Destination Load Balancing

To handle increased data flow, Jefferson Lab (JLab) is partnering with ESnet for development of an AI/ML directed compute work Load Balancer (LB) of UDP streamed data. The LB is FPGA based featuring dynamically configurable, low latency and high throughput destination address switching. The LB provides integration of edge and core computing to support JLab experimental programs, the Electron-Ion Collider, as well as data centers of the future. In the ESnet/JLab FPGA Accelerated Transport (EJFAT) initiative, the function of the LB Data Plane (DP) is to redirect data streams to selectable (but unknown to sender) destination hosts based on current worload and within that host to destination ports as a function of sub- stream id. This effects hierarchical scaling, first across compute machines for processing over a series of events and second, across ports so different data source sub-streams may be assigned to different processors for further parallelization. The LB Control Plane (CP) programs the DP using compute farm telemetry to direct and balance workloads across a compute cluster as the operating conditions require. While Proportional/Integrative/Derivative (PID) controllers are often seen in similar applications, here we investigate the feasibility of a Reinforcement Learning (RL) based schedule manager running in the CP to provide dynamic updates to the DP scheduling policy.

Lawrence, David↗

Spotlight: efficient automated global optimization in rietveld analysis of diffraction data

Performing reliable Rietveld analysis on tens or hundreds of powder diffraction datasets from parametric or time-resolved experiments often poses a bottleneck in extracting meaningful results from the data. While automated analysis of data has recently been demonstrated, high temperature annealing studies, during which phase transformations occur and lattice parameters may change due to repartitioning of elements, are prime examples where automation by a simple phase identification from a database of room temperature structures or automation by sequential refinements is likely to fail. To enable reliable, efficient, automated Rietveld analysis, we present a Python package named Spotlight , building on established Rietveld packages such as MAUD, GSAS , or GSAS-II , which extends the refinement of best fit parameters to a global optimization using an ensemble of optimizers leveraging hierarchical parallel execution on high-performance computing clusters. Spotlight further enables the efficient design of refinement plans through the iterative automated machine-learning of a surrogate for the refinement on which the global optimizations are performed until results from the surrogate converge to the response surface data. We demonstrate Spotlight with the analysis of uranium molybdenum and Ti–6Al–4V datasets, as well as in two open-source tutorials analyzing aluminium oxide and lead sulphate.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Boundary and object detection in real world images

A solution to the problem of automatic location of objects in digital pictures by computer is presented. A self-scaling local edge detector which can be applied in parallel on a picture is described. Clustering algorithms and boundary following algorithms which are sequential in nature process the edge data to locate images of objects.

Yakimovsky, Y.↗