Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “DWPF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Selection of Glasses in Support of the Sludge Batch 9 Sulfate Solubility Limit for Coupled Operation with the Salt Waste Processing Facility

For Sludge Batches 3 through 8, the sulfate (SO 4 2- )solubility limit for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) has been determined by laboratory-scale crucible testing. In preparation for Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) processing, a comparison demonstrated that minor compositional differences existed between the Sludge Batch 8 (SB8)-Frit 803 and SB9-Frit 803 glass composition regions for sludge-only and coupled operations with the Actinide Removal Process (ARP) and Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU). Thus, no experimental testing was necessary and the SB8 SO 4 2- limit of 0.65 wt.% was recommended for SB9 processing. This previous SB9 assessment did not address coupled processing with streams from the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), which is anticipated to start operations in November 2019. These high activity streams will include monosodium titanate (MST) and sludge solids from the Sludge Solids Receipt Tank (SSRT) as well as Cs-containing strip effluent (SE). The incorporation of these SWPF streams is expected to reach TiO 2 concentrations in glass greater than 2 wt.% based on single and double MST strike scenarios. In support of coupled operation with SWPF, the DWPF Product Composition Control System was revised and allows a TiO 2 concentration of up to 6 wt.% (minus measurement uncertainty) in glass. For the SB8-Frit 803 SO 4 2- solubility study, the maximum TiO 2 concentration evaluated was 0.94 wt.%. Since the influence of increased TiO 2 on the retention of SO 4 2- in the SB9 glass region is unknown, a test matrix of ten glass compositions has been proposed to determine whether the 0.65 wt.% SO 4 2- limit is still appropriate for SB9 coupled operation with SWPF. This report documents the development of a test matrix that will support this study.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Washing Study with SRS Tank 26 Samples FTF-26-19-12 and -13

A recent analysis of Tank 26, one of the feed tanks for the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), determined a higher than anticipated sulfur concentration in the supernatant and a significant amount of insoluble sulfur, which could negatively impact the DWPF glass waste form. Savannah River Remediation Engineering (SRR-E) requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) perform a washing study with Tank 26 material to determine amount of sulfur removed during washing tests. SRNL decanted supernate from a sample of Tank 26 until it was at 12 wt% insoluble solids. Subsequently, SRNL performed washing experiments from the 8 M sodium initial concentration to targeted endpoints of 4 M, 2 M and 1 M sodium concentration (assuming no sodium dissolution). Results show that over 80% of the sulfur was removed and nearly all the sulfur was in the aqueous phase at the end of washing, demonstrating effective removal of sulfur during washing. Additional washing is likely to decrease the sulfur concentration further since most of the sulfur was in the aqueous phase.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Calculation of Glycolate Concentration Factors Across the 242-25H (3H) Evaporator System

Two models were developed to predict glycolate concentration factors across the 242-25H (3H) Evaporator system. The first model, identified as the Unrestricted Evaporation Model, was designed to evaluate concentration of typical 3H feed material to relatively high densities in order to calculate the concentration factor of glycolate in a given feed stream. This model may be used to understand the potential of glycolate to concentrate from a generic feed material through the 3H system. The second model, identified as the Holistic Evaporation Model, was designed to evaluate the evaporation of dilute, glycolate-containing Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) waste with the requirement that high silicon concentrations typical of recycle material require dilution to adhere to current technical safety requirements. This model may be used to understand the potential of glycolate from DWPF recycle material to concentrate as a result of feeding through the 3H system.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2021

Examining Thermolytic Production of Hydrogen from Lubrication Oil

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (SRR) to conduct testing via Technical Task Request (HR) to determine the thermolytic HGR of Mobil SHC™ 630, a lubrication oil. Currently, 35 gallons of contaminated Mobil SHC 630 is proposed for release into the recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) to Tank 22 and then to the 242-16H (2H) Evaporator system. Inhibited recycle waste in the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) is transferred to Recycle Pump Tank (RPT) in the Low Point Pump Pit (LPPP) and then to the Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) H-area. The lubrication oil would be added directly to the RPT, bypassing the RCT. The current DWPF waste compliance plan for liquid transfers from the RCT to the CSTF limits the concentration of Mobil SHC 630 to <1,100 ppm which is equal to <9.3 gallons of Mobil SHC 630 when considering a 7,500 gal RCT batch with an initial Mobil SHC 630 concentration of 42 mg/L. Mobil SHC 630 is expected to be largely immiscible in the caustic aqueous waste stream. It is a blend of base oils including polyalphaolefin (PAO) base oil and additives such as triphenylphosphate and cresyl diphenyl phosphate at various concentrations (<0.25 wt%). While the base oils are expected to be largely unreactive in CSTF waste, the triarylphosphates additives would be expected to hydrolyze in the caustic waste, forming diarylphosphates and phenol. The tests described herein were governed by a single Run Plan and will determine thermolytic HGR from the caustic aqueous solution, as well as from any organic phases present.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

An Assessment of the Materials of Construction for the Transfer Lines and Unit Operations Equipment Associated with the Recycle Diversion Process

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes and vitrifies radioactive waste that it receives from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) and Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). As a result of the evaporation of water during both the melter feed preparation and the melter feed vitrification steps in DWPF, a recycle waste stream is generated, neutralized, and sent back to the CSTF. The recycle waste is a dilute water stream originating from the collection of condensate liquids containing some minor sludge and frit solids and other waste components primarily resulting from entrainment into the condensate during foam-over events. The recycle stream volume is significant and is expected to approach 3 million gallons per year once the SWPF reaches full operation. Diverting the bulk of the recycle waste stream from the CSTF is essential for the eventual closure of the waste tanks, and hence the completion of the SRS liquid waste mission.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Evaluation Of Glass Density to Support the Estimation of Fissile Mass Loadings in Sludge Batch 10 Glasses

Per a directive from the Department of Energy Savannah River Operations Office (DOE-SR) in 2008, the fissile mass loading concentration must remain below 897 g/m 3 in each high-level waste (HLW) glass canister produced by the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). To support Sludge Batch 5 (SB5) processing, the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) developed a technical basis that facilitates the evaluation of fissile mass loading of the glass product. The calculation is based on the iron (Fe) concentration in the glass as determined by measurements from the Slurry Mix Evaporator acceptability analysis as well as the glass density. In April 2022, a subsequent DOE-SR directive increased the fissile mass loading limit to 2500 g/m 3 beginning with Sludge Batch 11. Thus, the 897 g/m 3 limit still applies to Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) processing. For SB5 through initial Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) processing prior to coupled operation with the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF), SRNL provided DWPF a bounding glass density value that was based on a statistical evaluation of density measurements. To eliminate the need for experimental work, a composition-based density model for HLW glasses was developed at SRNL in 2019. The objective of this report is to present the bounding glass density determined with the composition-based density model for SB10 sludge-only (SO) and coupled processing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

M-Star ® Software Test and Verification

Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) currently manages the risk for retained hydrogen in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) vessels by implementing a Retained Hydrogen Program. The current program relies on Sludge Batch (SB) 8 Gas Chromatograph data and on conservative assumptions concerning gas release and retention to determine allowable vessel Quiescent time (Q-time). The authors identified M-Star ® CFD as a software that could simulate processes such as fluid flow, heat transfer, species transport, chemical reactions, particle transport, and retained hydrogen gas release. Preliminary simulation results suggest that more realistic assumptions on gas retention and release may be feasible for the DWPF retained hydrogen program. Because of the desire to use the M-Star ® software to perform analyses that support nuclear safety, SRMC has requested Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) to upgrade the software classification level of M-Star ® CFD from level D to level A to perform analyses that support nuclear safety.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2024

Impacts of Fast Critical Assembly Fuel Discards on Liquid Waste Processes

The Savannah River Nuclear Solutions (SRNS) Fast Critical Assembly (FCA) mission is reestablishing the electrolytic dissolver for processing of Pu and Pu-U materials clad in stainless steel (SS). H-Canyon is planning to dissolve and neutralize FCA fuel without recovering the special nuclear material (i.e., Pu) prior to discarding to the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) operated by the Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) Liquid Waste (LW) Organization. The FCA discards will be combined with sludge in the CSTF after Low Temperature Aluminum Dissolution (LTAD) if needed. The combined waste will be washed, concentrated, and vitrified at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). The high level waste canisters produced will be temporarily stored in the Glass Waste Storage Buildings prior to transfer to a future federal repository. Decants from LTAD and sludge washing will be combined with DWPF recycle and dissolved salt cake to prepare salt batches for processing in the Salt Waste Processing Facility. The resulting decontaminated salt solution will be processed in the Saltstone Production Facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Studies on the Vitrification Potential of High Risk Spent Nuclear Fuels

This research explored vitrification of U-Zr nuclear fuel that exhibits an explosion hazard when processed by common nitric acid dissolution. Glass frits were chosen based on properties that had been previously measured as well as being demonstrated successfully in production at the Defense Waste Process Facility (DWPF). Zirconium and Aluminum metal powders were chosen to represent the spent fuels after literature demonstrated that the potential phase that causes the issue for explosive reaction in the effluent stream is tied to the Zirconium-III phase field. DSC measurements were carried out on various simulants and waste forms to better understand thermal behavior of these materials. Zirconium (Zr) was tested with both nitric acid and the new effluent flowsheet that is under development by the SRNL Chemical Process Control (CPC) group. The nitric acid test did show the expected exothermic behavior as well as how the behavior is affected by particle size of the powders used. In contrast, the effluent samples did not show an exothermic peak. However, the concentration of metal in the samples was orders of magnitude lower than in the nitric acid testing and further testing of the effect of concentration on the exothermicity that could be measured confirmed a dampened signal. Tests were run that included frit, both DWPF Frit 510 and Iron Phosphate frit, exhibiting complex curves that included multiple endothermic and exothermic peaks during heating and cooling. The final crucible samples appear similarly to the bulk glasses pointing to these peaks being a part of the dissolution of the simulant into the base glasses.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Low Purge and Mercury Recovery Testing with Sludge Batch 10 Tank 40 Simulant

Researchers at the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) have completed testing as requested by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC) to perform experiments to determine the impact of using a lower or inert purge in Sludge Batch (SB) 10 processing under the Nitric-Glycolic Acid (NGA) flowsheet. A key objective of this testing was also to determine the mercury speciation and recovery during each experiment. The testing was performed as part of the SB10 Technical Task Request (TTR) and Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). Two sets of tests were performed, and a Run Plan was approved prior to each set of experiments to document the planned testing. Three initial experiments were completed to determine whether a low air purge would be beneficial to CPC processing at higher acid stoichiometry (110%) based on the Koopman minimum acid (KMA) equation (116% Hsu). One of the tests, an inert nitrogen purge experiment, was also completed to demonstrate that excluding oxygen did not introduce any new hazards. The experiments were designed to be identical except for the change in purge gas and purge flowrate from run to run. After reviewing the results from the initial three experiments, six additional tests were proposed by SRNL to support the lower purge study and to look for processing alternatives for improving mercury recovery. These additional six tests were all completed at a very low acid stoichiometry to mimic the pH experienced during processing in DWPF (~7). DWPF is processing SB10 sludge at an acid stoichiometry of 90% based on the Hsu equation. The additional SRNL experiments were performed at an acid stoichiometry of 62.5% KMA stoichiometry (66.3% Hsu) to produce a Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) product with a pH of about 7. All experiments used simulants of both SWPF streams, although no entrained solvent was added during any of the experiments

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Utilizing Commercial Submersible Mixer Pumps for Sludge Removal in Savannah River Site's Tank 26 - 20289

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Liquid Waste System (LWS) safely manages, stores, treats, and dispositions liquid radioactive waste. The LWS consists of 51 underground waste storage tanks (eight of which are operationally closed and filled with grout), waste evaporators, treatment facilities, and solidification facilities, known as the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) and Saltstone Production Facility (SPF). One of the waste storage tanks, Tank 26, was placed into service in 1980 as an F Tank Farm (FTF) Evaporator Feed Tank. From 1980 to 2013, Tank 26 received F Canyon receipts and dilute supernate that was then transferred to the 242-16F FTF Evaporator for volume reduction. In 2013, the steam tube bundle failed in the FTF Evaporator, and the decision was made not to repair/resume evaporator operation. During operation of Tank 26, solids built up to a level of 2.03 m in the tank with a volume of 1062.9 kL. Due to the evaporator failure and subsequent shutdown, the solids in Tank 26 were selected to feed Sludge Batch 10, which is collected and prepped prior to being sent to DWPF for final disposition. To accomplish solids removal, Commercial Submersible Mixer Pumps (CSMPs) were selected to slurry the solids in preparation to be sent to Tank 51. Four CSMPs were installed in Tank 26 with each one installed in a separate quadrant of Tank 26. This work would mark the first deployment of CSMPs in an SRS waste tank. The CSMPs were developed in response to operational issues from previous mixing pumps and budgetary constraints. The CSMPs use the concept of modifying commercially available equipment for nuclear waste applications. The CSMPs consist of a 230-horsepower submersible mixing pump (manufactured by GPM, Inc.) joined to a mast fabricated at SRS. For this application, Savannah River Remediation (SRR) design services was challenged to provide a mast design that required no steel superstructure support system on top of Tank 26. Also, SRR design services provided a simplified Tank 26 riser interface that did not require extensive machine parts to adjust height of the suction screen of the CSMP within the tank. Other design improvements include no requirements for tank top radiation monitors and no requirements for flushing of the CSMPs during startup/shutdown operations. The CSMPs were operated at an initial height of 2.29 m above the Tank 26 bottom for 10 days. After sludge sounding, the CSMPs were lowered to a height of 1.52 m with no issues due to proper work planning and the simplified riser interface. With the CSMPs lowered to a level of 1.52 meters above the tank bottom, the CSMPs were operated for 12 days and another sounding was performed. The sounding level came back matching the disturbance depth results of the first pump run. Chemistry samples were analyzed while the tank was left to settle. The analysis revealed enough weight percent solids to provide good feed to Sludge Batch 10. Also, the results revealed the supernate within the mixture would provide good salt solution feed to Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) Salt Batch 3. So, the plan was modified to let the disturbed solids settle and decant the salt solution for addition to SWPF Salt Batch 3. Then water will be added back to Tank 26, and the CSMPs run in order to wash the solids to decrease settling time prior to being sent to Tank 51 for Sludge Batch 10. Utilizing CSMPs for waste removal in an SRS Tank has provided a cost-effective means for further waste removal efforts. In addition, the CSMPs are easier to operate by utilizing a robust and simplified design. The CSMPs performed quite well with no process shutdown or delays during operation. As a result, CSMPs are integral to the future of removing radioactive waste from storage tanks at SRS. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Savannah River Site High Level Radioactive Waste Tank Sample Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation - 20346

To support the revision of flammability calculations and controls for the Savannah River Site (SRS) High-Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) tanks, Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) conducted laboratory measurements with the goal of quantifying hydrogen produced in HLW by non-radiolytic chemical reactions (i.e., thermolysis). Testing was performed with HLW tank supernate samples that represented a cross section of types of waste at SRS, including tanks that store typical evaporator concentrate, dissolved salt-cake, dilute recycle stream from the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), evaporator concentrate of the recycle stream from DWPF, fresh waste from the canyon separations facility, and waste that has been through salt processing cesium removal. Non-radioactive simulant testing included the classes of organic compounds historically introduced into the HLW tanks that were recently shown to be the most active toward the thermolytic generation of hydrogen. The reaction rate equations developed for thermolytic hydrogen generation from each class of organic compound showed direct proportionality to organic compound concentration and hydroxide concentration. Simulant testing identified that highly concentrated waste with high hydroxide concentration had the highest rates of thermolytic hydrogen generation. Using the radioactive tank sample thermolysis measurements at high temperatures and the mechanistic salt dependence of the simulant models, a global model was developed for tank waste thermolytic hydrogen generation as a function of total organic carbon content of SRS HLW. Through the primary functionality of the global model (organic carbon and free hydroxide concentration), the relative reactivity of the organic carbon in the waste was quantified. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Analysis of Defense Waste Processing Facility Sample: Off-Gas Condensate Tank Sample Batch 27862

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested by Savannah River Remediation (now Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC)), through a Technical Task Request (X-TTR-H-00107), to characterize the “as-received” Off-Gas Condensate Tank (OGCT) Sample identified as sample batch 27862, which was delivered to SRNL Shielded Cells on April 30, 2021. This OGCT report is the third of three sample characterization reports dealing with this Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Diversion Project. The other two recycling stream characterization reports are the Recycle Collection Tank (RCT) and the Slurry Mix Evaporator Condensate Tank (SMECT) sample report.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Impacts of the Addition of Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40 on Acid Stoichiometry and Hydrogen Production

H-Canyon plans to discard Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material that is currently stored in Tanks 16.3 and 16.4. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) determined that a portion of the SRE material can be added to Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) in Tank 40 and the remainder will be added to Sludge Batch 10 (SB10) that is currently being prepared in Tank 51. A processing flowsheet for both the nitric-formic acid flowsheet and the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet were previously developed for SB9 sludge-only and coupled operation with the Actinide Removal Process – Modular Caustic Side Solvent Extraction Unit (ARP-MCU) and the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). Due to the compositional change in Tank 40 after the addition of SRE material, it is necessary to determine the influence on the acid stoichiometry operating window and hydrogen production for SB9 processing. An assessment was completed to address the influence of an addition of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon on the chemistry of Tank 40, the defined acid stoichiometry window (with and without SWPF streams) for the nitric-formic and nitric-glycolic acid flowsheets, and the resulting influence of the hydrogen production. Hydrogen production during the SRAT/SME cycles consists of thermolytic, radiolytic, and catalytic hydrogen. For the nitric-formic acid flowsheet, catalytic hydrogen dominates the hydrogen production during DWPF operation mode for the SRAT and SME vessels. This report was written to summarize that assessment. No SRNL testing is needed prior to adding up to 7,100 additional gallons of SRE and DR-3 Fuel from H-Canyon to Tank 40. Also, the addition of SRE will not exceed the Shielded Cells reported values for catalytic hydrogen for either the nitric-formic acid flowsheet (Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) limit of 0.15 lb/h) or the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet (TSR limit 0.024 lb/h). The addition of the ARP stream from SWPF and the use of the nitric-glycolic acid flowsheet are both expected to decrease hydrogen generation, leading to a larger safety margin in the CPC.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Antifoam Development for Eliminating Flammability Hazards and Decreasing Cycle Time in the Defense Waste Processing Facility

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to develop a new antifoam control method for the Defense Waste Processing Facility’s (DWPF) Chemical Process Cell (CPC). SRNL completed testing of both chemical and nonchemical foam controls. The nonchemical foam controls were either ineffective (or worse, created more foam) or impractical (i.e., a water spray can control foam, but excessive water is needed). As a result, the focus of this study was on finding a superwetter or commercial antifoam for controlling foam.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Antifoam Development for Eliminating Flammability Hazards and Decreasing Cycle Time in the Defense Waste Processing Facility

The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was requested to develop a new antifoam control method for the Defense Waste Processing Facility’s (DWPF) Chemical Process Cell (CPC). SRNL completed testing of both chemical and nonchemical foam controls. The nonchemical foam controls were either ineffective (or worse, created more foam) or impractical (i.e., a water spray can control foam, but excessive water is needed). As a result, the focus of this study was on finding a superwetter or commercial antifoam for controlling foam.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Sludge Batch 10 Frit Development and Variability Study Matrix Design

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) is currently preparing to initiate processing of Sludge Batch 10 (SB10), which is comprised of material from Tanks 11H, 13H, 15H, and 26H, and Alternate Feed Stock-2 (AFS-2). H-Canyon also had a need to discard Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE) material that was stored in Tanks 16.3 and 16.4. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) added a portion of the SRE material to Sludge Batch 9 (SB9) in Tank 40 and the remainder was added to SB10 that is currently being prepared in Tank 51. In support of sludge batch preparation and qualification efforts, SRR requested that the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) complete the following tasks based on the SB10 projections provided by the SRR System Planning group.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Gandolinium poison solubility testing for the downstream impacts from accelerated basin de-inventory

The Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) Program at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is designed to accelerate the de-inventory of L-Basin and accelerate the Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Disposition mission. Spent fuel will be dissolved in H-Canyon without recovery of uranium. The dissolver solutions will be temporarily stored, pH-adjusted to excess hydroxide (which will facilitate precipitation of metal oxides/hydroxides), transferred to the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF), and subsequently immobilized in the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) during planned sludge batch campaigns. ABD accelerates basin closure, significantly reduces programmatic risk, and greatly reduces the lifecycle budget requirements for the site by eliminating the need for a SNF drying and packaging capability. The ABD approach represents a significant change to the clean-up approach for the SRS. However, the increased fissile loading in sludge batches, due to the dissolver solutions, requires investigation to ensure fissile limits are efficiently and safely managed; higher fissile loadings in the glass are projected to be two to three times higher than the current fissile concentration limit of 897 g/m 3 and will be addressed in a future report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗