Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Checking”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2014

Model Checking Degrees of Belief in a System of Agents

Reasoning about degrees of belief has been investigated in the past by a number of authors and has a number of practical applications in real life. In this paper we present a unified framework to model and verify degrees of belief in a system of agents. In particular, we describe an extension of the temporal-epistemic logic CTLK and we introduce a semantics based on interpreted systems for this extension. In this way, degrees of beliefs do not need to be provided externally, but can be derived automatically from the possible executions of the system, thereby providing a computationally grounded formalism. We leverage the semantics to (a) construct a model checking algorithm, (b) investigate its complexity, (c) provide a Java implementation of the model checking algorithm, and (d) evaluate our approach using the standard benchmark of the dining cryptographers. Finally, we provide a detailed case study: using our framework and our implementation, we assess and verify the situational awareness of the pilot of Air France 447 flying in off-nominal conditions.

MAS Verification↗
NASA NTRS2020

Model Checking as a Service: Towards Pragmatic Hidden Formal Methods

Executable models can be used to support all engineering activities in Model-Based Systems Engineering. Testing and simulation of such models can provide early feedback about design choices. How-ever, in today’s complex systems failures could arise due to subtle errors that are hard to find without checking all possible execution paths. Formal methods, and especially model checking can uncover such subtle errors, yet their usage in practice is limited due to the specialized expertise and high computing power required. There-fore we created an automated, cloud-based environment that can verify complex reachability properties on SysML State Machines using hidden model checkers. The approach and the prototype is illustrated using an example from the aerospace domain.

Karban, Robert↗
NASA NTRS2024

Expansion of Check-Cases for 6DOF Simulation

This effort expands upon a previous NASA activity that developed flight simulation benchmark check-cases to include new check-cases for the Cislunar domain, comparing multiple NASA simulation tools. The results of this effort describe the benefits of standardizing inputs, simulation comparisons and describe an interactive website that enables comparison of externally provided simulation data. Participating simulations improved their software and identified implementation errors. This activity elevated simulation credibility and provided a measure of validation for the simulations actively in use for NASA’s Human Landing Systems (HLS).

Modeling↗
NASA NTRS2024

NASA Engineering and Safety Center Technical Bulletin No. 24-04: 6DOF Check Cases

In 2015, the NESC released benchmark Earth-based check-cases for well specified, rigid-body, six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) aero/spacecraft models to promote consistent and accurate flight simulations across multiple Agency tools and facilities. Recently, the NESC expanded upon that effort to add Lunar-based check-cases to support new lunar exploration initiatives. This study produced a smaller, focused set of cases that exercise new and unique features of missions in the lunar environment in comparison with 8 high-fidelity NASA simulation tools and provides a measure of validation for simulations supporting Human Landing Systems.

Flight Mechanics↗
NASA NTRS2003

Model checking for software security properties

This paper describes the use of the Flexible Modeling Framework (FMF) for model checking (MC) to perform and search for vulnerabilities in the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) communication protocol.

model checking formal methods software security↗
NASA NTRS1999

A Process for Verifying and Validating Requirements for Fault Tolerant Systems Using Model Checking

Model checking is shown to be an effective tool in validating the behavior of a fault tolerant embedded spacecraft controller. The case study presented here shows that by judiciously abstracting away extraneous complexity, the state space of the model could be exhaustively searched allowing critical functional requirement to be validated down to the design level.

model checking fault tolerant embedded spacecraft ↗
NASA NTRS2005

Model Checking Artificial Intelligence Based Planners: Even the Best Laid Plans Must Be Verified

Automated planning systems (APS) are gaining acceptance for use on NASA missions as evidenced by APS flown On missions such as Orbiter and Deep Space 1 both of which were commanded by onboard planning systems. The planning system takes high level goals and expands them onboard into a detailed of action fiat the spacecraft executes. The system must be verified to ensure that the automatically generated plans achieve the goals as expected and do not generate actions that would harm the spacecraft or mission. These systems are typically tested using empirical methods. Formal methods, such as model checking, offer exhaustive or measurable test coverage which leads to much greater confidence in correctness. This paper describes a formal method based on the SPIN model checker. This method guarantees that possible plans meet certain desirable properties. We express the input model in Promela, the language of SPIN and express the properties of desirable plans formally.

model checking↗
NASA NTRS2011

Logic Model Checking of Unintended Acceleration Claims in the 2005 Toyota Camry Electronic Throttle Control System

Part of the US DOT investigation of Toyota SUA involved analysis of the throttle control software. JPL LaRS applied several techniques, including static analysis and logic model checking, to the software. A handful of logic models were built. Some weaknesses were identified; however, no cause for SUA was found. The full NASA report includes numerous other analyses

Toyota↗
NASA NTRS1998

Validating Requirements for Fault Tolerant Systems Using Model Checking

Model checking is shown to be an effective tool in validating the behavior of a fault tolerant embedded spacecraft controller. The case study presented here shows that by judiciously abstracting away extraneous complexity, the state space of the model could be exhaustively searched allowing critical functional requirements to be validated down to the design level.

Fault↗
NASA NTRS2021

Compositional Realizability Checking within FRET

A set of requirements for a reactive system is realizable if, for any sequence of inputs that satisfy the assumptions on the environment, the guarantees always hold. Realizability checking is essential to ensure that an implementation can be constructed that satisfies the requirements. We propose a framework that supports users in the non-trivial task of developing realizable requirements. Our framework uses architectural information to automatically de-compose a set of requirements into subsets that can be analyzed separately, and therefore more efficiently. It then integrates existing algorithms in order to detect unrealizability, identify minimal sets of conflicting requirements, and compute counterexamples. The capability to focus on minimal conflict sets is key for localizing and correcting the sources of unrealizability. Our approach supports this process by enabling users to interactively visualize and explore the produced conflict sets and counterexamples. We have implemented our framework in the open-source Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET), and have used it on a variety of industrial-level case studies, showcasing the strengths of our approach in terms of raw performance, as well as diagnostic potential.

FRET↗
NASA NTRS2022

Realizability Checking of Requirements in FRET

Requirements formalization has become increasingly popular in industrial settings as an effort to disambiguate designs and optimize development time and costs for critical system components. Formal requirements elicitation also enables the employment of analysis tools to prove important properties, such as consistency and realizability. In this report, we present the realizability analysis framework that we developed as part of the Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET). Our framework prioritizes usability, and employs state-of-the-art analysis algorithms that support infinite theories. We demonstrate the workflow for realizability checking, showcase the diagnosis process that supports visualization of conflicts between requirements and simulation of counterexamples, and discuss results from industrial-level case studies.

Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool↗
DOE OSTI2025

Low-Density Parity-Check Stabilizer Codes as Gapped Quantum Phases: Stability under Graph-Local Perturbations

We generalize the proof of stability of topological order, due to Bravyi, Hastings, and Michalakis, to stabilizer Hamiltonians corresponding to low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes without the restriction of geometric locality in Euclidean space. We consider Hamiltonians 𝐻 0 defined by ⟦𝑁,𝐾,𝑑⟧ LDPC codes, which obey certain topological quantum order conditions: (i) code distance 𝑑 ≥ 𝑐⁢log (𝑁), implying local indistinguishability of ground states, and (ii) a mild condition on local and global compatibility of ground states—these include good quantum LDPC codes and the toric code on a hyperbolic lattice, among others. We consider stability under weak perturbations that are quasilocal on the interaction graph defined by 𝐻 0 and that can be represented as sums of bounded-norm terms. As long as the local perturbation strength is smaller than a finite constant, we show that the perturbed Hamiltonian has well-defined spectral bands originating from the 𝑂⁡(1) smallest eigenvalues of 𝐻 0 . The band originating from the smallest eigenvalue has 2 𝐾 states, is separated from the rest of the spectrum by a finite energy gap, and has exponentially narrow bandwidth 𝛿 =𝐶⁢𝑁⁢𝑒 −Θ⁡(𝑑) , which is tighter than the best-known bounds even in the Euclidean case. We also obtain that the new ground-state subspace is related to the initial-code subspace by a quasilocal unitary, allowing one to relate their physical properties. Our proof uses an iterative procedure that performs successive rotations to eliminate non-frustration-free terms in the Hamiltonian. Our results extend to quantum Hamiltonians built from classical LDPC codes, which give rise to stable symmetry-breaking phases. These results show that LDPC codes very generally define stable gapped quantum phases, even in the non-Euclidean setting, initiating a systematic study of such phases of matter.

mathematical physics↗
DOE OSTI2025

Architecture for fast implementation of quantum low-density parity-check codes with optimized Rydberg gates

Here, we propose an implementation of bivariate bicycle codes [S. Bravyi et al., Nature (London) 627, 778 (2024)] based on long-range Rydberg gates between stationary neutral atom qubits. An optimized layout of data and ancilla qubits reduces the maximum Euclidean communication distance needed for nonlocal parity-check operators. An optimized Rydberg gate pulse design enables 𝖢𝖹 entangling operations with fidelity $\mathscr{F}$ >0.999 at a distance greater than 12 µ⁢m. The combination of optimized layout and gate design leads to a quantum error correction cycle time of ∼1.2⁢8 ms for a [[144,12,12]] code, which is nearly a factor-of-two improvement over previous designs.

Poole, C. [Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United↗
DOE OSTI2025

Toward a 2D Local Implementation of Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Codes

Geometric locality is an important theoretical and practical factor for quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes that affects code performance and ease of physical realization. For device architectures restricted to two-dimensional (2D) local gates, naively implementing the high-rate codes suitable for low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing incurs prohibitive overhead. In this work, we present an error-correction protocol built on a bilayer architecture that aims to reduce operational overheads when restricted to 2D local gates by measuring some generators less frequently than others. We investigate the family of bivariate-bicycle qLDPC codes and show that they are well suited for a parallel syndrome-measurement scheme using fast routing with local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Through circuit-level simulations, we find that in some parameter regimes, bivariate-bicycle codes implemented with this protocol have logical error rates comparable to the surface code while using fewer physical qubits. Published by the American Physical Society 2025

Berthusen, Noah (ORCID:0000000275862786)↗