SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Ascent”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1972

Aerodynamic stability and drag characteristics of a parallel burn/SRM ascent configuration at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 4.96

Experimental aerodynamic investigations were conducted in the NASA/MSFC 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel during March 1972 on a .003366 scale model of a solid rocket motor version of the space shuttle ascent configuration. The configuration consisted of a parallel burn solid rocket motor booster on an external H-O centerline tank orbiter. Six component aerodynamic force and moment date were recorded over an angle of attack range from -10 to 10 deg at zero degrees sideslip and over a sideslip range from -10 to 10 deg at 0, +6, and -6 deg angle of attack. Mach number ranged from 0.6 to 4.96. The performance and stability characteristics of the complete ascent configuration and build-up, and the effects of variations in tank diameter, orbiter incidence, fairings and positioning of the solid rocket motors and tank fins were determined.

Sims, J. F.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Aerodynamic stability and drag characteristics of a parallel burn/SRM ascent configuration (M equals 0.6 to 4.96)

Experimental aerodynamic investigations were conducted in the NASA/MSFC 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel during April 1972 on a 0.004-scale model of a solid rocket motor version of the space shuttle ascent configuration. The configuration consisted of a parallel burn solid rocket motor booster on an external HO centerline tank orbiter. Six component aerodynamic force and moment data were recorded over an angle of attack range from -10 deg to +10 deg at zero degrees sideslip and over a sideslip range from -10 deg to +10 deg at zero degrees angle of attack. Mach numbers ranged from 0.6 to 4.96. The purpose of the test was to determine the performance and stability characteristics of the complete ascent configuration and buildup, and to determine the effects of variations in HO tank and SRM nose shaping, orbiter incidence and position, and position of the solid rocket motors.

Sims, F.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Rocket ascent G-limited moment-balanced optimization program (RAGMOP)

This document describes the RAGMOP (Rocket Ascent G-limited Momentbalanced Optimization Program) computer program for parametric ascent trajectory optimization. RAGMOP computes optimum polynomial-form attitude control histories, launch azimuth, engine burn-time, and gross liftoff weight for space shuttle type vehicles using a search-accelerated, gradient projection parameter optimization technique. The trajectory model available in RAGMOP includes a rotating oblate earth model, the option of input wind tables, discrete and/or continuous throttling for the purposes of limiting the thrust acceleration and/or the maximum dynamic pressure, limitation of the structural load indicators (the product of dynamic pressure with angle-of-attack and sideslip angle), and a wide selection of intermediate and terminal equality constraints.

Lyons, J. T.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Effects of ascent trajectory mode and tank disposal method on shuttle payload accommodation

The effects of external tank disposal by retrorocket versus passive tank drop, and targeting the main engine burn for high apogee versus the baseline parking orbit ascent method on shuttle payload accommodation capability were investigated. Missions launched from Eastern Test Range were investigated over a range of orbit altitudes to determine tank disposal requirements including footprint dispersions and alternate impact locations, performance, and orbital maneuvering system requirements. Passive tank drop also proved to be advantageous from a payload accommodation standpoint. Direct insertion was shown to be a means of accommodating long payloads at higher altitudes than permitted by the baseline ascent method.

Blair, J. C.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 15 mission report. Supplement 3: Ascent propulsion system final flight evaluation

Results from the postflight analysis of the ascent propulsion system (APS) performance during the Apollo 15 mission are presented. The duty cycle for the LM-10 APS consisted of two firings, and ascent stage liftoff from the lunar surface and the terminal phase ignition (TPI) burn. An evaluation was made of APS performance for the first firing and found to be satisfactory. No propulsion data was received from the second APS burn; however, all indications were that the burn was nominal. All performance parameters were well within their LM-10 3-sigma limits. Calculated throat erosion at engine cutoff for the LM-10 APS was approximately 3 percent greater than predicted.

Griffin, W. G.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Performance capability of laser-powered launch vehicles using vertical ascent trajectories

The use of a ground-based high-power laser source to power a vertically launched rocket vehicle is investigated. By using a vertical ascent trajectory, only a single laser source is required. The vertical ascent mode is not applicable to earth orbit destinations but is applicable to missions beyond earth escape. Performance and trajectory characteristics are examined for vertical trajectories to earth escape and solar escape (which may be of interest in the future for radioactive waste disposal). Specific impulse values from 2000 to 5000 seconds are considered. With these values, a single-stage vehicle can deliver payloads to earth escape and beyond, but extremely high power sources (gigawatts) are required.

Spurlock, O. F.↗

NASA NTRS1973

A nonlinear programming approach for optimizing two-stage lifting vehicle ascent to orbit

An optimal atmospheric flight branched trajectory-shaping capability is presented based on the Davidon-Fletcher-Powell variable metric parameter optimization technique. Gradient information is generated using finite difference methods. A typical atmospheric flight branched optimization problem is analyzed which requires the determination of 31 parameters. This parameter set includes the three-dimensional description of vehicle attitude control angles for three branches of flight: first-stage ascent, second-stage ascent, and first-stage flyback. The important inflight inequality contraints required to maintain the integrity of the vehicles are considered. Some of the numerical methods employed are discussed, along with several new auxiliary techniques developed to improve the compatibility of the numerical gradient and iterator.

Kamm, J. L.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Optimal payload ascent trajectories of winged vehicles

A trajectory analysis is presented which shows the advantage of lifting ascent and the penalties associated with increased wing mass due to increases in aerodynamic loading. The vehicle analyzed is made up of an orbiter, an expendable liquid fuel tank, and two solid rocket motors. Results of the tradeoff are illustrated in a graph of the total vehicle mass plotted against the trajectory constraint. Results indicate that even when structural mass penalties are considered lifting ascent provides a payload delivery.

Martin, J. A.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Preliminary Arc-Jet tests of ablator/RSI joints in simulated space shuttle ascent and entry heating

Five ablator/RSI panels were tested in simulated Shuttle heating conditions to determine heat pulse effects on the ablator and the ablator/RSI joints. Two of the panels were subjected to both ascent and entry heating. The other three panels were subjected to entry heating only. The double-pulse heating (ascent plus entry) had no significant effect on char-layer integrity. Evaluation of the effects of entry heating on the ablator/RSI joints was difficult because, with the panel configuration used, severe pressure gradients developed within some of the joints during testing causing hot-gas flow through the joints. In joints where pressure leaks apparently did not develop, temperatures within the joints were reasonable compared to ablator and RSI back surface temperatures.

Brewer, W. D.↗

NASA NTRS1980

STS-1 Nominal Cycle 3 March/April Launch, Ascent Base Convective Heating Environments

Ascent base convective heating environments were determined for the nominal ascent trajectory for the STS-1 Cycle 3 March/April launch period. Both first and second stage environments are defined for all base heating DFI locations and design body points of interest. An identical format to the STS-1 dispersed trajectory environment was followed throughout. As expected, STS-1 nominal environments are generally less severe than those determined for the high loft and low loft dispersed trajectory conditions. The reduction in cold wall heating with the nominal trajectory varies for each base location analyzed, but, in general, was approximately twenty percent.

Bender, R. L., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1981

Sensitivity analysis of the Space Shuttle to ascent wind profiles

This paper presents a parametric sensitivity analysis of the Space Shuttle Ascent flight to the wind profile. Engineering systems parameters are obtained by flight simulations using wind profile models and samples of detailed (Jimsphere) wind profile measurements. The wind models used are the synthetic vector wind model, with and without the design gust, and a model of the vector wind change with respect to time. From these comparison analyses an insight is gained on the contribution of winds to ascent subsystems flight parameters.

Smith, O. E.↗

NASA NTRS1982

Sensitivity analysis of the space shuttle to ascent wind profiles

A parametric sensitivity analysis of the space shuttle ascent flight to the wind profile is presented. Engineering systems parameters are obtained by flight simulations using wind profile models and samples of detailed (Jimsphere) wind profile measurements. The wind models used are the synthetic vector wind model, with and without the design gust, and a model of the vector wind change with respect to time. From these comparison analyses an insight is gained on the contribution of winds to ascent subsystems flight parameters.

Smith, O. E.↗

NASA NTRS1983

Ascent air data system results from the space shuttle flight test program

The ascent air data system of the Space Shuttle consists of a simple biconic spike probe on the nose of the external tank. Pressure measurements were calibrated in a wind tunnel to obtain vehicle attitude and speed (relative to the air) and dynamic pressure. The wind tunnel test data analysis and the calibration are discussed in terms of test problems and calibration parameter formulation. The flight pressures are traced from telemetry data to final air data products. Analysis of the flight results showed that static pressure could not be accurately determined at the higher Mach numbers (above approx. 2.0). By replacing static pressure with data from a postflight estimated trajectory the ascent air data system performance met the user requirements. Lessons learned are enumerated, the most important being the need for a thorough systems integration effort.

Hillje, E. R.↗

NASA NTRS1983

A comparison of measured and theoretical predictions for STS ascent and entry sonic booms

Sonic boom measurements have been obtained during the flights of STS-1 through 5. During STS-1, 2, and 4, entry sonic boom measurements were obtained and ascent measurements were made on STS-5. The objectives of this measurement program were (1) to define the sonic boom characteristics of the Space Transportation System (STS), (2) provide a realistic assessment of the validity of xisting theoretical prediction techniques, and (3) establish a level of confidence for predicting future STS configuration sonic boom environments. Detail evaluation and reporting of the results of this program are in progress. This paper will address only the significant results, mainly those data obtained during the entry of STS-1 at Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB), and the ascent of STS-5 from Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The theoretical prediction technique employed in this analysis is the so called Thomas Program. This prediction technique is a semi-empirical method that required definition of the near field signatures, detailed trajectory characteristics, and the prevailing meteorological characteristics as an input. This analytical procedure then extrapolates the near field signatures from the flight altitude to an altitude consistent with each measurement location.

Garcia, F., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Vertical ascent from earth to geosynchronous orbit

The concept of ascending vertically from the equator on earth to the point in geosynchronous orbit directly above was investigated. The gravity losses were found to be so great that vertical ascent is not practical with only chemical-rocket propulsion. With laser propulsion, propellant requirements with vertical ascent are reduced and might allow the use of single-stage vehicles from earth to geosynchronous orbit. Combined or composite chemical and laser propulsion is shown to be useful. A gravity ladder suspended from geosynchronous orbit part of the distance to earth is shown to reduce the vehicle propulsion requirements.

Martin, J. A.↗

NASA NTRS1985

The space shuttle ascent vehicle aerodynamic challenges configuration design and data base development

The phase B Space Shuttle systems definition studies resulted in a generic configuration consisting of a delta wing orbiter, and two solid rocket boosters (SRB) attached to an external fuel tank (ET). The initial challenge facing the aerodynamic community was aerodynamically optimizing, within limits, this configuration. As the Shuttle program developed and the sensitivities of the vehicle to aerodynamics were better understood the requirements of the aerodynamic data base grew. Adequately characterizing the vehicle to support the various design studies exploded the size of the data base to proportions that created a data modeling/management challenge for the aerodynamicist. The ascent aerodynamic data base originated primarily from wind tunnel test results. The complexity of the configuration rendered conventional analytic methods of little use. Initial wind tunnel tests provided results which included undesirable effects from model support tructure, inadequate element proximity, and inadequate plume simulation. The challenge to improve the quality of test results by determining the extent of these undesirable effects and subsequently develop testing techniques to eliminate them was imposed on the aerodynamic community. The challenges to the ascent aerodynamics community documented are unique due to the aerodynamic complexity of the Shuttle launch. Never before was such a complex vehicle aerodynamically characterized. The challenges were met with innovative engineering analyses/methodology development and wind tunnel testing techniques.

Dill, C. C.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Shuttle system ascent aerodynamic and plume heating

The shuttle program provided a challenge to the aerothermodynamicist due to the complexity of the flow field around the vehicle during ascent, since the configuration causes multiple shock interactions between the elements. Wind tunnel tests provided data for the prediction of the ascent design heating environment which involves both plume and aerodynamic heating phenomena. The approach for the heating methodology based on ground test firings and the use of the wind tunnel data to formulate the math models is discussed.

Foster, L. D.↗

NASA NTRS1988

LANDER program manual: A lunar ascent and descent simulation

LANDER is a computer program used to predict the trajectory and flight performance of a spacecraft ascending or descending between a low lunar orbit of 15 to 500 nautical miles (nm) and the lunar surface. It is a three degree-of-freedom simulation which is used to analyze the translational motion of the vehicle during descent. Attitude dynamics and rotational motion are not considered. The program can be used to simulate either an ascent from the Moon or a descent to the Moon. For an ascent, the spacecraft is initialized at the lunar surface and accelerates vertically away from the ground at full thrust. When the local velocity becomes 30 ft/s, the vehicle turns downrange with a pitch-over maneuver and proceeds to fly a gravity turn until Main Engine Cutoff (MECO). The spacecraft then coasts until it reaches the requested holding orbit where it performs an orbital insertion burn. During a descent simulation, the lander begins in the holding orbit and performs a deorbit burn. It then coasts to pericynthion, where it reignites its engines and begins a gravity turn descent. When the local horizontal velocity becomes zero, the lander pitches up to a vertical orientation and begins to hover in search of a landing site. The lander hovers for a period of time specified by the user, and then lands.

Source record↗