Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “AERODYNAMIC FORCE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5

Aerodynamic forces of fluttering cylindrical and/or planar structures

Complexity of the phenomena of panel flutter instability has resulted in the necessity of developing separate design criteria for a variety of flow conditions and panel configurations. Vehicle panel configurations with low aspect ratios are of interest in low supersonic flow, where boundary layer effects are important.

Yates, J. E.↗

Computer program for calculating aerodynamic forces on blade sections

Calculation is taken from pressure or velocity distribution along blade surface. Blade sections have either one or two /tandem/ blade segments. Program is recommended primarily for use with ideal flow pressure distributions where forces in drag direction are neglected.

Mcnally, W. D.↗

Results of an aerodynamic force and moment investigation of an 0.015-scale configuration 3 space shuttle orbiter in the NASA/ARC 3.5-foot hypersonic wind tunnel (OA58)

The primary objective of the test was to obtain stability and control data for the basic configuration and an alternate configuration for the Space Shuttle Orbiter. Pitch runs were made with 0 deg of sideslip at Mach numbers of 5.3, 7.3 and 10.3. Six-component force data and fuselage base pressures were recorded for each run. Shadowgraph pictures were taken at selected points. Model 420 was used for the tests.

Dziubala, T. J.↗

Supersonic tests of an 0.015 scale space shuttle mated vehicle model (67-OTS) in the LaRC UPWT to obtain aerodynamic force data (IA42A/B)

Wind tunnel tests were conducted of the NASA/Rockwell 0.015 scale configuration 4 mated space shuttle vehicle. Data were obtained for a range of Mach numbers from 1.60 to 4.63 and angles of attack from minus 10 degrees to plus 10 degrees. A complete model build-up was performed. Longitudinal and lateral directional stability and control data were obtained for the tank alone, tank plus solid rocket boosters, and mated configuration of tank plus orbiter plus solid rocket boosters. Single component rudder hinge moment data were obtained at rudder deflections of zero degrees and minus 20 degrees for each Mach number tested.

Hardin, R.↗

Wind tunnel tests of an 0.015-scale configuration 140A/B space shuttle orbiter model (67-0) in the NASA/LRC 8-foot TPT to obtain transonic aerodynamic force data (OA106)

These tests were conducted to obtain longitudinal stability and control data for Mach numbers from 0.35 to 1.2. Data were obtained for an alpha range of -2 deg to +22 deg at beta = 0 deg. The effect of speedbrake deflection and body flap deflection was obtained through the Mach range. Boundary layer transition strips were used on the model.

Burrows, R. R.↗

Flow effects with cross-blown lifting jets of V/STOL aircraft and their reactions on aerodynamical forces and moments of the airframe

Systematic basic studies on the close and distant effects of cross blown single and twin lifting jets were performed with the aid of a principle model. The different effects are described in detail. The number of the experimental parameters is reduced to the most essential ones: (1) the angle of attack, (2) the flight and the jet velocities as well as the jet diameter, (3) the distance between the twin jets, (4) the location of the wing relative to the jets and the fuselage, and (5) the ground distance. The results of systematic pressure distribution measurements on the fuselage surface are studied, especially in the close vicinity of the jet exits. From these results, functions on the influence of the parameters are deduced.

Viehweger, G.↗

The Aerodynamic Forces on Airship Hulls

The new method for making computations in connection with the study of rigid airships, which was used in the investigation of Navy's ZR-1 by the special subcommittee of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics appointed for this purpose is presented. The general theory of the air forces on airship hulls of the type mentioned is described and an attempt was made to develop the results from the very fundamentals of mechanics.

Munk, M. M.↗

On the convergence of unsteady generalized aerodynamic forces

Variations in generalized forces calculated by different computer programs are traced to improper mathematical modeling techniques. Comparisons of generalized forces calculated by three theoretical methods are presented to illustrate difficulties involved in obtaining prediction convergence for increasing wave number. Use of a sufficiently dense chordwise paneling arrangement, in finite panel methods, results in predictions that are essentially identical to predictions of converged solutions. Procedural modifications are suggested for application in finite panel methods to increase prediction accuracy and reduce computer usage costs.

Rowe, W. S.↗

Steady and unsteady aerodynamic forces from the SOUSSA surface-panel method for a fighter wing with tip missile and comparison with experiment and PANAIR

The body surface-panel method SOUSSA is applied to calculate steady and unsteady lift and pitching moment coefficients on a thin fighter-type wing model with and without a tip-mounted missile. Comparisons are presented with experimental results and with PANAIR and PANAIR-related calculations for Mach numbers from 0.6 to 0.9. In general the SOUSSA program, the experiments, and the PANAIR (and related) programs give lift and pitching-moment results which agree at least fairly well, except for the unsteady clean-wing experimental moment and the unsteady moment on the wing tip body calculated by a PANAIR-predecessor program at a Mach number of 0.8.

Cunningham, Herbert J.↗

Calculation of non-stationary aerodynamic forces in the near sonic range

The development of a mathematical method for calculating nonstationary supersonic flow in the near-sonic range is described. A perturbation formula is derived based on the exact stationary values; it is applicable to the equation for potential. The problem can thus be divided into stationary and nonstationary fields. The pressure distribution in an oscillating profile is determined, based on hyperbolic differential equations. It is shown that there are important corollaries concerning the application of linear theory. With suitable extrapolations, linear theory can be used up to about Mach 0.8. Linear theory is not applicable, however, when determining the moment coefficients; for this case, a special technique is described.

Teipel, I.↗