SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 883 records · Page 49

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2018

Status of Metallic Structural Materials for Molten Salt Reactors

In the US and around the world, significant interest surrounds development and deployment of nuclear systems using molten salts to transfer heat. Several configurations are being explored, including the use of fluoride salts either as the primary coolant of a reactor with solid fuel or with the fissile material dissolved in the salt. Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs) with fluoride salt typically have a thermal neutron spectrum. There are also fast-spectrum reactors that could use chloride salts to transfer heat. As a result of operation of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the 1960s, a system with uranium fuel dissolved in a fluoride-salt medium is the most well-established technology. A nickel alloy with about 6%Cr and molybdenum as a solid solution strengthening agent was developed and deployed for all structural applications in this reactor. The alloy was commercialized as Hastelloy N. During these experiments and in post-decommissioning characterization of material behavior, it was determined that the most significant challenges for structural materials are embrittlement, from helium introduced by transmutation of Ni, and corrosion and grain boundary embrittlement from the fission product tellurium. The MSRE had an outlet temperature of approximately 650°C. The mechanical properties of Hastelloy N are not sufficient to support long-term operation of an MSR above this temperature. Qualification of a material for use in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, “Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components,” Division 5, “High Temperature Reactors,” will facilitate licensing with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Hastelloy N has not been qualified for use in nuclear construction, and significant additional characterization would be required for Code qualification. Given that this alloy is susceptible to He embrittlement and has limited high-temperature strength, it is not recommended that Code qualification be pursued. Instead, it is recommended that a systematic development program be initiated to develop new nickel alloys that contain a fine, stable dispersion of intermetallic particles to trap He at the interface between the matrix and particle and with increased solid solution strengthening from addition of refractory elements. Extensive screening of attractive alloy compositions for elevated temperature strength, microstructural stability, weldability, and resistance to He embrittlement (characterized using ion implantation) will lead to an alloy down-selection for commercialization and Code qualification.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Gas-cooled Fast Reactor Research and Development Roadmap

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) commissioned the development of technology roadmaps for advanced (non-light water reactor) reactor concepts to help focus research and development funding over the next five years. The roadmaps show the research and development needed to support demonstration of an advanced (non-LWR) concept by 2030, consistent with DOE’s Vision and Strategy for the Development and Deployment of Advanced Reactors. The starting point for the roadmaps is the Technical Readiness Assessment performed as part of an Advanced Test and Demonstration Reactor study released in 2016. The roadmaps were developed based upon a review of technical reports and vendor literature summarizing the technical maturity of each concept and the outstanding research and development needs. Critical path tasks for specific systems were highlighted on the basis of time and resources needed to complete the tasks and the importance of the system to the performance of the reactor concept. The roadmaps are intended to be generic, i.e. not specific to a particular vendor’s design, but features of the General Atomics EM2 were included to provide specific examples to illuminate needed R&D tasks to be conducted in support of demonstration in the 2030-2035 window. This report provides the roadmaps to engineering demonstration for of a Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor with an outlet temperature around 850 C. The selection of tasks and associated timelines rely heavily upon the Generation IV International Forum Technology Roadmaps and more recent information provided by a GFR developer, General Atomics.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Use of Neutron Flux Calculated by Shift in a Grizzly Reactor Pressure Vessel Fracture Simulation

The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) plays the critical role of containing the reactor and coolant in a light water reactor nuclear power plant, and must be able to safely perform this function under a variety of normal and off-normal transient loading conditions. The RPV is subjected to harsh environmental conditions (elevated temperature and high neutron flux) whenever the plant is operating, which leads to embrittlement of the steel over time. RPVs contain populations of flaws introduced during the manufacturing process, and the primary safety concern is that during a transient event, a fracture could initiate at the site of one of these flaws and lead to rupture of the RPV. RPVs are very rugged structures, and the probability of this occurring is very low, but as the RPV's steel becomes embrittled over time, its resistance to fracture decreases and this becomes more likely. Assessing the likelihood of RPV fracture during a transient event involves performing a probabilistic fracture mechanics analysis, in which random sampling procedures are used to assess the probability of fracture of a population of flaws. Grizzly offers unique capabilities for modeling the RPV using 1D, 2D, or 3D representations, taking advantage of parallel computing for this type of analysis. One of the important inputs to Grizzly is the spatial distribution of the neutron fluence, which has a large impact on the material embrittlement, and should thus be characterized as accurately as possible. The VERA core simulator developed by the CASL program takes advantage of high performance computing resources to perform high-fidelity multiphysics simulations of reactor physics, including the effects of neutron transport, fuel performance, and thermal hydraulics. Recently a capability was developed to also evaluate neutron fluxes away from the reactor core through the Shift code. This allows for a detailed 3D map of the spatial variation of the fluence in components such as the RPV to be computed, which is ideal for use with Grizzly. This report documents a procedure developed to use the fluences computed in Shift in a Grizzly simulation, which allows for improved realisim in the prediction of the effects of environmental exposure on propensity for reactor pressure vessel fracture. This capability demonstrated on RPVs with multiple types of configurations.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Gas-cooled Fast Reactor Research and Development Roadmap

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Source Term Reduction for Advanced and Small Modular Boiling Water Reactors

The United States Department of Energy (US DOE) is currently supporting the development of various advanced and small modular reactor (SMR) designs. Several of these designs have commenced license application with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC). These reactors have improved safety features that may significantly reduce radiological source terms in the event of design and beyond-design basis accidents. Specifically, some reactors feature a smaller containment volume relative to the available fission product depositional surface area, which supports increased fission product retention in the containment vessel. Pressurized water reactors (PWR) and boiling water reactors (BWR) with this feature include the integral pressurized water reactor (iPWR) and the BWRX-300 design by General Electric. A prior research program supported by the US DOE quantified the source term reduction associated with light water iPWRs and developed iPWR-specific theoretical models for fission product deposition rates. This program included a sequence of research projects that started with a feasibility study, development of theoretical models that predict higher deposition rates, and finally, development of empirical data for verification and validation of the theoretical models. The current project, which is a feasibility study, is the first step in a similar program to quantify the source term reduction associated with small and advanced light water BWRs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Machine Learning Assisted Safety Modeling and Analysis of Advanced Reactors

With the advances in computational power and numerical methods, analysts can now rely on first-principle simulations to predict ultra-fine details in a variety of applications. Advances in machine learning (ML) have produced algorithms that can now learn high-level abstractions via hierarchical models. This project aims to leverage advances in ML techniques and the available high-resolution simulation data to develop a novel modeling and simulation (M\&S) methodology for reactor safety analysis. While application-agnostic ML techniques are available, complex physics constraints need to be incorporated into ML techniques to build ML-based closures for computationally efficient predictive simulations. This project intends to develop a physics-guided data-driven multi-scale methodology for M\&S of advanced reactors. The project focuses on thermal fluid (T/F) phenomena, which play major roles in advanced reactor safety. Specifically, we propose a data-driven coarse-mesh turbulence model based on local flow features for the transient analysis of thermal mixing and stratification in a sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR). The model has a coarse-mesh setup to ensure computational efficiency, while it is trained by fine-mesh computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model to ensure accuracy. Three different neural networks are developed and tested for loss-of-flow transients in the hot pool of SFR, i.e. the densely connected convolutional neural network (DCNN), long-short-term-memory network based on proper orthogonal decomposition (POD-LSTM), and the DCNN informed by LSTM (DCNN-LSTM). The performances of these three neural networks are evaluated based on baseline models. The DCNN-LSTM model has been chosen for further hyperparameter optimization. Furthermore, based on a simplified two-dimensional case, uncertainty quantification (UQ) of the developed ML-based closure are investigated with three methods, i.e. Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensemble, and Bayesian neural network. The developed ML-based turbulent viscosity closure relation based on deep ensemble is then integrated into the system analysis module SAM and serves as a term in the conservation equations. Such a SAM-ML based procedure guarantees that the obtained results are consistent with the physical constraints of the thermal-fluid system. The SAM-ML simulation on the same loss-of-flow transient showed comparable accuracy with the CFD simulation but with a much coarser mesh setup. Last but not least, the ML-based closure improvement with the support of higher-fidelity data from large eddy simulation (LES) is discussed. As a first step towards this direction, a baseline LES simulation is performed to obtain comparable data with RANS results. Based on the early results, future investigation on further improving the ML-based closure is discussed. We believe the developed approach that combines scientific machine learning with nuclear system analysis code can benefit the advanced reactor community as more accurate safety analyses will better characterize reactor safety margins and reduce licensing efforts.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Synthetic Electricity Market Data Generation and HERON Use Case Setup of Advanced Nuclear Reactors Coupled with Thermal Energy Storage Systems

This study evaluates and optimizes advanced nuclear reactors coupled with thermal energy storage (TES) systems in an Integrated Energy System (IES) architecture to enable advanced nuclear power plants (A NPP) to participate in multi-commodity markets, thus enhancing their economic competitiveness. Nuclear-TES coupling scenarios studied herein are designed attenuate the nuclear heat dynamics and defer energy delivery to a later time, enabling the nuclear reactor to continue operating at or near steady-state design conditions as usual while also enabling flexible generation. Three A-NPPs, namely, an advanced light-water reactor (A LWR), a high temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) and a liquid-metal fast reactor (LMFR) were selected as the initial use cases for demonstrating the technoeconomic of thermally balanced energy storage coupling design for thermal power extraction. Each of the reactor technologies were evaluated in two different electricity markets. Stochastic optimization approach was adopted which included the evaluation of price signals from the Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland (PJM) market, and Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), using an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model. Risk Analysis Virtual Environment (RAVEN) tool and its dispatch optimization plugin, the Holistic Energy Resource Optimization Network (HERON), were used to perform dispatch and capacity optimization, using the price data provided by the ARMA models. The results from the Nuclear-TES use cases will be used to design and characterize dynamic integrated system behavior and feedback.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Modeling of Prismatic High Temperature Reactors in Pronghorn

Pronghorn is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based thermal-hydraulics code developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) for advanced reactor analysis. It has been previously applied to model Pebble-Bed High Temperature Reactors (High Temperature Reactor (HTR)s), Liquid-Metal Cooled Reactors, and Molten Salt Reactors, among others. This work applies the coarse-mesh thermal hydraulics capabilities in Pronghorn to model Prismatic-Core HTRs. In particular, the Oregon State University (OSU)’s High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is modeled with Pronghorn. The HTTF is a 1:4 height scaled-down facility of General Atomics’ Modular High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Initial Demonstration of New Griffin Technologies for Simulating the Running-In Phase of Pebble Bed Reactors

Griffin is a reactor multiphysics modeling application based on MOOSE (Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment) and specifically targeting transient modeling of advanced reactors. Griffin has been used recently to model pebble-bed reactors for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research and the Advanced Reactor Technology program. This modeling work has focused thus far on the direct calculation of equilibrium cores. This report documents an initial demonstration of a new running-in simulation capability. The new running-in capability is verified using the existing direct equilibrium core calculation capability. A simplified pebble-bed reactor model is then used to demonstrate the running-in simulation capability. This demonstration shows that Griffin is able to simulate years of operation during the running-in phase efficiently with each depletion step taking only several seconds. Two new technologies are also presented in this report which have been developed in Griffin that will be essential for improved accuracy both of the direct equilibrium core computation and the new running-in simulation capability. The first technology is an online cross section generation capability specifically targeted for pebble-bed reactors. This will improve the accuracy of the depletion calculation as the cross sections are generated at the exact core status. This also avoids the difficult step of pre-generating a separate standalone multigroup cross section set. Secondly, a newly implemented discretization for discontinuous finite element method (DFEM) SN transport in cylindrical (RZ) coordinates, which can be solved efficiently using the existing SN sweep solver, is discussed and some results are shown demonstrating the usefulness of the additional accuracy transport provides over a diffusion approximation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Perspective on “code qualifying” new graphite grades for use in advanced nuclear reactors*

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) publishes the Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code, which include guidance for the safe development, construction, and operation of boilers and pressure vessels. ASME BPV Code Section III “Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components” Division 5 focuses on “High Temperature Reactors”. Subsection HH, subpart A lists the different materials properties that are to be measured and how those properties change due to different environmental conditions (oxidation and irradiation damage) for a graphite to be accepted for use in a high temperature reactor core (i.e., “Code Qualified”). Currently there are no nuclear graphite grades that are “Code Qualified” (i.e., a reactor designer can select a graphite grade and build their reactor without any additional testing), which is due in part to development of new graphite grades in the last 20 years and the lack of comprehensive programs needed to produce the data for the code cases. This perspective is going to discuss the requirements, as called out in the ASME BPV Code, that are necessary to “code qualify” a nuclear graphite grade but will primarily focus on the practical and technical challenges associated with irradiation-induced property changes and how to address these to assist with getting graphite ready for use in advanced nuclear reactors. These same technical challenges can be expected to arise for other materials being developed for advanced reactor concepts.

advanced nuclear reactors↗

DOE OSTI2018

ABSORPTION CHILLER AND STRATIFIED CHILLED-WATER STORAGE TANK CONFIGURATIONS FOR COUPLING TO A SMALL MODULAR REACTOR

Power maneuvers stemming from time-varying loads imposed on nuclear reactors from diurnal changes in demand and renewable intermittency can be detrimental to the life of the reactor. Temperature swings during power maneuvers result in thermal and mechanical stresses in fuel elements and other reactor components. Thermal Energy Storage (TES) reservoirs can be coupled to reactors to absorb these grid instabilities. Previous work has shown chilled-water storage can help shift cooling loads that contribute to the daily peak electric demand from on-peak to off-peak hours. The objective of this work is to evaluate a stratified chilled-water storage tank as a potential TES reservoir for a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) using absorption chillers for chilled-water production. Simulation results reveal absorption chiller performance is hindered when receiving steam from a tap on the low-pressure turbine. A better configuration involves integrating the absorption chillers into a flash vessel system that is thermally coupled to a sensible heat storage system. The sensible heat storage system maintains reactor thermal output at 100% and matches turbine output with demand while producing enough steam to power four large absorption chillers to charge a stratified chilled-water storage tank, which is used to offset cooling loads in an adjacent facility.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Sensitivity Studies, Gap Analysis, and Benchmark Experiment Optimization for Reactor Applications

In regards to nuclear data, some reactor applications may lack validation experiments, which reduces confidence in predicted results. This is especially true for emerging advanced reactor, micro reactor, and Accelerator Driven System (ADS) designs. This work presents an approach to design new criticality experiments that have similar k eff cross section sensitivities to an application of interest. This process involves simulations to generate cross-section sensitivities to a parameter of interest (such as k eff ), a gap analysis to determine which existing benchmarks are most similar to the application, and an experiment optimization. This work focuses on cross-section sensitives and gap analysis for three examples relevant to the reactor physics community including a Travelling Wave Reactor (TWR) type-design, Kilopower (a space reactor design), and a lead-bismuth eutectic cooled accelerator-driven system (ADS) to transmute minor actinides.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2015

The 14 MeV Neutron Irradiation Facility in MARIA Reactor

The MARIA reactor with thermal neutron flux density up to 3x10{sup 14} cm{sup -2} s{sup -1} and a number of vertical channels is well suited to material testing by thermal neutron treatment. Beside of that some fast neutron irradiation facilities are operated in MARIA reactor as well. One of them is thermal to 14 MeV neutron converter launched in 2014. It is especially devoted to fusion devices material testing irradiation. The ITER and DEMO research thermonuclear facilities are to be run using the deuterium - tritium fusion reaction. Fast neutrons (of energy approximately 14 MeV) resulting from the reaction are essential to carry away the released thermonuclear energy and to breed tritium. However, constructional materials of which thermonuclear reactors are to be built must be specially selected to survive intense fluxes of fast neutrons. Strong sources of 14 MeV neutrons are needed if research on resistance of candidate materials to such fluxes is to be carried out effectively. Nuclear reactor-based converter capable to convert thermal neutrons into 14 MeV fast neutrons may be used to that purpose. The converter based on two stage nuclear reaction on lithium-6 and deuterium compounds leading to 14 MeV neutron production. The reaction chain is begun by thermal neutron capture by lithium-6 nucleus resulted in triton release. The neutron and triton transport calculations have been therefore carried-out to estimate the thermal to 14 MeV neutron conversion efficiency and optimize converter construction. The usable irradiation space of ca. 60 cm{sup 3} has been obtained. The released energy have been calculated. Heat transport has been asses to ensure proper device cooling. A set of thermocouples has been installed in converter to monitor its temperature distribution on-line. Influence of converter on reactor operation has been studied. Safety analyses of steady states and transients have been done. Performed calculations and analyses allow designing the converter and formulate its operation limits and conditions. During first tested operation of the converter the 14 MeV neutron flux density was estimated to 10{sup 9} cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}, whereas fast fission neutrons inside converter achieved 10{sup 12} cm{sup -2} s{sup -1}, and thermal neutrons were reduced down to 109 cm-2 s-1. Taking into account the feasibility of almost incessant converter operation for a number of months, its arisen as one of the most powerful (in terms of fluence), currently available 14 MeV neutron source. Such a converter currently under operation in the MARIA reactor core will be presented. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Startup Physics Testing of Advanced Reactors

This report documents the startup physics testing from initial fuel loading through ascension to full power for past advanced reactor startup physics testing programs. The review includes an assessment of what nuclear physics data was measured, why this data was measured, how was the measurement made, and the agreement with predictive reactor performance calculations of that time. The purpose of this review is to establish historical precedence for test inclusion for future advanced reactors planned for demonstration at the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC). The historical review includes reactor designs considered to be significantly different from current light-water reactor designs, or use simplified, inherent, passive, or other innovative means to accomplish their safety functions.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Fuels and Materials Challenges for the Very High Temperature Reactor

High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs) featuring particle fuel are a very mature technology. Commercial deployment occurred in the mid-1980's with the Fort St.Vrain and Thorium Hochtemperatur Reaktor by providing electricity to the grids in the United States and West Germany, respectively. The technology was then adopted by Japan and China with the operation of the High Temperature Test Reactor in Oarai, Japan and the High Temperature Reactor (HTR-10) in China. These commercial reactors typically operate with an outlet coolant temperature of 750 deg. C to 800 deg. C. Increasing the outlet temperature of the HTGR to even higher temperatures above 900 deg. C will improve the thermodynamic efficiency of the system and enable application of a new class of gas reactor, the very high temperature reactor (VHTR), to provide process heat, electricity, and hydrogen to a broad range of industrial customers with the attendant benefits of improved energy security and reduced CO{sub 2} emissions. However, the increase in coolant outlet temperature presents a number of technical challenges associated with fuels and materials. For over a decade, the U.S. Department of Energy has been sponsoring a broad program of research and development with a goal of addressing the technical fuels and materials challenges to support deployment of a VHTR that could safely and economically operate at outlet temperatures of 750 to 950 deg. C. In summary, fuels and materials challenges exist with deploying a VHTR with an outlet temperature of 950 deg. C in the areas of structural materials, graphite and TRISO fuel. However, R and D is underway or has recently been completed suggesting that technical solutions are possible. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) Lay-Up - 19187

UCOR, an AECOM-led partnership with Jacobs, manages the cleanup of the 2,200-acre East Tennessee Technology Park for its client, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The site was contaminated with radioactive, hazardous and industrial wastes generated by more than 40 years of national defense and energy missions. 2019 is the 50. anniversary of the shutdown of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE). MSRE ran a brief four years in the 1960's but earned an enduring legacy as an innovative reactor technology concept which has enjoyed a renewal of global interest in the past several years. In 2018, it was given elevated status among advanced reactor programs within DoE's Nuclear Energy office. The MSRE was a graphite-moderated, liquid fueled reactor that operated from June 1965 through December 1969. Although it was shut down nearly 50 years ago, certain systems within the reactor have continued to operate to maintain the facility in a safe and stable condition until it can be demolished as part of the comprehensive cleanup of the Oak Ridge Reservation. These systems are composed of a complex network of pipes, valves, gauges and associated equipment that control air filtration and pressure buildup resulting from fluorine gas generated through radiolysis of the fluoride salt which once fueled the reactor. In 2016, an MSRE Engineering Evaluation Team was chartered to assess current facility conditions and develop recommendations to maintain the facility in a safe state until deactivation and demolition commences. Plans are now underway to 'lay up' the MSRE facility until deactivation and demolition can occur. The proposed MSRE Facility Layup will minimize maintenance costs, reduce personnel risk of injury and exposure, provide reliable electric service to the facility and require zero personnel occupancy at MSRE. In the proposed layup approach a new source of electrical power to required loads will be routed through the facility, and new gas processing and ventilation systems will be installed that will be optimized for safe processing of the constituent hazardous gasses that exist in the legacy vessels at MSRE. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Developing Materials for Extreme Environments and Their Use in Nuclear Waste Canisters and Reactors - 20559

The paper focuses on the development of materials which can be utilized in extreme industrial environments. The paper discusses the advancement of materials and their application in components which are utilized in extreme industrial environments as such that of the nuclear field and especially in the nuclear waste field. Nuclear power plants have become an indispensable part of the electricity generation, medical, food processing and many other industries. Though burning small amount of fuel as compared to conventional power plants, they also create waste which is not easy to handle as other types of wastes. The nuclear waste sitting at the bottom of spent fuel tanks around the globe has raised public concerns on how it will be dealt with. Europe has started to give an answer by working on geological repositories. Though till yet, waste has been cooled in spent fuel tanks and after processing, is precisely placed in nuclear waste canisters and casks and transported to sites across the country for further cooling and storage. Though in all this process there had been a great deal of advancement on the type of casks and canisters used and the processes for transporting nuclear material and waste. Often reports about radioactive material leakage, moisture content inside barrels etc. has surfaced. Be it official or unofficial report, there seems a technical failure on how the nuclear waste has been stored and placed at facilities around the globe. The other aspect of this material development is to be beneficial for nuclear reactors. As the technology gets advanced, nuclear reactors change their titles from Gen II to Gen III and so on. The new fleet of upcoming reactors will be exceptionally safer, reliable and more efficient. But these benefits will also bring drawbacks with them. As these reactors will operate at high temperature (above 800 degree Celsius) they also ask for advancement in materials used in the reactor core, fuel used, reactor control etc. The paper tries to answer such concerning questions. The work shows the study done on different material that can be better candidates for extreme environments. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

A Methodology for Loading the Advanced Test Reactor Driver Core for Experiment Analysis

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is one of the premier irradiation facilities in the world. The ATR hosts experiments from a variety of laboratories, companies, and disciplines. Because of its flexibility in providing customized irradiation conditions to experiments, such as coolant chemistry, temperature, and reactor power, analysis for experiments, both from a programmatic and safety perspective, can be a challenging endeavor. Because of these experiment variables, there is always an effort to improve upon the existing analysis methodology in order to provide the sponsor of any given experiment with the most accurate predictions possible. The paper discusses the effort to improve upon the methodology for loading the ATR driver core for experiment analysis. Experiment analysis at INL is generally broken up into three separate disciplines: neutronics, thermal-hydraulics, and structural. The focus of this paper is neutronics analysis. After the experiment has a preliminary design, the neutronics analyst will create a model in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code to calculate fuel and material heating rates from MCNP tallies and provide those to the thermal-hydraulics analyst, and calculate reactivity worths, perturbation on the axial fission profile of the ATR driver core by the experiment, void worths, and experiment backup worths. Also, there are usually several programmatic parameters that the experiment sponsor requests that the neutronics analyst calculates. These can include heat generation rates, burnup and displacements per atom (DPA). In order to accurately analyze these parameters, an important input into the physics analyst's MCNP model is the loading of the ATR driver core. The ATR driver core consists of 40, 19-plate highly-enriched uranium (HEU) fuel elements, arranged in a serpentine shape, as pictured in Figure 1. The ATR driver core is responsible for the vast majority of the thermal power of the reactor and the nuclear interactions with the experiments being irradiated in ATR. A unique feature of ATR is the 'power tilt' across the reactor. A power tilt means that the Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast Lobes of ATR frequently operate at different powers, providing different irradiation conditions for the experiments in and around the lobes of the reactor. In order to achieve lobe power splits, different fuel elements for each of the 40 positions are chosen by ATR Reactor Engineering so that lobe power splits can be maintained during an operating cycle. A typical fuel loading for an ATR cycle consists of 14 to 18 new fuel elements and 2 to 26 depleted fuel elements. These loadings are typically chosen from three different types of fuel elements. All three ATR fuel element types share a common design, spelled out in Chapter 4 of the ATR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). The fuel element meat is HEU UAlx dispersion fuel sandwiched between aluminum cladding with a length of 121.92 cm (4 ft), with 19 plates per fuel element. The three variations of this common design are designated by the first two letters in their serial numbers: XA, YA, and NB. XA elements are most commonly used. These elements have nominally 1075 g of uranium-235 and 0.66 g of boron-10. The NB elements have the same uranium-235 loading as the XA elements, but no boron in any plates. These elements are used when excess reactivity is needed. The YA elements have the same loading as the XA elements, except that the outermost plate (Plate 19) has no boron or uranium. These elements are used to mitigate aged reflector damage. In order to accurately model the ATR driver core, all three types of fuel elements must be accounted for in the MCNP model. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗