Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “inventory”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48

Transuranic Waste Volume Reduction Methods for Los Alamos National Laboratory

Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL, or the Lab) is one of the United States’ (U.S.) weapons complex nuclear security laboratories; it is owned by the Department of Energy (DOE) and operated by Triad National Security, LLC. LANL’s mission is to solve national security challenges through scientific excellence, which includes nuclear deterrence and stockpile stewardship. Such activities generate a variety of radioactive waste types, including transuranic (TRU) waste. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is under a congressional mandate to produce no fewer than 80 plutonium pits per year by 2030 to meet Department of Defense requirements and support the nuclear deterrent. LANL is responsible for producing at least 30 pits per year by 2026, while the Savannah River Site will produce 50 pits per year by 2030. As of August 2018, the NNSA TRU waste inventory at LANL was at 53% capacity. In order to ensure the nuclear material missions are able to continue uninterrupted, the storage of TRU waste needs to remain below 60% of total capacity. As LANL increases production and prepares to meet the 30 pits per year goal, waste generation will increase substantially. Thus, there is a need to rejuvenate current infrastructure and implement TRU waste reduction methods in the coming years.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Mixed Waste Landfill Annual Long-Term Monitoring & Maintenance Report (Apr 2015-Mar 2016)

Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is a multi-purpose engineering and science laboratory owned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)/National Nuclear Security Administration. SNL is managed and operated by Sandia Corporation (Sandia), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation. Sandia National Laboratories, New Mexico (SNL/NM) is located within the boundaries of Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB), southeast of the City of Albuquerque in Bernalillo County, New Mexico. The Mixed Waste Landfill (MWL) is located 4 miles south of SNL/NM central facilities and 5 miles southeast of Albuquerque International Sunport, in the north-central portion of Technical Area (TA)-III. The MWL disposal area comprises 2.6 acres. During operations, the MWL accepted containerized and other low-level radioactive waste and minor amounts of mixed waste from SNL/NM research facilities and off-site DOE and U.S. Department of Defense generators from March 1959 to December 1988. More specific information regarding the MWL inventory and past disposal practices is presented in the MWL Phase 2 RCRA Facility Investigation Report (Peace et al. September 2002) and the extensive MWL Administrative Record.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

IER-519 CED-2: Final Design for Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments (TEX) with Absorbers to Provide Validation Benchmarks for Hanford Tank Farms

The Hanford tank farms contain 56 million gallons of waste across 177 tanks. The primary criticality safety concern for the waste is the plutonium inventory in waste solids – approximately 670 kg in total. Criticality safety analysis credits the absorption and dilution properties of the large quantities of other elements (aluminum, chromium, iron, manganese, nickel, silicon, sodium, and zirconium) present in the waste. Of these, iron and manganese are by far the most significant neutron absorbers, particularly for the waste compositions of highest criticality safety concern. The criticality safety analyses at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Vitrification Plant (WTP) and the Savannah River tank farms also credit iron and manganese as the primary neutron absorbers to demonstrate subcriticality.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Transfer and Flushing Evaluation for Potential Precipitated Solids in the 241-AP-106 to EMF Transfer Pipeline for DFLAW

Waste transfer pipeline flushing is necessary to maintain pipeline performance, but added flush fluid increases the nuclear waste inventory. During the Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) mission, waste transfer lines from the Interim Low-Activity Waste Storage Tank (i.e., 241-AP-106) to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility must have the capability of being flushed to prevent accumulation of solids and to mitigate corrosion concerns. Operational experience at Hanford has shown that the solids precipitation occurs during processing operations from dilute Hanford liquids. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was requested to evaluate the potential precipitated solid particle transport and flushing operational capabilities of the AP-106 through the Effluent Management Facility (EMF) low-point drain LAW feed pipeline. The evaluation results do not provide operational requirements, but rather provide a scoping basis for understanding the potential operational significance of solids precipitation in the pipeline. The salt and aluminum phase solids most likely to precipitate from the LAW feeds during cooling, evaporation, or mixing have particle densities that are estimated to range from 1.62 to 2.78 g/mL and a spherical particle size range of 8 to 2100 μm, depending on the solid phase considered. Application of the method to calculate the critical deposition velocity required by TFC-ENG-STD-26 at conservatively bounding estimates for the solids concentrations demonstrates that potentially precipitated solids may deposit on the bottom of the transfer pipe invert at the lower LAW feed pipeline flow rate, but the upper LAW feed pipeline flow rate will likely prevent deposition. The system pressure limit for the AP-106 through the EMF low-point drain LAW feed pipeline likely exceeds any pressure loss at a calculated critical deposition velocity even for the most adverse potential precipitated solid. However, should solids settle as a result of no-flow conditions, the flow capabilities of the AP-106 through the EMF low-point drain LAW feed pipeline are shown, based on the available literature, to be potentially inadequate for effective flushing operations to remove solids, even at solids concentrations below the maximum specified for LAW feed. Thus, stepwise solids accumulations over multiple transfers may be an issue, and eventual line plugging may occur. Further inadequacies may potentially be realized should the cohesive nature of certain precipitates be accounted for.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

HSLA-100 Forging Contract Vendor Post-Award Meeting [Slides]

LANL utilizes thick-walled, spherical vessels for numerous basic science, materials, and system performance experiments. These pressure retaining vessels are designed and fabricated to meet the intent of ASM E B&PV Section VIII, Division 3 and Code Case 2564. LANL has successfully contracted past production of component parts (nozzle and cover forgings, plate production and head forming) and overall vessel construction (welding, inspection, hydrostatic testing) utilizing HSLA-100 steel. As current vessel inventories approach design lifetimes, we are once again embarking upon a series of fabrication contracts to produce replacement components and vessel assemblies to ensure continued experiment cadence at LANL. We anticipate releasing additional future vessel production contracts as experimental demands at LANL continue to increase

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Historical Data Analysis Supporting the Data Quality Objectives for the INL Site Environmental Soil Monitoring Program

This document represents the initial evaluation and soil monitoring proposed by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC (BEA) in 2015. The evaluation included analyses of historical soil monitoring data and soil inventories, current emission estimates, and modeled potential deposition/accumulation patterns. The initially proposed monitoring included a 5-year rotation of in-situ gamma measurements augmented by soil sampling with laboratory analyses near each major active and some inactive facilities. It also proposed rotational in-situ gamma measurements and soil sampling at two centrally located onsite air monitoring locations coinciding with sampling at the traditional offsite soil monitoring locations. The chosen alternative includes only physical soil sampling with laboratory analysis and only at the Radioactive Waste Management Complex (RWMC), the two air monitors and the offsite locations as documented in Data Quality Objectives Supporting the Environmental Soil Monitoring Program for the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Site, INL/EXT-15-34909, Revision 0, February 2016. The data and evaluations in this document are valid for comparisons with future soil data that may be collected in many INL site locations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

(α,n) nuclear data scoping study

Neutrons from the (α,n) reaction are an important component of nondestructive assay techniques to determine enriched uranium and other actinide inventories in a variety of critical points in the nuclear fuel cycle. However, uncertainties in the cross section, total neutron yield and neutron spectrum, and gamma emissions from these reactions, such as 19 F(α,n) and 17,18 O(α,n), introduce large uncertainties in the determination of mass of actinides of interest and can represent several significant quantities in unaccounted material in certain facility processes. Calculations and measurements depend on accurate nuclear data; however, much of the relevant data in use today was measured in the 1980s and earlier and has not been updated. Thus, the current uncertainties in the cross sections and neutron emission spectra are unacceptably large. This report documents the results of a scoping study of (α,n) reaction data that considered the current state of the data and recommends areas of improvement. It also addresses the codes use to calculate the (α,n) neutron and gamma source terms and recommends code improvements to support required analysis.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Post-Irradiation Examinations of the ATF Experiments - 2020 Status

This report contains the results of post-irradiation examination (PIE) of both Accident Tolerant Fuels-1 (ATF-1) rodlets and ATF-2 rodlets irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The experiment is part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) program’s Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The ATF-1 PIE focused on the continuation of the analyses of five rodlets, one containing U 3 Si 2 fuel, two containing UN-U 3 Si 5 composites, and two with UN-U 3 Si 2 composites. The non-destructive examinations of the U 3 Si 2 rodlet showed results comparable to the previously investigated rodlets. The profilometry of the UN-U 3 Si 2 composites highlighted permanent deformation of the cladding at the pellet-pellet interface, suggesting that hourglassing of the composite pellet occurred during irradiation, causing increased localized stresses on the Zirlo cladding tube due to Pellet-Cladding Mechanical Interaction (PCMI). The UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets, which were contained in Kanthal cladding, did not show enhanced cladding deformation at the pellet interfaces; however, it is to be noted that the initial gap of these two rodlets was larger than typical light water reactor (LWR) gaps. The larger gap might have been sufficient to accommodate the fuel swelling without having contact between the fuel and cladding, explaining the absence of PCMI. Regarding the fission products, no axial redistribution of the major gamma emitters was observed in any of the composite rodlets. Fission gas measurements on the UN-U 3 Si 5 rodlets also has been performed. The estimated fission gas release, based on the calculated fission product inventory, remains limited, with a higher fission gas release for the rodlet that experienced a higher power.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

User Guide to the Advanced Dimensional Depletion for Engineering of Reactors (ADDER) Software (V.1.0)

The Advanced Dimensional Depletion for Engineering of Reactors (ADDER) software is being developed in the Research and Test Reactor (RTR) Program at Argonne National Laboratory to meet the reactor design and analysis needs of the Conversion Program. ADDER is a flexible tool that (1) provides a depletion capability through coupling external neutronics codes with a built-in CRAM solver or external depletion code and (2) provides a user-friendly interface to perform fuel management and criticality search operations. The ADDER software is a Python 3 application written using modern software development practices subject to a compliant implementation of NQA-1 and applicable Department of Energy software quality assurance standards. This report is the user guide for the initial software release as ADDER v1.0.0. The motivation for a software to have flexible capabilities that ADDER possesses is the need to support a wide variety of geometries that are commonly required in analysis of research and test reactors. These reactors can have complex fuel, experiment, or control material shuffling patterns that persist over several years with many fuel management and partial refueling intervals. The scale of fuel management analysis can require tracking of an inventory that is multiple times the core loading. Many reactors, both power and non-power reactors of various types, will find the features of ADDER useful to facilitate key tasks that a fuel or core design engineer must perform with the convenience of concise input and validated functionality.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

NCERC News (Jan-Mar 2021) [Slides]

The National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) provides updates on experiments done as part of the HYPATIA and MUSIC campaigns as well as CAAS-3S criticality alarm testing, criticality safety classes, warehouse inventory, and KRUSTY disassembly.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Deployment of Energy Storage to Improve Environmental Outcomes of Hydropower

This paper describes how the installation of energy storage systems, co-sited with hydroelectric projects, can offer both economic and environmental benefits by enabling a broader range of electricity performance, capitalizing on its flexibility and grid reliability, while mitigating critical environmental impacts or improving environmental outcomes across U.S. rivers and streams. The paper attempts to link environmental outcomes to energy storage utilization. It offers a comprehensive inventory of research-grade work, site-specific studies, policies, and pilot projects regarding energy storage and hydropower that show significant environmental implications. It provides an outline of methodologies given the known costs and attributes of storage technologies, with case study illustrations. It outlines the key components of a methodology that could be applied within the context of specific projects to reveal the environmental benefits of energy storage paired with hydropower production to properly size the storage systems to seize benefits. The actual methodology would be developed in future work. Finally, we provide a set of gaps to be addressed in future work as this important idea gains traction.

13 HYDRO ENERGY↗

Assessing the Consistency of Estimated Ground Cover Fractions between the BLM AIM Method and Optical Remote Sensing Method

Since 2012, Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) has supported the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in developing remote sensing methodologies for long-term environmental monitoring of Palo Verde Mesa in eastern Riverside County, California, including methods for: detailed mapping of ephemeral streams, estimating fractional cover of desert-land surface components (e.g., trees, shrubs, litters, and bare ground), evaluating erosion risk or land stability, and characterizing vegetation alliances using spatial structure and geostatistical approaches. These studies showed the promise of remote sensing for monitoring changes in desert landscapes by providing information that would be difficult to obtain through field surveys. During this time the BLM has also worked to establish long-term monitoring protocols and compiled field-observation data collected using standardized protocols from the Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) strategy. The AIM data can be compared to data derived from remote sensing methods to evaluate their relative operational utility in monitoring landscape change. If ground cover estimated using remotely sensed imagery is comparable to AIM ground cover estimates, then remote sensing can be used to monitor whether any land cover change in desert landscapes may be related to solar energy development. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the consistency in ground cover estimates between AIM data and those derived from publicly- available remotely sensed imagery, such as that available through the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP), to examine feasibility of a remote sensing method for complementing AIM monitoring. Based on the image analysis in this study, we also provide recommendations for how small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) data may be used to complement BLM’s AIM data and NAIP imagery for future vegetation monitoring. The ground cover types we originally planned to investigate were trees, shrubs, and bare ground. However, the small sample size and a limited range of cover fraction of trees and shrubs in the AIM dataset (e.g., 33 samples with a maximum shrub cover of 18%, 14 samples with a maximum tree cover of 17%) did not allow for performing a meaningful evaluation for the remote sensing approach. Therefore, we conducted the study focusing on bare ground, foliar, and rock cover, all of which are indicators reported in the AIM remote sensing dataset.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗

An Overview of Non-LWR Vessel Cooling Systems for Passive Decay Heat Removal (Technical Letter Final Report)

The following report provides a technical review of various reactor vessel cooling system (VCS) concepts under consideration for decay heat removal (DHR) in non-light water advanced reactor designs. This review focuses on ex-vessel designs, including the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS), the Reactor Vessel Auxiliary Cooling System (RVACS), and hybrid iterations, using both air and water cooling to achieve their heat removal function. Based on a literature review of publicly available sources published between 1979 and 2021, a technical summary is presented detailing existing and planned VCS design options, their applicability to specific reactor type, and review of authored research and development studies. Following an assessment of the availability of data and modeling tools, an evaluation was performed analyzing their likely performance during normal, degraded, and accident conditions, including reliability, stability, and longevity. With renewed consideration of air-based DHR systems by some US vendors, there is a need to fully understand the complexities inherent to natural circulation systems, and more importantly, how they may influence safety-related heat removal functions and system performance. For DHR systems that rely on air-based mode of cooling, this entails quantification of the impacts of low flow conditions during start-up, relative elevations of inlet and outlet ducts for below-grade installations, effects of the use of multiple parallel chimneys for redundancy, and impact of weather conditions at the plant site. For systems relying on water-based mode cooling, reliance on limited coolant inventory in an event of pipe break or extended duration accident scenarios, sensitivities related to stability of boiling flow and heat transfer conditions, and quantification of full-scale structural vibrations on balance of plant structures are among the complicating factors.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Vessel Fabrication Overview

LANL utilizes spherical vessels for numerous basic science, materials, and system performance experiments. These pressure vessels are designed and fabricated to meet the intent of ASME B&PV Section VIII, Division 3 and Code Case 2564. LANL has successfully contracted vessel construction in the past, utilizing HSLA-100 steel. As current vessel inventories approach design life, we are once again embarking upon a series of fabrication contracts to produce replacement components and vessel assemblies to support continued experiment cadence at LANL. LANL’s intent is to ramp up a continuous vessel supply chain for the DOE Complex.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Results from the Second MCU Flush DSSHT Sample

The Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) stopped operations on May 22, 2019. As part of a plan to de-inventory the remainder of the liquids in the system, samples are sent to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for analysis. A recent set of samples was pulled from the Decontaminated Salt Solution (DSS) Hold Tank (DSSHT) on 6/25/21, and arrived on the same day. The current DSSHT contents includes heel from the first flush of DSSHT (reference SRNL-L3100-2021-00019), deionized water (DIW) backflush of the DSS Coalescer, DIW flushes of the DSS Hydraulic Accumulator (DSSHA), DIW flush of the Contactor Drain Tank (CDT), and DSS Decanter drain material. The DIW flushes from the coalescer, DSSHA, and CDT were pumped through the DSS Decanter to allow for flushing of the DSS Decanter.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Demonstration of Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Higher Fissile Content Glass

The Accelerated Basin De-inventory (ABD) Program has been proposed as an alternative for future spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and nuclear material processing at the Savannah River Site (SRS). This approach would change the baseline H-Canyon (HCAN), Concentrate, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF), and Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) operations. The ABD Program would require that all domestic and foreign research reactor SNF currently at SRS be dissolved, stored, and then transferred to CSTF without the recovery of uranium. Preliminary assessments in the ABD Program plan have shown that ~5000 extra SRS high-level waste (HLW) canisters would be produced if the fissile mass loading remains at the current 897 g/m 3 limit; however, increasing the limit to 2500 g/m 3 would result in ~520 extra canisters. Thus, the ABD Program plan requires an increase of the DWPF fissile mass loading limit to 2500 g/m 3 to minimize canister production. DWPF considers the following isotopes in the calculation of fissile mass loading: U-233, U-235, Pu-239 and Pu-241.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Vadose and Saturated Zone Flow and Transport Calculations for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington

The purpose of the fate and transport modeling described in this environmental calculation file (ECF) is to evaluate the impacts to groundwater associated with waste disposal operations at Mixed Waste Low-Level Burial Ground (LLBG) Trenches 31 and 34 to satisfy requirements in DOE O 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management. The model integrates the flow and transport in the vadose zone beneath the active trenches with the saturated zone downgradient of the trenches to predict the radionuclide concentration at the point of assessment (POA). DOE M 435.1-1, Radioactive Waste Management Manual, defines the POA as the point of highest projected dose or concentration beyond a 100 m (328 ft) buffer zone surrounding the disposed waste. The modeling is conducted in accordance with the DOE G 435.1, Implementation Guide for Use with DOE M 435.1-1, performance assessment (PA) guidelines. The modeling involves evaluation of the groundwater concentrations and radionuclide arrival times during the 1,000-year compliance and 10,000-year sensitivity-uncertainty periods per DOE O 435.1 and DOE M 435.1. This analysis does not consider radionuclide release during facility operations, only the post-closure impacts of the radionuclides to the environment. The evaluation of potential radiological dose to groundwater receptors caused by releases from a closed facility containing radioactive waste typically includes the following: (1) Release of radionuclides from that facility (2) Transport of those radionuclides through the environment, and (3) Exposure to humans to environmental concentration levels of those radionuclides The fate and transport three-dimensional (3D) model analysis involves the post-closure impacts to the environment of the technetium-99, iodone-129, and uranium (all isotopes in the waste). The residual inventory estimates include several radionuclides, but technetium-99 is typically responsible for almost all of the beta-gamma dose equivalent associated with groundwater (water resources) protection per 40 CFR 141, “National Primary Drinking Water Regulations” (e.g., see the results in WCH-520, Performance Assessment of Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, Hanford Site, Washington; hereinafter referred to as the ERDF PA), and iodone-129 can also be a significant dose contributor for some waste (e.g., RPP-RPT-59958, Performance Assessment for the Integrated Disposal Facility, Hanford Site, Washington; hereinafter referred to as the IDF PA). Uranium does not typically factor significantly into the impacts to groundwater, even during the 10,000-year sensitivity-uncertainty period, but always remains of interest as a contaminant. This ECF does not address vadose and saturated zone modeling for Trench 94 of the 200 East Area LLBG. Current information confirms the validity of the low corrosion rate of the naval reactor plant carbon steel (HY-80), and the even lower corrosion rate of the nickel-iron-chromium alloy reactor vessel (Inconel Alloy 600) presented in DOE/EIS-0259, Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Disposal of Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser, Ohio Class, and Los Angeles Class Naval Reactor Plants. Based on these low corrosion rates, the time to breach the reactor vessel to allow release of radionuclides from the activated metal of the reactor vessel internal structure is at least 10,000 years. This time to breach precludes the need to evaluate the vadose and saturated zone transport of contaminants released from the reactor compartment disposal packages in the 200 East Area LLBGs PA (CP-63826, Waste Release Model Package Report for the Active Trenches of the Low-Level Burial Grounds, Hanford Site, Washington).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Molybdenum Benchmark Update [Slides]

Review of Motivations: Molybdenum (Mo) isotopes found in HALEU fuels, space reactor applications, fission product inventories; 95 Mo is one of the 15 main absorbing fission products in light water reactors; New differential measurements of isotopic Mo cross sections in unresolved resonance region (URR) from RPI need validation; New and future Mo cross sections from IRSN and JAEA at J-PARC need validation; There are few benchmarks sensitive to Mo; Only one intermediate benchmark.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗