Results for “dusty or complex plasma” — Page 48

NASA NTRS2021

The Asymmetric Inner Disk of the Herbig Ae Star HD 163296 in the Eyes of VLTI/MATISSE: Evidence for a Vortex?

Context.A complex environment exists in the inner few astronomical units of planet-forming disks. High-angular-resolution observa-tions play a key role in our understanding of the disk structure and the dynamical processes at work.Aims.In this study we aim to characterize the mid-infrared brightness distribution of the inner disk of the young intermediate-massstar HD 163296 from early VLTI/MATISSE observations taken in theL- andN-bands. We put special emphasis on the detection ofpotential disk asymmetries.Methods.We use simple geometric models to fit the interferometric visibilities and closure phases. Our models include a smoothedring, a flat disk with an inner cavity, and a 2D Gaussian. The models can account for disk inclination and for azimuthal asymmetriesas well. We also perform numerical hydrodynamical simulations of the inner edge of the disk.Results.Our modeling reveals a significant brightness asymmetry in theL-band disk emission. The brightness maximum of the asym-metry is located at the NW part of the disk image, nearly at the position angle of the semimajor axis. The surface brightness ratio inthe azimuthal variation is3.5±0.2. Comparing our result on the location of the asymmetry with other interferometric measurements,we confirm that the morphology of ther<0.3au disk region is time-variable. We propose that this asymmetric structure, located in ornear the inner rim of the dusty disk, orbits the star. To find the physical origin of the asymmetry, we tested a hypothesis where a vortexis created by Rossby wave instability, and we find that a unique large-scale vortex may be compatible with our data. The half-lightradius of theL-band-emitting region is0.33±0.01au, the inclination is52◦+5◦−7◦, and the position angle is143◦±3◦. Our models predictthat a non-negligible fraction of theL-band disk emission originates inside the dust sublimation radius forμm-sized grains. Refractorygrains or large (&10μm-sized) grains could be the origin of this emission.N-band observations may also support a lack of smallsilicate grains in the innermost disk (r.0.6au), in agreement with our findings fromL-band data.

J Varga↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of NASA-STD-1008: Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments

As we return to the Moon with Artemis, hardware will inevitably be exposed to lunar dust. Encountering the surface of a dusty planetary body brings significant hazards to the hardware. A team of subject matter experts across NASA were brought together to create a standard for addressing the best means of performing ground testing of hardware and systems to guard against the expected negative effects that dust may bring. This effort resulted in NASA-STD-1008: Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments. The NASA Technical Standard went through an Agency wide review and was approved for public release in September 2021.

lunar dust↗

NASA NTRS2022

Mars Climate Sounder Observations of Gravity Wave Activity throughout Mars’s Lower Atmosphere

Gravity waves are one way Mars’s lower atmospheric weather can affect the circulation and even composition of Mars’s middle and upper atmosphere. A recent study showed how on-planet observations near the center of the 15 micron CO2band by the A3 channel(635–665 cm−1)of the Mars Climate Sounder on board Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO-MCS) could sense horizontally short, vertically broad gravity waves at≈25 km above the surface by looking at small-scale radiance variability in temperature-sensitive channels. This approach is extended here to two additional channels closer to the wings of the 15 micron CO2band,A1 (595–615 cm−1) and A2 (615–645 cm−1), to sense gravity waves throughout the lower atmosphere. Using information from all three channels demonstrates that gravity wave activity in Mars’s lowermost atmosphere is dominated by orographic sources, particularly over the extremely rough terrain of Valles Marineris. Much of this orographic population is either trapped or filtered in the lowest two scale heights, such that variations in filtering and non-orographic sources shape the gravity wave population observed at 25 km above the surface. During global dust storms, however, gravity wave activity in the first scale height decreases by approximately a factor of two, yet trapping/filtering of what activity remains in the tropics substantially weakens. Exceptionally high radiance variability at night in the tropics during the less dusty part of the year is the result of observing mesospheric clouds rather than gravity waves.

Nicholas G Heavens↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Feasibility of using Low-Cost COTS Sensors for Particulate Monitoring in Space Missions

Real-time measurement of particles suspended in the spacecraft cabin is of great importance to verify that maximum allowable dust concentrations are not exceeded. This is primarily to protect astronaut health, but also has implications for dust-sensitive equipment. Recently, there is growing interest in low-cost commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) particle sensors by air quality researchers for their ability to map concentrations of airborne particulate matter in various terrestrial settings. In addition to low cost (< $2,000), the compact size and minimal weight of these sensors make them a potential choice for space missions. The detection mechanism for these aerosol sensors is typically measurement of light scattered by particles as they flow through a sensing volume. The amount of scattered light for detection depends on the particle size, shape, density, and refractive index of the particle material. Ideally, particle instruments should be calibrated with reference instruments for each different type of aerosol measurement. In this study we review multiple parameters that may impact the performance of state-of-the-art low-cost aerosol sensors. Environmental factors such as temperature, relative humidity, low ambient pressure, radiation and charge environment, partial-gravity and microgravity can affect the accuracy of particle measurements. Characteristics of the dust aerosols including particle size distribution, aerosol composition, refractive index, morphology and concentration levels also affect the measurement accuracy. Finally, we look at these parameters and issues with respect to an example COTS low-cost aerosol sensor. Instrument performance specifications are evaluated, and experiments are performed to measure real-time concentrations of Arizona Road Dust (a terrestrial reference test dust) and lunar dust simulant in a laboratory chamber. Overall, this study provides insight for evaluating spacecraft particulate monitoring technologies and raises questions to be answered before incorporating low-cost COTS sensors in future space missions to dusty destinations.

lunar dust↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orbital Drag Near Small Bodies Due to Lofted Fines from Surface Activity

Small bodies have been shown to be more granular and dusty than previously expected. Furthermore, as a result of landings, mining, or natural impacts, bodies with negligible atmospheres, such as moons and asteroids, may experience an exospheric environment abundant in lofted fines. Significant quantities of these may interfere with the nominal trajectories of spacecraft in low orbits. This work investigates the threshold of activity that would induce concerns to a spacecraft's nominal mission around various bodies including the Moon, Bennu, Comet Wild-2, and Phobos. Coupled motion of spacecraft navigation and control is expressed in SE(3).

Fines↗

NASA NTRS2022

Repeatable Method for Conducting Chamber Studies of Aerosolized Lunar Simulant

The Artemis Mission goal of returning humans to the Moon requires new solutions to engineering problems posed by the extremely harsh environment of the lunar surface. Using the Apollo missions as historical evidence, dust will be a significant obstacle in the success of a sustained human and robotic presence. Hardware such as tools, machinery, extra-vehicular activity (EVA) suits, and components of landers and habitats will all be subject to various degrees of contamination by lunar dust, and each piece of hardware has its own considerations for performance under dusty conditions. Such hardware must be tested and verified for use during lunar missions under guidance from NASA technical standards. Aerosolized dust can be used to test and verify hardware in two ways: volumetric and surface area loading. Volumetric loading (measured in mass of airborne dust per volume of air) may cause hardware to malfunction via dust ingestion or other mechanisms. Surface area loading (measured in mass of settled dust per surface area) may cause hardware to malfunction by altering its thermal properties or by fouling optical surfaces such as camera lenses. This publication describes a method to achieve a stable, user-determined volumetric loading in an arbitrary chamber along with recommendations for how to use such chambers for customized hardware testing.

Benjamin J Sumlin↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orbital Drag Near Small Bodies Due to Lofted Fines from Surface Activity

Recent exploratory missions have revealed that small bodies are more granular and dusty than previously expected. As a result of landings, mining, impacts, or other natural phenomena, bodies with negligible atmospheres such as moons and asteroids may experience an exospheric environment abundant in lofted fines. Significant quantities of these may interfere with the nominal trajectories of spacecraft in low orbits. This paper applies data collected from remote sensor and direct sample collection to approximate the density of atmospheric fines in three environments: high-velocity lunar fines generated during landings, the coma of active comets, and cryovolcanic plumes from the Saturnian moon Enceladus. It also investigates the threshold of activity that would induce concerns about a spacecraft's nominal mission. Coupled motion of spacecraft navigation and control is expressed in SE(3).

Fines↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Dust Mitigation Technology to Enable Survive the Night Capabilities

Introduction: As we return to the Moon, the lunar regolith (i.e. lunar dust) covering the surface will be an obstacle to nominal operations. Accounts from Apollo astronauts and analysis of hardware returned from the surface illustrate just how deleterious the dust can be [1]. During Apollo missions, the lunar dust adhered to hardware mechanically and electrostatically [2]. Surviving the Night: Mitigating the lunar dust will be critical to surviving the night. Going hand-in-hand with other extreme environment considerations, dust mitigation is critical to mission success. Dust Impacts on Other Systems: The lunar dust can have negative implications for power, thermal, mechanisms, and several other systems or sub-systems. For example, Apollo encountered marked degradation of performance in heat rejection systems for the lunar roving vehicle, science packages, and other components because of the lunar dust [1]. For power alone, dust can cause internal clogging for power connectors, heat rejection issues, excessive dust on reflective surfaces, reduced power output for solar arrays, and so on. Dust Mitigation Strategy: In addition to considering technology solutions, it is important for hardware, systems, and or components to have a dust mitigation strategy. At a high level, hardware that will encounter the lunar dust should consider these things when defining a dust mitigation strategy: • Understand Natural Environment • Understand Induced Environment • Understand Tolerance to Dust • Write Dust Requirements • Select Dust Mitigation Solutions • Test Hardware in Dusty Environment More information on each of these can be provided to hardware owners. Dust Mitigation Technology Development: NASA has a series of technologies that may be available for hardware that needs to survive the lunar night. Many of these solutions are leveraging dust mitigation technology development efforts from NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), as well as efforts from ESDMD programs, industry, and academia. Through a series of STMD programs (both internal to NASA and through partnerships), there are several technologies in development as considerations as dust mitigation solutions for hardware. Within STMD, the Game Changing Development Program (GCD) has funded several internal dust mitigation projects including low to mid TRL development, demonstrations on CLPS landers of high TRL solutions, and creating standards and best practices for dust mitigation. STMD dust mitigation efforts also include a series of partnerships for developing technologies and advancing the state of dust mitigation at NASA. This includes the Lunar Surface Innovation Consortium (LSIC), Small Business Innovation Research, Early Stage Innovations (ESI), Space Technology Research Grants (STRG), Announcement of Collaboration Opportunities (ACOs) and Tipping Points (TPs), and Challenges and Crowdsourcing, among others. There are also a series of dust mitigation solutions that have been widely used terrestrially, or during Apollo. In recent years, several studies have produced more data on the efficacy of these potential solutions in the lunar environment. Dust Mitigation Solutions: Dust mitigation solutions generally fall into four categories: • Dust Tolerant Mechanisms • Passive Dust Mitigation Capabilities • Active Dust Mitigation Capabilities • Dust Measurement Capabilities There are a series of solutions that may prove beneficial for hardware that needs to survive the lunar night, including new technology development as well as proven, terrestrial solutions. This presentation will discuss in more detail what some of these solutions are for payloads going to the surface. References: [1] J. R. Gaier, NASA/TM—2005-213610, The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions [2] T. J. Stubbs, et al. Impact of Dust on Lunar Exploration, 2005

dust mitigation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Wizard Staff: A Mobile Tool Supporting Human Exploration on The Lunar Surface

The Wizard Staff is a rechargeable, battery powered mobile tool with multiple uses for lunar surface exploration. It supports human activity as a surface survey tool, provides external illumination to enhance safety, delivers networking, communications, and navigation features to remote sites, and assists crew rescue with an emergency beacon and rigid splint structure. As a survey tool, it assists crewed geologic field site exploration with external lights, cameras, and LiDAR to illuminate, map, and record the sample collection process. As a relay station, it provides a surface intranet communications and navigation node for extended exploration far from the lander or habitation module. A separately developed Search-and-Rescue (SAR) handheld device can broadcast a signal to the Gandalf Staff containing crew position and biometric data. The staff then formats the message and sends it orbiting satellite(s) for emergency response via the LunaNET on a dedicated frequency similar to terrestrial applications using an Emergency Position-Indicating Radiobeacon (EPIRB). The staff is designed with an upper and lower segment. Components in the upper segment are the LiDAR, external lighting arrays, cameras, communications equipment, intelligence devices, and user interface for crew operations. The lower segment is a set of FeLiPO4 battery cells packed into the 2” diameter carbon fiber tube. When the battery pack is discharged, a spring connector (designed for the dusty lunar environment) easily disconnects the two segments for replacement with another fully charged battery pack. The lower segment can be used for Incapacitated Crew Rescue (ICR) as a rigid splint. As a stand-alone science platform, the Wizard Staff provides infrastructure for instruments and sensors to record the lunar environment over long periods of time. After a crew installs the components on the lunar surface, the platform delivers data to the lunar lander or base station for analysis. The stand-alone mode requires an auxiliary power source (e.g. solar array) and energy storage system (e.g. battery), so it could also be used as an electrical recharging station. A working prototype of Wizard Staff has been developed with collaboration between NASA (JSC, MSFC, and GSFC), Texas Space Technology Applications and Research (T STAR), and Texas A&M University (TAMU) using $300k of innovation funding in FY’21 and FY’22. The functional staff weights 36# on Earth (6# on the Moon), stands 2.1m tall and delivers external lighting with an array of 40 LED bulbs generating 1460 Lux at 2m range (near field), or 2 Lux at 50m (far field).

Gandalf Staff↗

NASA NTRS2023

Low-Cost Testing in Representative Lunar Regolith Environment

Rapid prototyping and testing are key enablers of iterative designs common in early technology research and development. Testing in a dusty environment is critical to prepare the Cryogenic Magnetic Coupler for lunar operations. To enable early and iterative testing of dust mitigation concepts, a low-cost, low-fidelity representative lunar regolith environment was developed at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Armstrong Flight Research Center (Edwards, California). Based on preliminary testing with this test setup, a similar setup may be of interest to universities and other entities looking to develop the capability to safely test relatively small-scale components with lunar regolith simulant. The development of this lunar regolith test chamber and results from preliminary testing are presented in this paper. Also discussed are further development strategies for the potential improvement of this setup.

Scott Stebbins↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Survive the Dust: Dust Mitigation Technology to Enable Survive the Night Capabilities

Introduction: As we return to the Moon, the lunar regolith (i.e. lunar dust) covering the surface will be an obstacle to nominal operations. Accounts from Apollo astronauts and analysis of hardware returned from the surface illustrate just how deleterious the dust can be [1]. During Apollo missions, the lunar dust adhered to hardware mechanically and electrostatically [2]. Surviving the Night: Mitigating the lunar dust will be critical to surviving the night. Going hand-in-hand with other extreme environment considerations, dust mitigation is critical to mission success. Dust Impacts on Other Systems: The lunar dust can have negative implications for power, thermal, mechanisms, and several other systems or sub-systems. For example, Apollo encountered marked degradation of performance in heat rejection systems for the lunar roving vehicle, science packages, and other components because of the lunar dust [1]. For power alone, dust can cause internal clogging for power connectors, heat rejection issues, excessive dust on reflective surfaces, reduced power output for solar arrays, and so on. Dust Mitigation Strategy: In addition to considering technology solutions, it is important for hardware, systems, and or components to have a dust mitigation strategy. At a high level, hardware that will encounter the lunar dust should consider these things when defining a dust mitigation strategy: • Understand Natural Environment • Understand Induced Environment • Understand Tolerance to Dust • Write Dust Requirements • Select Dust Mitigation Solutions • Test Hardware in Dusty Environment More information on each of these can be provided to hardware owners. Dust Mitigation Technology Development: NASA has a series of technologies that may be available for hardware that needs to survive the lunar night. Many of these solutions are leveraging dust mitigation technology development efforts from NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), as well as efforts from ESDMD programs, industry, and academia. Through a series of STMD programs (both internal to NASA and through partnerships), there are several technologies in development as considerations as dust mitigation solutions for hardware. Within STMD, the Game Changing Development Program (GCD) has funded several internal dust mitigation projects including low to mid TRL development, demonstrations on CLPS landers of high TRL solutions, and creating standards and best practices for dust mitigation. STMD dust mitigation efforts also include a series of partnerships for developing technologies and advancing the state of dust mitigation at NASA. This includes the Lunar Surface Innovation Consortium (LSIC), Small Business Innovation Research, Early Stage Innovations (ESI), Space Technology Research Grants (STRG), Announcement of Collaboration Opportunities (ACOs) and Tipping Points (TPs), and Challenges and Crowdsourcing, among others. There are also a series of dust mitigation solutions that have been widely used terrestrially, or during Apollo. In recent years, several studies have produced more data on the efficacy of these potential solutions in the lunar environment. Dust Mitigation Solutions: Dust mitigation solutions generally fall into four categories: • Dust Tolerant Mechanisms • Passive Dust Mitigation Capabilities • Active Dust Mitigation Capabilities • Dust Measurement Capabilities There are a series of solutions that may prove beneficial for hardware that needs to survive the lunar night, including new technology development as well as proven, terrestrial solutions. This presentation will discuss in more detail what some of these solutions are for payloads going to the surface. References: [1] J. R. Gaier, NASA/TM—2005-213610, The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions [2] T. J. Stubbs, et al. Impact of Dust on Lunar Exploration, 2005

dust mitigation↗

NASA NTRS2023

Investigating Abrasion Effects of Lunar Simulant Grain Sizes on Candidate Spacesuit Fabric

Lunar dust is identified as one of the most significant challenges during the Apollo exploration missions due to its extremely abrasive and electrostatic characteristics. As NASA and the space industry prepare for the upcoming Artemis missions, researching and testing with lunar simulant is quintessential to understanding the effects of lunar dust on the systems and equipment that will be deployed on the lunar surface. Testing will also provide paths that lead to developing technologies and cleaning tools that could be used for dust mitigation. Additionally, it is expected that any hardware that will be exposed to the dusty environment should undergo rigorous testing to ensure it will maintain long-term performance and operate on the lunar surface. For this study, exterior spacesuit fabric was observed. Abrasion is one of the main concerns of lunar dust exposure for spacesuit fabric. Three different abrasion methods were chosen: a rotary tumbler, the Martindale method, and Accelerotor. These abrasion methods were tested on coated and uncoated spacesuit material, Orthofabric, to understand the abrasion rates of sieved lunar simulant and investigate if the addition of ceramic coating mitigated dust abrasion. To summarize, the testing results provided that larger grains are more abrasive than smaller grains, and the selected ceramic coatings did not minimize abrasion during the controlled abrasion tests. It is important to note that the selected ceramic coatings were not designed or intended to provide protection from the abrasive lunar environment. It is recommended to select additional ceramic coatings with an elevated TRL of 5 or greater for testing with Orthofabric and lunar simulant. As an additional note, contact angle measurements were not accounted for in coating selection and should be a factor when selecting adhesion resistant coatings for lunar dust.

grain size↗

NASA NTRS2015

Asteroid (90) Antiope: Another Icy Member of the Themis Family?

Many members of the Themis family show evidence of hydration in the form of oxidized iron in phyllosilicates (Florczak, M. et al. [1999]. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 134, 463–471), and OH-bearing minerals (Takir, D., Emery, J.P. [2012]. Icarus 219, 641–654). The largest member, (24) Themis, has H2O ice covering its surface (Campins, H. et al. [2010]. Nature 464, 1320–1321; Rivkin, A.S., Emery, J.P. [2010]. Nature 464, 1322–1323). We have investigated the second largest Themis-family asteroid, (90) Antiope, which Castillo-Rogez and Schmidt (Castillo-Rogez, J.C., Schmidt, B.E. [2010]. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L10202) predict to have a composition that includes water ice and organics. We obtained 2–4-lm spectroscopy of (90) Antiope in 2006 and 2008, and we find an absorption in the 3-lm region clearly present in our 2008 spectrum and likely in our 2006 spectrum. Both spectra have rounded, bowl-shaped absorptions consistent with those ascribed to water ice as in the spectrum of Asteroid (24) Themis. We also present and compare Spitzer 8–12-lm mid-infrared spectra of (24) Themis and (90) Antiope. We find that (90) Antiope is lacking a ‘‘fairy castle’’ dusty surface, which is in contrast to (24) Themis, other Themis family members (Licandro, J. et al. [2012]. Astron. Astrophys. 537, A73), and Jupiter Trojans (e.g. Emery, J.P., Cruikshank, D.P., Van Cleve, J. [2006]. Icarus 182, 496–512). We conclude that the surface structure of (90) Antiope is most similar to Cybele Asteroid (121) Hermione (Hargrove, K.D. et al. [2012]. Icarus 221, 453–455).

Asteroids↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar Development & Test Facility, JSC B351

In anticipation of extended operations on the lunar sur-face, JSC Building B351 has been prepared to meet test needs to mature technologies that extract resources from lunar regolith, handle lunar regolith or must perform in a dusty lunar environment. Domains such as In-Situ Re-source Utilization (ISRU), dust mitigation, power generation and distribution, robotics and surface tools will all require testing with lunar regolith/simulants to demonstrate flight readiness. The Lunar Development and Test Facility (LDTF) houses environmental test capabilities, including lunar simulants, geared toward advancing Technical Readiness Level (TRL) of these lunar surface technologies. Seen as an agency need to enable and demonstrate new technologies, a portion of the facility capability was developed under the “Dirty Lunar Surface Simulation “project in FY2020, funded by the NASA Game Changing Development program. Some current uses include testing of an oxygen extraction from lunar regolith test, a spacesuit cleaning tool evaluation, and a study to measure dust effects on space radiators (thermal management).

Michael Reddington↗

NASA NTRS2021

Spitzer’s Last Look at Extragalactic Explosions: Long-Term Evolution of Interacting Supernovae

Here we present new, yet final, mid-infrared (mid-IR) data for supernovae (SNe) based on measurements with the Spitzer Space Telescope. Comparing our recent 3.6 and 4.5 μm photometry with previously published mid-IR and further multiwavelength data sets, we were able to draw some conclusions about the origin and heating mechanism of the dust in these SNe or in their environments, as well as about possible connection with circumstellar matter (CSM) originating from pre-explosion mass-loss events in the progenitor stars. We also present new results regarding both certain SN classes and single objects. We highlight the mid-IR homogeneity of SNe Ia-CSM, which may be a hint of their common progenitor type and of their basically uniform circumstellar environments. Regarding single objects, it is worth highlighting the late-time interacting Type Ib SNe 2003gk and 2004dk, for which we present the first-ever mid-IR data, which seem to be consistent with clues of ongoing CSM interaction detected in other wavelength ranges. Our current study suggests that long-term mid-IR follow-up observations play a key role in a better understanding of both pre- and post-explosion processes in SNe and their environments. While Spitzer is not available anymore, the expected unique data from the James Webb Space Telescope, as well as long-term near-IR follow-up observations of dusty SNe, can bring us closer to the hidden details of this topic.

Supernovae↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of Stirling Convertors for Radioisotope and Fission Power Systems

NASA has been developing free-piston Stirling-cycle power convertors over the past 22 years for use in nuclear power systems that would provide electricity for space science missions to dark, dusty, or distant destinations where solar power is not practical. These nuclear power systems would generate heat from either the radioactive decay of isotopes or fission nuclear reactors. That heat would be converted to usable electricity using highly efficient Stirling convertors for a wide range of power needs needing 10s of watts to 50 kWe. NASA’s Radioisotope Power Systems (RPS) Program is maturing advanced thermoelectric and dynamic conversion technologies that would increase the system efficiency beyond what is currently possible using heritage systems to enable a larger number of robotic missions or higher power missions to solar system bodies of interest. The Dynamic Radioisotope Power Systems (DRPS) Project has matured prototype Stirling convertors to sufficiently increase the technology readiness level for infusion into flight development. Flexure and gas-bearing free-piston Stirling convertors were developed under contract by commercial partners and delivered to enable government evaluation. Gas-bearing designs have met performance and robustness requirements and were selected for flight development. This paper provides the status of SRSC test campaign and maturity level.

Dynamic↗

NASA NTRS2022

Helium-Like X-Ray Line Complexes Show That the Hottest Plasma on the O Supergiant ζPuppis Is in Its Wind

We present an analysis of Chandra grating spectra of k ey helium-lik e line comple x es to put constraints on the location with respect to the photosphere of the hottest ( T 6 ×10 6 K) plasma in the wind of the O supergiant ζPup and to explore changes in the 18 yr between two sets of observations of this star. We fit two models –one empirical and one wind-shock-based –to the S XV , Si XIII , and Mg XI line comple x es and show that an origin in the wind flow, abo v e r ≈1.5 R ∗, is strongly fa v oured o v er an origin less than 0.3 R ∗abo v e the photosphere ( r 1.3 R ∗), especially in the more recent, very long-exposure data set. There is a modest increase in the line and continuum fluxes, line widths, wind absorption signatures, and of the hot plasma’s distance from the photosphere in the 18 yr since the first Chandra grating observation of ζPup. Both modes of modelling include the effects of dielectronic recombination satellite emission line blending on the helium-like comple x es –the first time this has been accounted for in the analysis of He-like line ratios in O stars.

Maurice A Leutenegger↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of NASA Gateway Lunar Dust Mitigation and Contamination Modeling and Analysis

The planned NASA Artemis campaign has several lunar surface missions in which the NASA Gateway is the waypoint between lunar orbit and the lunar surface for Human Lander System (HLS). Each of these missions is an opportunity for lunar dust to be introduced into the Gateway environment, post surface mission, potentially causing end of life (EOL) performance degradation due to lunar dust contamination of sensitive hardware and systems on the exterior of Gateway and Visiting Vehicles. The Gateway Systems Engineering and Integration (SE&I) and Induced Environments teams are addressing the challenge of lunar dust with a two-pronged approach. Characterization of the lunar dust induced environment around Gateway and contamination risk is accomplished with a comprehensive physics-based framework, the Gateway On-orbit Lunar Dust Modeling and Analysis Program (GOLDMAP), which is currently in development. Analysis results from GOLDMAP define Gateway-level induced environments requirements and are flowed to elements and subsystems. In parallel, a dust mitigation strategy is being developed with a focus on lunar dust protection, dust mitigation technologies, mitigation and testing guidance, and cross-program coordination and is informed by outputs from GOLDMAP analyses. Activities supporting both components include hardware susceptibility assessments and testing, and scientific experiments on lunar regolith.

Gateway↗