Civilian Nuclear Energy: Programmatic and Technical Achievements [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Results for “KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Finding of Effect, And Mitigation Documentation for Building 23-620, Mercury, Area 23, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) plans to demolish Building 23-620 in the town of Mercury (Nevada State Historic Preservation Office [SHPO] Resource No. B15283), which is on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) in Nye County, Nevada (see Figure 1). The purpose of the undertaking is related to the modernization of Mercury for future mission needs. The NNSA/NFO will implement this undertaking in accordance with the Programmatic Agreement between the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding Modernization and Operational Maintenance of the Nevada National Security Site, at Mercury in Nye County, Nevada, hereafter referred to as the Mercury PA. Building 23-620 was built in 1968 as office space for the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL), who worked on the design and engineering of nuclear weapons. In the 1990s, it became a maintenance facility for Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Company (REECo), and eventually, it became the Real Estate Services building in 2004. The town of Mercury and the immediate surrounding area have been formally determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register, NRHP) as the Mercury Historic District (MHD, SHPO Resource No. D230) under Criteria A and C for its importance in supporting nuclear testing and scientific research from 1951 through 1992. Building 23-620 was identified as a contributing element to the MHD in a 2018 architectural survey of the district (Reno et al.) and recorded on a Nevada Architectural Resource Assessment (ARA) form (Reno et al. 2017). Building 23-620 was also identified in Appendix C of the Mercury PA as a Category I contributing element, indicating that it might be individually eligible for the NRHP. It is a historic property for the purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and subject to the stipulations of the Mercury PA. Mitigation Report: The purpose of this letter report is to submit documentation related to the mitigation of the demolition of Building 23-620 (Nevada State Historic Preservation Office [SHPO] Resource No. B15283) in the Mercury Historic District (MHD, SHPO Resource No. D230). This submission is intended to comply with the stipulations in the Programmatic Agreement between the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer Regarding Modernization and Operational Maintenance of the Nevada National Security Site, at Mercury in Nye County, Nevada, hereafter referred to as the Mercury PA.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Evaluation of Building 23-620, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory J-3 Office, Nevada National Security Site, Nye County, Nevada
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) plans to demolish Building 23-620, the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) J-3 Office Building (Nevada State Historic Preservation Office [SHPO] Resource No. B15283) at the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) in Nye County, Nevada. The NNSA/NFO is implementing a long-term project to modernize the town of Mercury for future mission needs. The project is considered an undertaking subject to review under Title 54 of United States Code (USC) § 306108, commonly known as Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Title 54 USC § 300101, et seq., and its implementing regulations, Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (36 CFR) Part 800. In 2018, Desert Research Institute (DRI) completed an architectural survey of the town of Mercury. This effort resulted in the identification, recordation, and evaluation of the Mercury Historic District (MHD, SHPO Resource No. D230), including the identification of its contributing elements (Reno et al. 2018). The MHD was recommended eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP, National Register) under the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOI) Significance Criteria A and C, as defined in 36 CFR Part 60.4, as a significant concentration of buildings and structures with a direct and important association with Cold War-era nuclear testing from 1951 through 1992. It has not been evaluated under Criteria B and D to date. As part of a larger modernization program for Mercury, the NNSA/NFO and the SHPO executed the 2018 Programmatic Agreement between the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office and the Nevada State Historic Preservation Officer regarding Modernization and Operational Maintenance of the Nevada National Security Site, at Mercury in Nye County, Nevada (Mercury PA). The Mercury PA includes streamlined Section 106 procedures for undertakings in the MHD based on contributing element categories. Building 23-620 is identified in Appendix C of the Mercury PA as a Category I contributing element, indicating that it might be individually eligible for the NRHP. It is a historic property for the purposes of Section 106 compliance and subject to the stipulations of the Mercury PA. Per Stipulation VI of the Mercury PA, when the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for an undertaking includes Category I elements, the NNSA/NFO must evaluate the Category I elements for individual NRHP eligibility under all of the SOI Significance Criteria prior to initiating any activity that may affect the elements. The purpose of this report is to evaluate Building 23-620 as a potential individually eligible historic property in fulfillment of Stipulation VI of the Mercury PA. The evaluation detailed herein concludes that Building 23-620 is not individually eligible for listing in the NRHP. Although it retains aspects of integrity and continues to contribute to the MHD, it is not individually significant under any of the SOI Significance Criteria.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
P841-1 Procurement Quality Overview: Course #53500 [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
J. Robert Oppenheimer: Niels Bohr and Atomic Weapons
On May 18 th , 1964, J. Robert Oppenheimer made his last visit to Los Alamos, highlighted by a talk on Niels Bohr before a full house at the community’s civic auditorium and by an audio link to another full house sitting in the Laboratory’s main auditorium. Although recorded, his talk was not transcribed. Later, Oppenheimer sent a transcript to the Laboratory, which is reproduced below. His talk, of course, deviated from time-to-time from this written version. Unfortunately, the transcript was microfilmed, the original disappearing. Hence, all of Oppenheimer’s marginal notations and handwritten edits are unreadable. A poor quality recording is being converted to a modern format and will be available for listening.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
Nuclear Criticality Safety Pipeline Course - LLNL [Slides]
This presentation details the nuclear criticality safety pipeline course. An educational program from University of California, Berkeley. This course touches on nuclear criticality each fall semester. The curriculum instructs on the fundamentals of criticality safety and provides hands on experience with special nuclear material. This presentation covers lecture topics, project overview, and major criticality safety evaluation projects.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Expansion of the Verified, Archived, Library of Inputs and Data (VALID) [Slides]
This project dialogue provides an update on the Expansion of Verified, Archived, Library of Inputs and Data or VALID. VALID is a QA-Like (Quality Assurance) process to generate high quality models from reliable reference descriptions and make those models available to users. This presentation provides a brief project overview, a reminder of cases added in FY2021, cases currently in progress, and future plans for VALID.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
Nuclear Criticality Safety Repository, Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC), & NDA Program [Slides]
This lecture covers the Nuclear Criticality Safety Repository (NCSR), Radiation Safety Information Computational center (RSICC), and Non-destructive Assay (NDA) program. The lecture provides information on the Fiscal year of 2022 and various phases of the NCSR Program and NDA. Further background information is provided for the RSICC and operations summary.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
ISO TC85/SC5/WG8 “Nuclear Criticality Safety” Meeting [Slides]
This presentation is on meeting resolutions and agendas for the May 2022 Working Group 8 (WG8) Meeting.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
AMPX Developments in FY2022 [Slides]
This talk centers on AMPX developments in fiscal year of 2022. This presentation provides links to the open-source subset of SCALE, including AMPX. The discussion additionally provides an overview of GNDS support in AMPX. The presentation includes selected features on several SCALE versions and features.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
The Purpose of the DOE/NNSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Program Review [Slides]
This presentation touches on the purpose of the DOE/NNSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Program Review. This presentation also covers the background, history, mission, and vison of the organization. Slides include visual representations of the technical program element activities and the current NCSP work sites.
2022 Virtual NCSP TPR↗
ORNL NCSP FY 2022 Budget Summary and Highlights [Slides]
This presentation covers the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) fiscal year 2022 budget summary. This presentation includes charts and graphs on budget spending and spending details for the 2022 fiscal year.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
The meaning of the Terms “Credible” and “Unlikely” for Nuclear Criticality Safety Purposes [Slides]
This presentation explains the meaning of the terms “Credible” and “Unlikely” for nuclear criticality safety purposes. This presentation references several terminology resources. With a focused look into ANS-8.1 Terminology. The presentation concludes with a talk on safety culture and the formality of operations program (FOP).
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
ORNL NCSP Training and Education Support for FY2022 [Slides]
This presentation is on Oak Ridge National Labatory (ORNL) Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP) training and education support for Fiscal Year 2022. This lecture explains the approved training and education tasks for fiscal year 2022. Additional training developments for 2022 are covered.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
NCSP Related Nuclear Data Research at RPI [Slides]
This lecture is on NCSP related nuclear data research at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). This presentation includes an overview of fiscal year 2022 activity. Additionally, it has a talk on the RPI Nuclear Data (ND) Group Research, an update on Linear Accelerators (LINAC) refurbishment, and the Enhanced Thermal Target & Cold Moderator (ETTC) Target System.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
FY22 CritView Status & Database Expansion [Slides]
This presentation covers Fiscal Year FY22 CritView Status & Database Expansion. This presentation Provide an update for progress and current status related to the CritView digital handbook for FY22/FY23. The lecture also covers a budget summary, FY22 highlights, CritView overview, and future work for FY23.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
LANL Accident Analysis and Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling [Slides]
After completion of this course, the analyst will understand the differences between an unmitigated analysis and a mitigated analysis. After completion of this course, the analyst will know the key receptors that a radiological and hazardous chemical accident analysis must consider. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand how to calculate a radiological release source term and a toxic chemical release source term for various phenomenology. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand how to calculate a radiological and toxic chemical health insult to key receptors and compare to consequence thresholds. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand the role of atmospheric dispersion in radiological and toxic consequence calculations. After completion of this course, the analyst will understand atmospheric dispersion modeling and the inputs to and outputs from the MACCS/POSTMAX codes.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
NSRC Digital Collections National Security Research Center [Slides]
Abstract not provided.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗