Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “Handling Qualities”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 865 records · Page 48
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Frequency Domain Quasi Maximum Likelihood Identification of Low Order Aeroservoelastic Models from Flight-Test Data

Background and Motivation - Low Order Equivalent System (LOES) - From handling qualities analysis - Traditionally simplifying complex control law and plant - More easily understood form - Extend LOES to a complex model due to aeroelasticity - Maximum likelihood (Filter Error) System Identification - Z = H_loes (U + W) + V - There are a lot of parameters - Estimate noise parameters - Extra outputs mean extra parameters to estimate - Usually assume noise model to simplify - Output Error and Equation Error - Results in biased estimates of the parameters - Sensing flexible aircraft have many outputs - Quasi maximum likelihood exploits redundancy of outputs

Jeffrey Ouellette↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Dynamics and Controls (530)

AFRC Controls and Dynamics Branch - Research Areas: - Traditional GN&C - Classical and advanced control algorithms - Risk based approaches for safety critical applications - Integration of novel sensors and sensor fusion (FOSS, LIDAR, etc.) - Trajectory optimization and control - Flight/System Dynamics - Equations of Motion and integrated modeling of vehicles and vehicle systems - Unique and novel vehicle dynamics - Methods for extracting relevant vehicle dynamic information from flight data - Human and vehicle interfaces and interactions - Handling Qualities and Pilot-in-the-loop oscillations (PIO) predictions and design metrics - Ride quality research - Autonomy - Novel algorithms, sensors, and sensor fusion - Bounding risk for testing automated systems - Pilot/Operator interactions - Engineering Support and Airworthiness Assessments - Aircraft modifications and experimental configurations

Chris Miller↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Distributed Thrust Takeoff for the NASA X-57 Mod IV Flight Demonstrator

The Mod IV configuration of the X-57 flight demonstrator concept featured two forms of distributed electric propulsion—one cruise propulsor at each wingtip for primary propulsion that enabled favorable interaction with the wingtip vortex, and six high-lift propulsors distributed along the leading edge of each wing to enhance low-speed flight characteristics. The power system that fed these propulsors was arranged in two independent power buses. This unique arrangement did not lend itself to traditional “one engine inoperative” methods for determining performance after a critical failure in the propulsion system. Several potential failure scenarios were identified as potential “critical loss of thrust” events, and experiments that included pilot-in-the-loop simulation with the project test pilots were conducted to determine if these events would result in adequate handling and performance. Prior research showed that a total failure of one of the cruise motors during takeoff or initial climb could result in unacceptable performance for a traditional full-power takeoff. A new technique dubbed Distributed Thrust Takeoff (DiTTo) was developed to reduce the impact of the thrust asymmetry and total loss of thrust that could occur in any of the critical loss of thrust scenarios. The results showed that adequate performance and handling qualities could be achieved in each of the critical failure scenarios when using the DiTTo technique.

Distributed Propulsion, Electric Propulsion, Criti↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Distributed Thrust Takeoff for the NASA X-57 Mod IV Flight Demonstrator

The Mod IV configuration of the X-57 flight demonstrator concept featured two forms of distributed electric propulsion—one cruise propulsor at each wingtip for primary propulsion that enabled favorable interaction with the wingtip vortex, and six high-lift propulsors distributed along the leading edge of each wing to enhance low-speed flight characteristics. The power system that fed these propulsors was arranged in two independent power buses. This unique arrangement did not lend itself to traditional “one engine inoperative” methods for determining performance after a critical failure in the propulsion system. Several potential failure scenarios were identified as potential “critical loss of thrust” events, and experiments that included pilot-in-the-loop simulation with the project test pilots were conducted to determine if these events would result in adequate handling and performance. Prior research showed that a total failure of one of the cruise motors during takeoff or initial climb could result in unacceptable performance for a traditional full-power takeoff. A new technique dubbed Distributed Thrust Takeoff (DiTTo) was developed to reduce the impact of the thrust asymmetry and total loss of thrust that could occur in any of the critical loss of thrust scenarios. The results showed that adequate performance and handling qualities could be achieved in each of the critical failure scenarios when using the DiTTo technique.

Distributed Propulsion↗
NASA NTRS2002

Navigation Algorithms for the SeaWiFS Mission

The navigation algorithms for the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) were designed to meet the requirement of 1-pixel accuracy-a standard deviation (sigma) of 2. The objective has been to extract the best possible accuracy from the spacecraft telemetry and avoid the need for costly manual renavigation or geometric rectification. The requirement is addressed by postprocessing of both the Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver and Attitude Control System (ACS) data in the spacecraft telemetry stream. The navigation algorithms described are separated into four areas: orbit processing, attitude sensor processing, attitude determination, and final navigation processing. There has been substantial modification during the mission of the attitude determination and attitude sensor processing algorithms. For the former, the basic approach was completely changed during the first year of the mission, from a single-frame deterministic method to a Kalman smoother. This was done for several reasons: a) to improve the overall accuracy of the attitude determination, particularly near the sub-solar point; b) to reduce discontinuities; c) to support the single-ACS-string spacecraft operation that was started after the first mission year, which causes gaps in attitude sensor coverage; and d) to handle data quality problems (which became evident after launch) in the direct-broadcast data. The changes to the attitude sensor processing algorithms primarily involved the development of a model for the Earth horizon height, also needed for single-string operation; the incorporation of improved sensor calibration data; and improved data quality checking and smoothing to handle the data quality issues. The attitude sensor alignments have also been revised multiple times, generally in conjunction with the other changes. The orbit and final navigation processing algorithms have remained largely unchanged during the mission, aside from refinements to data quality checking. Although further improvements are certainly possible, future evolution of the algorithms is expected to be limited to refinements of the methods presented here, and no substantial changes are anticipated.

Hooker, Stanford B.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

VTOL Analysis for Emergency Response Applications (VAERA) - Identifying Technology Gaps for Wildfire Relief Rotorcraft Missions

The mission of VAERA (VTOL Analysis for Emergency Response Applications) is to enable the design, development, and analysis of emergency response rotorcraft for different disaster scenarios. The project’s current focus is on improving crewed and uncrewed rotorcraft for wildfire relief efforts. This paper presents background information on the current state of the art for wildfire-fighting crewed and uncrewed rotorcraft, current wildfire operations, handling and flying qualities considerations of similar vehicles, and the limitations of uncrewed sub-1000 lb commercial off the shelf (COTS) rotorcraft that could be (and sometimes are) used for different wildfire missions. Technology gaps that are currently limiting rotorcraft firefighting capabilities are identified using the background information, and a plan of how to address each of the identified technology gaps is presented. In this paper, the key technology gaps identified for rotorcraft in the wildfire environment include: poor performance and handling/flying qualities, inadequate or nonexistent categorization of handling qualities, unvalidated flight dynamics turbulence modeling approaches, and inadequate subsystems for wildfire missions. While numerous concerns for rotorcraft operating in the wildfire environment exist, this paper focuses on those issues that are either not being addressed by others, or that require more attention. The goals of this paper are to both educate the public on critical technology gaps for wildfire-fighting rotorcraft that have not gained significant traction in the public domain, and to explain the work required to address those technology gaps.

VTOL↗
NASA NTRS1991

Use of piloted simulation for high-angle-of-attack agility research and design criteria development

This paper reviews the use of piloted simulation at Langley Research Center as part of the NASA High-Angle-of-Attack Technology Program (HAATP) program to provide methods and concepts for the design of advanced fighter aircraft. A major focus of this program is to develop the design process required to fully exploit the benefits from advanced control concept for high-angle-of-attack agility. Important methodologies associated with the effective us of piloted simulation of the research are described, particularly those relating to the test techniques, validation of the test results, and design guidelines/criteria development.

Angle of attack↗
NASA NTRS2003

XV-15 Tiltrotor Aircraft: 1999 Acoustic Testing - Test Report

An XV-15 acoustic test is discussed, and measured results are presented. The test was conducted by NASA Langley and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., during October 1999, at the BHTI test site near Waxahachie, Texas. As part of the NASA-sponsored Short Haul Civil Tiltrotor noise reduction initiative, this was the third in a series of three major XV-15 acoustic tests. Their purpose was to document the acoustic signature of the XV-15 tiltrotor aircraft for a variety of flight conditions and to minimize the noise signature during approach. Tradeoffs between flight procedures and the measured noise are presented to illustrate the noise abatement flight procedures. The test objectives were to support operation of future tiltrotors by further developing and demonstrating low-noise flight profiles, while maintaining acceptable handling and ride qualities, and refine approach profiles, selected from previous (1995 & 1997) tiltrotor testing, to incorporate Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), handling qualities constraints, operations and tradeoffs with sound. Primary emphasis was given to the approach flight conditions where blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise dominates, because this condition influences community noise impact more than any other. An understanding of this part of the noise generating process could guide the development of low noise flight operations and increase the tiltrotor's acceptance in the community.

Edwards, Bryan D.↗
NASA NTRS2003

XV-15 Tiltrotor Aircraft: 1997 Acoustic Testing

XV-15 acoustic test is discussed, and measured results are presented. The test was conducted by NASA Langley and Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., during June - July 1997, at the BHTI test site near Waxahachie, Texas. This was the second in a series of three XV-15 tests to document the acoustic signature of the XV-15 tiltrotor aircraft for a variety of flight conditions and minimize the noise signature during approach. Tradeoffs between flight procedures and the measured noise are presented to illustrate the noise abatement flight procedures. The test objectives were to: (1) support operation of future tiltrotors by further developing and demonstrating low-noise flight profiles, while maintaining acceptable handling and ride qualities, and (2) refine approach profiles, selected from previous (1995) tiltrotor testing, to incorporate Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), handling qualities constraints, operations and tradeoffs with sound. Primary emphasis was given to the approach flight conditions where blade-vortex interaction (BVI) noise dominates, because this condition influences community noise impact more than any other. An understanding of this part of the noise generating process could guide the development of low noise flight operations and increase the tiltrotor's acceptance in the community.

Edwards, Bryan D.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Archive data base and handling system for the Orbiter flying qualities experiment program

The OFQ archives data base and handling system assembled as part of the Orbiter Flying Qualities (OFQ) research of the Orbiter Experiments Program (EOX) are described. The purpose of the OFQ archives is to preserve and document shuttle flight data relevant to vehicle dynamics, flight control, and flying qualities in a form that permits maximum use for qualified users. In their complete form, the OFQ archives contain descriptive text (general information about the flight, signal descriptions and units) as well as numerical time history data. Since the shuttle program is so complex, the official data base contains thousands of signals and very complex entries are required to obtain data. The OFQ archives are intended to provide flight phase oriented data subsets with relevant signals which are easily identified for flying qualities research.

Myers, T. T.↗
NASA NTRS1966

Conference on V/STOL and STOL aircraft

This compilation contains results of recent NASA research on problems associated with V/STOL and STOL aircraft. The first three sections include papers presented at the NASA Conference on V/STOL and STOL Aircraft held at the Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, on April 4 and 5, 1966. The fourth section presents three additional papers on research testing techniques that are par­ticularly pertinent to the subject matter, but were not presented orally at the conference. Contributors include staff members from the Ames and Langley Research Centers of NASA and industrial representatives from Lockheed Aircraft Corporation; Ling-Temco-Vought, Incorporated; and The Boeing Company.

STOL AIRCRAFT↗
NASA NTRS1973

Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Manual Control

Papers are reported which were presented at the conference in the areas of displays, ride qualities and handling, driving and psychomotor skills, control, system identification and signal detection, electrophysiological and systems analysis, and modelling.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2008

Improved Thermal Design of a Compression Mold

A compression tool used to make 1-in. (2.5-cm) diameter disks of high-temperature polymers was designed to be shorter and of larger diameter than conventional tools to reduce heat loss to the surrounding air, thus making more efficient use of applied heat. This system is less sensitive to the amount and quality of insulation than previous tools, provides more repeatable processing, and improves the quality of the samples produced. These improvements come without increasing the weight of the punch portion of the tool over that of a conventional version, an important quality when handling lower-viscosity resins. In use, the base and body of the tool are assembled, and the polymer to be processed is placed into the body of the tool. The punch is inserted, and the assembled tool is placed into the press. A temperature/ pressure profile appropriate to the nature of the polymer is applied. A series of computational and experimental runs were made using a conventional tool to validate the computational model. The new tool design was then modeled, and when the performance showed a marked improvement, the new tool was manufactured. A new series of experimental runs showed that the thermal performance of the new tool agreed well with model predictions.

Kuczmarski, Maria A.↗