SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This submission includes maps of the spatial distribution of basaltic, and felsic rocks in the Oregon Cascades. It also includes a final Play Fairway Analysis (PFA) model, with the heat and permeability composite risk segments (CRS) supplied separately. Metadata for each raster dataset can be found within the zip files, in the TIF images
The submission includes the labeled datasets, as ESRI Grid files (.gri, .grd) used for training and classification results for our machine leaning model: - brady_som_output.gri, brady_som_output.grd, brady_som_output.* - desert_som_output.gri, desert_som_output.grd, desert_som_output.* The data corresponds to two sites: Brady Hot Springs and Desert Peak, both located near Fallon, NV. Input layers include: - Geothermal: Labeled data (0: Non-geothermal; 1: Geothermal) - Minerals: Hydrothermal mineral alterations, as a result of spectral analysis using Chalcedony, Kaolinite, Gypsum, Hematite and Epsomite - Temperature: Land surface temperature (% of times a pixel was classified as "Hot" by K-Means) - Faults: Fault density with a 300mradius - Subsidence: PSInSAR results showing subsidence displacement of more than 5mm - Uplift: PSInSAR results showing subsidence displacement of more than 5mm Also, the results of the classification using Brady and Desert Peak to build 2 Convolutional Neural Networks. These were applied to the training site as well as the other site, the results are in GeoTiff format. - brady_classification: Results of classification of the Brady-trained model - desert_classification: Results of classification of the Desert Peak-trained model - b2d_classification: Results of classification of Desert Peak using the Brady-trained model - d2b_classification: Results of classification of Brady using the Desert Peak-trained model
The presence or absence of leaves within plant canopies exert a strong influence on the carbon, water and energy balance of ecosystems. Identifying key changes in the timing of leaf elongation and senescence during the year can help to understand the sensitivity of different plant functional types to changes in temperature. When recorded over many years these data can provide information on the response of ecosystems to long-term changes in climate. The installation of digital cameras that take images at regular intervals of plant canopies across the Integrated Carbon Observation System ecosystem stations will provide a reliable and important record of variations in canopy state, colour and the timing of key phenological events. In this paper, we detail the procedure for the implementation of cameras on Integrated Carbon Observation System flux towers and how these images will help us understand the impact of leaf phenology and ecosystem function, distinguish changes in canopy structure from leaf physiology and at larger scales will assist in the validation of (future) remote sensing products. These data will help us improve the representation of phenological responses to climatic variability across Integrated Carbon Observation System stations and the terrestrial biosphere through the improvement of model algorithms and the provision of validation datasets.
Complete dataset from wave tank testing for the Delos-Reyes Morrow Pressure Device (DMP), commercialized by M3 Wave LLC as "APEX". Subdirectories include Readme files where appropriate to aid in navigation.
Current data from the AFDC provide locations and many details about EV charging stations, but not estimates of their peak loads or the number of vehicles they can accommodate. This dataset will augment the AFDC charging station locations with estimates of transmission load and vehicle throughput based on engineering specifications of the chargers, charging patterns based on vehicle types, battery capacities, and user behavior.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
This dataset contains telemetry data from the 220EV box truck as provided by the manufacturer, Dana. Data are recorded in a time series interval of 1 second. Recorded data contain odometer reading (kilometers), axle speed, state of charge of the battery, and cabin heater setting.
For more than 20 years, Argonne National Laboratory’s Vehicle & Mobility Systems Department has assessed how R&D investments by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Transportation Technologies Office and Alternative Fuels and Feedstocks Office affect vehicle energy use and cost. The analyses are performed using Autonomie, Argonne’s full-vehicle simulation tool for energy consumption, performance, and cost. The study covers five time frames ranging from present day through 2050, with more than 30 vehicle classes and applications (10 light duty and >20 medium and heavy duty), as well as six powertrain configurations (conventional, start-stop, hybrid electric vehicle, plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, battery-electric vehicle, and fuel cell electric vehicle) and five fuels (gasoline, diesel, natural gas, hydrogen, and electricity). Low and high technology uncertainty scenarios have been considered to capture a realistic range of outcomes. The resulting datasets include the assumptions used (i.e., efficiency, $/kWh), vehicle-level data (power, energy, weight, and cost), and outputs such as energy consumption, manufacturer’s suggested retail price, and total cost of ownership. These data are critical to stakeholders working in transportation, technology assessment, and long-term R&D planning.
Understanding how new vehicle technologies affect fuel economy and energy use is critical to the regulatory work performed by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which sets Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975. In order to support this work, Argonne National Laboratory uses Autonomie, a full-vehicle simulation tool, to evaluate advanced powertrain architectures and their effects on vehicle energy consumption and performance. A wide range of vehicle classes has been assessed (i.e., internal combustion engine vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery-electric vehicles, and fuel cell electric vehicles), as well as the effects of various technology improvements such as lightweighting, aerodynamic refinements, and low-rolling-resistance tires. Simulations have been run across multiple drive cycles to capture fuel and electricity use under realistic operating conditions. The resulting datasets include detailed vehicle-level results, model assumptions, and validation reports, all of which have been made publicly available through NHTSA in support of the 2023 notice of proposed rulemaking covering light-duty vehicles for model years 2027 to 2035. These data are critical to stakeholders working in fuel economy regulation, vehicle technology assessment, and energy policy analysis.