Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WASTES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2013

Emissions from US waste collection vehicles

Highlights: ► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. - Abstract: This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential alternative fuel technologies for waste collection vehicles. Life-cycle emissions, cost, fuel and energy consumption were evaluated for a wide range of fossil and bio-fuel technologies. Emission factors were calculated for a typical waste collection driving cycle as well as constant speed. In brief, natural gas waste collection vehicles (compressed and liquid) fueled with North-American natural gas had 6–10% higher well-to-wheel (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to diesel-fueled vehicles; however the pump-to-wheel (PTW) GHG emissions of natural gas waste collection vehicles averaged 6% less than diesel-fueled vehicles. Landfill gas had about 80% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel. Biodiesel waste collection vehicles had between 12% and 75% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel depending on the fuel source and the blend. In 2011, natural gas waste collection vehicles had the lowest fuel cost per collection vehicle kilometer travel. Finally, the actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles consists of repetitive stops and starts during waste collection; this generates more emissions than constant speed driving.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Carbon pools and flows during lab-scale degradation of old landfilled waste under different oxygen and water regimes

Graphical abstract: Display Omitted - Highlights: • 40 year old waste from an old MSW landfill was incubated in LSR experiments. • Carbon balances for anaerobic and aerobic waste degradation were established. • The transformation of carbon pools during waste degradation was investigated. • Waste aeration resulted in the formation of a new, stable organic carbon pool. • Water addition did not have a significant effect on aerobic waste degradation. - Abstract: Landfill aeration has been proven to accelerate the degradation of organic matter in landfills in comparison to anaerobic decomposition. The present study aims to evaluate pools of organic matter decomposing under aerobic and anaerobic conditions using landfill simulation reactors (LSR) filled with 40 year old waste from a former MSW landfill. The LSR were operated for 27 months, whereby the waste in one pair was kept under anaerobic conditions and the four other LSRs were aerated. Two of the aerated LSR were run with leachate recirculation and water addition and two without. The organic carbon in the solid waste was characterized at the beginning and at the end of the experiments and major carbon flows (e.g. TOC in leachate, gaseous CO{sub 2} and CH{sub 4}) were monitored during operation. After the termination of the experiments, the waste from the anaerobic LSRs exhibited a long-term gas production potential of more than 20 NL kg{sup −1} dry waste, which corresponded to the mineralization of around 12% of the initial TOC (67 g kg{sup −1} dry waste). Compared to that, aeration led to threefold decrease in TOC (32–36% of the initial TOC were mineralized), without apparent differences in carbon discharge between the aerobic set ups with and without water addition. Based on the investigation of the carbon pools it could be demonstrated that a bit more than 10% of the initially present organic carbon was transformed into more recalcitrant forms, presumably due to the formation of humic substances. The source of anaerobic degradation could be identified mainly as cellulose which played a minor role during aerobic degradation in the experiment.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Source segregation and food waste prevention activities in high-density households in a deprived urban area

Highlights: • Study of waste management in economically and socially deprived high-density housing. • Food waste segregation, prevention and recycling activities investigated. • Study involved a waste audit and household survey of 1034 households. • Populations in such areas are “hard-to-reach”. • Exceptional efforts and additional resources are required to improve performance. - Abstract: A waste audit and a household questionnaire survey were conducted in high-density housing estates in one of the most economically and socially deprived areas of England (Haringey, London). Such areas are under-represented in published research. The study examined source segregation, potential participation in a food waste segregation scheme, and food waste prevention activities in five estates (1034 households). The results showed that: contamination of recyclables containers was low; ca. 28% of the mixed residual waste’s weight was recyclable; food waste comprised a small proportion of the waste from these residents, probably because of their relatively disadvantaged economic circumstances; and the recycling profile reflected an intermittent pattern of behaviour. Although the majority of respondents reported that they would participate in a food waste separation scheme, the response rate was low and many responses of “don’t know” were recorded. Municipalities committed to foster improved diversion from landfill need to recognise that there is no “quick and easy fix”, regardless of local or national aspirations. Lasting and sustained behaviour change requires time and the quality of service provision and associated infrastructure play a fundamental role in facilitating residents to participate effectively in waste management activities that maximise capture of source-segregated materials. Populations in deprived areas that reside in high-rise, high-density dwellings are “hard-to-reach” in terms of participation in recycling schemes and exceptional efforts and additional resources are usually required to improve performance.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

Nevada National Security Site Waste Acceptance Criteria

This document establishes the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO), Nevada National Security Site Waste Acceptance Criteria (NNSSWAC). The NNSSWAC provides the requirements, terms, and conditions under which the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) will accept the following: • DOE hazardous and non-hazardous non-radioactive classified waste • DOE low-level radioactive waste (LLW) • DOE mixed low-level waste (MLLW) • U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) classified waste The LLW and MLLW listed above may also be classified waste. Classified waste is the only waste accepted for disposal that may be non-radioactive and shall be required to meet the waste acceptance criteria for radioactive waste as specified in this document. Classified waste may be sent to the NNSS as classified matter. Section 3.1.18 provides the requirements that must be met for permanent burial of classified matter. The NNSA/NFO and support contractors are available to assist the generator in understanding or interpreting this document. For assistance, please call the NNSA/NFO Environmental Management Operations (EMO) at (702) 295-7063, and the call will be directed to the appropriate contact.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Low Activity Waste Feed Solids Characterization and Filterability Tests

The primary treatment of the tank waste at the DOE Hanford site will be done in the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) that is currently under construction. The baseline plan for the WTP Pretreatment facility is to treat the waste, splitting it into High Level Waste (HLW) feed and Low Activity Waste (LAW) feed. Both waste streams are then separately vitrified as glass and sealed in canisters. The LAW glass will be disposed onsite in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). There are currently no plans to treat the waste to remove technetium in the WTP Pretreatment facility, so its disposition path is the LAW glass. Options are being explored to immobilize the LAW portion of the tank waste, i.e., the LAW feed from the WTP Pretreatment facility. Removal of 99 Tc from the LAW Feed, followed by off-site disposal of the 99 Tc, would eliminate a key risk contributor for the IDF Performance Assessment (PA) for supplemental waste forms, and has potential to reduce treatment and disposal costs. Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) is developing some conceptual flow sheets for LAW treatment and disposal that could benefit from technetium removal. One of these flow-sheets will specifically examine removing 99 Tc from the LAW feed stream to supplemental immobilization. The conceptual flow sheet of the 99 Tc removal process includes a filter to remove insoluble solids prior to processing the stream in an ion exchange column, but the characteristics and behavior of the liquid and solid phases has not previously been investigated. This report contains results of testing of a simulant that represents the projected composition of the feed to the Supplemental LAW process. This feed composition is not identical to the aqueous tank waste fed to the Waste Treatment Plant because it has been processed through WTP Pretreatment facility and therefore contains internal changes and recycle streams that will be generated within the WTP process. Although a Supplemental LAW feed simulant has previously been prepared, this feed composition differs from that simulant because those tests examined only the fully soluble aqueous solution at room temperature, not the composition formed after evaporation, including the insoluble solids that precipitate after it cools. The conceptual flow sheet for Supplemental LAW immobilization has an option for removal of 99 Tc from the feed stream, if needed. Elutable ion exchange has been selected for that process. If implemented, the stream would need filtration to remove the insoluble solids prior to processing in an ion exchange column. The characteristics, chemical speciation, physical properties, and filterability of the solids are important to judge the feasibility of the concept, and to estimate the size and cost of a facility.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Chemical Disposition of Plutonium in Hanford Site Tank Wastes

This report examines the chemical disposition of plutonium (Pu) in Hanford Site tank wastes, by itself and in its observed and potential interactions with the neutron absorbers aluminum (Al), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and sodium (Na). Consideration also is given to the interactions of plutonium with uranium (U). No consideration of the disposition of uranium itself as an element with fissile isotopes is considered except tangentially with respect to its interaction as an absorber for plutonium. The report begins with a brief review of Hanford Site plutonium processes, examining the various means used to recover plutonium from irradiated fuel and from scrap, and also examines the intermediate processing of plutonium to prepare useful chemical forms. The paper provides an overview of Hanford tank defined-waste–type compositions and some calculations of the ratios of plutonium to absorber elements in these waste types and in individual waste analyses. These assessments are based on Hanford tank waste inventory data derived from separately published, expert assessments of tank disposal records, process flowsheets, and chemical/radiochemical analyses. This work also investigates the distribution and expected speciation of plutonium in tank waste solution and solid phases. For the solid phases, both pure plutonium compounds and plutonium interactions with absorber elements are considered. These assessments of plutonium chemistry are based largely on analyses of idealized or simulated tank waste or strongly alkaline systems. The very limited information available on plutonium behavior, disposition, and speciation in genuine tank waste also is discussed. The assessments show that plutonium coprecipitates strongly with chromium, iron, manganese and uranium absorbers. Plutonium’s chemical interactions with aluminum, nickel, and sodium are minimal to non-existent. Credit for neutronic interaction of plutonium with these absorbers occurs only if they are physically proximal in solution or the plutonium present in the solid phase is intimately mixed with compounds or solutions of these absorbers. No information on the potential chemical interaction of plutonium with cadmium was found in the technical literature. Definitive evidence of sorption or adsorption of plutonium onto various solid phases from strongly alkaline media is less clear-cut, perhaps owing to fewer studies and to some well-attributed tests run under conditions exceeding the very low solubility of plutonium. The several studies that are well-founded show that only about half of the plutonium is adsorbed from waste solutions onto sludge solid phases. The organic complexants found in many Hanford tank waste solutions seem to decrease plutonium uptake onto solids. A number of studies show plutonium sorbs effectively onto sodium titanate. Finally, this report presents findings describing the behavior of plutonium vis-à-vis other elements during sludge dissolution in nitric acid based on Hanford tank waste experience gained by lab-scale tests, chemical and radiochemical sample characterization, and full-scale processing in preparation for strontium-90 recovery from PUREX sludges.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Measuring, Cutting and Sorting Irradiated Control Rods to Limit the Volume of Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste - 17001

During operation, the PWR control rods are either completely extracted (scram or safety rods) or partially inserted in the operating zone of the core (fine control or operating rods). At the nominal rating conditions or close to them, the operating zone is limited to some steps of insertion in the order of a few tens of cm. In fact, only the lower part of the control rods are subjected to a significant neutron flux with an impact on the neutron activation and so on the waste classification (Low Level Short-lived Waste versus Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste). Our calculative as well as experimental experience confirms the significant presence of radionuclides in the control rods, but only in the lower parts. Measuring, cutting and finally sorting control rod scraps can reduce the volume of Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste planned for our storage deposit facility. This paper presents the EDF/DP2D methodologies followed to determine the sort criteria between the Low Level Short-lived Waste versus the Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste zones for the Silver-Indium-Cadmium control rods. The irradiated control rods are stored in cases without their head. Each case can contain several control rods, and the cases are stored under water in the fuel assembly pool. To calculate the radioactive inventories, we have developed a calculation scheme which is composed of a 3-dimensional mapping of the neutron flux, a calculation of the evolution of the isotopic compositions under neutron flux and finally a comparison between calculated and measured values. The main hypotheses of the control rods calculation take into account: - 3-dimensional geometry and 3-dimensional neutron sources distribution, - the isotopic compositions including impurities, - the history of irradiation resulting mainly from the daily power production, the positions of the control rods in the loading patterns and the positions in the axial operating zone. In order to validate the calculations, measurements were made 20 meters under water in the fuel assembly pool. The experimental results show the presence of many gamma emitter radionuclides. Only Ag-108m was retained for validating the calculations. This is due to the fact that silver is considered as the 'standard' chemical element for our control rods and silver produces Ag-108m which is a long-lived gamma emitter radionuclide. The analysis of the calculated results and the measured values allow us to build a simplified physics model for the simulation of the control rods activation. Finally three sort criteria can be proposed: - Without measurement devices, the sorting is based on an empirical sort criterion. Cuttings must then be made on the 2 back-ends of the control rod pins. This option is due to the difficulty in knowing the orientation of the pins in the storage cases. The cutting lines are placed at approximately 1 m from the 2 back-ends of the pins. This approach does not allow a great optimization of the sorting, less than 50% of the length of the control rods can be saved from Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste storage. - With a simple dose rate measurement device, the knowledge of the orientation of the pins in the storage cases allows us to limit cuttings to the lower part of the control rods. Depending on the 'top to tail' cases, between approximately 50% and 75% of the length of the control rods can be saved from Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste storage. - With an accurate measurement device, the sorting can be based on a specific activity of Ag-108m. Over 4400 Bq/g of Ag-108m (corresponding to the Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste limit), the control rod pieces can be considered as a long-lived waste. The measurements must be made over the 2 back-ends of control rod pins to examine the cases of 'top to tail' storage. This approach allows a great optimization of the sorting. Depending on the history of irradiation, more than 75% of the length of the control rods can be saved from Intermediate Level Long-lived Waste storage. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Test for Reconditioning RA Waste with Simulated Bitumen and Concrete in a 1,2 MW Plasma Test Facility - 20092

The operation and maintenance of nuclear power plants, the non nuclear fuel cycle, etc generate low-level radioactive waste which, along with the historical radioactive waste from past nuclear activities, needs to be treated and stored, awaiting final disposal. Plasma technology offers a very effective way of treating this waste with a high volume reduction factor (VRF), free from organics, liquids and moisture, and meets without a doubt the acceptance criteria for safe storage and disposal. By means of a plasma beam of approximately 5000 deg. C, the inorganic materials are melted into a glassy slag, containing most of the radioactive isotopes while the organic material is gasified, oxidized and purified in an off-gas cleaning system. First the paper describes the new full-scale Plasma Melting Facility (PMF) at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant in Bulgaria which was taken in nuclear operation In May 2018. The plant has a capacity of 250 tons per year and the maximum contact dose rates of the incoming waste is 2 mSv/h. Different mixtures of radioactive waste packed in 200 l drums were successfully treated resulting in a glassy slag free from liquids and organic material with an important volume reduction factor (VRF). The Project was co-financed through a grant by Kozloduy International Decommissioning fund (KIDSF) administrated by the EBRD through Bulgarian national funding. Plasma is a suitable technology for treatment of problematic waste or even reconditioning waste so Belgoprocess was contracted to do plasma tests with simulated conditioned waste types. One can do tests on a laboratory scale on smaller samples and torch capacities of e.g. 50 kW but Belgoprocess wanted to do more realistic and reliable tests. So Belgoprocess contracted Phoenix Solutions Co who has a full-scope test facility equipped with a 1200 kW plasma torch for full-scope treatment of simulated conditioned waste. For a first confidential contract simulated 200 l (55 gallon) bitumen drums were treated. The drums contained different pucks of compacted waste such as rags, used filters, granulates, etc. The pucks were stacked in the 200 l drums and subsequently embedded with bitumen. A total of 6 drums were treated in the plasma facility. For a second contract simulated homogeneous 200 l (55 gallon) concrete drums with on the one hand concentrates and on the other hand spent resins were selected. A total of 6 drums with concrete and spent resins were treated and melted in the plasma testing facility. The paper describe the test facility, volume reduction factor (VRF) of different waste streams and most important parameters. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Life cycle costing of waste management systems: Overview, calculation principles and case studies

Highlights: • We propose a comprehensive model for cost assessment of waste management systems. • The model includes three types of LCC: Conventional, Environmental and Societal LCCs. • The applicability of the proposed model is tested with two case studies. - Abstract: This paper provides a detailed and comprehensive cost model for the economic assessment of solid waste management systems. The model was based on the principles of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and followed a bottom-up calculation approach providing detailed cost items for all key technologies within modern waste systems. All technologies were defined per tonne of waste input, and each cost item within a technology was characterised by both a technical and an economic parameter (for example amount and cost of fuel related to waste collection), to ensure transparency, applicability and reproducibility. Cost items were classified as: (1) budget costs, (2) transfers (for example taxes, subsidies and fees) and (3) externality costs (for example damage or abatement costs related to emissions and disamenities). Technology costs were obtained as the sum of all cost items (of the same type) within a specific technology, while scenario costs were the sum of all technologies involved in a scenario. The cost model allows for the completion of three types of LCC: a Conventional LCC, for the assessment of financial costs, an Environmental LCC, for the assessment of financial costs whose results are complemented by a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for the same system, and a Societal LCC, for socio-economic assessments. Conventional and Environmental LCCs includes budget costs and transfers, while Societal LCCs includes budget and externality costs. Critical aspects were found in the existing literature regarding the cost assessment of waste management, namely system boundary equivalency, accounting for temporally distributed emissions and impacts, inclusions of transfers, the internalisation of environmental impacts and the coverage of shadow prices, and there was also significant confusion regarding terminology. The presented cost model was implemented in two case study scenarios assessing the costs involved in the source segregation of organic waste from 100,000 Danish households and the subsequent co-digestion of organic waste with animal manure. Overall, source segregation resulted in higher financial costs than the alternative of incinerating the organic waste with the residual waste: 1.6 M€/year, of which 0.9 M€/year was costs for extra bins and bags used by the households, 1.0 M€/year for extra collections and −0.3 M€/year saved on incineration.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2015

Is bigger better? An empirical analysis of waste management in New South Wales

Highlights: • We search for the most efficient cost structure for NSW household waste services. • We found that larger services are no longer efficient. • We found an optimal size for the range 12,000–20,000 inhabitants. • We found significant economies of output density for household waste collection. • We found economies of scope in joint provision of unsorted and recycling services. - Abstract: Across the world, rising demand for municipal solid waste services has seen an ongoing increase in the costs of providing these services. Moreover, municipal waste services have typically been provided through natural or legal monopolies, where few incentives exist to reduce costs. It is thus vital to examine empirically the cost structure of these services in order to develop effective public policies which can make these services more cost efficient. Accordingly, this paper considers economies of size and economies of output density in the municipal waste collection sector in the New South Wales (NSW) local government system in an effort to identify the optimal size of utilities from the perspective of cost efficiency. Our results show that – as presently constituted – NSW municipal waste services are not efficient in terms of costs, thereby demonstrating that ‘bigger is not better.’ The optimal size of waste utilities is estimated to fall in the range 12,000–20,000 inhabitants. However, significant economies of output density for unsorted (residual) municipal waste collection and recycling waste collection were found, which means it is advantageous to increase the amount of waste collected, but maintaining constant the number of customers and the intervention area.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

International Approaches for Nuclear Waste Disposal in Geological Formations: Report on Fifth Worldwide Review

An important issue for present and future generations is the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel. Over the past over forty years, the development of technologies to isolate both spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other high-level nuclear waste (HLW) generated at nuclear power plants and from production of defense materials, and low- and intermediate-level nuclear waste (LILW) in underground rock and sediments has been found to be a challenging undertaking. Finding an appropriate solution for the disposal of nuclear waste is an important issue for protection of the environment and public health, and it is a prerequisite for the future of nuclear power. The purpose of a deep geological repository for nuclear waste is to provide to future generations, protection against any harmful release of radioactive material, even after the memory of the repository may have been lost, and regardless of the technical knowledge of future generations. The results of a wide variety of investigations on the development of technology for radioactive waste isolation from 19 countries were published in the First Worldwide Review in 1991 (Witherspoon, 1991). The results of investigations from 26 countries were published in the Second Worldwide Review in 1996 (Witherspoon, 1996). The results from 32 countries were summarized in the Third Worldwide Review in 2001 (Witherspoon and Bodvarsson, 2001). The last compilation had results from 24 countries assembled in the Fourth Worldwide Review (WWR) on radioactive waste isolation (Witherspoon and Bodvarsson, 2006). Since publication of the last report in 2006, radioactive waste disposal approaches have continued to evolve, and there have been major developments in a number of national geological disposal programs. Significant experience has been obtained both in preparing and reviewing cases for the operational and long-term safety of proposed and operating repositories. Disposal of radioactive waste is a complex issue, not only because of the nature of the waste, but also because of the detailed regulatory structure for dealing with radioactive waste, the variety of stakeholders involved, and (in some cases) the number of regulatory entities involved.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2013

Development of an Integrated Raman and Turbidity Fiber Optic Sensor for the In-Situ Analysis of High Level Nuclear Waste - 13532

Stored nuclear waste must be retrieved from storage, treated, separated into low- and high-level waste streams, and finally put into a disposal form that effectively encapsulates the waste and isolates it from the environment for a long period of time. Before waste retrieval can be done, waste composition needs to be characterized so that proper safety precautions can be implemented during the retrieval process. In addition, there is a need for active monitoring of the dynamic chemistry of the waste during storage since the waste composition can become highly corrosive. This work describes the development of a novel, integrated fiber optic Raman and light scattering probe for in situ use in nuclear waste solutions. The dual Raman and turbidity sensor provides simultaneous chemical identification of nuclear waste as well as information concerning the suspended particles in the waste using a common laser excitation source. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Maintaining department of energy (DOE) waste disposition pathways in today's uncertain budgetary environment - 15129

For many years the Department of Energy (DOE) and its prime contractors have worked collaboratively with commercial waste transportation, treatment, and disposal providers to develop and implement outlets for the efficient management and disposition of radioactive wastes, particularly 'no-path-forward' or 'difficult-to-treat' wastes. Both the DOE and commercial providers have made substantial investments to develop capabilities and infrastructure to address these wastes and both have benefited from this collaboration. For example, DOE realized significant cost savings and avoidances when a commercial facility became available that allowed closure of the TSCA incinerator in Oak Ridge or when commercial capabilities were expanded that precluded the need to build a new Hanford M-91 waste treatment facility, estimated at $540 million for design, permitting, and construction. In addition, expanded capabilities developed at commercial facilities ensured a known, if not guaranteed, source for managing waste and improving efficiencies for wastes which previously had no viable disposition outlet or that required extended schedules and cost for completion. Such wastes include sodium- and mercury-bearing wastes, classified shapes, or many forms of suspect transuranic (TRU) wastes. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

New Formulation of Cast Stone for {sup 99}Tc Immobilization in Sulfate Rich Secondary Waste Stream - 16098

A low-temperature, cementitious waste form called Cast Stone (or grout) has been selected for solidification of the Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF)-treated wastes at the Hanford Site. Because the waste stream to be solidified may be relatively high in sulfate, the current Cast Stone dry blend formulation with ordinary Portland cement (OPC), fly ash (FA), and blast furnace slag (BFS) (47% BFS, 45% FA, and 8% OPC) may not be adequate. Thus a new formulation, called secondary waste grout, was proposed and tested. The secondary waste grout uses hydrated lime [Ca(OH){sub 2}] to tie up the sulfate initially such that ettringite [Ca{sub 6}Al{sub 2}(SO{sub 4}){sub 3}(OH){sub 12}.26(H{sub 2}O)] forms rapidly instead of forming as the cementitious waste form cures. Three different liquid waste simulants (242-A evaporator, Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility [ERDF] leachates, and Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant [WTP] off-gas condensates) were prepared and solidified using this new dry blend formulation. Baseline grout dry mixes were 20 wt% hydrated lime (HL), 35 wt% OPC, and 45 wt% BFS, and two different water-to-dry mix (w/dm) ratios (0.5 and 0.6) of free water mass to mass of dry blend were tested. After curing for a minimum of 28 days, the grout solidified waste forms were characterized and used for Tc leachability testing using the EPA 1315 Method. X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed that ∼12-15% of ettringite was formed in early stage of 28-day curing for the grouts prepared with the high sulfate WTP simulant and HL addition. In addition, the new formulation of secondary waste grout prepared with HL (20%), OPC (35%), and BFS (45%) at either 0.5 or 0.6 water to dry mix ratio yields higher average Tc interval leachability index (LI) values (12.5 to 13.9) after 28 to 90 days of leaching using deionized water, which is higher than the desired {sup 99}Tc LI value of 12 for grout destined for burial in the Integrated Disposal Facility at the Hanford Site. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Managing Resin Wastes - Crossing the Digital Divide - 18326

The most important factor undercutting optimal waste management in the nuclear industry is developing a clear picture of the radioactivity content of the waste and its impact on waste disposal cost. For almost 35 years since the publishing of 10CFR61, waste characterization has relied on building its basis from samples collected from the final waste product as it is drawn from service or as it is packaged for disposal. This practice of sampling the product after it was collected continues to be followed to this day; 35 years after the publication of 10CFR61. This process, as it is followed, relies on minimum information and plant knowledge to formulate the characterization. While 10CFR61 and additional guidance documents promote the approach of using anticipated and statistically based scaling factors in addition to using data collected over time and a finite grouping of waste streams encompassing plant wastes, this guidance is often ignored in favor of using the earlier fallback options in the case of a limited sample base. The fallback allows the use of a final sample drawn from the waste when other data was not sufficiently available to be aligned to develop meaningful statistics. The determination of representativeness is obviated by the single sample resulting in a new waste stream being declared with every package. The sample used without statistical corroboration often is not representative. It would be unexpected if that sample were actually representative of anything more than itself. This paper discusses viable options for developing the basis for characterization through direct process monitoring to follow the accumulation of activity at the point of generation relying on hundreds of measurements being collected on a daily and weekly basis that can provide a much more reliable result along with significant cost savings. Direct monitoring of the accumulation of activity in process streams generating solid radwaste, including demineralizers and filter streams, is a more precise approach. Nearly all of these streams are monitored by plant chemistry on a regular schedule to maintain water quality and track fuel performance. The discussion in this paper will focus on resin bed tracking and how process knowledge drawn from routinely collected chemistry data can be brought together to form a consistent and precise solid waste radioactivity inventory. Some of the specific points covered in the paper include application and expansion of the fission product release computer program 3R-STAT, the importance of the spent fuel pool in radioactivity generation and its influence on the overall source term, and results from sample measurements collected over several years to corroborate using direct process measurements for the primary characterization basis. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Next Generation System Analysis Model: Capabilities for Simulating a Waste Management System - 19131

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition's Integrated Waste Management System (IWMS) program is applying integrated waste management system architecture analysis, system engineering, and decision analysis principles to inform potential future decisions regarding potential nuclear waste management system architectures. Architecture analyses of the IWMS are being conducted to support the future deployment of a comprehensive system for managing nuclear waste that considers all major aspects of the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle (i.e., transportation, storage, and disposal). The system architecture analyses consider alternative disposition pathways for commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) being stored dry in at-reactor Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) or wet in spent-fuel pools. One method for evaluating these alternatives is simulating the movement of SNF throughout the system components. Successfully simulating a system on the scale of a national waste management system requires - accurate baseline information (e.g., historic fuel discharges from reactors and dry storage loadings at reactor sites), - modeling all logistic interactions between components of the proposed system, and - tracking and reporting all relevant details regarding the simulation's execution. The Next Generation System Analysis Model (NGSAM) is an agent-based simulation software tool designed for the express purpose of modeling the IWMS. It is based on the Performance Analysis Tool, a simulation platform that has been used to model logistics for the Department of Defense and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Using existing, government-owned software allows NGSAM developers to modify the software at the level of source code and to develop flexible usability and modeling solutions for developing and running simulations of the IWMS. NGSAM imports data from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Unified Database (e.g., historic assembly information, thermal profiles for assembly heat, at-reactor dry storage loadings) to ensure that the simulation initializes with a realistic representation of the state of commercial SNF in the United States. NGSAM is designed with the flexibility to model and track the behavior of virtually any IWMS architecture assumptions or design considerations. For example, NGSAM can model multiple interim storage facilities or repositories or none at all. Similarly, all assumptions regarding shipment schedules, operating schedules, and reactor operation assumptions can be modeled and adjusted in NGSAM with relative ease. The development of NGSAM was targeted to waste management system analysts as the primary users. With that in mind, analysts from ORNL, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL), and Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) were intimately involved in the development process. That involvement extended beyond merely defining requirements. System analysts have been involved with design decisions and software benchmarking and tests, and they have provided subject-matter expertise where necessary. The result is a high degree of interaction between professional software developers and system analysts, with a multitude of benefits to both groups. This paper explores some of the underlying methodology of the agile software development process used in the creation of NGSAM. It illustrates the capabilities of NGSAM. Some example use cases are discussed as well, with relevant results providing context for how NGSAM is used by system analysts to gain a greater understanding of alternative waste management system architectures. This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed-to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

ANSTO Synroc Wasteforms for the Immobilization of a Range of Mo-99 Production Wastes - 19326

Tc-99m, the most commonly used radioisotope in nuclear medicine, is produced from the decay of Mo-99 which is predominantly produced in reactors by irradiation of enriched uranium targets. This results in three waste streams, one of which is a uranium filter cake containing fission products. This filter cake could itself be treated as a waste stream, or processed to retrieve the enriched uranium for further use, thus producing additional waste streams during reprocessing. All wastes are considered intermediate-level wastes and require an appropriate wasteform design for termination. ANSTO is collaborating with NECSA (Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa) to develop wasteform and processing solutions for the treatment of intermediate level wastes (ILW) from the production of Mo-99. The work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) with technical support from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Here we highlight some of the outcomes of this collaboration which has seen the investigation and performance testing of a range of waste treatment technologies. Among the treatment options for the various waste streams, including the enriched uranium filter cake itself, were glass, glass-ceramic, ceramic and geopolymer wasteforms. All wasteforms were characterized (e.g., by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)) and their performance characteristics, for example compressive strength and aqueous durability, determined by standard methods and compared. Consideration has been given to the most suitable, practical and cost effective solutions for the immobilization of these Mo-99 wastes. This paper will discuss the down-selection of wasteforms and process technologies for Mo-99 wastes and compare these with regards to wasteform performance and process technology readiness. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Deep Isolation - Innovation for the Storage and Disposal of High-level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel - 19367

Deep Isolation, Inc. is a private, Berkeley based company that has brought innovation to nuclear waste disposal. Deep Isolation has developed a disposal technique that adapts mature drilling technology and customizes it for the purpose of providing a safe and secure solution. Though the stalled nuclear waste program in the US has created unwanted burdens and costs, it has also provided object lessons which Deep Isolation has learned from and designed a novel approach. The solution proposed by Deep Isolation combines the best of the geosciences and social sciences to present the US and other countries with an optimized and tailored approach to disposing of a variety of nuclear waste. This system can complement existing potential storage and disposal sites, or in the case of countries with smaller amounts of waste--the national solution. Deep Isolation innovates where others have stalled and offers a means of deep geological disposal that costs less, takes less time to implement, and cuts down and in some cases eliminates the need for transportation of the waste. The technical solution optimized by Deep Isolation uses established directional drilling technology from the oil and gas industry to drill a vertical drill hole thousands of meters deep and then transition to a horizontal drill hole that is thousands of meters in length. The target media is in or below shale formations, which are present at various depths throughout much of the United States and throughout the world. The availability of suitable geology allows for permanent disposal at multiple locations - including existing nuclear sites, without a need to transport the waste to a central repository. This innovative solution not only offers options for commercial used nuclear fuel and defense spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste, but also other nuclear wastes such as those considered by DoE's past deep bore-hole program, i.e. cesium and strontium capsules. Greater-Than-Class-C (GTCC) waste is also an opportunity for Deep Isolation. DoE's preferred alternative for GTCC includes 'land disposal at generic commercial facilities.' Deep Isolation could provide safe, secure, and permanent disposal at a commercial facility. Deep Isolation complements the technical innovation with best practices from the social sciences. In acknowledgement that the past challenges to implement nuclear waste disposal facilities have been primarily due to socio-political failings, we have designed a means to deeply engage with public and stakeholders. Our approach is committed to partnering with communities, local jurisdictions, states, and Tribes to determine a path forward that benefits all involved, that is fully transparent, collaborative and accountable. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗