Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “ORION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 847 records · Page 47
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Orion Crew Module Seakeeping Simulation and Test Comparisons in Ocean Wave Environments

The NASA Orion Crew Module (CM) post-landing seakeeping and uprighting capabilities are being evaluated across a variety of ocean wave conditions. This paper provides an overview of quarter-scale and full-scale test data and how it compares with the CM seakeeping dynamic simulation results evaluated using Wave Energy Convertor Simulator (WEC-Sim).This includes a discussion of the status of the dynamic modeling effort, correlation of model inputs with the wave field from the test, and a comparison of the results against the physical test data with emphasis on the full-scale results. Analysis in the frequency domain showed similar response characteristics between the model and the test and shows energy peaks corresponding to both the natural response and the forced response due to the wave environment. Time domain comparisons showed that the linear WEC-Sim model under predicted the amplitude of the pitch and roll motion of the test article, with improved matching for smaller, longer crested waves. An attempt was made to correlate the pitch/roll response to incident wave slope to account for a possible delay in the BTA’s response. The results did not show a strong relationship in the response characteristics to incident wave slope, but better correlation was seen by comparing responses in the frequency domain. Evaluation of the simulation’s ability to match test results aided in understanding the current fidelity of the CM model in WEC-Sim and identifying areas for model improvement

Abigail Lockard↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Augmenting the Space Environment Complex's Thermal Vacuum Capabilities for Artemis 1 Orion Spacecraft Testing

The Space Environments Complex at Glenn Research Center’s Neil A Armstrong Test Facility (formerly Plum Brook Station) recently successfully completed Artemis 1 thermal vacuum testing. The Space Environments Complex boasts the world’s largest thermal vacuum chamber with a 122-foot tall, 100-foot diameter aluminum assembly vacuum chamber. The fifty-year old chamber has been adapted over its history to conduct several unique test campaigns in a variety of test environments. Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft testing is the most complex test campaign the Space Environments Complex has undergone to date, with temperature limits between -250 F to +300F in a high vacuum with significant requirements for quality data and contamination control of a flight vehicle. This presentation covers the improvements and innovations in the cryoshroud and thermal systems, data acquisition, as well as contamination and cleanliness to accommodate the rigors of a flight vehicle during a six-week thermal vacuum test. Additionally, the presentation covers successes and lessons learned from the testing.

Erin Reed↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Abstract: Orion Lighting Workaround for Maintaining Crew Circadian Entrainment

Introduction. Light is the major environmental time cue of our endogenous circadian pacemaker. Suboptimal crew circadian entrainment (CCE) is common and associated with acute and chronic medical symptoms. Additionally, fatigue from suboptimal CCE promotes problematic use of sleep medications. The Orion Cabin Lighting System (OCLS) consists of monochromatic light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. However, light is a powerful suppressor of melatonin and it is a disruptor of CCE if used at incorrect times. A commercial off the shelf (COTS) dynamic lighting system (COTS-DLS) is a potential workaround for maintaining CCE.

Matthew Lindsey↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion Artemis-1 Post-Flight Characterization

This abstract discusses the post-flight characterization of the heatshield used in the Orion Artemis-1 mission, which is a significant milestone in human space exploration. The Artemis-1 heatshield is a crucial component designed to protect the spacecraft during re-entry into Earth's atmosphere. It experiences extreme temperatures and forces as it encounters the intense heat generated by the friction between the spacecraft and the atmospheric gases. The post-flight characterization of the Artemis-1 heatshield involves analyzing its surface morphology and elemental composition. This analysis provides valuable insights into the performance and durability of the heatshield during the mission. By utilizing techniques such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX), a detailed examination of the heatshield’s surface features, and elemental composition can be conducted. The SEM analysis offers high-resolution imaging capabilities, enabling detailed observations of the heatshield’s surface morphology. EDX analysis provides elemental analysis, allowing for an assessment of any compositional changes induced by the thermal and environmental conditions experienced during the mission. This information is crucial for understanding the material's response to the extreme conditions and identifying any potential issues or degradation. Furthermore, density profiling analysis is performed to measure density variations across the depth of the heatshield material. This analysis offers insights into the effects of the mission on the heatshield, such as potential ablation, or changes in material porosity. Understanding these density variations helps to evaluate the heatshield's structural integrity and its ability to withstand future missions. This knowledge contributes to the ongoing development of advanced heatshield designs, enhancing their thermal protection capabilities and ensuring the safety of future manned missions to the Moon and beyond.

Tane Boghozian↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Modeling Uprighting of the Orion Crew Module using a Finite Element Method with Wave Coupling and Structural Deformability

The Crew Module Uprighting System (CMUS) for the Orion Crew Module (CM) includes five bags that inflate after splashdown to rotate and upright the CM as necessary. Wave conditions can be severe enough to damage the bags and tethers, which could make the recovery operation hazardous. The CMUS therefore has design limits that ultimately constrain where the CM can land based upon sea conditions. This manuscript describes a full fluid-structure interaction computational model being used for the CMUS. It is a finite element model that uses explicit time integration to directly simulate uprighting, a computational approach usually reserved for short duration, highly transient phenomena and novelly applied here. The goal of this current effort is to determine the feasibility of this approach for CMUS uprighting, and to estimate the loads the CMUS bags experience in different wave conditions. The results from this work will be used to supplement other experimental and computational data in support of NASA’s Artemis program.

John Puryear↗
NASA NTRS2024

Historical Retrospective on Orion GNC Design

On November 16, 2022, Artemis I successfully launched and began a nearly 26-day journey returning a human-rated spacecraft to the Moon for the first time in fifty years. The mission was a huge success and once again the world's attention was focused on the Moon. This paper will take a step back in time over the seventeen-plus years of design and development of the Orion Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) system that carried the spacecraft 1.4 million miles around the Moon and landed safely back on earth off the coast of San Diego California. Key design decisions (good and not so good) and "first-ever" capabilities will be chronicled. This paper will explore such things as the most advanced on-board targeting system ever flown on a spacecraft, never-been-done-before autonomous planetary Optical Navigation, and the first-ever truly skip entry guided to the desired target within a few miles.

Guidance Navigation and Control↗
NASA NTRS2024

Historical Retrospective on Orion GNC Design

On November 16, 2022, Artemis I successfully launched and began a nearly 26-day journey returning a human-rated spacecraft to the Moon for the first time in fifty years. The mission was a huge success and once again the world's attention was focused on the Moon. This paper will take a step back in time over the seventeen-plus years of design and development of the Orion Guidance Navigation and Control (GNC) system that carried the spacecraft 1.4 million miles around the Moon and landed safely back on earth off the coast of San Diego California. Key design decisions (good and not so good) and "first-ever" capabilities will be chronicled. This paper will explore such things as the most advanced on-board targeting system ever flown on a spacecraft, never-been-done-before autonomous planetary Optical Navigation, and the first-ever truly skip entry guided to the desired target within a few miles.

Guidance Navigation and Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Serial Propellant Tank Pressure Behavior in Artemis 1 Orion-ESM Propulsion System

An oscillatory pressure behavior was observed throughout the Orion-ESM propulsion system during the Artemis I mission. This behavior was attributed to propellant oscillations within the serial line connecting the two propellant tanks for each commodity. A linearized dynamic model of the serial propellant tank system was derived to explain this behavior. The model showed excellent agreement with the flight data, with the predicted system natural frequencies matching the flight data within 1%.

Liquid propulsion systems↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Serial Propellant Tank Pressure Behavior in Artemis I Orion-ESM Propulsion System

An oscillatory pressure behavior was observed throughout the Orion-ESM propulsion system during the Artemis I mission. This behavior was attributed to propellant oscillations within the serial line connecting the two propellant tanks for each commodity. A linearized dynamic model of the serial propellant tank system was derived to explain this behavior. The model showed excellent agreement with the flight data, with the predicted system natural frequencies matching the flight data within 1 percent.

Propellant Tank↗
NASA NTRS2025

Orion Hardware In The Loop OIMU Stimulation Latency Effect on Navigation State Estimation

Because Hardware In The Loop (HITL) testing involves the integration of flight software and flight hardware on the ground, non-flight-like effects may arise. One of these non-flight-like effects includes Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) stimulation latency that affects the time in which the measurement is received by the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). This paper seeks to present the extent to which this stimulation latency affects the navigational state estimate from the Orion navigation system for all phases of flight for Artemis II.

Christopher A Ertl↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion Hardware In The Loop OIMU Stimulation Latency Effect on Navigation State Estimation

Because Hardware In The Loop (HITL) testing involves the integration of flight software and flight hardware on the ground, non-flight-like effects may arise. One of these non-flight-like effects includes Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) stimulation latency that affects the time in which the measurement is received by the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). This paper seeks to present the extent to which this stimulation latency affects the navigational state estimate from the Orion navigation system for all phases of flight for Artemis II.

Christopher A Ertl↗