SEARCH · Engineering Papers
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Topics for the meeting were as follows: Safety Minute, High-level Overview of NCRTS, Overview of NCRTS Groups (Radiation Transport, Nuclear Data, and Nuclear Criticality Safety), and Question and Answer.
This presentation provides background information about domestic and international nuclear criticality safety consensus standards and gives a status summary of work in progress.
This presentation provides an overview of the DOE/NNSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, including the program's history, mission, vision, main functions, budgetary information, accomplishments, challenges, initiatives, and current work.
This presentation discusses progress on the revision of the Hand Calculations for Nuclear Criticality Safety Primer. The new Primer should be approved for unlimited release by the end of the summer 2022. ORNL and LLNL are working to incorporate the website complement onto the NCSP website.
This presentation provides an overview of the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, including its history, mission, vision, organization, measurement and evaluation priorities for FY23, 5-year plan, and cross-cutting nuclear data work.
Limited, specific needs exist to support current reactor fleet and fuel cycle. Primarily, MOX experiments representative of low burnup LWR fuel are needed. LEU+ power distribution measurements may also be useful. Advanced reactors present many challenges and opportunities. New fuel forms and associated processes lack validation. Initial core criticality calculations can be validated with appropriate, highly similar experiments. Transportation of LEU+/HALEU material will be essential, and will rely on new experiments to support validation
This presentation discusses the purpose of the criticality safety validation, decisions that were made during the validation exercise, the motivation that led to the creation of VADER, an explanation of USLSTATS, and an examination of VADER capabilities and interface.
This presentation discusses how KRUSTY was analyzed with LANL’s MCNP neutron transport code, Monte Carlo N-Particle. In the Monte Carlo method, neutrons are born in fission events and fly around the geometry having events (e.g., scatter, capture, fission, escape) according to the natural probabilities. “Natural probabilities” are given as neutron cross sections , which are measured and evaluated nuclear data. One of the goals of the benchmark project is to improve the nuclear cross sections (and the codes that use them). In this work, the response of interest is called k eff , which describes the neutron multiplication in a near critical system. Like most quantities, k eff is not measured directly; it is only inferred. In summation, MCNP results for k eff matched the measurements extremely well. The evaluated uncertainties are asymmetric and smaller than 0.00100 (e.g., + 0.00080 / – 0.00062). The largest uncertainties are due to alignment.
This presentation touches on the purpose of the DOE/NNSA Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Program Review. This presentation also covers the background, history, mission, and vison of the organization. Slides include visual representations of the technical program element activities and the current NCSP work sites.
This presentation explains the meaning of the terms “Credible” and “Unlikely” for nuclear criticality safety purposes. This presentation references several terminology resources. With a focused look into ANS-8.1 Terminology. The presentation concludes with a talk on safety culture and the formality of operations program (FOP).
This presentation covers the Nuclear Criticality Program (NCS) engineer resource pipeline activities. This presentation highlights resource pipeline projects supported by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
This lecture is on the design of a Uranium Dioxide-Beryllium Oxide UO 2 -BeO Critical Experiment at Sandia. This presentation provides background info on the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR). Additionally, this presentation shows experimental and alternative designs and concludes with a sensitivity analysis.
The project objective was to develop a feasible and cost-effective method for recovering rare earth elements (REEs) and critical materials (CMs) from coal and coal byproducts, resulting in high-purity individually separated REEs and CMs. The targeted REEs included Y, Pr, Nd, Gd, Dy, and Sm, with a purity of over 99.5%, while the CMs included Co, Mn, Ga, Sr, Li, Ni, Zn, and Ge, with a purity of over 90%. The project aimed to design a prototype facility capable of producing 1-3 tonnes/day of high-purity REO mixes. The work was divided into four designated circuits: 1) REE extraction and concentration, 2) REE separation and purification, 3) RE metal production, and 4) CM production. To achieve these goals, the project involved 11 tasks, including technology reviews, research, process flow diagram development, mass balance estimation, and preliminary technical-economic analysis. The project team included researchers from the University of Kentucky, University of Alabama and Virginia Tech as well as process specialists from Argonne National Laboratory. MP Materials provided technical support regarding rare earth markets and processing while Alliance Coal performed resource assessment. The project included a market analysis for Nd/Pr, Tb, Dy, Gd, Y, Co, Mn, Li, Sr, Ga, Ni, Zn, and Ge. These analyses provided insights into the supply and demand trends as well as historic and future projections of market price relative to purity requirements for these elements. Two coal resources were selected for the project: the West Kentucky No. 13 (Baker) Seam and an undisclosed lignite resource in the Illinois coal basin. The estimated quantities of REEs in these resources were calculated based on production samples and drilling data. It was estimated that there is adequate supply for an operation producing one metric ton daily of higher purity mixed rare earth oxides (MREO) for approximately 20 years at a site located in western Kentucky. In Circuit 1, project data was obtained from a pilot heap leach and REE concentration facility. It was concluded that the existing circuit, which generated a MREO concentrate, two types of CM mixed products, and Li- and Sr-containing waters, would be suitable feed for circuits 2-4. Data from the first-of-its-kind coal coarse refuse heap leach pilot pad played a crucial role in estimating reliable elemental concentrations of the pregnant leaching solution (PLS). The average total REE concentration in the PLS was found to be 28.6 ppm. In Circuit 2, several concepts were explored including a novel process referred to as solvent-assisted chromatography (SAC). This concept involved a novel columnar reactor that incorporated multiple mixer/settlers, thereby enabling the operation of counter-flowing aqueous and organic phases. Unfortunately, due to project time constraints, a complete fundamental modeling analysis could not be completed to fully evaluate the technology. Molten salt electrowinning was considered as an alternative for circuit 3 following circuit 2 purification circuit utilizing the novel SAC process. A mass and energy balance of Nd reduction to metal in a fluoride containing molten salt electrolyte was conducted. Comparisons were made with the current state of Asian molten salt electrorefining, and potential improvements in siphoning rare earth metals (REM) from the reactor were presented. A cost estimate was performed for the production of 1 tonne per day, which yielded a total of $2.29 million for the nine electrowinning (EW) cells required. The selected option for circuits 2 and 3 was a plasma distillation process, which initially separates rare earth elements (REEs) from other elements. This is followed by selective electrowinning in various ionic liquids. The selection was made on the basis of thermodynamic modeling and experimental data previously published by a project partner. The combination offers an innovative approach to integrated refining and RE metal production. For Circuit 4, an extensive literature review was conducted for the processing of the CMs. The ultimate decision was to utilize a combined plasma and ionic liquid process as well to produce individual high-purity concentrates of Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, and Mg. A separate flowsheet for Li and Sr was recommended, which would yield carbonates of these elements. Due to the lack of suitable experimental data at this time, a process recommendation could not be provided but several methods have been proposed for consideration. Lastly, a techno-economic analysis (TEA) was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the proposed process for further investigation. The TEA results revealed a capital expense (CapEx) of $737 million and an annual operational expense (OpEx) of $220 million. Due to the selected elements, the hypothetical heap leach pad can produce 1 metric tonne per day of REO equivalent, but a conscious decision was made to only treat targeted REEs, resulting in the production of 0.4 metric tonne of REM. An estimated annual revenue of $90.87 million was projected based on standard market pricing information provided by the funding agency. During the TEA, ten different modules were evaluated for costing purposes. The precipitation circuit was identified as the largest single operational expense, followed by the Mg/Mn process due to the amount of treated metal. In terms of capital expenditures, the heap leach process incurred the highest cost, followed by the Mg/Mn process. The scalability of the plasma process is a crucial consideration since the reactors cannot be scaled beyond the largest demonstrated size due to their reliance on surface area of the slag and vapor phase. The purity estimate for the REEs are generally 98%±2% to produce a metal. The purity level being lower than the project objective was due to the lack of specific experimental data needed to tighten the tolerance of the estimates. Based on literature and previous experience, the CMs are estimated as follows; Ga (95%+, metal), Sr (95%+, carbonate), Li (95%+, carbonate), Ni (98%±2%, metal), Zn (95%+, metal sponge), Ge (95%+, metal), Co (98%±2%, metal), and Mn (98%±2%, metal).
Learning Objectives: Know that there are multiple sets of factors affecting nuclear criticality safety; Know how the neutron physics relates to physical factors; Know the basic requirements for performing a safety evaluation; Know the basic process for performing a safety evaluation.
This presentation covers consistent nuclear data evaluations for criticality safety. Topics include the evaluation procedure, n+ 139 La evaluation, the work in progress for the n+ 233 U evaluation (emphasis on capture), and a concluding Summary.
Conclusions of this presentation conclude that the experiment is feasible with at least 10 critical configurations, and low expected benchmark uncertainty. Potential high impact for the understanding of commercially used neutron absorber plates. Next steps are to think about other configurations: rod pitch, other rods – Finalize plate support, uncertainty study. Additionally, the potential use of IER-441 central test region to safely place the plate in the core. Next steps include the Determination of the neutron absorber plate characterization path and the Potential SINBAD benchmark of neutron transmission measurements.
This presentation is on the formality of operations and nuclear criticality safety standards. This lecture starts with an Introduction then leads into a conversation on the dependencies of formality of operations. Secondly the presentation includes a review of past issues. Included is a Discussion about “credible” and “unlikely” – variables for process analysis in ANS-8.1, Section 4.1.2, and the double contingency principle, Section 4.2.2, respectively. The presentation finishes with some conclusions.
This presentation includes an overview of the program and Background of the Defense Nuclear Facility Safety Board (DNFSB) recommendation 2007-1. Additionally, discussed is the Fissile Material Holdup and Nuclear Criticality Safety (NCS).