Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “electricity demand”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46

Unleash Values From Grid-Edge Flexibility: An Overview, Experience, and Vision for Leveraging Grid-Edge Distributed Energy Resources to Improve Grid Operations

The power system landscape is presently undergoing a dramatic change with the rapid integration of numerous distributed energy resources (DERs) at the grid edge. Broadly, we consider grid-edge DERs as any electricity source, storage, and demand response program connected to the medium-to-low-voltage distribution system.

distributed energy resource↗

Resident Tolerance to Transitional Temperature Deviation in Smart Communities

Choosing the right HVAC system or the right algorithm of implementing demand response may create significant energy and environmental gains while maintaining resident comfort. But these questions are closely related to the concept of user comfort, which in turn requires a reasonable fit between user preferences and temperature setpoints. While setting the temperature right is a well-researched question, systems in transition from one setpoint to another are currently not thoroughly addressed in research. But how tolerant the residents really are if a system spends a large share of time outside of the comfort setpoint. This study gives some early insights on how the deviation of temperature from the setpoint affect perceived resident comfort. We use two weeks of data for a smart neighborhood located in Atlanta, GA. We find that the system spends 20% - 50% of time deviating from the setpoint by more than 1℉. However, we do not find that increasing deviations cause resident complaints or increasing overrides.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Thermal Modeling and Limitations for Power Electronics Embedded in Medium-Voltage Cables

As next-generation energy technologies gain traction and power demand increases, the existing electrical infrastructure faces significant stress, prompting innovative solutions to enhance the grid's capacity and lifespan. This work explores the possibility of embedding medium-voltage (MV) power electronics directly inline with the cable, and the resulting thermal challenges. Since the majority of power distribution cables installed in the U.S. are passively cooled, the work focuses primarily on passive cooling, with an emphasis on the limitations of axial heat spreading within the cable. To date, literature on axial spreading of high incident heat loads on cables and cable environments is limited, typically reporting cases with <10 W of incident heat load. This work will explore the considerations, limits, and tradeoffs of cable-embedded heat loads significantly larger than the cable losses. Both external and internal effects are modeled analytically in nondimensional terms via a Biot number analysis, allowing fundamental limits and tradeoffs to be derived. The work culminates in the design and experimental validation of a cable-embedded thermal system capable of passively dissipating 300 W of heat from a coaxial SiC mosfet switch module over a length of 20 cm, thus validating the possibility of MV cable-embedded power electronics from a thermal standpoint.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

A Study of Cost-Saving Potential of Load Flexibility Measures in Grid-Interactive Multifamily Buildings

With recent advances in smart technologies, more and more smart devices are penetrating the residential and commercial buildings market. The introduction of these smart devices is also helping IoT companies emerge with load aggregator roles in the sector. With more utility companies on the track of supporting OpenADR protocols, the aggregators could play a significant role in providing load flexibilities by automatically responding to demand response (DR) events and coordinating load flexibility measures between customers. This would benefit utility companies by reducing stress on the grid during critical peak demand hours as well as customers by allowing them to utilize utility rate structures advantageous to those able to reduce electric usage during high-demand hours. This study evaluates cost and energy savings from adopting multiple load flexibility measures in multifamily buildings. Combinations of different load flexibility measures, including space temperature floating, light dimming, automatic window shading, and water heater temperature floating, are considered. The simulations are performed using OpenStudio®, an open-source U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) simulation platform. For the case study, we used a midrise apartment building with weather conditions from Denver, Colorado. To compare climate zone differences, simulations were also performed for Los Angeles, California, and Chicago, Illinois. Initial results indicate that the application of automated load flexibility measures without careful consideration of dispatching strategies and DR program enrollments could significantly affect the savings. To get meaningful cost savings, aggregators need to encourage tenant awareness to curtail energy usage through occupant behavior in addition to dispatching automatic load flexibility measures. The outcomes from this study are believed to help load aggregators understand the risks and benefits of load flexibility opportunities.

building energy modeling↗

Elucidating Cathode Degradation Mechanisms in LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 (NMC811)/Graphite Cells Under Fast Charge Rates Using Operando Synchrotron Characterization

Li-ion batteries capable of extreme fast charging (XFC) are in demand to facilitate widespread electric vehicle (EV) adoption. While the impact of fast charge on the negative electrode has been studied, degradation of state-of-the-art NMC811 under XFC conditions has not been studied in detail. Herein, cathode degradation is probed in NMC811/graphite batteries by analysis of structural and chemical changes for recovered samples previously cycled under XFC conditions and during typical cycling. NMC surface reconstruction, as determined by soft X-ray absorption, was not detected for recovered electrodes. Furthermore, bulk redox activity from X-ray absorption near edge structure measurements showed more change in the oxidation state of Ni and Co under the 1C charge rate compared to the 4C rate consistent with the electrochemistry. Increased unit cell volume contraction under the 1C rate as determined by operando X-ray diffraction suggests that higher charge rates may provide a protective effect on the cathode by reducing structural distortion due to less delithiation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Using Membranes with Internal Microchannels to Prevent Drying-out during CO 2 Electrolysis

Scaling up CO 2 electrolysis is a vital aspect in the transition to manufacturing sustainable fuels and chemical compounds, satisfying the demand for chemicals and demand for storing renewable electricity. Depending on the employed catalyst, different products can be produced, such as carbon monoxide and ethylene, by applying a voltage on a CO 2 and H 2 O fed electrolyzer. CO is a desirable product according to techno-economic analysis, because it can be produced selectively using a silver catalyst and is a precursor for hydrocarbons in the Fischer–Tropsch process. In a state-of-the-art CO 2 electrolyzer, two electrodes are directly pressed against an ion-exchange membrane – this is called a zero-gap configuration. Therefore, the membrane is a crucial component for the system, since it has the role of providing a conductive medium between the electrodes. One of the challenges in CO 2 electrolysis is that water is consumed in the reaction. At high current density, this may cause the membrane's surface near the cathode to dry out, lowering efficiency or perhaps stopping the process entirely, since there is no longer a conductive medium. As a result, water management is critical for this process. In this work, we approach the drying-out challenge by studying the novel concept of a membrane with internal microchannels. These channels allow the circulation of water or an electrolyte inside the membrane, which reduces the water diffusion path and affects the membrane’s conductivity. The effects of channel geometry, location, and concentrations of electrolyte inside on water content, conductivity and overall performance are studied in a 2D COMSOL model. In addition, the effect of internal concentration of electrolyte on the membrane’s resistance, on the process performance and the K + cross-over to cathode side were investigated experimentally. Our modeling results prove that the presence of the channels can keep the membrane hydrated. The highest current densities are observed when the channel is closest to the cathode, and with smaller pores. Smaller pores are advantageous due to the trade-off between enhanced membrane conductivity and the lower conductivity of the liquid itself. If water is circulated in a large channel, it increases the membrane’s ionomer conductivity due to hydration but the overall conductivity is decreased since water is not highly conductive. Nonetheless, the results also show that a higher concentration of electrolyte inside the microchannels can significantly increase the total conductivity of the membrane, and therefore the energy efficiency of the process. These effects are most significant at higher current densities. In the experimental results, we’ve observed similar effects in terms of membrane conductivity and current density of the process – the higher the electrolyte concentration the higher the current density. Furthermore, a low concentration decreases the amount of potassium which crosses over to the cathode side, inhibiting salt deposition. We’ve concluded that a small channel, up to 90 µm wide, close to the pore with an electrolyte with a concentration of up to 10 mM could be very beneficial for the water management and energy efficiency of the process. This helps to keep the membrane hydrated at higher current densities, improves the conductivity of the membrane, and it doesn’t have significant impacts on the salt deposition.

Petrov, Kostadin Veselinov↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Baseline vs. DER Scenario

Projections and associated uncertainty estimates are generated for a variety of user-selectable EV charging sessions, electricity tariffs, subsidy levels, revenue schemes, charging station configurations, and on-site solar and/or storage options. The outputs are presented in CHIP's web portal browser in the form of easily interpretable graphics (interactive graphs and bar charts) that facilitate convenient comparison among different scenarios to aid decision-making. The user should bring assumptions for modeling on simulation planning horizon, number of EV charging sessions per year, electricity costs (energy and demand charge rates; flat versus time-of-use rate), site capital costs (equipment for EV chargers and transformer), solar PV, and battery energy storage (kW).

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗