Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “WASTES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Recent Developments in Radioactive Waste Management in the Federal Republic of Germany - 17450

In 2013 the Federal Parliament and the Federal Council passed the Act Concerning the Search and Selection of a Site for a Repository for Heat-Generating Radioactive Waste and the Amendment of Other Acts (Site Selection Act). It was a restart for the search for a repository for especially heat-generating waste in Germany. As a first step in May 2014 the Commission 'Storage of High-Level Radioactive Waste' started their work. Their aim was to debate and clarify the principle questions concerning the management of heat-generating radioactive waste. As well as to evaluate and determine the fundamentals for the Site Selection Process e.g. safety requirements, exclusion criteria, minimum requirements and consideration criteria for the site selection. They also evaluated the organizational and procedural arrangements in the scope of waste management. As a first act to implement the suggestions of this Commission the organizational structures in waste management were greatly altered. This reorganization not only had a significant influence on the waste management of high-active, but also on the management of low- and intermediate-active waste management in the Federal Republic of Germany. In 2015 a second Commission started its work focusing on the funding of waste management in Germany. The results of this Commission were presented in April 2016. At the moment the suggestions of this Commission are being implemented, changing the financial responsibilities for waste management in the Federal Republic of Germany. The presentation will focus on changes and the developments of radioactive waste management in Germany and talk about the ongoing process in implementing the suggestions of the two Commissions. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

In-service inspection of radioactive waste tanks at the Savannah River Site - 15410

Liquid radioactive wastes from the Savannah River Site (SRS) separation process are stored in large underground carbon steel tanks. The high level wastes are processed in several of the tanks and then transferred by piping to other site facilities for further processing before they are stabilized in a vitrified or grout waste form. Based on waste removal and processing schedules, many of the tanks, will be required to be in service for times exceeding the initial intended life. Until the waste is removed from storage, transferred, and processed, the materials and structures of the tanks must maintain a confinement function by providing a barrier to the environment and by maintaining acceptable structural stability during design basis events, which include loadings from both normal service and abnormal (e.g., earthquake) conditions. A structural integrity program is in place to maintain the structural and leak integrity functions of these waste tanks throughout their intended service life. In-service inspection (ISI) is an essential element of a comprehensive structural integrity program for the waste tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS). The ISI program was developed to determine the degree of degradation the waste tanks have experienced due to service conditions. As a result of the inspections, an assessment can be made of the effectiveness of corrosion controls for the waste chemistry, which precludes accelerated localized and general corrosion of the waste tanks. Ultrasonic inspections (UT) are performed to detect and quantify the degree of general wall thinning, pitting and cracking as a measure of tank degradation. The results from these inspections through 2013, for the 27 Type III/IIIA tanks, indicate no reportable in-service corrosion degradation in the primary tank (i.e., general, pitting, or cracking). The average wall thickness for all tanks remains above the manufactured nominal thickness minus 0.25 millimeter and the largest pit identified is approximately 1.70 millimeter deep (i.e., less than 10% through-wall). Improvements to the inspection program were recently instituted to provide additional confidence in the degradation rates. Thickness measurements from a single vertical strip along the accessible height of the primary tank have been used as a baseline to compare historical measurements. Changes in wall thickness and pit depths along this vertical strip are utilized to estimate the rate of corrosion degradation. An independent review of the ISI program methodology, results, and path forward was held in August 2009. The review recommended statistical sampling of the tanks to improve the confidence of the single strip inspection program. The statistical sampling plan required that SRS increase the amount of area scanned per tank. Therefore, in addition to the baseline vertical strip that is obtained for historical comparisons, four additional randomly selected vertical strips are inspected. To date, a total of 104 independent vertical strips along the height of the primary tank have been completed. A statistical analysis of the data indicates that at this coverage level there is a 99.5% confidence level that one of the worst 5% of all the vertical strips was inspected. That is, there is a relatively high likelihood that the SRS inspection program has covered one of the most corroded areas of any of the Type III/IIIA waste tanks. These data further support the conclusion that there are no significant indications of wall thinning or pitting. Random sampling will continue to increase the confidence that one of the worst 5% has been inspected. In order to obtain the additional vertical strips, and minimize budget and schedule impacts, data collection speed for the UT system was optimized. Prior to 2009, the system collected data at a rate of 32 square centimeters per minute. The scan rate was increased to 129 - 160 square centimeters per minute by increasing the scanner step and pixel sizes in the data acquisition set-up. Laboratory testing was utilized to optimize the scan index/pixel size such that the requirements for wall thinning and pit detection were still maintained. SRS continues to evaluate improvements to ultrasonic equipment. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Thermochemical Reactivity Hazards of TRU Waste Constituents - 16075

The thermochemical stability of transuranic (TRU) wastes can be problematic and can lead to uncontrolled chemical reactions that can pose a risk to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facilities. In 2003, decontamination cloth waste laden with sodium or potassium nitrate and cerium nitrate caught fire in a glovebox at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS) in Colorado. In 2005, as a result of the RFETS fire, management responsible for decommissioning Hanford's Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP) engaged Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) to investigate the thermochemical stabilities of potential TRU wastes arising from decontamination of PFP plutonium gloveboxes. Based on PNNL's studies, PFP management used decontamination approaches that would produce TRU wastes that would be stable during PFP waste management operations, during transport, and eventually during disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico. In 2014, TRU waste containing nitrate-laden organic kitty litter reacted uncontrollably, breached its TRU drum, released TRU, contaminated 21 individuals and the WIPP, and resulted in TRU release outside the facility. In support of the Technical Advisory Team assembled by DOE to investigate the causes of the WIPP event, PNNL investigated the thermochemical stabilities of characteristic wastes in the breached drum and identified a waste that could have caused the breach. This paper describes the RFETS fire, provides results from PNNL's screening studies of potential PFP decontamination wastes and, provides results from PNNL's probative studies investigating the thermochemical stabilities of representative waste constituents in the breached WIPP drum. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

WIPP Certification of the Retrieval Box Assay System at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Plant, Idaho - 16241

The Retrieval Box Assay System (RBAS) at the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Plant (AMWTP) is an Imaging Passive Active Neutron system supplemented with a High Purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma system for the quantification of Pu-239 Fissile Gram Equivalent (FGE) and transuranic (TRU) alpha activity of waste containers of various sizes up to 249 cm x 149 cm x 198 cm (Length x Width x Height). The system was originally calibrated in 2002 (with a range of surrogate matrices and radioactive sources in a 213 cm x 122 cm x 122 cm FRP box) and has been operational for over a decade. As of August 2015, the RBAS has measured approximately 18,000 boxes (50,000 m3 of waste) which has subsequently been fed into the facility's treatment process. Its success, and the wide envelope of waste that it can characterize, has led AMWTP to extend the RBAS mission to include WIPP certification. As part of this new project, the instrument must be capable of meeting WIPP's Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) which include reporting activities and masses of the 10 WIPP-tracked radionuclides. The system will be required to assay sludge and debris waste streams, shredded waste and large metal items. The container size includes Standard Waste Box (SWBs), Fiberglass Reinforced Plywood (FRPs) and large Shredder Boxes. Sludge matrices will be loaded into 210-liter (55-gallon) drums and placed inside an SWB. After assay, boxes will be over-packed into SLB-II's for shipment to WIPP. The target waste streams will contain mixtures of Weapons Grade plutonium, Heat Source plutonium (high in Pu-238 content) and Mixed Oxide (MOX). The activity of the waste is expected to encompass a wide dynamic range of activity from low-level waste (LLW) to TRU with up to several hundred grams of plutonium. Some packages will have high gamma activity associated with fission and activation products such as Cs-137 and Co-60. The existing RBAS hardware (detectors, electronics, assay chamber etc.) was retained for this project. Two lead filters were provided and installed on the existing filter wheels to attenuate the gamma ray flux from the highest activity boxes to avoid overload of the HPGe detectors. The new software suite includes PC-FRAM (Version 5), which is used for the isotopic analysis of the gamma spectra. Integration of FRAM and neutron results is performed using a software package known as RBAS WIPP Analysis Reporting Software (RWARS). This package also performs matrix dependent background adjustments. Other upgrades provided include automated tests that identify when assay parameters fall outside a predetermined range and a new Quality Checking (QC) application. Minimum Detectable Activity (MDA) values were determined for the active and passive neutron modes as a function of measured matrix correction indices. The resulting Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) has been demonstrated to be less than 3700 Bq/g alpha activity (100 nCi/g). Modifications were performed to update the system TMU parameters to accommodate assay of non-standard size boxes and a wider range of matrix materials. A series of calibration confirmation, measurements were performed on site in 2014 using a representative range of surrogate boxes and radioactive sources including Pu. The WIPP WAC performance criteria were successfully demonstrated up to 157 g Pu and the system passed its first Performance Demonstration Program (PDP) cycle in the Spring of 2015. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

The UK's National Policy and Programme for the Management of Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste - 16574

This paper provides a broad overview of the United Kingdom's (UK's) national policies and national programme for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The aim of the paper is to ensure a clear understanding of the approach taken in the UK so that opportunities for learning lessons and joint working, where they exist, can be identified and to ensure a general understanding of the interdependencies between the various approaches taken in the UK. With a legacy that dates back to the late 1940's/early 1950's the UK have a range of complex and difficult issues to resolve that have evolved over time. What was considered to be acceptable in the past is not thought of in the same way today. We therefore need to be forward thinking, innovative and above all ready to adapt our practices and policies to address previously unknown issues and complications. Due to the wide range of types of radioactive wastes and materials to be managed in the UK we have needed to establish a set of high level principles to cover all radioactive waste types while at the same time ensure that specific approaches for specific issues are developed within that framework. In the UK we have also had to consider the issue of integration to ensure that an approach that addresses one issue does not inadvertently cause a problem elsewhere - for example: in disposing of the high volumes of very low level waste we needed an approach to ensure that other low level waste has a disposal route. Financing of decommissioning and future waste management is clearly one of the biggest challenges to be addressed. As mentioned above ensuring that the legacy left for future generation is not one of a burden - we need to ensure that measures are in place to fund and manage long lived radioactive wastes. Finally, it is clear that not all radioactive wastes are the same and therefore different approaches are needed for managing the different types of material. This requires a proportionate and prioritised approach so while the same ultimate goal is applied (i.e.: the safe and responsible management of radioactive waste) some radioactive wastes are more equal than others and need to be treated accordingly. In the UK we believe that we have a broad programme in place that allows the right balance to be struck in managing all our radioactive waste and spent fuel in a proportionate, safe and responsible manner.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

A National Disposal Facility for Radioactive Waste for Iraq - 16610

Radioactive waste resulted in the past in Iraq from a number of nuclear activities and facilities all of them seriously damaged or destroyed during the Gulf war. The task of decommissioning such facilities and managing the resulting waste is being supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the European Union (EU), and the United States (US). A national policy for radioactive waste management for Iraq has been drafted by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST); a draft strategy for radioactive waste management implementation is in preparation. In this framework, Iraq is considering locating a radioactive waste disposal facility at the Al-Tuwaitha site, near the capital city of Bagdad. In the framework of its Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation the EU has recently started a cooperation project named 'Feasibility Study, Basic Design, and Engineering Design of an Engineered Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility' for Iraq (Project IQ4.01/11). The project aims at producing the design of a repository for the radioactive waste resulting from the decommissioning activities and from the continuing use of radioisotopes in medicine and the oil and gas industry in the country. The contract for this cooperation project was awarded by the European Commission in April 2015 to the consortium of two international engineering companies, Nukem Technologies Engineering Services GmbH and DBE Technology GmbH, both of Germany, and Javys a.s., the national waste management agency of Slovakia. The planned Iraqi near-surface repository is constrained by the complex security conditions in the country. This has led to the decision of using whenever possible the Al-Tuwaitha site, were most of the waste is located, as the repository location. The project work will therefore focus on assessing whether and which part of the waste expected to result from the decommissioning and remediation activities is amenable for surface disposal in an appropriately engineered facility. In addition, careful review of the site characteristics shall provide enough elements to justify and validate the political decision of disposing of the waste in Al Tuwaitha. Thereafter, the project work will focus on the conceptual and later the engineering design of the repository. Finally, a Safety Analysis will provide the basis for regulatory decisions about the further steps for realization of the Iraqi final disposal facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Performance Assessment of a Generic Nuclear Waste Repository in Shale - 18392

A performance assessment (PA) is an important component of a comprehensive safety analysis for a nuclear waste repository. In a PA, probabilistic simulations of the total repository system are performed, and results are evaluated against performance metrics. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses help prioritize additional research and model development. The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has been developing a state of the art PA simulation software tool-kit, Geologic Disposal Safety Assessment (GDSA) Framework, that couples increasingly higher fidelity models of subsystem processes into total system PA simulations. Over the past several years, PAs of generic repositories in three geologic media (salt, shale, and crystalline rock) have demonstrated ongoing developments in capability. The current PA of a nuclear waste repository in a generic shale formation showcases GDSA Framework, including capabilities in domain discretization (Cubit), multi-physics simulations (PFLOTRAN), uncertainty and sensitivity analysis (Dakota), and visualization (Paraview). The generic shale reference case considers the disposal of 22,000 metric tons heavy metal of commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in a generic shale formation. PA simulations account for the thermal load and radionuclide inventory of the waste form, components of the engineered barrier system including waste package and buffer, and components of the natural barrier system including the host rock shale and underlying and overlying stratigraphic units. Two repository layouts are considered, one for emplacement of waste packages containing 12 pressurized water reactor (PWR) assemblies, and one for 4-PWR waste package emplacement. Model domains are half-symmetry and contain between 7 and 22 million grid cells. Grid refinement captures the detail of individual waste packages, emplacement drifts, access drifts, and shafts. Simulations are run in a high-performance computing (HPC) environment on 512 or 2048 processes. The governing equations describing coupled heat and fluid flow and reactive transport are solved with PFLOTRAN, an open-source, massively parallel multiphase flow and reactive transport code. Additional simulated processes include waste package degradation; waste form dissolution; radioactive decay and ingrowth in aqueous, solid, and adsorbed phases; and a simple biosphere based on a pumping well. Simulations are run to 106 y; dose and radionuclide concentrations are observed within aquifers at a point approximately 5 km downgradient of the repository. Dakota is used to sample likely ranges of input parameters including waste form and waste package degradation rates and properties of engineered and natural materials to quantify uncertainty in predicted concentrations and sensitivity to input parameters. Given the assumptions of the reference case, results of 12-PWR and 4-PWR simulations are very similar. Dose at the pumping well 5-km downgradient of the repository does not exceed 10-9 Sv/y. I-129 is the largest contributor to dose. The dose due to Cl-36, the next largest contributor, is orders of magnitude smaller. At the pumping well, the concentration of I-129 5-km downgradient does not exceed 10-14 mol/L. Rank correlation coefficients indicate that the maximum concentration of I-129 within the aquifer is sensitive to shale (repository host rock) porosity and aquifer permeability. These results affirm that HPC-capable codes can be used to simulate important multi-physics couplings directly in a total system performance assessment of a geologic repository, and can be used in prioritization of future research and model development. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

The Legislative and Regulatory Histories Related to Greater-Than-Class-C Low-Level Radioactive Waste - 18602

The history surrounding the legislative and regulatory developments regarding Greater-Than-Class C Low Level Radioactive Waste (GTCC LLW) is both interesting and complex. On October 25, 1978, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking pertaining to the development of regulations for the land disposal of LLW. This regulation was one of the first undertaken by NRC since its inception pursuant to the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. Given the problematic challenges that many States were facing with releases of radioactivity from waste disposal facilities at the time, the technical bases supporting this rulemaking were both forward-thinking and comprehensive. The rule included a waste classification system that was tiered in four waste classes: Class A, B, C and GTCC LLW. On December 27, 1982, the NRC finalized the requirements for disposing of these classes of radioactive waste in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 (10 CFR 61). The NRC established the waste classification system to protect both members of the public and individuals that may someday inadvertently intrude in the waste placed in the disposal facility after expiration of the institutional control period. This waste classification was developed to ensure that radiation doses to members of the public and an inadvertent intruder would not exceed 0.25 mSv y{sup -1} (25 mrem y{sup -1}) or 5.0 mSv y{sup -1} (500 mrem y{sup -1}), respectively. At the time the regulation was promulgated, GTCC LLW was considered generally not suitable for near surface disposal. It was recognized that disposal of GTCC LLW would require disposal technologies having greater confinement capacity or protection than 'normal' near-surface disposal. In 1980 Congress enacted the Low-Level Waste Policy Act of 1980, as amended in 1985 (LLWPAA of 1985) that assigned responsibility of disposing of GTCC LLW generated in the commercial sector or owned or generated by the federal government to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). At the time States were having difficulties in developing disposal facilities within the time constraints mandated in the LLWPA of 1980. Therefore, Congress believed that if DOE was assigned responsibility of developing disposal facilities for GTCC LLW, then the States would be more likely to develop new LLW disposal facilities. Congress also assigned the NRC with the responsibility to license the disposal of GTCC LLW generated or owned by the federal government or by the commercial sector. Lastly, Congress changed the definition of LLW that had been defined in the LLWPA of 1980 removing the 'transuranic' exclusionary language. Four years later, on May 25, 1989, the NRC promulgated its regulation needed to implement the mandates specified in the LLWPAA of 1985. The NRC revised 10 CFR 61.55 specifying that the NRC was responsible for licensing the disposal of GTCC LLW. However, it inadvertently did not revise the definition of LLW needed to remove the 'transuranic' exclusionary language in this rulemaking consistent with the LLWPAA of 1985. This seemingly inconsequential omission was not discovered until a Petition for Rulemaking was filed in Texas in July 2014. Moreover, this omission has effectively orphaned waste with certain transuranic radionuclides with concentrations exceeding 100 nanocuries per gram (100 nCi/g). In December 2015, the NRC Commissioners directed its staff to move forward with a rulemaking to resolve this issue and to perform a regulatory analysis to determine whether or not an Agreement State can license the disposal of GTCC LLW pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. The paper will discuss past and current legislation, rulemaking, and regulatory developments pertaining to resolving the transuranic waste discrepancy and providing a pathway to disposition GTCC LLW. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Treatment of Problematic Reactive Metal Wastes Using the GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV{sup TM}) Process - 18639

Decommissioning of sodium cooled reactors and fast reactor technologies have generated a number of reactive metal waste configurations that are problematic to treat and typically lack cost effective treatment methods and disposition options. As a result, Veolia Nuclear Solutions, under contract with Idaho National Laboratory (owned by the U.S. Department of Energy and managed and operated by Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC) demonstrated its GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV){sup TM} technology to safely convert sodium metal to a non-reactive vitrified oxide form. The demonstration project, supported by glass formulation and crucible testing, consisted of a series of ICV{sup TM} melts that processed elemental sodium into stable non-reactive glass. Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC is evaluating the GeoMelt{sup R} technology as a means to safely and reliably convert radioactive reactive metal residues that contaminate components from sodium cooled reactors into waste forms that comply with existing disposition pathways. Reactive metal wastes at INL require treatment in order to remove the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) reactivity and ignitability characteristics in order to comply with land disposal restrictions. GeoMelt{sup R}, which is an alternative to other potential treatment approaches, provides a robust approach that chemically converts the reactive metals to an inert oxide while also immobilizing radionuclides in a vitrified waste form with durability equal to or better than vitrified nuclear fuel reprocessing wastes (very robust and inert waste forms). Most other treatment approaches generate hydrogen gas which is problematic. In 2016, Veolia Nuclear Solutions demonstrated the effectiveness of the GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} process in deactivating reactive sodium metal. Crucible, bench-scale, and engineering-scale demonstrations were conducted on several surrogate waste configurations with various ratios of sodium metal and glassformers. Each ratio and configuration demonstrated complete deactivation of the surrogate sodium metal. Follow-on work in 2017 demonstrated the deactivation of reactive sodium by GeoMelt{sup R} ICV{sup TM} at a higher waste loading relative to previously demonstrated work performed in 2016. The higher waste loading optimized glass chemistry while enhancing the economical full-scale treatment of reactive metals. The GeoMelt{sup R} technology is a proven radioactive waste treatment technology capable of immobilizing radioactive wastes, including bulk rubble such as drums and other steel vessels usually without pretreatment. Utilizing the GeoMelt{sup R} technology to treat reactive metals eliminates pretreatment steps resulting from having to separate the reactive metal from steel containers or jackets as GeoMelt{sup R} can easily operate at temperatures sufficient to melt the steel and expose the reactive metal for treatment. Eliminating handling steps of reactive metals is a significant safety advantage since reactive metals are pyrophoric. The results of this two-year demonstration program and future planned activities are presented in the paper. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Advanced Retrieval Demonstrations of the Hanford Waste End Effector - 19383

This paper describes advanced retrieval demonstrations of the Hanford Waste End Effector (HWEE) at the Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) Cold Test Facility conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) in co-operation with the U.S. Department of Energy - Office of River Protection and WRPS. The HWEE is a water-based scarifier originally developed by PNNL for the U.S. Department of Energy tank retrieval systems in the 1990's as the confined sluicing end effector and later used with additional development in the waste retrieval of tanks at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The HWEE is being assessed for potential use in Hanford tank retrievals because it is expected to use less water during waste retrieval than other water-based methods (e.g., sluicing) previously used in Hanford tanks. This is primarily because the HWEE uses three rotating high-pressure jets for dislodging the waste and a high-velocity conveyance system to retrieve the water and the waste locally at the point of waste dislodging. The retrieval demonstrations build on previous development testing (Phase I) completed in 2017 by addressing key tank waste challenges, including retrieval of a mixed layered simulant and retrieval of uneven simulant profiles like that found near tank walls. The tests involved retrieval of water and kaolin (sludge) simulant to determine pumping rate, dilution factors, and a demonstration of vertical pumping capability. Upgrades to the HWEE for Phase II testing included a more robust inlet screen, internal flush jet modification for lower water usage, and removal of the external flush mole that was not used during Phase I retrieval testing. In addition, a rotational positioning capability was added to the three-dimensional gantry to gain additional movement capability and flexibility needed to implement more complex retrieval mining techniques. Two simulant configuration options using existing simulant materials were defined to represent key Hanford tank waste properties: 1) layered waste (e.g., strong crust over weaker sediment) and 2) topography that is representative of tank waste (uneven surface). Historical information from Hanford waste, including tank history, sampling reports, and images, was investigated to define the simulant characteristics and physical configuration. Using the layered simulant configuration, retrieval tests focused on demonstrating the same operational parameters irrespective of simulant strength. The focus of the topographical retrieval test was to demonstrate the ability to clean next to the tank wall using a tilted HWEE and to demonstrate water confinement using a specific mining strategy. This paper will describe the Phase II test equipment, instrumentation, simulant preparation procedures, and testing methodology. Testing results that will be presented include HWEE water usage versus operating pressure, simulant characterization data, dilution ratios, and retrieval rates. Reaction forces and other factors that would affect the remote operation of the HWEE will also be presented. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 76: US DOE Problematic Waste Streams and Policy Impacts

This panel provided an overview of DOE problematic waste streams including status and path forward. Potential policy implications that exist now and/or in the future were discussed. Topics included, greater-than-Class C low level waste, depleted uranium, and sodium waste. The panel also discussed potential treatment options for these wastes. As part of the introduction, Renee Echols welcomed the audience and went over a quick overview of what would be discussed on the panel. Theresa Kliczewski provided an overview of why this panel is relevant to US Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management: there are problematic waste streams that still exist across the DOE cleanup complex. Theresa noted that the DOE EM Headquarters Office of Waste and Materials Management (EM-4.2), for which she is employed with, continues to work with the DOE cleanup sites on a path forward for these problematic waste streams. Presentations proposed include: 1 - Overview of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Path Forward (Theresa Kliczewski, US DOE EM (USA)); 2 - Status of Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposition of Depleted Uranium Oxide Conversion Product Generated from DoE's Inventory of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (Jaffet Ferrer-Torres, US DOE (USA)); 3 - Problematic Waste Streams on the Oak Ridge Reservation (John Wrapp, UCOR (USA)); 4 - K Basin Sludge Removal (Ryan Covert, CH2M Hill PRC (USA)); 5 - Providing Technology Solutions for Treatment of Challenging Waste Streams (Tammy Monday, Perma-Fix Environmental Services (USA)); 6 - Treatment of Problematic Reactive Metal Waste Using the GeoMelt{sup R} In-Container Vitrification (ICV{sup TM}) Process (Ron Mitchell, Veolia Nuclear Solutions (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Meeting the Challenges, Exceeding Expectations in Radioactive Liquid Waste Work - 18657

The Savannah River Site (SRS) is an 803-square kilometer (310-square mile) U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) site located near Aiken, South Carolina, encompassing parts of Aiken, Barnwell, and Allendale counties. SRS is a key industrial complex responsible for environmental stewardship, environmental cleanup, waste management, and disposition of nuclear materials. The Site was constructed in the early 1950's in support of the United States' Cold War efforts. In July 2009, the DOE began a new era by awarding a stand-alone contract to execute the Liquid Waste Mission at SRS. The Liquid Waste Contractor is responsible for all liquid waste operations, including waste management, disposition, and management of all liquid waste facilities at SRS, as well as operationally closing high-level waste tanks. Currently, there are 43 operational underground storage tanks containing approximately 132.5 million liters (35 million gallons) of radioactive waste. Before tanks can be closed, work involves removing, stabilizing, and disposing of high- and low-level radioactive waste from the tanks. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2013

A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK

Highlights: • We evaluate operational municipal solid waste incinerators in the UK. • The supply chain of four case study plants are examined and compared in detail. • Technical, financial and operational data has been gathered for the four plants. • We suggest the best business practices for waste incinerators. • Appropriate strategy choices are the major difficulties for waste to energy plants. - Abstract: The uptake in Europe of Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator plants has increased rapidly in recent years. In the UK, 25 municipal waste incinerators with energy recovery are now in operation; however, their waste supply chains and business practices vary significantly. With over a hundred more plant developments being considered it is important to establish best business practices for ensuring efficient environmental and operational performance. By reviewing the 25 plants we identify four suitable case study plants to compare technologies (moving grate, fluidised bed and rotary kiln), plant economics and operations. Using data collected from annual reports and through interviews and site visits we provide recommendations for improving the supply chain for waste incinerators and highlight the current issues and challenges faced by the industry. We find that plants using moving grate have a high availability of 87–92%. However, compared to the fluidised bed and rotary kiln, quantities of bottom ash and emissions of hydrogen chloride and carbon monoxide are high. The uptake of integrated recycling practices, combined heat and power, and post incineration non-ferrous metal collections needs to be increased among EfW incinerators in the UK. We conclude that one of the major difficulties encountered by waste facilities is the appropriate selection of technology, capacity, site, waste suppliers and heat consumers. This study will be of particular value to EfW plant developers, government authorities and researchers working within the sector of waste management.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Comparative lifecycle assessment of alternatives for waste management in Rio de Janeiro – Investigating the influence of an attributional or consequential approach

Highlights: • Management of organic solid waste in Rio de Janeiro was investigated through LCA. • An attributional approach was compared to a consequential. • Two approaches for identification of electricity marginal were compared. • The chosen approach can affect hierarchy between compared treatment alternatives. - Abstract: The environmental impacts from three management alternatives for organic fraction of municipal solid waste were compared using lifecycle assessment methodology. The alternatives (sanitary landfill, selective collection of organic waste for anaerobic digestion and anaerobic digestion after post-separation of organic waste) were modelled applying an attributional as well as consequential approach, in parallel with the aim of identifying if and how these approaches can affect results and conclusions. The marginal processes identified in the consequential modelling were in general associated with higher environmental impacts than average processes modelled with an attributional approach. As all investigated waste management alternatives result in net-substitution of energy and in some cases also materials, the consequential modelling resulted in lower absolute environmental impacts in five of the seven environmental impact categories assessed in the study. In three of these, the chosen modelling approach can alter the hierarchy between compared waste management alternatives. This indicates a risk of underestimating potential benefits from efficient energy recovery from waste when applying attributional modelling in contexts in which electricity provision historically has been dominated by technologies presenting rather low environmental impacts, but where projections point at increasing impacts from electricity provision in coming years. Thus, in the present case study, the chosen approach affects both absolute and relative results from the comparison. However, results were largely related to the processes identified as affected by investigated changes, and not merely the chosen modelling approach. The processes actually affected by future choices between different waste management alternatives are intrinsically uncertain. The study demonstrates the benefits of applying different assumptions regarding the processes affected by investigated choices – both for provision of energy and materials substituted by waste management processes in consequential LCA modelling, in order to present outcomes that are relevant as decision support within the waste management sector.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Flexible Packaging and Real Time Assay Techniques to Divert Low Activity Waste LLW from the UK LLWR - 18011

Historically, all Low Level Waste (LLW) produced in the UK was sent to the Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) near Drigg in Cumbria in mild steel IP2 containers. However, this single national asset is filling up very quickly and the UK national LLW policy is to divert waste to alternative sites wherever possible. This paper will describe how through a collaboration between Magnox Ltd, NUVIA Limited, Pactec EPS and Augean Plc has allowed for low activity LLW (<200 MBq/Tonne) to be packaged into IP1 flexible bags, assayed within the flexible packages and then consigned to a suitably designed and licensed landfill site. The Magnox site at Harwell in Oxfordshire is in the process of total decommissioning. A project was initiated to explore the viability of utilising the PACTEC LIFTPAC{sup R} IP1 flexible packages which can contain 1 m{sup 3} of waste and assaying the waste using the NUVIA Limited transportable High Resolution Assay Monitor (HiRAM) before sending the waste for disposal at the Augean Plc East Northants Resource Management Facility (ENRMF) in Cambridgeshire. The project led to a fundamental change in the culture of LLW disposal and the paper will explore the commonly held misconception that flexible packaging can only be used for the transportation and disposal of Very Low Level Waste (VLLW). It will also explore how the NUVIA Limited HiRAM system can assay large quantities of these bags in a short time period to a high level of accuracy such that they were able to consign the waste for disposal to ENRMF. This technique and disposal route is open and available to many other waste producers both within the UK and beyond and has proven cost savings to the waste producer. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Updated Declaration of Legacy Waste Based on Re-evaluated Records - 18283

Kerntechnische Entsorgung Karlsruhe (KTE) has the assignment to decommission and dispose of the nuclear installations on the Karlsruhe site. The entire inventory of these installations as well as the existing waste materials stored in the interim storage of the central waste management section (formerly central decontamination department / HDB) is planned to be sent to the repository Konrad commissioned for the acceptance of low level waste and intermediate level waste. Therefore it is treated according to the respective acceptance criteria. KTE has approximately 45.000 m{sup 3} of legacy waste, which was produced prior to the first issue of these acceptance criteria [1] and hence has to be re-qualified. Legacy waste generally has a radiological declaration, which is not sufficient to meet the criteria applied by the regulators and independent experts today. In order to achieve a modern declaration, additional information such as acquisition records, operational reports, calculated activation, old and new analyses and burn-up calculations as well as knowledge of the physical and chemical boundary conditions of defined material streams is needed. At KTE the waste was treated in batches according to accepted methods documented in the database system KADABRA. For each batch, records regarding the waste type, activity and mass are available for reevaluation. Each batch record consists of information on the raw waste treated in the batch, on the batch itself and on the resulting interim products or waste products. On the basis of this existing or additionally acquired knowledge a declaration concept matching the existing information and the requirements of the repository can be derived and discussed with the independent expert and the regulator. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

DEM and MELT In-Can Vitrification Process for Fukushima Daiichi Water Treatment Secondary Waste - 20034

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station was severely damaged by a tsunami induced by the earthquake on March 11, 2011. A large amount of water treatment secondary waste has been generated from the purification work of contaminated water that consists of the water flowing into the reactor building. The Mid and Long-Term Road map specifies that solid waste at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station should be stored safely and reasonably according to its characteristics. In order to meet this goal, a versatile treatment solution is needed, and the In-Can vitrification seems to be a suitable solution. The DEM and MELT In-Can vitrification process is being developed and qualified in France to treat waste arising from decommissioning and dismantling operations. This qualification is carried out through the consortium of the DEM and MELT project coordinated by CEA which gathers Orano, ECM technologies and Andra. The DEM and MELT In-Can vitrification process is a robust, simple and versatile in situ vitrification process. It is designed for high or intermediate level waste and is compact enough to be implemented in an existing facility or close to the waste to be treated. It is developed to treat liquid and solid waste, to produce a small amount of secondary waste and to minimize investment and operating costs. The DEM and MELT In-Can vitrification process is also developed with a modular design in order to be adapted to nuclear operators needs and requirements. The In-Can melting process has already been developed and fully qualified by the CEA for Alpha liquid waste and can be rated TRL 7 for this scope. The In-Can vitrification technology is considered as a qualified solution that could be applied for the treatment of waste resulting from the D and D work in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The feasibility evaluation of the DEM and MELT In-Can vitrification process for Fukushima Daiichi water treatment secondary waste is a project led by Orano, CEA and ANADEC. This R and D project is performed by the funds from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as The Subsidy Program 'Project of Decommissioning and Contaminated Water Management'. This paper presents the first results of this feasibility evaluation, from the scenarios and glass formulation definition to the industrial implementation feasibility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS2004

Compaction of Space Mission Wastes

The current solid waste management system employed on the International Space Station (ISS) consists of compaction, storage, and disposal. Wastes such plastic food packaging and trash are compacted manually and wrapped in duct tape footballs by the astronauts. Much of the waste is simply loaded either into the empty Russian Progress vehicle for destruction on reentry or into Shuttle for return to Earth. This manual method is wasteful of crew time and does not transition well to far term missions. Different wastes onboard spacecraft vary considerably in their characteristics and in the appropriate method of management. In advanced life support systems for far term missions, recovery of resources such as water from the wastes becomes important. However waste such as plastic food packaging, which constitutes a large fraction of solid waste (roughly 21% on ISS, more on long duration missions), contains minimal recoverable resource. The appropriate management of plastic waste is waste stabilization and volume minimization rather than resource recovery. This paper describes work that has begun at Ames Research Center on development of a heat melt compactor that can be used on near term and future missions, that can minimize crew interaction, and that can handle wastes with a significant plastic composition. The heat melt compactor takes advantage of the low melting point of plastics to compact plastic materials using a combination of heat and pressure. The US Navy has demonstrated successful development of a similar unit for shipboard application. Ames is building upon the basic approach demonstrated by the Navy to develop an advanced heat melt type compactor for space mission type wastes.

Fisher, John↗