Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “AEROTHERMODYNAMICS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 829 records · Page 46
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aerothermal Effects of Hypersonic Shock Impingement on a Highly Swept Leading Edge

A numerical study is conducted to investigate aerothermal implications of oblique shock impingement on a highly swept leading edge in hypersonic flow, with flow conditions and geometry relevant to non-propulsive leading edge heating on hypersonic cruise vehicles. In contrast to propulsive inlet leading edge shock impingement, which has been subject to extensive historical study, bow shock impingement on a highly swept wing leading edge has received comparatively little attention in the literature. Distinguishing characteristics of this type of flow include a potentially dominant surface heating contribution from crossflow-induced viscous dissipation, possible wall velocity slip and temperature jump effects, and various modes of shock layer thermal nonequilibrium that can interact with shock impingement flowfield structures. One overall goal of this work is to assess the impact of bow shock impingement and related nonequilibrium phenomena for wing leading edge design, materials selection and thermal management. Another goal is to improve understanding – and thereby reduce associated design margins – for the physical processes and mechanisms that may influence wing leading edge heating in the presence of an impinging shock. A combination of direct simulation Monte Carlo and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes analysis is used to assess surface and flowfield characteristics for a series of hypersonic shock impingement problems, based on historical ground tests and related flight conditions. Favorable comparisons are performed with experimental data, and various thermal nonequilibrium effects are quantified.

direct simulation Monte Carlo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Aerothermal Flight Data on NASA Mars Entry Vehicles

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Mars 2020 entry vehicles included temperature measurements inside and direct heat flux on the surface of the thermal protection system (TPS) material. The instrumentation was included to begin addressing predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating and ablative TPS material response. The MSL aeroshell included temperature measurements at seven heatshield locations, from which total aerodynamic heating was reconstructed. The Mars 2020 instrumentation suite included eleven heatshield measurement locations and new backshell measurements at nine locations: six with temperature sensors, two with sensors to directly measure total heat flux, and one to measure radiative heat flux. Both instrumentation suites returned full sets of data, with all temperature sensors nearest to the surface surviving entry, indicating minimal material recession. Heatshield boundary layer transition (BLT) was observed for both vehicles prior to the time of peak heating, with transition starting near the shoulder and progressing towards the stagnation area. MSL’s higher speed on approach to Mars resulted in higher total heating compared to Mars 2020, with the maximum occurring near the heatshield’s leeside shoulder. The Mars 2020 backshell heating data indicate significant contributions from shock layer radiation. Heating from Navier-Stokes flowfield calculations are in family with reconstructed heating. The paper covers the instrumentation, BLT and reconstructed heating on both heatshields, backshell heating for Mars 2020, TPS performance, and predicted versus reconstructed heat fluxes. Opportunities for improved design approaches for future Mars missions are discussed, especially for the upcoming Mars Sample Return mission.

Mars Science Laboratory↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from Aerothermal Flight Data on NASA Mars Entry Vehicles

The NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and Mars 2020 entry vehicles included temperature measurements inside and direct heat flux on the surface of the thermal protection system (TPS) material. The instrumentation was included to begin addressing predictive capabilities for aerodynamic heating and ablative TPS material response. The MSL aeroshell included temperature measurements at seven heatshield locations, from which total aerodynamic heating was reconstructed. The Mars 2020 instrumentation suite included eleven heatshield measurement locations and new backshell measurements at nine locations: six with temperature sensors, two with sensors to directly measure total heat flux, and one to measure radiative heat flux. Both instrumentation suites returned full sets of data, with all temperature sensors nearest to the surface surviving entry, indicating minimal material recession. Heatshield boundary layer transition (BLT) was observed for both vehicles prior to the time of peak heating, with transition starting near the shoulder and progressing towards the stagnation area. MSL’s higher speed on approach to Mars resulted in higher total heating compared to Mars 2020, with the maximum occurring near the heatshield’s leeside shoulder. The Mars 2020 backshell heating data indicate significant contributions from shock layer radiation. Heating from Navier-Stokes flowfield calculations are in family with reconstructed heating. The paper covers the instrumentation, BLT and reconstructed heating on both heatshields, backshell heating for Mars 2020, TPS performance, and predicted versus reconstructed heat fluxes. Opportunities for improved design approaches for future Mars missions are discussed, especially for the upcoming Mars Sample Return mission.

Mars Science Laboratory↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Examination of Mars2020 Shock-Layer Conditions via Infrared Laser Absorption Spectroscopy of CO2 and CO

Amid-infrared laser absorption diagnostic was deployed to study a simulated Mars2020 shock layer in the Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) facility at NASA’s Ames Research Center. Rapid RF-diplexing techniques enabled quantitative temperature and number density measurements of CO2 and CO with μs-resolution over an incident shock velocity range of 1.39 – 3.75 km/s. Two interband cascade lasers were utilized at 4.17 and 4.19 μm to resolve eight CO2 asymmetric stretch fundamental band (𝜈3) transitions from two different vibrational levels: 0000 (ground state) and 0110 (first excited bending mode). The probed rotational levels span across J” = 58 to J” = 140. Results are compared to DPLR simulations of the shock layer using kinetic mechanisms of Johnston et al. and Cruden et al. At shock velocities below 3.1 km/s, the agreement between the measurements and the Johnston mechanism is typically within 5% for temperature and within 10% for number density. At shock velocities above 3.1 km/s, the CO2 measurement becomes sensitive to a thin boundary layer and corrections of this effect are presented. On test cases with enough energy to dissociate CO2, a quantum cascade laser scanned the P(2, 20), P(0, 31), and P(3, 14) transitions of the CO fundamental band at 4.98 μm. CO formation rate is measured to be close to the Johnston kinetic mechanism at low velocities, and then trending towards the Cruden kinetic mechanism at high velocities. On a few low velocity test cases, rovibrational relaxation of the Martian atmosphere is probed with μs resolution.

Laser Absorption↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Core Stage Green Run Base Heating: Anomaly, Mitigation and Flight Redesign

The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hot-fire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Core Stage Green Run Base Heating: Anomaly, Mitigation and Flight Redesign

The NASA Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is composed of four RS-25 liquid oxygen and hydrogen rocket engines in the Core Stage (CS). The SLS Core Stage went through Green Run hotfire testing at NASA Stennis Space Center’s B-2 test facility in 2021. The main goal of this testing was to confirm Core Stage tanking, propulsion and thrust vector control systems operations and performance to verify with predicted models. Two hot-fire (HF) test sequences were performed with the first one (HF1) in January for a test duration of 70 seconds and the second (HF2) testing completed in March for a test duration of 500 seconds. This paper focuses on the base heating anomalies observed during HF1 and HF2 where an extensive fire was observed along the Core Stage base heat shield during test operations. This environment was not anticipated and led to extensive unplanned damage to the thermal protection system which was augmented for flight. Green Run observations also led to a reassessment of flight environments for Artemis I. This paper discusses the potential cause of the anomalies, the flow physics, the reconstructed base environments, and mitigation plans for HF2 and flight.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRS2023

Experimental Investigation of Block-TPS Fence/Gap Roughness Effects on Transition Onset and Turbulent Heating at Mach 6

An experimental investigation of boundary-layer transition and convective surface heating on wind tunnel models that simulated aeroshells comprised of multiple blocks of thermal protection system (TPS) material has been performed. Two representative entry vehicle geometries, a sphere-cone aeroshell and a sphere-cone aeroshell, were considered. Multiple cast ceramic models of each geometry were fabricated with varying fence heights or gap depths to represent gap fillers that either protrude above, or are recessed below, the TPS blocks due to differential ablation during reentry. Wind tunnel testing was performed at Mach 6 over a range of Reynolds numbers sufficient to produce laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow. Convective surface heating and boundary-layer transition onset data were obtained using global phosphor thermography. The experimental heating data are presented herein, as are comparisons to laminar and turbulent smooth-wall heat transfer distributions from computational flow field simulations.

Aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRS2023

Assessment of the Fluid Dynamics Boundary Condition in Ablating or Blowing Flows

Improved models of ablative thermal protection systems have enabled the treatment of materials and fluid behavior in a coupled manner. This paper reports a new approach to modeling the interface between fluid and material, with attention to the conservation of species mass flux and energy on the fluid side of the interface. The general equation is presented and is shown to recover the traditional uncoupled fluid/materials response interface. Including the chemical reaction terms on the CFD side of the interface makes the heat flux exchange independent of the thermodynamic reference state and, therefore, a measurable quantity. Doing so allows the material response solver to take as input the surface heat flux rather than a film coefficient. Removing the film coefficient approximation enables more direct solution of vehicle thermal response but requires consistency in the wall state. The mixing of the shock layer and pyrolysis gas is then computed with finite rate chemistry within the fluid solver. The boundary conditions described have been implemented in the DPLR v4.05.1 code. Char removal is captured using finite rate chemistry in DPLR’s gas surface interaction module. Aspects of coupling these solutions to material response are discussed.

Ablation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Backshell Radiative Heating and Shock Layer Kinetic Measurement in NASA’s Electric Arc Shock Tube Facility

A methodology for creating incident shocks with similarity to the backshell radiative heating environment on planetary probes is presented. Two test series were carried out in the Electric Arc Shock Tube (EAST) at NASA Ames to quantify the backshell environment for planned and executed missions entering the atmospheres of Mars and Titan. The comparison of measured radiance in the shock tube to predicted post shock radiation levels is used to quantify the uncertainty in the model. This model uncertainty may then be related back to the flight condition to assess the error in the flight heating prediction. Tests for Mars entry show the shock tube measurements to be bracketed between two kinetic models by 2-7%. This suggests an 8% error in predicting the measured heating cannot be attributed to radiation. Comparisons to planned Titan entry suggest a substantial overprediction of the backshell radiation, which suggests opportunity for future refinement of radiative heating models.

radiation↗
NASA NTRS2023

Assessment of the Fluid Dynamics Boundary Condition in Ablating or Blowing Flows

Improved models of ablative thermal protection systems have enabled the treatment of materials and fluid behavior in a coupled manner. This paper reports a new approach to modeling the interface between fluid and material, with attention to the conservation of species mass flux and energy on the fluid side of the interface. The general equation is presented and is shown to recover the traditional uncoupled fluid/materials response interface. Including the chemical reaction terms on the CFD side of the interface makes the heat flux exchange independent of the thermodynamic reference state and, therefore, a measurable quantity. Doing so allows the material response solver to take as input the surface heat flux rather than a film coefficient. Removing the film coefficient approximation enables more direct solution of vehicle thermal response but requires consistency in the wall state. The mixing of the shock layer and pyrolysis gas is then computed with finite rate chemistry within the fluid solver. The boundary conditions described have been implemented in the DPLR v4.05.1 code. Char removal is captured using finite rate chemistry in DPLR’s gas surface interaction module. Aspects of coupling these solutions to material response are discussed.

Ablation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRS2024

Defining the Operational Envelope for Air Flows in the Miniature Arc-Jet Research Chamber (mARC II)

The second-generation 30 kW miniature Arc-jet Research Chamber (mARC II) at NASA Ames Research Center produces high enthalpy flows relevant for entry systems ground testing. The mARC II facility has recently undergone upgrades, including the installation of a new vacuum system to address the issues preventing it from maintaining underexpanded flow under test conditions. In this work, we present data obtained from an Integrated Systems Testing campaign and provide an initial assessment of arc-jet performance following the upgrades. Air is used as the working gas for the standard mARC II arc-heater configuration with two constrictor disks. Seven runs were investigated for five test conditions to assess the lowest achievable stagnation point heat fluxes for air flow rates of 0.15 or 0.25 g s −1 . The heat flux was measured using a water-cooled Gardon gauge (Ø4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical) at 70 mm from the nozzle exit plane. The new vacuum system produced test box pressures in the medium (fine) vacuum range (~0.03 torr, 4 Pa) prior to gas addition and successfully maintained underexpanded flow after gas addition. The upgrade yielded a ~4X reduction in heat flux relative to the previous system for the same set test conditions. We report the lowest heat fluxes measured in mARC II to date, ranging from 26 to 81 W cm −2 , for sonic flow enthalpies of 4–14 MJ kg −1 . Bulk enthalpies estimated using an energy balance method (EB 2 ) are reported for the first time using mARC II.Initial data suggests EB 2 generally estimates lower enthalpies than sonic flow methods for mARC II. Lastly, laminar axisymmetric Navier–Stokes simulations were performed using the NASA DPLR code. Numerical heat flux results show good agreement with experiments at low arc powers (3–15% difference at the minimum set arc current), but discrepancy increases with arc power (49% difference at the maximum set arc current).

Pitot tube↗
NASA NTRS2024

Defining the Operational Envelope for Air Flows in the Miniature Arc-Jet Research Chamber (mARC II)

The second-generation 30 kW miniature Arc-jet Research Chamber (mARC II) at NASA Ames Research Center produces high enthalpy flows relevant for entry systems ground testing. The mARC II facility has recently undergone upgrades, including the installation of a new vacuum system to address the issues preventing it from maintaining underexpanded flow under test conditions. In this work, we present data obtained from an Integrated Systems Testing campaign and provide an initial assessment of arc-jet performance following the upgrades. Air is used as the working gas for the standard mARC II arc-heater configuration with two constrictor disks. Seven runs were investigated for five test conditions to assess the lowest achievable stagnation point heat fluxes for air flow rates of 0.15 or 0.25 g s −1 . The heat flux was measured using a water-cooled Gardon gauge (Ø4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical) at 70 mm from the nozzle exit plane. The new vacuum system produced test box pressures in the medium (fine) vacuum range (~0.03 torr, 4 Pa) prior to gas addition and successfully maintained underexpanded flow after gas addition. The upgrade yielded a ~4X reduction in heat flux relative to the previous system for the same set test conditions. We report the lowest heat fluxes measured in mARC II to date, ranging from 26 to 81 W cm −2 , for sonic flow enthalpies of 4–14 MJ kg −1 . Bulk enthalpies estimated using an energy balance method (EB 2 ) are reported for the first time using mARC II.Initial data suggests EB 2 generally estimates lower enthalpies than sonic flow methods for mARC II. Lastly, laminar axisymmetric Navier–Stokes simulations were performed using the NASA DPLR code. Numerical heat flux results show good agreement with experiments at low arc powers (3–15% difference at the minimum set arc current), but discrepancy increases with arc power (49% difference at the maximum set arc current).

arc-jet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Expanding the Measurement Capabilities of the mARC II Arc-Jet to Map the Operating Envelope for High-Enthalpy Air Flows

The mARC II is a 30 kW arc-jet facility at NASA Ames Research Center developed to produce high-enthalpy flows for low-cost technology development purposes. In this work, we introduce new measurement capabilities following the latest facility upgrades and begin characterizing the operating envelope for the two-disk arc-heater configuration with air as the working gas. The lower bound of the envelope corresponds to the lowest set current and the farthest sensor distance from the nozzle (𝐼set = 40 A, 𝑧 = 69 mm), while the upper bound corresponds to the highest current and closest sensor distance (𝐼set = 200 A, 𝑧 = 2 mm). Stagnation point heat flux was measured using a water-cooled Gardon gauge (⌀4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical), with values ranging from 15 ≤ q̇₀ ≤ 900 W/cm2. Stagnation pressure was measured using a water-cooled Pitot probe (⌀4.76 mm, 3/16" hemispherical), with values ranging from 18 ≤ p₀ ≤ 1100 Pa. The upgraded vacuum system is demonstrated to significantly extend the lower end of the operating envelope of the mARC II. Additionally, measurements of bulk enthalpy (3 ≤ h ≤ 13 MJ/kg) and stagnation enthalpy (4 ≤ h₀ ≤ 34 MJ/kg) demonstrate the mARC II facility's high-enthalpy capabilities. Completion of the operating envelope characterization is ongoing in tandem with the development of complementary diagnostic capabilities and numerical simulations.

TPS↗