Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “aeroelastic”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 811 records · Page 45
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Ground Vibration Testing of the TiltRotor Aeroelastic Stability Testbed

This report is a summary of the ground vibration testing of the TiltRotor Aeroelastic Stability Testbed (TRAST). The U.S. Army has developed this new tiltrotor model system to validate whirl flutter stability analysis, a critical instability mechanism in this type of aircraft. As such, component-level vibration testing is critical to creating and validating analytical models. This report includes experimental vibration testing results from component level to the full model system. In addition, experimentally measured stiffness values are reported for key components of the model.

wind tunnel testing↗
DOE OSTI2025

WEIS and FAST.Farm Advancements Beyond Wind Turbine Aeroelasticity

Presentation at the 7th Wind Energy Systems Engineering workshop from NREL principal engineer Jason Jonkman, Ph.D., on NREL's numerical tools Wind Energy with Integrated Servo-control (WEIS), which focuses on the integrated design of floating wind turbines, and FAST.Farm, a simulation tool for multi-turbine wind farms based on popular aero-servo-hydro-elastic solver OpenFAST. The presentation discusses recent advancements beyond wind turbine aero-elasticity.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Aeroelastic Modelling of Large Wind Turbines: Towards a Unified OpenFAST-SEAHOWL Approach

In recent years, the scale of wind turbines has significantly increased to maximize energy capture for a given site (particularly offshore), presenting new challenges in terms of structural design and dynamics. As towers grow taller and blades grow longer, flexion and torsion of the latter have a non-negligible impact on the behavior and performance of the turbine in terms of overall loads, power production, and control. When representing large-scale wind turbines numerically to capture these important effects, particular attention must therefore be given to the level of fidelity for representing each structural component, as well as the coupling scheme used between them to keep simulations accurate, stable, and efficient. To address this issue, we combine here the two following tools: (1) OpenFAST, the reference whole-turbine simulation tool from NREL with standalone modules covering each physics and the choice between loose coupling and a new tight coupling scheme for structural dynamics, and (2) SEAHOWL, the whole-turbine simulation tool from TotalEnergies with monolithic coupling of structural dynamics through Project Chrono and partitioned coupling for multiphysics interactions.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
NASA NTRS2015

Aeroelastic Tailoring Study of N+2 Low-Boom Supersonic Commercial Transport Aircraft

The Lockheed Martins N+2 Low-boom Supersonic Commercial Transport (LSCT) aircraft is optimized in this study through the use of a multidisciplinary design optimization tool developed at the NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. A total of 111 design variables are used in the first optimization run. Total structural weight is the objective function in this optimization run. Design requirements for strength, buckling, and flutter are selected as constraint functions during the first optimization run. The MSC Nastran code is used to obtain the modal, strength, and buckling characteristics. Flutter and trim analyses are based on ZAERO code and landing and ground control loads are computed using an in-house code.

aeroelastic tailoring↗
NASA NTRS2015

Aeroelastic Tailoring Study of N+2 Low Boom Supersonic Commerical Transport Aircraft

The Lockheed Martin N+2 Low - boom Supersonic Commercial Transport (LSCT) aircraft was optimized in this study through the use of a multidisciplinary design optimization tool developed at the National Aeronautics and S pace Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center. A total of 111 design variables we re used in the first optimization run. Total structural weight was the objective function in this optimization run. Design requirements for strength, buckling, and flutter we re selected as constraint functions during the first optimization run. The MSC Nastran code was used to obtain the modal, strength, and buckling characteristics. Flutter and trim analyses we re based on ZAERO code, and landing and ground control loads were computed using an in - house code. The w eight penalty to satisfy all the design requirement s during the first optimization run was 31,367 lb, a 9.4% increase from the baseline configuration. The second optimization run was prepared and based on the big-bang big-crunch algorithm. Six composite ply angles for the second and fourth composite layers were selected as discrete design variables for the second optimization run. Composite ply angle changes can't improve the weight configuration of the N+2 LSCT aircraft. However, this second optimization run can create more tolerance for the active and near active strength constraint values for future weight optimization runs.

low boom supersonic civil transport↗
NASA NTRS2018

Analytical Performance, Loads, and Aeroelastic Stability of a Full-Scale Isolated Proprotor

The prediction of the performance and loads of a full-scale isolated proprotor and the calculation of whirl flutter stability of the rotor installed in a wind tunnel are considered in this study. The comprehensive analysis CAMRAD II is used. The test article is a research proprotor based on the Bell 609 rotor and the wind tunnel test apparatus is the newly developed Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) installed in the USAF NFAC 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnel. The performance and loads predictions and the stability calculations cover the following operating conditions: hover, cruise, conversion, and helicopter mode. These pre-test analytical results are being obtained to identify test operating limits, ensure a safe wind tunnel test and predict test results. Eventually, the goal is to perform a correlation study, identify shortfalls in the analytical model and introduce improvements to the analytical model. Performance and loads test results to date show that rotor torque (and yoke lag moment) may limit the test envelope. Shake test data based stability analysis shows that the TTR/609 is solidly stable within the test envelope.

Proprotor↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelasticity

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aeroelasticity↗