Transition to a Thorium-based Fuel Cycle - Choices, Challenges, and Options
The Charter for the Evaluation and Screening (E and S) of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options requested by the US Department of Energy calls for the identification of promising fuel cycle options to help guide the future directions of research and development in this area. The final report for this study, which was produced by various national laboratory and industry experts, collected the expansive set of fuel cycle options into 40 evaluation groups (EGs). In support of this study, detailed steady-state physics and mass flow data for each of these groups were compiled into a set of Fuel Cycle Data Packages (FCDPs). The data in the FCDPs were then used to quantify the nine criteria detailed in the study to identify the most promising EGs. In addition to supporting the E and S study, data from these FCDPs can be used to benchmark fuel cycle simulation tools for equilibrium calculations. Once benchmarked, their dynamic modeling capabilities can support the continuing effort to determine the most effective approaches for transitioning to proposed advanced future fuel cycles. While steady-state conditions can be calculated directly in some cases, fuel cycle simulation tools allow for the transition scenarios to be simultaneously optimized on multiple parameters such as the fissile material availability, the amount of desirable material in storage, and the time required for transition. In addition to fuel cycle simulations where material availability is considered and is often a constraint to achieving transition, determining the technology needs to enable a transition to take place is also a key consideration (e.g., what technology is needed, when it is needed, and whether it is needed only during the transition and not for the equilibrium fuel cycle). This paper evaluates the material and technology issues and challenges associated with a transition from a uranium-based fuel cycle (such as that operating in the US today, represented by EG01) to a thorium-based fuel cycle, recognizing that thorium requires fissile material to start up. Based on the findings of the E and S report, the two most promising thorium fuel cycle options are considered in this report: (1) EG26, a thermal spectrum molten salt reactor (MSR), and (2) EG28, represented by a sodium fast reactor (SFR, fast spectrum) and a resource-renewable boiling water reactor (RBWR, intermediate spectrum). (authors)