DOE OSTI2019
Soil properties and biological communities contribute to carbon loss and gain, which vary significantly by ecosystem, but current carbon cycling models fail to incorporate interactions among these groups. We experimentally manipulated and modeled how mycorrhizal fungi and roots alter carbon dynamics in temperate, tropical, and boreal forests (see Jiang et al. 2017, Moore et al. 2015a, 2015b, in review, Zak et al. 2019, Rewcastle et al. in review). To date, we find that the influence of fungi on carbon dynamics varies by the nutrient constraints of that ecosystem. For example, in temperate forests mycorrhizal fungi compete with the free-living community to reduce carbon degradation - a pattern not seen in a boreal forest. We established a site in Costa Rica to explore the impact of fungi and roots on tropical forest carbon cycling and again found that the results were context dependent. Building on this, I held a workshop with soil carbon modelers and soil ecologists to explore how experiments and models predict carbon dynamics. We conducted a meta-analysis and ran model simulation with 5 soil carbon models. Surprisingly, we found that the spread in the models and experiments were similar - they predicted responses equally well (Sulman et al. 2018). However, the area we seemed to know little about and that produced the most spread in the models, and thus the underlying model assumptions, was the response of protected and unprotected carbon pools. These seem like exciting areas to follow-up on in the future. In addition, data from these experiments spurred numerous other studies across ecosystems and with a variety of modeling groups focusing on how plant-soil interactions alter carbon and nutrient cycling. For example, Classen wrote an Ecological Society of America invited centennial review paper on this topic in 2015. Our group hosted several workshops that resulted in the Sulman et al. (2018) paper in Biogeoscience and Classen recently attended a workshop at the University of Michigan on mycorrhizal influence on the carbon cycle that resulted in another thought piece (Zak et al. 2019) in New Phytologist and she has an invited review paper at Functional Ecology (Bennett & Classen in review) on this topic. Overall, there were >25 papers published on this topic over the grant period with 15 more papers in revision/review that were related to this project – we have at least two more papers in preparation. We trained >27 students and postdocs and participated in numerous talks, workshops, and community events promoting the importance of soils, soil diversity, and global change.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗