Engineering Papers⌕ Search

SEARCH · Engineering Papers

Results for “mated”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 775 records · Page 43
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1998

International Space Station ECLSS Operations Status - Increment OA

This paper describes Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) operations to date for preflight planning, international partner coordination and mission plan execution of the International Space Station (ISS). The focus is on the activities involved with the STS-88(2A) Space Shuttle Endeavor flight, the first delivery of the US segment of the ISS, which consists of the Pressurized Mating Adapter (PMA)/and Node 1 elements, and the delivery of the first Russian segment of the ISS, the FGB, a US-financed and Russian- built module.

Lamczyk, Philip C.↗
NASA NTRS1996

Temperature Regulation in Crewmembers After a 115-Day Space Flight

Impaired thermoregulation, which has been observed during exercise following bed rest, may significantly impact crewmembers during space flight operations by decreasing exercise capacity and orthostatic tolerance. Impaired temperature regulation would cause higher levels of core temperature, due to an attenuated cutaneous vasodilatory reflex and sweating response, for a given oxygen consumption. Two mate crewmembers of the Mir 18 mission performed supine cycle exercise se (20 min @ 40% and 20 min @ 65% preflight VO2pk) 145 days preflight and 5 days postflight. Core temperature (Tcore) was measured by an ingestible telemetry pill, skin blood flow (SBF) by laser Doppler velocimetry, and sweat rate (SR) by dew point hygrometry. Tcore at the time of test termination was similar (37.8 C) for both subjects before and after flight despite a shorter test duration (40 vs 28-29 minutes) postflight. The slopes of the SBF/Tcore relationship (Subj 1: 396 vs 214; Subj 2: 704 vs 143 Perfusion Unit/degC) and SR/Tcore relationship (Subj 1: 4.5 vs 2.1; Subj 2: 11.0 vs 3.6mg/min/sq cm/degC) were reduced postflight. Tcore thresholds for both SR (Subj 1: 37.4 vs 37.6; Subj 2: 37.6 vs 37.6 C) and SBF (Subj 1: 37.3 vs 37.5; Subj 2: 37.6 vs 37.7 C) were similar pre- to postflight. For these 2 crewmembers, it appeared that thermoregulation during exercise was impaired as evidenced by compromised heat loss responses after long-duration space flight.

Lee, S. M. C.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Crew Activity Report/Flight Day 6 Highlights

On this sixth day of the STS-92 mission, the flight crew, Commander Brian Duffy, Pilot Pamela A. Melroy, and Mission Specialists Koichi Wakata, Leroy Chiao, Peter J.K. Wisoff, Michael E. Lopez-Alegria, and William S. McArthur continue working on the exterior of the International Space Station (ISS) to prepare the station for its first resident crew. Lopez-Alegria and Wisoff perform the second of four spacewalks to maneuver the third pressurized mating adapter (PMA-3) into its new location on the Unity module.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-92 Crew Activity Report/Flight Day 4 Highlights

On this fourth day of the STS-92 mission, the flight crew, Commander Brian Duffy, Pilot Pamela A. Melroy, and Mission Specialists Koichi Wakata, Leroy Chiao, Peter J.K. Wisoff, Michael E. Lopez-Alegria, and William S. McArthur give an overview of the day's accomplishments. Footage of the third pressurized mating adapter (PMA-3), the common berthing mechanism (CBM), and the installed Z1 truss are shown.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-92 Crew Interview/L. Chiao

The STS-92 Mission Specialist Leroy Chiao is seen being interviewed. He answers questions about his inspiration to become an astronaut, his training, and gives details of the mission, including overviews of the Z1 truss, the third pressurized mating adapter (PMA-3), the common berthing mechanism (CBM), and the spacewalks. He shares his thoughts on the role of STS-92 in preparing the International Space Station (ISS) for the first resident crew, Russia's contribution to the ISS, and the importance of the ISS and Space Shuttle in the future.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-92 Crew Activity Report/Flight Day 7 Highlights

On this seventh day of the STS-92 mission, the flight crew, Commander Brian Duffy, Pilot Pamela A. Melroy, and Mission Specialists Koichi Wakata, Leroy Chiao, Peter J.K. Wisoff, Michael E. Lopez-Alegria, and William S. McArthur continue work on the Z1 truss and the third pressurized mating adapter (PMA-3) on the International Space Station (ISS). Footage is seen of Chiao's and McArthur's spacewalk while they install two DC-to-DC converter units and attach a second tool storage box on the Z1 truss.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-92 Crew Interview - Wakata

STS-92 Mission Specialist Koichi Wakata is interviewed. He answers questions about his inspiration to become an astronaut, his training, and gives details on the mission, including overviews of the ZI truss, the S-band antenna, the third pressurized mating adapter (PMA-3), the common berthing mechanism, and his part in controlling the robotic arm during the spacewalks. He shares his thoughts on Russia's contribution to the International Space Station (ISS), the role of STS-92 in preparing the ISS for its first resident crew, and the importance of ISS in the future.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

Technologies for Refueling Spacecraft On-Orbit

This paper discusses the current technologies for on-orbit refueling of spacecraft. The findings of 55 references are reviewed and summarized. Highlights include: (1) the Russian Progress system used by the International Space Station; (2) a flight demonstration of superfluid helium transfer; and (3) ground tests of large cryogenic systems. Key technologies discussed include vapor free liquid outflow, control of fluid inflow to prevent liquid venting, and quick disconnects for on-orbit mating of transfer lines.

Chato, David J.↗
NASA NTRS1997

Evaluation of a Human Modeling Software Tool in the Prediction of Extra Vehicular Activity Tasks for an International Space Station Assembly Mission

The difficulty of accomplishing work in extravehicular activity (EVA) is well documented. It arises as a result of motion constraints imposed by a pressurized spacesuit in a near-vacuum and of the frictionless environment induced in microgravity. The appropriate placement of foot restraints is crucial to ensuring that astronauts can remove and drive bolts, mate and demate connectors, and actuate levers. The location on structural members of the foot restraint sockets, to which the portable foot restraint is attached, must provide for an orientation of the restraint that affords the astronaut adequate visual and reach envelopes. Previously, the initial location of these sockets was dependent upon the experienced designer's ability to estimate placement. The design was tested in a simulated zero-gravity environment; spacesuited astronauts performed the tasks with mockups while submerged in water. Crew evaluation of the tasks based on these designs often indicated the bolt or other structure to which force needed to be applied was not within an acceptable work envelope, resulting in redesign. The development of improved methods for location of crew aids prior to testing would result in savings to the design effort for EVA hardware. Such an effort to streamline EVA design is especially relevant to International Space Station construction and maintenance. Assembly operations alone are expected to require in excess of four hundred hours of EVA. Thus, techniques which conserve design resources for assembly missions can have significant impact. We describe an effort to implement a human modelling application in the design effort for an International Space Station Assembly Mission. On Assembly Flight 6A, the Canadian-built Space Station Remote Manipulator System will be delivered to the U.S. Laboratory. It will be released from its launch restraints by astronauts in EVA. The design of the placement of foot restraint sockets was carried out using the human model Jack, and the modelling results were compared with actual underwater test results. The predicted locations of the sockets was found to be acceptable for 94% of the tasks attempted by the astronauts, This effort provides confidence in the capabilities of this package to accurately model tasks. It therefore increases assurance that the tool maybe used early in the design process.

Dischinger, H. Charles↗
NASA NTRS1992

STS-49 Endeavour/Compiled Video for Editors

Compiled footage includes shots taken of the rollout of Endeavour at Palmdale, CA, the departure and arrival of Endeavour for Kennedy Space Center (KSC), main engine three installation, solid rocket booster (SRB) segment lift and stack at the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), external tank mate to SRB, Intelsat rotation at the Vertical Processing Facility (VPF), Endeavour rollover from the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) to VAB, rollout to Pad B, and the flight readiness firing (FRF). The crew is seen during the Terminal Countdown and Demonstration Test (TCDT) training activities, at breakfast, suiting up, and exiting the Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2000

STS-92 Extravehicular Activity Overview

Daryl Schuck, STS-92 Lead Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Officer, gives an overview of the four EVAs scheduled for the STS-92 mission. He discusses the construction phase of the International Space Station (ISS) and the equipment to be installed onto the ISS, such as the Z-1 Truss, PMA-3 (Third Pressurized Mating Adapter), S-Band Antenna, and the DC to DC Power Converter. Mr. Schuck describes the challenges of the mission, and the activities and objectives of the spacewalks. He then answers questions from the press.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2001

STS-102 Crew Activity Report/Flight Day 4 Highlights

On this fourth day of the STS-102 mission, Expedition 2 crewmembers Jim Voss and Susan Helms are seen preparing for and performing their spacewalks. Discovery Pilot Jim Kelly is shown maneuvering the robotic arm as he helps Helms and Voss to install the Third Pressurized Mating Adapter (PMA-3) to the Unity Module on the International Space Station (ISS).

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1998

International Space Station General Resource Reel

The construction and evolution of the International Space Station (ISS) is seen through various clips. Live footage shows the following: (1) the Zarya Module under construction and during launch preparations; (2) the Unity Module under construction, during launch preparations, and being lowered into the payload canister; (3) STS-88 Mission Specialists Jerry Ross and Jim Newman during training for their spacewalks, including activities in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL); (4) Zarya and Unity docking to the Service Module; (5) the Expedition 1 crew (William Shepherd, Yuri Gidzenko, and Sergei Krikalev) during emergency escape training in the Black Sea and during water survival training at Johnson Space Center; (6) the X-38 Crew Return Vehicle Drop Test; and (7) the US Destiny Laboratory Module, Pressurized Mating Adapter (PMA), Service Module, Italian Multi-Purpose Logistics Module, US Airlock, and US Habitation Module under construction. Computerized animations show the following: (1) an ISS fly-around; (2) the STS-88 Space Shuttle as it docks with Zarya and attaches Zarya to the Unity Module; (3) the Space Shuttle as it docks with ISS and installs the Z1 truss segment and PMA; (4) the Soyuz spacecraft as it docks with ISS; (5) interior and exterior views of the Columbus Attached Pressurized Module; and (6) a Transhab animation showing the interior and exterior and marking the components.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2001

STS-102/Expedition 2 Mission Overview

John Shannon, STS-102 Lead Flight Director, Bernestine Dickey, STS-102 Launch Package Manager, and Rick La Brode, International Space Station (ISS) Lead Flight Director, give an overview of the STS-102 mission during a prelaunch press conference. Mr. Shannon discusses how the mission came into being and its objectives, including information on the launch and a day-by-day account of mission activities. Ms. Dickey gives details on the payload of STS-102, describing the system racks, cargo elements, and crew supplies delivered via the Leonardo Multi-Purpose Logistics Module. Mr. La Brode describes the current configuration of the ISS and upcoming changes. He also discusses the activities of the Expedition 2 crew during the next four months. Computer simulations show the ISS' current and future (after the STS-102 mission) configurations, the installations of Leonardo, and the move of the Pressurized Mating Adapter from one port to another on the Destiny Laboratory. The panel then answers questions from the press.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2001

STS-102 Extravehicular Activities Briefing

Keith Johnson, STS-102 Lead Extravehicular Activities Officer, gives an overview of the mission's spacewalks in this prelaunch press conference. He describes the activities, objectives, and timeline of the spacewalks during the STS-102 mission. Computerized simulations show the move of the Third Pressurized Mating Adapter (PMA3) and the retrieval of the rigid umbilicals from the payload bay of Discovery. Mr. Johnson then answers questions from the press.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1994

Modeling Thermal Contact Resistance

One difficulty in using cryocoolers is making good thermal contact between the cooler and the instrument being cooled. The connection is often made through a bolted joint. The temperature drop associated with this joint has been the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies. The low temperature behavior of dry joints have shown some anomalous dependence on the surface condition of the mating parts. There is also some doubts on how well one can extrapolate from the test samples to predicting the performance of a real system. Both finite element and analytic models of a simple contact system have been developed. The model assumes (a) the contact is dry (contact limited to a small portion of the total available area and the spaces in-between the actual contact patches are perfect insulators), (b) contacts are clean (conductivity of the actual contact is the same as the bulk), (c) small temperature gradients (the bulk conductance may be assumed to be temperature independent), (d) the absolute temperature is low (thermal radiation effects are ignored), and (e) the dimensions of the nominal contact area are small compared to the thickness of the bulk material (the contact effects are localized near the contact). The models show that in the limit of actual contact area much less than the nominal area (a much less than A), that the excess temperature drop due to a single point of contact scales as a(exp -1/2). This disturbance only extends a distance approx. A(exp 1/2) into the bulk material. A group of identical contacts will result in an excess temperature drop that scales as n(exp -1/2), where n is the number of contacts and n dot a is constant. This implies that flat rough surfaces will have a lower excess temperature drop than flat polished surfaces.

Kittel, Peter↗